A post hoc comparative real-world analysis of HEAD-US score for joint health assessment of patients with severe haemophilia A and B in Spain.

AIM: Joint damage due to haemarthrosis can be effectively monitored with point-of care ultrasound using the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with US (HEAD-US) scoring system. A post hoc comparative analysis of the joint status of patients with severe haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) was performed. METHODS: The databases of two observational, cross-sectional studies that recruited patients with HA or HB from 12 Spanish centres were analysed to compare the status of the elbows, knees and ankles in patients with severe disease according to treatment modality. The HEAD-US score was calculated in both studies by the same trained operators. RESULTS: Overall, 95 HA and 41 HB severe patients were included, with a mean age of 35.2 ± 11.8 and 32.7 ± 14.2 years, respectively. The percentage of patients who received prophylaxis, over on-demand (OD) treatment, was much higher in HA (91.6%) than in HB (65.8%) patients. With a similar number of target joints, the HEAD-US score was zero in 6.3% HA and 22.0% HB patients (p < .01), respectively. The HA population showed significantly worse HEAD-US scores. Whilst osteochondral damage occurred more frequently in patients OD or tertiary prophylaxis, our data suggest that articular damage is less prominent in primary/secondary prophylaxis, regardless of the type of haemophilia. These latter treatment modalities were also associated with a lower prevalence of synovial hypertrophy, particularly in HB patients. CONCLUSION: This post hoc analysis indicates that joint status seems to be significantly influenced by haemophilia type (HA or HB) and treatment modality in these severe Spanish populations with severe disease. Continuing HEAD-US monitoring for the early detection and management of intra-articular abnormalities, as well as more efficiently tailored therapies should be warranted.

Association of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor use with risk of osteoporotic fracture among older women: A nationwide, population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the relationship between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and fracture in elderly women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and newly prescribed antidiabetic medications (ADMs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used the population-based cohort study data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea (2013-2020). Women ≥65 years old with T2DM, who were newly prescribed ADMs other than glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and thiazolidinedione, and who had comprehensive health check-up data were included. RESULTS: A total of 1,333 SGLT2i users were matched in a 1:2 ratio with 2,626 non-SGLT2i users. After propensity score matching, mean age, body mass index, number of ADMs, and other covariates were well-balanced between SGLT2i users and non-SGLT2i users. During the follow-up period, a higher incidence of vertebral fractures in SGLT2i users than in non-SGLT2i users (incidence rate 19.2 vs. 13.8 per 1,000 person-years; hazard ratio 1.40, 95 % confidence interval 1.00-1.96, p = 0.049). No significant difference was noted in other types of fracture. CONCLUSION: SGLT2i use showed an increased risk of vertebral fracture than non-SGLT2i use in elderly women. Although further validation is required, SGLT2i should be cautiously prescribed in older women due to the potential association with fracture risk.

Association of Muscle Mass Loss with Diabetes Development in Liver Transplantation Recipients.

BACKGRUOUND: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is one of the most significant complications after transplantation. Patients with end-stage liver diseases requiring transplantation are prone to sarcopenia, but the association between sarcopenia and PTDM remains to be elucidated. We aimed to investigate the effect of postoperative muscle mass loss on PTDM development. METHODS: A total of 500 patients who underwent liver transplantation at a tertiary care hospital between 2005 and 2020 were included. Skeletal muscle area at the level of the L3-L5 vertebrae was measured using computed tomography scans performed before and 1 year after the transplantation. The associations between the change in the muscle area after the transplantation and the incidence of PTDM was investigated using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median, 4.9 years), PTDM occurred in 165 patients (33%). The muscle mass loss was greater in patients who developed PTDM than in those without PTDM. Muscle depletion significantly increased risk of developing PTDM after adjustment for other confounding factors (hazard ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 1.84; P=0.001). Of the 357 subjects who had muscle mass loss, 124 (34.7%) developed PTDM, whereas of the 143 patients in the muscle mass maintenance group, 41 (28.7%) developed PTDM. The cumulative incidence of PTDM was significantly higher in patients with muscle loss than in patients without muscle loss (P=0.034). CONCLUSION: Muscle depletion after liver transplantation is associated with increased risk of PTDM development.