Targeting Patient-Derived Orthotopic Gastric Cancers with a Fluorescent Humanized Anti-CEA Antibody.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer poses a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge as surgical resection provides the only opportunity for a cure. Specific labeling of gastric cancer could distinguish resectable and nonresectable disease and facilitate an R0 resection, which could improve survival. METHODS: Two patient-derived gastric cancer lines, KG8 and KG10, were established from surgical specimens of two patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Harvested tumor fragments were implanted into the greater curvature of the stomach to establish patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) models. M5A (humanized anti-CEA antibody) or IgG control antibodies were conjugated with the near-infrared dye IRDye800CW. Mice received 50 µg of M5A-IR800 or 50 µg of IgG-IR800 intravenously and were imaged after 72 hr. Fluorescence imaging was performed by using the LI-COR Pearl Imaging System. A tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) was calculated by dividing the mean fluorescence intensity of the tumor versus adjacent stomach tissue. RESULTS: M5A-IR800 administration resulted in bright labeling of both KG8 and K10 tumors. In the KG8 PDOX models, the TBR for M5A-IR800 was 5.85 (SE ± 1.64) compared with IgG-IR800 at 0.70 (SE ± 0.17). The K10 PDOX models had a TBR of 3.71 (SE ± 0.73) for M5A-IR800 compared with 0.66 (SE ± 0.12) for IgG-IR800. CONCLUSIONS: Humanized anti-CEA (M5A) antibodies conjugated to fluorescent dyes provide bright and specific labeling of gastric cancer PDOX models. This tumor-specific fluorescent antibody is a promising potential clinical tool to detect the extent of disease for the determination of resectability as well as to visualize tumor margins during gastric cancer resection.

Leveraging the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board for Dissemination of Evidence-Based Recommendations on the Staging and Treatment of Gastric Cancer: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Compliance with evidence-based treatment guidelines for gastric cancer across the United States is poor. This pilot study aimed to create and evaluate a change package for disseminating information on the staging and treatment of gastric cancer during multidisciplinary tumor boards and for identifying barriers to implementation. METHODS: The change package included a 10-min video, a brief knowledge assessment, and a discussion guide. Commission on Cancer-accredited sites that perform gastrectomy were invited to participate. Participants completed the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) scale (range, 12-60) and scales to measure the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness (score range, 4-20). Semi-structured interviews were conducted to further define inner and outer setting barriers. RESULTS: Seven centers participated in the study. A total of 74 participants completed the pre-video knowledge assessment, and 55 participants completed the post-video assessment. The recommendations found to be most controversial were separate staging laparoscopy and modified D2 lymphadenectomy. Sum scores were calculated for acceptability (mean, 17.43 ± 2.51) appropriateness (mean, 16.86 ± 3.24), and feasibility (mean, 16.14 ± 3.07) of the change package. The ORIC scores (mean, 46.57 ± 8.22) correlated with responses to the open-ended questions. The key barriers identified were patient volume, skills in the procedures, and attitudes and beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: The change package was moderately to highly feasible, appropriate, and acceptable. The activity identified specific recommendations for gastric cancer care that are considered controversial and local barriers to implementation. Future efforts could focus on building skills and knowledge as well as the more difficult issue of attitudes and beliefs.

Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with high morbidity, which limits the degree to which patients may benefit from this therapy. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: This was a single institution prospective clinical trial and comparative study using historical controls. Patients with histologically confirmed peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) of appendiceal, colorectal, ovarian, or primary peritoneal origin, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) [Formula: see text] 10 were eligible. RESULTS: Clinical trial: 18 patients (median age 57 years, 39% female) with appendiceal (15) or colorectal (3) primary PSM underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. Median and range outcomes were: operative time 219 min (134-378), EBL 10 mL (0-100), time to return to bowel function 3 days (1-7), duration IV narcotic use 3 days (1-8), length of stay 6 days (3-11). All patients had a complete cytoreduction (CC-score 0). Three (17%) experienced minor morbidity, with no major morbidity or mortality. Median DFS and OS were not reached with median follow-up of 48 months. Comparative analysis: Laparoscopic approach associated with reduced time to return of bowel function (3 versus 4 days, p = 0.001), length of stay (8 versus 5 days, p < 0.001), and morbidity (16% versus 42%, p = 0.008). Independent predictors of DFS included prior chemotherapy (HR 5.07, 95% CI 1.85, 13.89; p = 0.002), and CC-score > 0 (HR 3.31, 95% CI 1.19, 9.41; p = 0.025), but not surgical approach. CC-score > 0 was the only independent predictor of OS (HR 10.12, 95% CI 2.16, 47.30, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC should be considered for patients with PSM with low-volume disease, including those with adenocarcinoma histology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02463877.

Commission on Cancer Facility Type is Associated with Overall Survival in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the United States.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, "high-volume" centers for gastric cancer treat significantly fewer cases per year compared with centers in Asia. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes, aside from volume, are poorly understood. METHODS: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2015 were analyzed in the NCDB cohort. Commission on Cancer facility types were classified as either Academic/Research Programs (ARP) or Non-Academic Programs (NAP). Factors associated with treatment at facility type were assessed by logistic regression. Overall survival was compared between facility types by Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of patients were treated at ARPs. In multivariable analysis, patients treated at ARPs were younger, healthier (Charlson-Deyo score), and had lower AJCC stage. Treatment at an ARP was associated with superior median OS compared with treatment at a NAP (17.3 months vs. 11.1 months, respectively, P < 0.001,) and in each stage of disease. Treatment of stages II and III patients at ARPs increased over time. Among patients with stages II and III disease, adherence to therapy guidelines was higher and postoperative mortality was lower at ARPs. CONCLUSION: Although patients at ARPs tend to have favorable characteristics, superior overall survival may also be due to better adherence to therapy guidelines and capacity to rescue after surgical complications.

A Multi-institutional Study of Peritoneal Recurrence Following Resection of Low-grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dissemination of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs), sometimes referred to as pseudomyxoma peritonei, can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Little is known about the natural history of localized (non-disseminated) LAMNs. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the risk of peritoneal recurrence in patients with localized LAMNs. METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed localized LAMNs. Baseline characteristics, pathology, and follow-up data were collected. The primary endpoint was the rate of peritoneal recurrence. RESULTS: We identified 217 patients with localized LAMNs. Median age was 59 years (11-95) and 131 (60%) patients were female. Surgical management included appendectomy for 124 (57.1%) patients, appendectomy with partial cecectomy for 26 (12.0%) patients, and colectomy for 67 (30.9%) patients. Pathology revealed perforation in 46 patients (37.7% of 122 patients with perforation status mentioned in the report), extra-appendiceal acellular mucin (EAM) in 49 (22.6%) patients, and extra-appendiceal neoplastic cells (EAC) in 13 (6.0%) patients. Median follow-up was 51.1 months (0-271). Seven (3.2%) patients developed a peritoneal recurrence, with a median time to recurrence of 14.4 months (2.5-47.0). Seven (15.2%) patients with histologic evidence of perforation had recurrence, versus no patients (0%) without perforation (p < 0.001); five (10.2%) patients with EAM versus two (1.2%) patients without EAM (p = 0.007), and one (7.7%) patient with EAC versus six (2.9%) patients without EAC (p = 0.355) had recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional study represents the largest reported series of patients with localized LAMNs. In the absence of perforation or extra-appendiceal mucin or cells, recurrence was extremely rare; however, patients with any of these pathologic findings require careful follow-up.

Predictors and significance of histologic response to neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative therapy is the standard-of-care for locally-advanced gastric cancer but many patients do not respond. There are currently no known factors that predict response to therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study aimed to evaluate treatment effect grade (TEG) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy and surgery at a single center. Ordinal logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of TEG, scaled from 0 to 3. RESULTS: Fifty patients were identified. The majority were male (n = 33) and 50% were Hispanic. The most common regimens given were: 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (n = 23, 46%), epirubicin, cis- or oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin or Xeloda (n = 8, 16%), and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin (n = 9, 18%). Twenty-seven patients (55%) had complete or partial response to therapy (TEG 0-2), and 23 patients (46%) had no response (TEG 3). Of numerous variables analyzed, only race and SRC histology were associated with TEG. TEG was associated with disease free, but not disease specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, 46% of patients had no histologic response to therapy. SRC histology, and possibly race, should be considered in determination of optimal multidisciplinary regimens and in amount of therapy to be given upfront, as patients with SRC histology and those of non-Asian race are less likely to respond to standard regimens.

It's not always too late: a case for minimally invasive salvage esophagectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Standard of care for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) and surgical resection 4-8 weeks after completion of nCRT. It is recommended that the CRT to surgery interval not exceed 90 days. Many patients do not undergo surgery within this timeframe due to patient/physician preference, complete clinical response, or poor performance status. Select patients are offered salvage esophagectomy (SE), defined in two ways: resection for recurrent/persistent disease after complete response to definitive CRT (dCRT) or esophagectomy performed > 90 days after completion of nCRT. Salvage esophagectomy reportedly has higher postoperative morbidity and poor survival outcomes. In this study, we assessed outcomes, overall, and disease-free survival of patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy by both definitions (recurrent/persistent disease after dCRT and/or > 90 days), compared to planned (resection after nCRT/within 90 days) esophagectomy (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy at a single institution from 2009 to 2019. Esophagectomy for benign disease and patients who did not receive nCRT were excluded. Outcomes included postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: 97 patients underwent minimally invasive esophageal resection for esophageal carcinoma. 89.7% of patients were male. Mean age was 64.9 years (range 36-85 years). 94.8% of patients had adenocarcinoma, with 16 transthoracic and 81 transhiatal approaches. On comparing planned esophagectomy (n = 87) to esophagectomy after dCRT failure (n = 10), no significant differences were identified in overall survival (p = 0.73), disease-free survival (p = 0.32), 30-day or major complication rate, anastomotic leak, or LOS. Similarly, when comparing esophagectomy < 90 days after CRT (n = 62) to > 90 days after CRT completion (n = 35), no significant differences were identified in overall survival (p = 0.39), disease-free survival (p = 0.71), 30-day or major complication rate, LOS, or anastomotic leak rate between groups. In this comparison, local recurrence was noted to be elevated with SE as compared to PE (64.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Overall survival and disease-free survival were equivalent between SE and PE. Local recurrence was noted to be increased with SE, though this did not appear to affect survival. Although planned esophagectomy remains the standard of care, salvage esophagectomy has comparable outcomes and is appropriate for selected patients.

Prognostic Utility of Pre- and Postoperative Circulating Tumor DNA Liquid Biopsies in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising technology for treatment selection, prognostication, and surveillance after definitive therapy. Its use in the perioperative setting for patients with metastatic disease has not been well studied. We characterize perioperative plasma ctDNA and its association with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 71 patients undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases and evaluated their plasma with a targeted 73-gene ctDNA next-generation sequencing test before and after surgery. The association between perioperative ctDNA, as well as other patient factors, and PFS was evaluated by Cox regression. RESULTS: ctDNA was detectable in 28 patients (39.4%) preoperatively and in 37 patients (52.1%) postoperatively. Patients with high ctDNA [maximum somatic variant allele fraction (MSVAF) > 0.25%] had worse PFS than those with low MSVAF (< 0.25%) in both the pre- and postoperative settings (median 4.8 vs. 19.3 months, p < 0.001, and 9.2 vs.15.0 months, p = 0.049, respectively; log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, high-grade histology [hazard ratio (HR) 3.42, p = 0.001], incomplete resection (HR 2.35, p = 0.010), and high preoperative MSVAF (HR 3.04, p = 0.001) were associated with worse PFS. Patients with new postoperative alterations in the context of preoperative alteration(s) also had a significantly shorter PFS compared with other groups (HR 4.28, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of perioperative ctDNA and new postoperative ctDNA alterations in the context of preoperative alterations predict worse outcomes in patients undergoing resection for peritoneal metastases. This may highlight a role for longitudinal ctDNA surveillance in this population.

Preoperative Risk Score for Predicting Incomplete Cytoreduction: A 12-Institution Study from the US HIPEC Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreductive surgery with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC), incomplete cytoreduction (CCR2/3) confers morbidity without survival benefit. The aim of this study is to identify preoperative factors which predict CCR2/3. METHODS: All patients who underwent curative-intent CRS/HIPEC of low/high-grade appendiceal, colorectal, or peritoneal mesothelioma cancers in the 12-institution US HIPEC Collaborative from 2000 to 2017 were included (n = 2027). The primary aim is to create an incomplete-cytoreduction risk score (ICRS) to predict CCR2/3 CRS utilizing preoperative data. ICRS was created from a randomly selected cohort of 50% of patients (derivation cohort) and verified on the remaining patients (validation cohort). RESULTS: Within our derivation cohort (n = 998), histology was low-grade appendiceal neoplasms in 30%, high-grade appendiceal tumor in 41%, colorectal tumor in 22%, and peritoneal mesothelioma in 8%. CCR0/1 was achieved in 816 patients and CCR 2/3 in 116 patients. On multivariable analysis, preoperative factors associated with incomplete cytoreduction were male gender [odds ratio (OR) 3.4, p = 0.007], presence of ascites (OR 2.8, p = 0.028), cancer antigen (CA)-125 ≥ 40 U/mL (OR 3.4, p = 0.012), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ≥ 4.2 ng/mL (OR 3.2, p = 0.029). Each preoperative factor was assigned a score of 0 or 1 to form an ICRS from 0 to 4. Scores were grouped as zero (0), low (1-2), or high (3-4). Incidence of CCR2/3 progressively increased by risk group from 1.6% in zero to 13% in low and 39% in high. When ICRS was applied to the validation cohort (n = 1029), this relationship was maintained. CONCLUSION: The incomplete cytoreduction risk score incorporates preoperative factors to accurately stratify the risk of CCR2/3 resection in CRS/HIPEC. This score should not be used in isolation, however, to exclude patients from surgery.

Adherence with operative standards in the treatment of gastric cancer in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Despite multiple clinical trials and practice guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer, oncologic outcomes have not improved in the United States. One potential reason could be differences in the quality of surgery as performed in a controlled trial versus in practice. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, rates of adherence with operative standards for gastrectomy for cancer were analyzed. Of the numerous evidence-based operative standards outlined in the manual, two were reliably measured in the NCDB: (1) achieving and R0 resection, and (2) having > 16 lymph nodes examined. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: A total of 28,705 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative-intent gastrectomy during 2004-2014 were identified. Only 36.5% of stage 0/I patients, and 41.8% of stage II/III patients, met minimum standards. Predictors for meeting standards included age < 65, fewer comorbidities, Asian/Pacific Islander race, and treatment at academic and high-volume centers. Patients who met standards had longer OS (stage 0/I: 104.9 versus 66.6 months; stage II/III: 40.6 versus 26.0 months; p < 0.001 for both). Meeting standards was a significant predictor for improved OS for both stage 0/I and II/III patients (HR = 0.665 and HR = 0.747, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: For standards that are measurable in the NCDB, adherence is poor. Improved adherence with operative standards may improve survival for gastric cancer patients in the U.S. There is a need for better measuring of, and adherence with, operative standards in gastrectomy for cancer.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prevention Strategies for Venous Thromboembolism after Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The risk factors and incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are not well defined in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). We sought to characterize the incidence, risk factors, and pharmacothromboprophylaxis strategies for VTE after CRS/HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of CRS/HIPEC procedures at our institution from 8/2007 to 11/2017, examining the 60-day VTE incidence. Baseline, potential risk factor, and prevention strategy data were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used to determine risk factors associated with 60-day VTEs. RESULTS: We identified 25 60-day VTEs among 447 CRS/HIPEC procedures (5.6%). VTEs were discovered on median postoperative day 20 (range 2-59); pulmonary emboli (68%) were the most common type of VTE. The 60-day VTE rate was 10.2% before versus 4.9% after initiation of a policy to discharge patients on pharmacothromboprophylaxis (p = 0.10). Patients with 60-day VTEs had longer average length of stay (14 vs. 11 days, p = 0.01) and higher 60-day mortality rate (4% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.02) than those without VTEs. Caprini score (odds ratio [OR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.15, p = 0.01), preoperative serum albumin level (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-1.00, p = 0.05), and 60-day non-VTE serious morbidity (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.25-9.51, p = 0.02) were risk factors associated with 60-day VTEs on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: VTEs are relatively common after CRS/HIPEC and are associated with high Caprini scores, low serum albumin levels, and additional inpatient comorbidities. They result in longer length of stay and higher mortality rate. Compliance with current guidelines for extended postoperative thromboprophylaxis was likely associated with reduced VTE rate.

Obstruction-Free Survival Following Operative Intervention for Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Appendiceal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peritoneal metastases from appendiceal cancer are at high risk of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There are no definitive treatment guidelines regarding operative intervention for MBO. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of operative intervention in this population. METHODS: We identified patients with peritoneal metastases from appendiceal cancer who underwent surgery for MBO at our institution between 2011 and 2018. Baseline characteristics, postoperative complications, and follow-up data were collected. The primary endpoint was obstruction-free survival (OFS). Other endpoints were postoperative recovery of bowel function, 60-day Clavien-Dindo (CD) morbidity, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent operative treatment for MBO, of whom 14 had high-grade (HG) histology and 12 had low-grade (LG) histology. Seven (25.9%) patients had severe (CD grade 3 or higher) 60-day complications, including one (3.8%) postoperative death. All remaining patients had return of bowel function and resumed oral intake during hospitalization. Six (23.1%) patients had repeat admissions for MBO after surgery. Median OFS was 17.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-31.8), and median OS was 18.5 months (95% CI 3.6-33.3) following surgery. CONCLUSION: In this carefully selected group of patients with peritoneal metastases from appendiceal cancer, surgery for MBO provided durable palliation with acceptable morbidity.

Does Primary Tumor Side Matter in Patients with Metastatic Colon Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Primary tumor location has been shown to be prognostic of overall survival (OS) in patients with both locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer. The impact of sidedness on prognosis has not been evaluated in the setting of peritoneal-only metastases treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases of patients with peritoneal surface malignancy undergoing CRS/HIPEC from three high-volume centers was performed. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients with metastatic colon cancer to the peritoneum who underwent CRS/HIPEC with mitomycin C were identified. Fifty-one patients (45%) had left-sided primary tumors, and 64 (55%) had right-sided primary tumors. Patients with right-sided tumors were more likely to be older (median age 56 vs. 49 years, p = 0.007) and to have signet ring cell histology (17% vs. 4%, p = 0.026). Patients with right-sided tumors had median disease-free survival (DFS) and OS of 14 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.5-17.5) and 36 months (95% CI 27.4-44.6), respectively, versus 16 months (95% CI 11.0-21.0) and 69 months (95% CI 24.3-113.7) for those patients with left-sided tumors. On multivariate analysis, primary tumor side was an independent predictor of both DFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was a dramatic, clinically significant difference in OS between patients with right- and left-sided tumors, and primary tumor side was an independent predictor of DFS and OS. Primary tumor side should be considered in patient selection for CRS with or without HIPEC.

Primary Tumor Sidedness is Predictive of Survival in Colon Cancer Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A US HIPEC Collaborative Study.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical relevance of primary tumor sidedness is not fully understood in colon cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of a multi-institutional database of patients with peritoneal surface malignancy at 12 participating high-volume academic centers from the US HIPEC Collaborative. RESULTS: Overall, 336 patients with colon primary tumors who underwent curative-intent CRS with or without HIPEC were identified; 179 (53.3%) patients had right-sided primary tumors and 157 (46.7%) had left-sided primary tumors. Patients with right-sided tumors were more likely to be older, male, have higher Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), and have a perforated primary tumor, but were less likely to have extraperitoneal disease. Patients with complete cytoreduction (CC-0/1) had a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.6-15.3) versus 13.1 months (95% CI 9.5-16.8) [p = 0.158] and median overall survival (OS) of 30 months (95% CI 23.5-36.6) versus 45.4 months (95% CI 35.9-54.8) [p = 0.028] for right- and left-sided tumors; respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that right-sided primary tumor was an independent predictor of worse DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.19-2.56; p =0.004) and OS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.09-2.73; p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Right-sided primary tumor was an independent predictor of worse DFS and OS. Relevant clinicopathologic criteria, such as tumor sidedness and PCI, should be considered in patient selection for CRS with or without HIPEC, and guide stratification for clinical trials.

Evaluation of treatment and outcomes for Hispanic patients with gastric cancer at Commission on Cancer-accredited centers in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gastric cancer in the Hispanic population commonly presents with poor clinical features. Characteristics of this vulnerable population and optimal therapy for these patients have not been clearly defined. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2014), we analyzed patient demographics, clinical factors, treatment-related factors, and outcomes for Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients with gastric adenocarcinoma in the United States. RESULTS: A total of 129 666 patients were included in this analysis. Hispanics were younger, more often female, had larger tumors, and were more likely to present with metastatic disease (all P < 0.001). Hispanics were more likely to undergo staging laparoscopy (5.6% vs 4.9%; P = 0.037), gastrectomy (63.5% vs 56.9%; P < 0.001), and ≥ 15 lymph nodes examined (56.1% vs 50.5%; P < 0.001). Hispanics were less likely to have negative margins (91.2% vs 92.8%; P = 0.004). Hispanics with stage II/III disease were less likely to receive neoadjuvant therapy (31.7% vs 38.7%; P < 0.001), but more likely to receive multimodal therapy (48.9% vs 46.1%; P = 0.01). Predictors for improved overall survival in Hispanics included multimodal therapy, negative margins, and treatment at an academic center. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to optimize treatment of this distinct and growing population of gastric cancer patients should focus on earlier diagnosis, referral to academic centers, and high-quality surgery.

Factors Associated with 60-Day Readmission Following Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Readmission rates following surgery are subject to scrutiny in efforts to control health care costs. This study was designed to define the 60-day readmission rate following cytoreduction and HIPEC at a high-volume center and to identify factors associated with readmission. METHODS: Patients who underwent complete cytoreduction and HIPEC at a single institution from August 2007 through June 2014 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Multiple preoperative and operative factors were analyzed for their ability to predict 60-day readmission following surgery. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients were identified. Forty patients (17%) experienced readmission within 60 days of surgery. The most common reasons for readmission were ileus/dehydration (12, 31%), deep space infection (8, 21%), and DVT/PE (6, 15%). Initial postoperative length of stay was longer for patients readmitted within 60 days (median 12 vs. 9 days, p = 0.013). Of categorical variables analyzed, including gender, histology, HIPEC agent, intraoperative transfusion, and individual procedures performed during cytoreduction, adjuvant systemic therapy, and postoperative morbidity, only Charlson comorbidity index CCI (odds ratio (OR) = 3.80 [1.68-8.60]) and stoma creation (OR = 6.04 [1.56-12.14]) were associated with 60-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Few measurable variables are associated with readmission following cytoreduction and HIPEC. Patients with high CCI and those with stomas created at the time of CRS/HIPEC may be at increased risk of readmission within 60 days. Earlier or more frequent follow-up for high-risk patients should be considered as a strategy to reduce readmissions.

Histologic Predictors of Recurrence in Mucinous Appendiceal Tumors with Peritoneal Dissemination after HIPEC.

BACKGROUND: Mucinous appendiceal tumors (MAT) are rare neoplasms that can metastasize to the peritoneum and often are treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC. Pathologic classification and outcomes vary, but standardized histologic definitions are emerging. We sought to evaluate outcomes in this disease after CRS/HIPEC using standardized pathologic criteria. METHOD: Outcomes of MAT with peritoneal metastases (PM) after CRS/HIPEC from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed at our institution. Standardized histologic categories per WHO and consensus definitions were used: low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN), low-grade adenocarcinoma (LGAC), or high-grade adenocarcinoma (HGAC) primary tumors; and acellular mucin (AM), low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei (LGMCP), or high-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei (HGMCP) peritoneal metastases. Cox proportional hazards model was used identify predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients undergoing 197 CRS/HIPECs were included. Among 75 patients with primary histology review, there were 33 (44.0%) LAMNs, 28 (37.3%) LGACs, and 14 (18.7%) HGACs. Peritoneal histology was benign in 6 (3.0%), AM in 33 (16.8%), LGMCP in 114 (57.9%), and HGMCP in 44 (22.3%). PFS was not reached for AM, 34.3 months for LGMCP, and 16.8 months for HGMCP (p < 0.001). Peritoneal histology predicted PFS on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 9.82 and 24.60 for LGMCP and HGMCP, respectively, vs. AM, p < 0.001). Among the LGMCP group, CEA and completeness of cytoreduction (CC score) predicted PFS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized peritoneal histology in patients with PM from MAT predicts PFS and patients with low-grade histology can be further discriminated by CEA and CC score.

Preoperative Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis is an Independent Predictor of Progression-Free Survival.

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a useful tool for detecting genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). To date, most ctDNA tests have been performed on patients with widely metastatic disease. Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (metastases) present unique prognostic and therapeutic challenges. We therefore explored preoperative ctDNA in patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing surgery. METHODS: Patients referred for surgical resection of peritoneal metastases underwent preoperative blood-derived ctDNA analysis (clinical-grade NGS [68-73 genes]). ctDNA was quantified as the percentage of altered circulating cell-free DNA (% cfDNA). RESULTS: Eighty patients had ctDNA testing: 46 (57.5%) women; median age 55.5 years. The following diagnoses were included: 59 patients (73.8%), appendix cancer; 11 (13.8%), colorectal; five (6.3%), peritoneal mesothelioma; two (2.5%), small bowel; one (1.3%) each of cholangiocarcinoma, ovarian, and testicular cancer. Thirty-one patients (38.8%) had detectable preoperative ctDNA alterations, most frequently in the following genes: TP53 (25.8% of all alterations detected) and KRAS (11.3%). Among 15 patients with tissue DNA NGS, 33.3% also had ctDNA alterations (overall concordance = 96.7%). Patients with high ctDNA quantities (≥ 0.25% cfDNA, n = 25) had a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those with lower ctDNA quantities (n = 55; 7.8 vs. 15.0 months; hazard ratio 3.23, 95% confidence interval 1.43-7.28, p = 0.005 univariate, p = 0.044 multivariate). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with peritoneal metastases referred for surgical intervention have detectable ctDNA alterations preoperatively. Patients with high levels of ctDNA have a worse prognosis independent of histologic grade.

Cirrhosis is not a contraindication to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in highly selected patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient selection for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is critically important to optimizing outcomes. There is currently no literature regarding the safety of CRS/HIPEC in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this case series is to report the outcomes of three patients with well-compensated cirrhosis who underwent CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained peritoneal surface malignancy database. Patient, tumor, and operative-related details were recorded as short-term postoperative outcomes. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: All patients had well-compensated (Child-Pugh Class A) cirrhosis and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0. One patient had preoperative evidence of portal hypertension. All safely underwent CRS/HIPEC with completeness of cytoreduction (CC) scores of 0. The postoperative morbidity profile was unique, but all complications were manageable and resulted in full recovery to preoperative baseline status. CONCLUSIONS: Patient selection for CRS/HIPEC is critical for optimization of short- and long-term outcomes. This small series suggests that well-compensated cirrhosis should not be an absolute contraindication to CRS/HIPEC.