Immunogenicity of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine in frequent platelet donors.

Frequent plateletpheresis is associated with severe lymphopenia of uncertain clinical significance. We assessed the functional impact of frequent platelet donations and associated lymphopenia on the response to neoantigens. We conducted a prospective study of 102 platelet donors (HIV uninfected) who were naive to meningococcal vaccination recruited at Brigham and Women's Hospital. One dose of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine was administered. Seroresponse was defined as a fourfold increase of serum bactericidal antibody titers and seroprotection was defined as postvaccination titers of ≥1:8, for each of the 4 vaccine antigens (A, C, W, and Y). Mean age of participants was 61 years, 69% were male, and medial number of platelet donations in prior year was 14 (interquartile range, 4-20). Frequent platelet donors had a low CD4 count (14% with ≤200/µL and 34% with ≤350/µL). Seroresponse rates varied from 68% for serogroup Y to 86% for serogroup A and were higher for participants with baseline titers of <1:8. Postvaccination seroprotection rates varied from 76% for serogroup Y to 96% for serogroup A. After adjustments for age, sex, and frequent donations, lower total lymphocyte or lower CD4 counts were not associated with lower responses. These data suggest no impairment by plateletpheresis-associated lymphopenia on response to these neoantigens. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04224311.

First-in-Human Randomized, Controlled Trial of Mosaic HIV-1 Immunogens Delivered via a Modified Vaccinia Ankara Vector.

Background: Mosaic immunogens are bioinformatically engineered human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) sequences designed to elicit clade-independent coverage against globally circulating HIV-1 strains. Methods: This phase 1, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled healthy HIV-uninfected adults who received 2 doses of a modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA)-vectored HIV-1 bivalent mosaic immunogen vaccine or placebo on days 0 and 84. Two groups were enrolled: those who were HIV-1 vaccine naive (n = 15) and those who had received an HIV-1 vaccine (Ad26.ENVA.01) 4-6 years earlier (n = 10). We performed prespecified blinded cellular and humoral immunogenicity analyses at days 0, 14, 28, 84, 98, 112, 168, 270, and 365. Results: All 50 planned vaccinations were administered. Vaccination was safe and generally well tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. Both cellular and humoral cross-clade immune responses were elicited after 1 or 2 vaccinations in all participants in the HIV-1 vaccine-naive group. Env-specific responses were induced after a single immunization in nearly all subjects who had previously received the prototype Ad26.ENVA.01 vaccine. Conclusions: No safety concerns were identified, and multiclade HIV-1-specific immune responses were elicited. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02218125.

Induction of HIV-1-specific mucosal immune responses following intramuscular recombinant adenovirus serotype 26 HIV-1 vaccination of humans.

BACKGROUND: Defining mucosal immune responses and inflammation to candidate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccines represents a current research priority for the HIV-1 vaccine field. In particular, it is unclear whether intramuscular immunization can elicit immune responses at mucosal surfaces in humans. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we evaluated systemic and mucosal immune responses to a candidate adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) vectored HIV-1 envelop (Env) vaccine in baseline Ad26-seronegative and Ad26-seropositive healthy volunteers. Systematic mucosal sampling with rectal Weck-Cel sponges and rectal biopsies were performed. RESULTS: Intramuscular immunization elicited both systemic and mucosal Env-specific humoral and cellular immune responses in the majority of subjects. Individuals with preexisting Ad26-specific neutralizing antibodies had vaccine-elicited immune responses comparable to those of subjects who were Ad26 seronegative. We also observed no increase in activated total or vector-specific mucosal CD4+ T lymphocytes following vaccination by either histopathology or flow cytometry. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that a single intramuscular administration of this Ad26-vectored HIV-1 Env vaccine elicited both systemic and mucosal immune responses in humans. Induction of antigen-specific humoral and cellular mucosal immunity was not accompanied by a detectable increase in mucosal inflammation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01103687.

First-in-human evaluation of a hexon chimeric adenovirus vector expressing HIV-1 Env (IPCAVD 002).

BACKGROUND: We report the first-in-human safety and immunogenicity assessment of a prototype hexon chimeric adenovirus (Ad) serotype 5 (Ad5) vector containing the hexon hypervariable regions of Ad serotype 48 (Ad48) and expressing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 EnvA. METHODS: Forty-eight Ad5 and Ad48 seronegative, HIV-uninfected subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation phase 1 study. Four groups of 12 subjects received 10(9) to 10(11) viral particles (vp) of the Ad5HVR48.EnvA.01 vaccine (n = 10 per group) or placebo (n = 2 per group) at week 0 or weeks 0, 4, and 24. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed. RESULTS: Self-limited reactogenicity was observed after the initial immunization in the highest (10(11) vp) dose group. Responses in vaccinees included Ad48 neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers higher than Ad5 nAb titers, EnvA-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay titers, and EnvA-specific enzyme-linked immunospot assay responses, and these responses generally persisted at week 52. At week 28 in the 10(9), 10(10), and 10(11) vp 3-dose groups, geometric mean EnvA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay titers were 5721, 10 929, and 3420, respectively, and Ad48 nAb titers were a median of 1.7-fold higher than for Ad5. CONCLUSIONS: Ad5HVR48.ENVA.01 was safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic at all doses tested. Vector-elicited nAb responses were greater for Ad48 than Ad5, confirming that Ad-specific nAbs in humans are primarily, but not exclusively, directed against the hexon hypervariable regions. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00695877.

Safety and immunogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA-BN, IMVAMUNE) is emerging as a primary immunogen and as a delivery system to treat or prevent a wide range of diseases. Defining the safety and immunogenicity of MVA-BN in key populations is therefore important. METHODS: We performed a dose-escalation study of MVA-BN administered subcutaneously in 2 doses, one on day 0 and another on day 28. Twenty-four hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients were enrolled sequentially into the study, and vaccine or placebo was administered under a randomized, double-blind allocation. Ten subjects received vaccine containing 10(7) median tissue culture infective doses (TCID50) of MVA-BN, 10 subjects received vaccine containing 10(8) TCID50 of MVA-BN, and 4 subjects received placebo. RESULTS: MVA-BN was generally well tolerated at both doses. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were identified. Transient local reactogenicity was more frequently seen at the higher dose. Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to Vaccinia virus (VACV) were elicited by both doses of MVA-BN and were greater for the higher dose. Median peak anti-VACV NAb titers were 1:49 in the lower-dose group and 1:118 in the higher-dose group. T-cell immune responses to VACV were detected by an interferon γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay and were higher in the higher-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: MVA-BN is safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in HSCT recipients. These data support the use of 10(8) TCID50 of MVA-BN in this population. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00565929.

Effect of vaccination with modified vaccinia Ankara (ACAM3000) on subsequent challenge with Dryvax.

BACKGROUND: Despite the success of smallpox vaccination, the immunological correlates of protection are not fully understood. To investigate this question, we examined the effect of immunization with modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) on subsequent challenge with replication-competent vaccinia virus (Dryvax). METHODS: Dryvax challenge by scarification was conducted in 36 healthy subjects who had received MVA (n = 29) or placebo (n = 7) in a previous study of doses and routes of immunization. Subjects were followed up for clinical take, viral shedding, and immune responses. RESULTS: MVA administration attenuated clinical takes in 21 (72%) of 29 subjects, compared with 0 of 7 placebo recipients (P = .001). Attenuation was most significant in MVA groups that received 1 x 10(7) median tissue culture infective doses (TCID(50)) intradermally (P = .001) and 1 x 10(7) TCID(50) intramuscularly (P = .001). Both duration and peak titer of viral shedding were reduced in MVA recipients. Peak neutralizing antibody responses to vaccinia virus or MVA previously induced by MVA immunization were associated with attenuated takes (P = .02) and reduced duration (P = .001) and titer (P = .005) of viral shedding. CONCLUSIONS: MVA immunization results in clinical and virologic protection against Dryvax challenge. Protection is associated with prior induction of neutralizing antibodies to MVA or vaccinia virus. MVA administered intradermally has protective and immunologic responses similar to those of a 10-fold-higher dose given subcutaneously.

Safety and immunogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara (ACAM3000): effect of dose and route of administration.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a clinical trial of the safety and immunogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) to examine the effects of dose and route of administration. METHODS: Seventy-two healthy, vaccinia virus-naive subjects received 1 of 6 regimens of MVA (ACAM3000) or placebo consisting of 2 administrations given 1 month apart. RESULTS: MVA was generally well tolerated at all dose levels and by all routes. More pronounced local reactogenicity was seen with the intradermal and subcutaneous routes than with intramuscular administration. Binding antibodies to whole virus and neutralizing antibodies to the intracellular mature virion and extracellular enveloped virion forms of vaccinia virus were elicited by all routes of MVA administration and were greater for the higher dose by each route. Similar levels of neutralizing antibodies were seen at a 10-fold-lower dose given intradermally (1 x 10(7) median tissue culture infective doses [TCID(50)]), compared with responses after 1 x 10(8) TCID(50) given intramuscularly or subcutaneously. T cell immune responses to vaccinia virus were detected by an interferon gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay but had no clear relationship to dose or route. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that intradermal immunization with MVA provides a dose-sparing effect by eliciting antibody responses similar in magnitude and kinetics to those elicited by the intramuscular or subcutaneous routes but at a 10-fold-lower dose.