Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 21(5): 434-441, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37156485

ABSTRACT

A core component of NCCN's mission is to improve and facilitate equitable cancer care. Inclusion and representation of diverse populations are essential toward this goal of equity. Within NCCN's professional content, inclusivity increases the likelihood that clinicians are prepared to provide optimal oncology care to all patients; within NCCN's patient-facing content, it helps ensure that cancer information is relevant and accessible for all individuals. This article describes changes that have been made in the language and images used in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) and the NCCN Guidelines for Patients to promote justice, respect, and inclusion for all patients with cancer. The goals are to use language that is person-first, nonstigmatizing, inclusive of individuals of all sexual orientations and gender identities, and anti-racist, anti-classist, anti-misogynist, anti-ageist, anti-ableist, and anti-fat-biased. NCCN also seeks to incorporate multifaceted diversity in images and illustrations. NCCN is committed to continued and expanding efforts to ensure its publications are inclusive, respectful, and trustworthy, and that they advance just, equitable, high-quality, and effective cancer care for all.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Respect , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy , Medical Oncology , Language , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Cancer ; 126 Suppl 10: 2416-2423, 2020 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32348572

ABSTRACT

Clinical practice guidelines in oncology lead to improved outcomes in care. However, the most frequently used guidelines are developed for highly resourced systems. Recognizing the significant and increasing burden of cancer in low- and middle-income countries, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has developed resource-stratified framework and harmonization processes that allow the NCCN Guidelines to be tailored and optimized for specific geographical areas, resource levels, and settings. The critical need for local expertise and involvement in successful development and uptake is emphasized, and the promise of this collaboration for advancement in oncology programs is illustrated.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Standard of Care/standards , Developing Countries , Global Health , Humans , Socioeconomic Factors
3.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 18(3): 250-259, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32135508

ABSTRACT

Although oncology care has evolved, outcome assessment remains a key challenge. Outcome measurement requires identification and adoption of a succinct list of metrics indicative of high-quality cancer care for use within and across healthcare systems. NCCN established an advisory committee, the NCCN Quality and Outcomes Committee, consisting of provider experts from NCCN Member Institutions and other stakeholders, including payers and patient advocacy, community oncology, and health information technology representatives, to review the existing quality landscape and identify contemporary, relevant cancer quality and outcomes measures by reevaluating validated measures for endorsement and proposing new measure concepts to fill crucial gaps. This manuscript reports on 22 measures and concepts; 15 that align with existing measures and 7 that are new.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Humans
4.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 22(3): 139, 2024 Apr 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38897217
5.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 17(1): 64-84, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30659131

ABSTRACT

Cervical cancer is a malignant epithelial tumor that forms in the uterine cervix. Most cases of cervical cancer are preventable through human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination, routine screening, and treatment of precancerous lesions. However, due to inadequate screening protocols in many regions of the world, cervical cancer remains the fourth-most common cancer in women globally. The complete NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of cervical cancer. This manuscript discusses guiding principles for the workup, staging, and treatment of early stage and locally advanced cervical cancer, as well as evidence for these recommendations. For recommendations regarding treatment of recurrent or metastatic disease, please see the full guidelines on NCCN.org.


Subject(s)
Medical Oncology/standards , Papillomavirus Infections/therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/standards , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Brachytherapy/methods , Brachytherapy/standards , Cervix Uteri/diagnostic imaging , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/standards , Female , Fertility Preservation/methods , Fertility Preservation/standards , Humans , Hysterectomy/standards , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/standards , Medical Oncology/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Organ Sparing Treatments/standards , Papanicolaou Test/standards , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomaviridae/pathogenicity , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Societies, Medical/standards , United States , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
6.
Lancet ; 390(10103): 1654-1663, 2017 Oct 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28756902

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: On Aug 14, 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab for women with advanced cervical cancer on the basis of improved overall survival (OS) after the second interim analysis (in 2012) of 271 deaths in the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 240 trial. In this study, we report the prespecified final analysis of the primary objectives, OS and adverse events. METHODS: In this randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical carcinoma from 81 centres in the USA, Canada, and Spain. Inclusion criteria included a GOG performance status score of 0 or 1; adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function; adequately anticoagulated thromboembolism; a urine protein to creatinine ratio of less than 1; and measurable disease. Patients who had received chemotherapy for recurrence and those with non-healing wounds or active bleeding conditions were ineligible. We randomly allocated patients 1:1:1:1 (blocking used; block size of four) to intravenous chemotherapy of either cisplatin (50 mg/m2 on day 1 or 2) plus paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 or 175 mg/m2 on day 1) or topotecan (0·75 mg/m2 on days 1-3) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 on day 1) with or without intravenous bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on day 1) in 21 day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, voluntary withdrawal by the patient, or complete response. We stratified randomisation by GOG performance status (0 vs 1), previous radiosensitising platinum-based chemotherapy, and disease status (recurrent or persistent vs metastatic). We gave treatment open label. Primary outcomes were OS (analysed in the intention-to-treat population) and adverse events (analysed in all patients who received treatment and submitted adverse event information), assessed at the second interim and final analysis by the masked Data and Safety Monitoring Board. The cutoff for final analysis was 450 patients with 346 deaths. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00803062. FINDINGS: Between April 6, 2009, and Jan 3, 2012, we enrolled 452 patients (225 [50%] in the two chemotherapy-alone groups and 227 [50%] in the two chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups). By March 7, 2014, 348 deaths had occurred, meeting the prespecified cutoff for final analysis. The chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups continued to show significant improvement in OS compared with the chemotherapy-alone groups: 16·8 months in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups versus 13·3 months in the chemotherapy-alone groups (hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·62-0·95]; p=0·007). Final OS among patients not receiving previous pelvic radiotherapy was 24·5 months versus 16·8 months (0·64 [0·37-1·10]; p=0·11). Postprogression OS was not significantly different between the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (8·4 months) and chemotherapy-alone groups (7·1 months; 0·83 [0·66-1·05]; p=0·06). Fistula (any grade) occurred in 32 (15%) of 220 patients in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (all previously irradiated) versus three (1%) of 220 in the chemotherapy-alone groups (all previously irradiated). Grade 3 fistula developed in 13 (6%) versus one (<1%). No fistulas resulted in surgical emergencies, sepsis, or death. INTERPRETATION: The benefit conferred by incorporation of bevacizumab is sustained with extended follow-up as evidenced by the overall survival curves remaining separated. After progression while receiving bevacizumab, we did not observe a negative rebound effect (ie, shorter survival after bevacizumab is stopped than after chemotherapy alone is stopped). These findings represent proof-of-concept of the efficacy and tolerability of antiangiogenesis therapy in advanced cervical cancer. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute.


Subject(s)
Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/drug therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Topotecan/administration & dosage , Topotecan/adverse effects
7.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 16(2): 170-199, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29439178

ABSTRACT

Endometrial carcinoma is a malignant epithelial tumor that forms in the inner lining, or endometrium, of the uterus. Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Approximately two-thirds of endometrial carcinoma cases are diagnosed with disease confined to the uterus. The complete NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of endometrial cancer and uterine sarcoma. This manuscript discusses guiding principles for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of early-stage endometrial carcinoma as well as evidence for these recommendations.


Subject(s)
Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Uterine Neoplasms/etiology
8.
Radiology ; 283(2): 450-459, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28051912

ABSTRACT

Purpose To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with diagnostic contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in detecting lymph node (LN) metastasis in high-risk endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods This prospective multicenter HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and all participants gave written informed consent. Data were accrued between January 2010 and June 2013. Patients underwent PET/CT and pelvic and abdominal lymphadenectomy. Two hundred seven of 215 enrolled patients had PET/CT and pathologic examination results for the abdomen and pelvis. Mean patient age was 62.7 years ± 9.6 (standard deviation). Data in all 23 patients with a positive abdominal examination and in 26 randomly selected patients with a negative abdominal examination were used for this central reader study. Seven independent blinded readers reviewed diagnostic CT and PET/CT results in different sessions 1 month apart. Accuracy was calculated at the participant level, correlating abdominal (right and left para-aortic and common iliac) and pelvic (right and left external iliac and obturator) LN regions with pathologic results, respecting laterality. Reader-average sensitivities, specificities, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of PET/CT and diagnostic CT were compared. Power calculation was for sensitivity and specificity in the abdomen. Results Sensitivities of PET/CT versus diagnostic CT for the detection of LN metastasis were 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57, 0.72) versus 0.50 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.58) (P = .01) in the abdomen and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.72) versus 0.48 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.56) (P = .004) in the pelvis. Corresponding specificities were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.92) versus 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.96) (P = .11) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.96) versus 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.94) (P = .27), and AUCs were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.89) versus 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.86) (P = .39) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.92) versus 0.73 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.84) (P = .02). Conclusion FDG PET/CT has satisfactory diagnostic accuracy in the detection of abdominal LN metastasis in high-risk endometrial cancer. Compared with diagnostic CT alone, addition of PET to diagnostic CT significantly increased sensitivity in both the abdomen and pelvis while maintaining high specificity. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Radiopharmaceuticals , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity
9.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 20(5.5): 549-550, 2022 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35660572
10.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 15(1): 92-120, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28040721

ABSTRACT

Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecologic malignancy. Ninety percent of vulvar cancers are predominantly squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), which can arise through human papilloma virus (HPV)-dependent and HPV-independent pathways. The NCCN Vulvar Cancer panel is an interdisciplinary group of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions consisting of specialists in gynecological oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and pathology. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Vulvar Cancer provide an evidence- and consensus-based approach for the management of patients with vulvar SCC. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for diagnosis, staging, treatment, and follow-up.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/therapy , Vulvar Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vulvar Neoplasms/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy , Female , Humans , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Vulvar Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vulvar Neoplasms/pathology
11.
Gynecol Oncol ; 142(3): 413-9, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27178725

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess if FDG PET combined with diagnostic CT improves diagnostic CT accuracy to detect lymph node (LN) metastasis in advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: A prospective HIPAA compliant ACRIN/GOG multicenter trial was conducted. Patients underwent concurrent diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT (DCT) and PET and pelvic/abdominal lymphadenectomy. Seven independent blinded readers reviewed PET-DCT and DCT one-month apart. Reference standard was surgically removed LN pathology. Accuracy values were calculated at participant level, correlating abdominal (right and left para-aortic/common iliac) and pelvic (right and left external iliac/obturator) LN regions with pathology, respecting laterality. Reader average sensitivities/specificities of PET-DCT vs. DCT were compared with generalized linear mixed models, and AUCs with Obuchowski's method. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients had PET-DCT and pathology. Forty-three of 153 patients had metastasis to abdominal LNs. Sample size calculation required review of the first 40 abdominal positive and 40 randomly selected abdominal negative studies. Patients were 24 to 74years (48.9±10.6) old. Mean sensitivities of PET-DCT/DCT for detection of LN metastasis in abdomen were 0.50 (CI: 0.44, 0.56) and 0.42 (CI: 0.36, 0.48) (p=0.052) and in pelvis 0.83 (CI: 0.78, 0.87) and 0.79 (CI: 0.73, 0.83) (p=0.15). Corresponding specificities were 0.85 (CI: 0.80, 0.89) and 0.89 (CI: 0.84, 0.92) (p=0.21) and 0.63 (CI: 0.54, 0.70) and 0.62 (CI: 0.53, 0.69) (p=0.83). Mean AUC values were 0.70 (CI: 0.61, 0.79) and 0.68 (CI: 0.59, 0.77) (p=0.43) and 0.80 (CI: 0.71, 0.88) and 0.76 (CI: 0.67, 0.85) (p=0.21) respectively. CONCLUSION: Addition of PET to DCT resulted in statistically borderline increase in sensitivity to detect LN metastasis in abdomen in advanced cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Prospective Studies , Retroperitoneal Space/diagnostic imaging , Retroperitoneal Space/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Young Adult
12.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 14(5 Suppl): 656-8, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27226506

ABSTRACT

For the first time, NCCN Guidelines are available for vulvar cancer, a rare gynecologic cancer. Early-stage cancers can be managed by surgery and observation, and many of these patients can be cured. Lymph node status drives treatment and correlates with survival. Positive groinal nodes require additional therapy, including radiation plus chemotherapy, depending on stage. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended in selected patients.


Subject(s)
Vulvar Neoplasms/surgery , Vulvar Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Vulvar Neoplasms/pathology
13.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 14(8): 961-9, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27496112

ABSTRACT

More than 14 million new cancer cases and 8.2 million cancer deaths are estimated to occur worldwide on an annual basis. Of these, 57% of new cancer cases and 65% of cancer deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Disparities in available resources for health care are enormous and staggering. The WHO estimates that the United States and Canada have 10% of the global burden of disease, 37% of the world's health workers, and more than 50% of the world's financial resources for health; by contrast, the African region has 24% of the global burden of disease, 3% of health workers, and less than 1% of the world's financial resources for health. This disparity is even more extreme with cancer. NCCN has developed a framework for stratifying the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) to help health care systems in providing optimal care for patients with cancer with varying available resources. This framework is modified from a method developed by the Breast Health Global Initiative. The NCCN Framework for Resource Stratification (NCCN Framework) identifies 4 resource environments: basic resources, core resources, enhanced resources, and NCCN Guidelines, and presents the recommendations in a graphic format that always maintains the context of the NCCN Guidelines. This article describes the rationale for resource-stratified guidelines and the methodology for developing the NCCN Framework, using a portion of the NCCN Cervical Cancer Guideline as an example.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Global Health/standards , Health Resources , Medical Oncology/standards , Quality of Health Care , Female , Humans , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy
14.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 13(4): 395-404; quiz 404, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25870376

ABSTRACT

The NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide interdisciplinary recommendations for treating cervical cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the NCCN Cervical Cancer Panel's discussion and major guideline updates from 2014 and 2015. The recommended systemic therapy options for recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer were amended upon panel review of new survival data and the FDA's approval of bevacizumab for treating late-stage cervical cancer. This article outlines relevant data and provides insight into panel decisions regarding various combination regimens. Additionally, a new section was added to provide additional guidance on key principles of evaluation and surgical staging in cervical cancer. This article highlights 2 areas of active investigation and debate from this new section: sentinel lymph node mapping and fertility-sparing treatment approaches.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/drug therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Fertility Preservation , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery
15.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 13(11): 1321-31, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26553763

ABSTRACT

The NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide interdisciplinary recommendations for treating endometrial carcinoma and uterine sarcomas. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the NCCN Uterine Neoplasms Panel's 2016 discussions and major guideline updates for treating uterine sarcomas. During this most recent update, the panel updated the mesenchymal tumor classification to correspond with recent updates to the WHO tumor classification system. Additionally, the panel revised its systemic therapy recommendations to reflect new data and collective clinical experience. These NCCN Guidelines Insights elaborate on the rationale behind these recent changes.


Subject(s)
Sarcoma/diagnosis , Sarcoma/therapy , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Sarcoma/etiology , Sarcoma/mortality , Uterine Neoplasms/etiology , Uterine Neoplasms/mortality
16.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 17(3): 193, 2019 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30865924
17.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 12(2): 248-80, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24586086

ABSTRACT

Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium (also known as endometrial cancer or more broadly as uterine cancer or carcinoma of the uterine corpus) is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in the United States. An estimated 49,560 new uterine cancer cases will occur in 2013, with 8190 deaths resulting from the disease. Uterine sarcomas (stromal/mesenchymal tumors) are uncommon malignancies, accounting for approximately 3% of all uterine cancers. The NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms describe malignant epithelial carcinomas and uterine sarcomas; each of these major categories contains specific histologic groups that require different management. This excerpt of these guidelines focuses on early-stage disease.


Subject(s)
Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans
18.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 11(3): 320-43, 2013 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23486458

ABSTRACT

These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Cervical Cancer focus on early-stage disease, because it occurs more frequently in the United States. After careful clinical evaluation and staging, the primary treatment of early-stage cervical cancer is either surgery or radiotherapy. These guidelines include fertility-sparing and non-fertility-sparing treatment for those with early-stage disease, which is disease confined to the uterus. A new fertility-sparing algorithm was added for select patients with stage IA and IB1 disease..


Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Management , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
19.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 29(4): 256-60, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23839633

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinomas are rare, aggressive orbital tumors that share histopathologic similarities with salivary gland malignancies. Neutron radiotherapy may be useful for treatment due to its high biological effectiveness for salivary malignancies. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the outcomes for 11 lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma patients treated with neutrons from 1988 to 2011. Most had undergone surgery prior to radiation therapy. However, gross residual disease was present in 8 patients. The most common American Joint Committee on Cancer stage was T4cN0M0. Four patients with skull base involvement received a radiosurgery boost and 1 received a proton therapy boost. RESULTS: Median follow up was 6.2 years. Median overall survival was 11.1 years and median disease-free survival was 6.3 years. Five-year local control was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method as 80%. Three patients had a local recurrence; 4 developed distant metastases. Six patients died. Seven patients had intact vision in the affected eye before neutron radiation. Two required enucleation for a painful dry eye. Of the 5 who avoided an enucleation, 3 had either severe visual impairment (20/400) or only light perception and 2 were without known vision compromise or complications at the time of their death. One patient developed asymptomatic frontal lobe radionecrosis after 2 courses of radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Neutron radiation therapy achieved excellent 5-year local control in this series of high-risk patients, with most cases having gross residual disease. Late recurrences and distant metastases remain a challenge. Meaningful ipsilateral vision preservation was not possible in most cases in the long term, although only 2 patients required an enucleation for treatment effects.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/radiotherapy , Eye Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases/radiotherapy , Neutrons/therapeutic use , Adult , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/mortality , Eye Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
20.
Pancreas ; 52(5): e282-e287, 2023 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37782886

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is the third most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Most patients who undergo resection develop recurrence. Standard treatment confers a median overall survival (OS) of 24 months. Exposure to alternate regimens may prevent chemoresistance. This study evaluated multiagent perioperative therapy for potentially resectable PDA patients to improve OS. METHODS: A single center, phase 2, trial of patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDA. Patients received neoadjuvant therapy with induction chemotherapy (gemcitabine, docetaxel, capecitabine) for 3 cycles, chemoradiation (intensity-modulated radiation therapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin) followed by surgery, and 2 months of adjuvant gemcitabine and oxaliplatin and 2 months of gemcitabine. The primary endpoint was OS. The secondary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Thirty-two eligible patients were enrolled. Twenty-two patients underwent surgical resection. After a median follow-up of 56.8 months, mOS was 31.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.2-58.1) for all patients, 58.1 months (95% CI, 31.6 to NR) for those who completed surgery. The mRFS was 31.3 months (95% CI, 12.5 to NR). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative therapy with GTX, chemoradiotherapy, and adjuvant GemOx/Gem resulted in promising survival of 58 months for patients who underwent resection and may represent another treatment option for PDA.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Capecitabine , Oxaliplatin , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Fluorouracil , Pancreatic Neoplasms
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL