Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 77: 154-157, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150985

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Buprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Patients in the emergency department (ED) can be initiated or continued on buprenorphine as a bridge to follow-up in the outpatient setting, but gaps in care may arise. The objective was to evaluate the impact of buprenorphine to-go packs as a continuing treatment option for patients presenting to the ED with OUD across a health system. METHODS: Adult patients discharged with a buprenorphine to-go pack from one of ten EDs within a major health system were included. The primary outcomes assessed within 30 days of ED discharge were: (1) return to a health system ED, and (2) fill history of buprenorphine in the state prescription drug monitoring program database. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA). RESULTS: A total of 124 patients received buprenorphine to-go packs. The sample was primarily male (79; 63.7%), white (89; 71.8%), on Medicaid (79; 63.7%), and had a mean age of 40.9 years. A total of 43 patients (34.7%) were initiated on buprenorphine for the first time, while 81 (65.3%) had received buprenorphine (prescription or to-go) previously. At 30 days post-visit, 76 (61.3%) had filled buprenorphine prescriptions, and 40 (32.3%) returned to an ED within the health system for opioid withdrawal (17; 42.5%), non-OUD-related reasons (22; 55%), or overdose (1; 2.5%). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a system-wide buprenorphine to-go supply at ED discharge is a feasible option to provide continuity of care to patients with OUD.


Subject(s)
Buprenorphine , Opioid-Related Disorders , Adult , United States , Humans , Male , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Emergency Service, Hospital , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(31): 1059-1062, 2021 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34351882

ABSTRACT

During July 2021, 469 cases of COVID-19 associated with multiple summer events and large public gatherings in a town in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, were identified among Massachusetts residents; vaccination coverage among eligible Massachusetts residents was 69%. Approximately three quarters (346; 74%) of cases occurred in fully vaccinated persons (those who had completed a 2-dose course of mRNA vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna] or had received a single dose of Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vaccine ≥14 days before exposure). Genomic sequencing of specimens from 133 patients identified the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in 119 (89%) and the Delta AY.3 sublineage in one (1%). Overall, 274 (79%) vaccinated patients with breakthrough infection were symptomatic. Among five COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized, four were fully vaccinated; no deaths were reported. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values in specimens from 127 vaccinated persons with breakthrough cases were similar to those from 84 persons who were unvaccinated, not fully vaccinated, or whose vaccination status was unknown (median = 22.77 and 21.54, respectively). The Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible (1); vaccination is the most important strategy to prevent severe illness and death. On July 27, CDC recommended that all persons, including those who are fully vaccinated, should wear masks in indoor public settings in areas where COVID-19 transmission is high or substantial.* Findings from this investigation suggest that even jurisdictions without substantial or high COVID-19 transmission might consider expanding prevention strategies, including masking in indoor public settings regardless of vaccination status, given the potential risk of infection during attendance at large public gatherings that include travelers from many areas with differing levels of transmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Crowding , Disease Outbreaks , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Young Adult
4.
Behav Brain Res ; 229(2): 427-32, 2012 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22249137

ABSTRACT

Conditioned fear is supported by a distributed network that prominently includes lateral and central amygdaloid nuclei. The role of corticomedial amygdaloid nuclei, including the medial nucleus (MeA), in fear acquisition or expression is not well understood. The present study demonstrates that pre-training excitotoxic lesions directed at the MeA disrupted both fear-potentiated startle (FPS) and conditioned freezing behavior elicited by re-exposure to a discrete olfactory cue. In contrast, such lesions had no effect on baseline startle reactivity or contextual FPS. These findings suggest that the MeA plays an obligatory role in either the acquisition or expression of olfactory conditioned fear, not limited by form of behavioral expression, but is not necessary for contextual conditioned fear.


Subject(s)
Amygdala/physiology , Conditioning, Classical/physiology , Olfactory Perception/physiology , Reflex, Startle/physiology , Amygdala/drug effects , Animals , Cues , Fear/physiology , Ibotenic Acid/administration & dosage , Male , Microinjections , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL