Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 133(1): 93-100.e4, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immediate IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to polyethylene glycol (PEG) are rare. Our understanding of PEG hypersensitivity is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and investigation outcomes of the largest cohort of patients with PEG allergy reported. METHODS: A total of 44 patients investigated for suspected PEG allergy across 4 United Kingdom tertiary allergy centers between October 2013 and December 2020 were studied. Clinical characteristics, index reaction, and approaches to and outcomes of allergy investigations were analyzed. RESULTS: PEG hypersensitivity was confirmed in 42 of 44 cases. Macrogol laxatives were the most common index drugs reported (23%), followed by depo-medroxyprogesterone (19%), oral penicillin V (10%), and depo-methylprednisolone (10%). In general, 61% experienced grade III anaphylaxis. Intradermal testing (IDT) increased the diagnostic sensitivity from 51% to 85%. Five patients experienced systemic reactions during IDT. Of the 5 patients, 2 were skin prick test positive to a high molecular weight PEG. Three patients with negative skin test results had positive drug provocation test results. Seven patients with PEG allergy reported tolerance to H1-antihistamines containing PEG. Administration of messenger RNA COVID-19 or Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines was tolerated in all 16 patients to whom they were administered. CONCLUSION: PEG hypersensitivity is an uncommon cause of drug-induced anaphylaxis. Four index drugs accounted for two-thirds of the cases, and reactions to these drugs should prompt PEG hypersensitivity investigations. PEG IDT increases diagnostic yield. The role of skin prick test with higher molecular weight PEGs requires further attention. Further studies are required to understand PEG thresholds and PEG equivalent doses of various administration routes. COVID-19 vaccines were tolerated by all exposed.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Polyethylene Glycols , Humans , Male , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Female , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Skin Tests , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , United Kingdom , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Intradermal Tests
2.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 129(4): 507-514.e2, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788420

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The beta-lactam antibiotic amoxicillin and the beta-lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid in combination with amoxicillin are known to cause both immediate- and nonimmediate-type hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To characterize a large cohort of patients with a history of amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid hypersensitivity. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of the demographics, presentation, investigation, and management of 331 patients presenting to 1 allergy center with a history of hypersensitivity to amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. RESULTS: Hypersensitivity was confirmed in 37 of 221 patients (17%) who took amoxicillin and 47 of 110 patients (43%) who took amoxicillin-clavulanic acid as the index drug. In immediate hypersensitivity, skin test results confirmed the diagnosis in 66 of 139 patients (47%). Penicillin cross-reactivity was observed in 16 of 36 patients (44%). Of the 16 patients who were cross-reactive, 13 (81%) reacted to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid as the index drug. All patients who had negative skin test results (73/139) underwent drug provocation. The negative predictive value of skin tests was 89%. In nonimmediate hypersensitivity, delayed intradermal tests confirmed diagnosis in 12 of 170 patients (7%). Of the 12 patients whose skin test results were positive, 8 (67%) presented with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. All patients with a negative skin test result (158/170) underwent drug provocation. The negative predictive value of skin tests was 95%. Penicillin cross-reactivity was observed in 3 of 12 patients (25%). Ten patients were diagnosed with hypersensitivity to clavulanic acid. CONCLUSION: The negative predictive value of skin tests in both immediate and nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions is excellent and excludes severe allergy. Nonimmediate hypersensitivity is rare. Confirmed hypersensitivity is more likely if amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is the index drug. Cross-reactivity was more common in patients presenting with immediate hypersensitivity, typically involving benzylpenicillin. A minority of patients were allergic to clavulanic acid.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Hypersensitivity, Immediate , Amoxicillin/adverse effects , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Clavulanic Acid/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Humans , Monobactams , Penicillin G , Penicillins/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Skin Tests , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/adverse effects
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 9(5): 2001-2009, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33444815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Piperacillin/tazobactam is a broad-spectrum penicillin. Hypersensitivity reactions are less commonly reported than with other penicillins except in patients with cystic fibrosis. OBJECTIVE: Detailed clinical characterization of a patient cohort referred with suspected piperacillin-tazobactam hypersensitivity. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, investigation, and management of 87 patients presenting to 5 European allergy centers. Patients underwent skin prick and intradermal testing with piperacillin/tazobactam, major (penicilloyl-polylysine) and minor (sodium penilloate) determinants, amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin, co-amoxiclav, clavulanic acid, and meropenem with immediate and, where appropriate, delayed reading of tests. Skin test-negative patients underwent drug provocation to piperacillin/tazobactam and/or other penicillins. A multistep protocol was used, depending on risk assessment. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 87 (55%) patients were diagnosed with hypersensitivity to piperacillin/tazobactam with either positive skin or drug provocation test results, of whom 10 (21%) had a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Twenty-six (54%) patients presented with immediate and 22 (45%) with nonimmediate hypersensitivity. Patients with cystic fibrosis predominantly presented with nonimmediate hypersensitivity (70%). Reactions were severe in 52% of immediate reactors (Brown's anaphylaxis grade 3) and moderately severe (systemic involvement) in 75% of nonimmediate reactors. The number of patients with negative skin test results tolerating reintroduction was comparable in immediate (80%) and nonimmediate (88%) hypersensitivity. One-third of patients were cross-sensitized to other penicillins. The cross-sensitization pattern raised the possibility of tazobactam allergy in 3 patients. In 21 patients selectively sensitized to piperacillin/tazobactam (12 immediate, 9 nonimmediate), tolerance to other beta-lactams was demonstrated by drug provocation testing. CONCLUSIONS: Piperacillin-tazobactam caused immediate and nonimmediate hypersensitivity with similar frequency. Most patients were selectively sensitized and tolerated other penicillins. Some patients may be allergic to the beta-lactamase inhibitor only.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Hypersensitivity, Immediate , Amoxicillin , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/epidemiology , Penicillins/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Skin Tests
6.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 7(7): 2212-2217.e1, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30922988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Flucloxacillin is a narrow-spectrum, beta-lactamase-resistant penicillin. Type I (IgE-mediated) and type IV (T-cell-mediated) reactions are less frequently reported than with other penicillins. OBJECTIVE: To undertake a detailed clinical characterization of a cohort of patients referred with suspected flucloxacillin hypersensitivity. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed demographic characteristics, presentation, investigation, and management of 108 patients presenting to 4 UK centers. Patients underwent skin prick and intradermal testing with flucloxacillin, major (benzylpenicilloyl poly-l-lysine) and minor determinants, amoxicillin, and benzylpenicillin with immediate and, where appropriate, delayed reading of the test. In the immediate group, a further 14 patients were tested to ampicillin and 16 to Augmentin (co-amoxiclav-combination of clavulanic acid and amoxicillin). Skin test-negative patients underwent oral drug provocation. A multistep protocol was used, depending on risk assessment. RESULTS: Forty of 108 (37%) patients were diagnosed with hypersensitivity to flucloxacillin, of whom 33 (82.5%) showed immediate and 7 (17.5%) nonimmediate hypersensitivity, respectively. In the immediate group, most reactions were severe: 19 of 33 (58%). Intradermal testing had a higher negative predictive value (86%) in the immediate group than in the nonimmediate group (67%). Only a minority of patients (6 of 17 [35%]) with IgE-mediated allergy were cross-sensitized on intradermal testing with other penicillins, compared with 3 of 4 (75%) in the delayed group. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to flucloxacillin are more common than delayed. Cross-sensitization to other penicillins appears higher in delayed reactions than in immediate. The negative predictive value of intradermal testing is higher in the immediate group than in the nonimmediate group. Drug provocation testing remains the diagnostic criterion standard.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Floxacillin/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amoxicillin , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination , Cross Reactions , Drug Eruptions/diagnosis , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/metabolism , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/chemically induced , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/metabolism , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/chemically induced , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/metabolism , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Intradermal Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Penicillin G , Predictive Value of Tests , Referral and Consultation , Retrospective Studies , Skin Tests , Tryptases/metabolism , Young Adult
7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 6(6): 1892-1897, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29477569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Omega-5 gliadin allergy (also known as wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis) is a rare allergy to wheat that often presents with intermittent severe anaphylaxis in the context of a cofactor, such as exercise. OBJECTIVE: To undertake a detailed clinical characterization of the largest cohort of patients with omega-5 gliadin allergy to date. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the demographic characteristics, presentation, investigation, and management of 132 patients presenting with omega-5 gliadin allergy in 4 UK centers. RESULTS: There were significant delays in diagnosis of 1 to 5 years (40% of patients) and more than 5 years (29% of patients). The commonest cofactors were exercise (80%), alcohol (25%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (9%). A minority of patients (11%) had no identifiable cofactor. The level of specific IgE to omega-5 gliadin does not predict the severity of allergic reactions. Patients who adhered to a gluten-free diet and those who avoided wheat in combination with exercise achieved the largest reductions in subsequent allergic reactions of 67% and 69%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Omega-5 gliadin allergy is a rare wheat allergy that presents with severe anaphylaxis. The diagnosis is frequently delayed, and therefore we recommend that all adult patients presenting with anaphylaxis of unclear cause should have omega-5 gliadin specific IgE tested. A gluten-free diet or avoidance of wheat-based meals in combination with exercise (if the cofactor is exercise) helps to significantly decrease the risk of future allergic reactions. However, antihistamines and an epinephrine autoinjector must always be prescribed because one-third of patients continue to have allergic reactions despite dietary advice.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Exercise , Gliadin/immunology , Wheat Hypersensitivity , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Diet, Gluten-Free , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Wheat Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Wheat Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Wheat Hypersensitivity/therapy , Young Adult
12.
BMJ ; 353: i2253, 2016 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27118732
13.
Open Orthop J ; 5(Suppl 2): 249-52, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21892368

ABSTRACT

One less visited area in musculoskeletal stem cell research is the effects of donor age on quality of stem cells. The prevalence of degenerative orthopaedic conditions is large, and the older population is likely to receive great benefit from stem cell therapies. There are many known growth factors involved in controlling and influencing stem cell growth which are also related to cell senescence. Of which, expressions are found to be altered in mesenchymal stem cells from older donors. Considerations must also be taken of these mechanisms which also have a role in cell cycle and tumour suppression.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL