ABSTRACT
Despite the effectiveness of hydroxyurea, adherence remains low for adolescents and young adults (AYA) living with sickle cell disease (SCD). This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a clinic-based, multicomponent (e.g., storytelling, problem solving) intervention with 20 AYA living with SCD. Results found that adherence significantly improved from intervention to follow-up 1 [t(19) = -2.213, p = .039]. AYA also were generally satisfied with the intervention. These findings, although promising, should be replicated on a larger scale.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Antisickling Agents , Feasibility Studies , Hydroxyurea , Medication Adherence , Humans , Hydroxyurea/therapeutic use , Anemia, Sickle Cell/drug therapy , Adolescent , Male , Female , Young Adult , Antisickling Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Follow-Up StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of adherence-promotion interventions for children, adolescents, and young adults prescribed a medication for > 90 days as part of a treatment regimen for a medical condition. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of adherence-promotion interventions published between 2013 and 2023 and including children, adolescents, and/or young adults with a medical condition. A total of 38 articles representing 39 trials met inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted to summarize included trials and a random-effects model was used to compute an overall intervention effect. Effect sizes by adherence outcome assessment methodology, participant age, and technology use were also computed. RESULTS: Pediatric adherence-promotion interventions demonstrate a medium effect with those randomized to an intervention displaying greater improvements in medication adherence than those randomized to a comparator condition (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.60, n = 37; 95% Prediction Interval: -0.32, 1.23). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence interventions for children, adolescents, and young adults with medical conditions increase adherence.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Racially minoritized youth with T1D are made vulnerable to disproportionately adverse health outcomes compared to White peers due to enduring systems of oppression. Thus, understanding modifiable psychosocial factors associated with diabetes-related outcomes in racially minoritized youth may help to buffer deleterious effects of racism. One factor meriting exploration is racial-ethnic identity. There is currently limited research on measures fit to assess ethnic identity in youth with chronic illnesses. This study's purpose is to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the revised Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM-R) in a racially- and income-diverse sample of youth with T1D across sociodemographic and illness-related proxies for one's positionality in oppressive systems. METHOD: As part of a larger study examining resilience, 142 youth with T1D ages 12-18 (Mage = 14.66, SDage = 1.62, 55.6% Black/African-American, 44.4% White) completed the MEIM-R and various psychosocial measures. HbA1c levels and illness duration were extracted from medical records and caregivers reported income information. Confirmatory factor analyses compared the structural validity of competing MEIM-R models, and uniform and non-uniform differential item functioning (DIF) was explored across sociodemographic and illness-related factors. RESULTS: While a bifactor structure was supported, the MEIM-R was found to exhibit DIF by race and gender on multiple MEIM-R items and did not demonstrate linear bivariate relations with other psychosocial factors. CONCLUSIONS: Since different MEIM-R item response patterns were observed across racial/ethnic and gender groups, caution is warranted in using this measure in racially and gender diverse youth with T1D.