ABSTRACT
Prestin (SLC26A5)-mediated voltage-driven elongations and contractions of sensory outer hair cells within the organ of Corti are essential for mammalian cochlear amplification. However, whether this electromotile activity directly contributes on a cycle-by-cycle basis is currently controversial. By restoring motor kinetics in a mouse model expressing a slowed prestin missense variant, this study provides experimental evidence acknowledging the importance of fast motor action to mammalian cochlear amplification. Our results also demonstrate that the point mutation in prestin disrupting anion transport in other proteins of the SLC26 family does not alter cochlear function, suggesting that the potential weak anion transport of prestin is not essential in the mammalian cochlea.
Subject(s)
Anion Transport Proteins , Proteins , Mice , Animals , Anion Transport Proteins/genetics , Anion Transport Proteins/metabolism , Proteins/metabolism , Sulfate Transporters/genetics , Sulfate Transporters/metabolism , Mammals/metabolism , Anions/metabolism , Hair Cells, Auditory, Outer/metabolism , Molecular Motor Proteins/genetics , Molecular Motor Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, the prognosis remains poor and more intensive neoadjuvant treatment might be needed to improve patient outcomes. We therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant doublet chemotherapy, triplet chemotherapy, and doublet chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally advanced OSCC. METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients aged 20-75 years with previously untreated locally advanced OSCC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were recruited from 44 centres across Japan. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) centrally via a web-based system to receive neoadjuvant doublet chemotherapy (two courses of fluorouracil [800 mg/m2 per day intravenously on days 1-5] and cisplatin [80 mg/m2 per day on day 1] separated by an interval of 3 weeks [NeoCF]), triplet chemotherapy (three courses of fluorouracil [750 mg/m2 per day on days 1-5], cisplatin [70 mg/m2 per day on day 1], and docetaxel [70 mg/m2 per day on day 1] repeated every 3 weeks [NeoCF+D]), or doublet chemotherapy (two courses of fluorouracil [1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1-4] and cisplatin [75 mg/m2 per day on day 1] separated by an interval of 4 weeks) plus 41·4 Gy radiotherapy [NeoCF+RT]) followed by oesophagectomy with regional lymph node dissection. Randomisation was stratified by T stage and institution. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. Analysis of safety included all patients who received at least one course of chemotherapy, and analysis of surgical complications included those who also underwent surgery. This study is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031180202, and the trial is complete. FINDINGS: A total of 601 patients (529 male individuals and 72 female individuals) were randomly assigned between Dec 5, 2012, and July 20, 2018, with 199 patients in the NeoCF group, 202 patients in the NeoCF+D group, and 200 patients in the NeoCF+RT group. Compared with the NeoCF group, during a median follow-up period of 50·7 months (IQR 23·8-70·7), the 3-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the NeoCF+D group (72·1% [95% CI 65·4-77·8] vs 62·6% [55·5-68·9]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·68, 95% CI 0·50-0·92; p=0·006) but not in the NeoCF+RT group (68·3% [61·3-74·3]; HR 0·84, 0·63-1·12; p=0·12). Grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia occurred in two (1%) of 193 patients in the NeoCF group, 32 (16%) of 196 patients in the NeoCF+D group, and nine (5%) of 191 patients in the NeoCF+RT group. Treatment-related adverse events leading to termination of neoadjuvant therapy were more common in the NeoCF+D group (18 [9%] of 202 participants) than in the NeoCF+RT group (12 [6%] of 200) and NeoCF group (eight [4%] of 199). There were three (2%) treatment-related deaths during neoadjuvant therapy in the NeoCF group, four (2%) deaths in the NeoCF+D group, and two (1%) deaths in the NeoCF+RT group. Grade 2 or higher postoperative pneumonia, anastomotic leak, and recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis were reported in 19 (10%), 19 (10%), and 28 (15%) of 185 patients, respectively, in the NeoCF group; 18 (10%), 16 (9%), and 19 (10%) of 183 patients, respectively, in the NeoCF+D group; and 23 (13%), 23 (13%), and 17 (10%) of 178 patients, respectively, in the NeoCF+RT group. The in-hospital deaths following surgery included three deaths in the NeoCF group, two deaths in the NeoCF+D group, and one in the NeoCF+RT group. INTERPRETATION: Neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy followed by oesophagectomy resulted in a statistically significant overall survival benefit compared with doublet chemotherapy and might be the new standard of care for locally advanced OSCC who are in good condition in Japan. Neoadjuvant doublet chemotherapy plus radiotherapy did not show significant improvement of survival compared with doublet chemotherapy. FUNDING: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development and National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Cisplatin , Docetaxel , Esophageal Neoplasms , Fluorouracil , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Female , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Aged , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Adult , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , EsophagectomyABSTRACT
Despite continuing advances in the development of effective new therapies, including immunotherapies, the prognosis of pancreatic cancer remains extremely poor. Gap junction proteins have become attractive targets for potential cancer therapy. However, the role of gap junction beta-4 (GJB4) protein remains unexplored in pancreatic cancer. Through bioinformatic analyses we discovered pancreatic cancer tissues showed higher levels of GJB4 transcripts compared to normal pancreatic tissues and this had a negative effect on overall survival in patients that had pancreatic cancer. The high expression of nuclear GJB4 was identified as a negative prognostic factor in such patients. Knockdown of GJB4 in cultured pancreatic cancer cells resulted in G0/G1 arrest followed by decreased cell proliferation and suppression of metastatic potential. The overexpression of GJB4 accelerated cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in a SUIT-2 cell line, whereas MET inhibitor canceled the acceleration. GJB4 suppression with siRNA significantly inhibited tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model. Mechanistically, suppression of GJB4 inhibited MET-AKT activities. Such data suggest that targeting the GJB4-MET axis could represent a promising new therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer.
Subject(s)
Cell Proliferation , Connexins , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Mice , Cell Cycle , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement , Connexins/metabolism , Connexins/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Mice, Nude , Neoplasm Metastasis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prognosis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met/genetics , Signal Transduction , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
Advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers (GC/GEJCs) harbor diverse molecular signatures, highlighting the need for intricate evaluations to identify potential therapeutic targets. Although whole-transcriptome sequencing (WTS) has emerged as a useful tool for understanding these molecular intricacies, its clinical implications have yet to be fully elucidated. This study evaluated the correlation between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and WTS, compared their clinical significance, and identified potential therapeutic targets undetectable through IHC alone. We enrolled 140 patients with advanced GC/GEJC and assessed them using IHC for six pivotal biomarkers: claudin-18 (CLDN18), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Concurrently, WTS was employed as part of the analyses in MONSTAR-SCREEN-2, a multicenter multiomics study. IHC analysis revealed 16.4% HER2, 39.3% CLDN18 (2+/3 + ≥75%), and 15.8% PD-L1 (combined positive score ≥ 10) positivity, among other molecular markers. Significant correlations were observed between IHC and WTS for all six pivotal biomarkers. Among nineteen HER2 IHC-positive patients treated with anti-HER2 therapeutics, ERBB2 status in WTS was significantly associated with progression-free survival (ERBB2-high vs. -low: median 9.0 vs. 5.6 months, log-rank p = 0.046). IHC-based molecular profiling revealed significantly high expression of CLDN18 in RTK-negative patients, with 78.4% positive for either CLDN18 or PD-L1. Additionally, WTS revealed elevated expression of pivotal biomarkers in patients displaying negative targetable biomarkers via IHC. Our findings highlighted the significant correlation between IHC and WTS, reinforcing the clinical utility of WTS. A subset with IHC-negative but WTS-positive status may benefit from specific biomarker-targeted therapies.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagogastric Junction , Immunohistochemistry , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Male , Female , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Middle Aged , Aged , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/metabolism , B7-H1 Antigen/genetics , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Claudins/genetics , Claudins/metabolism , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Transcriptome , Gene Expression Profiling/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the KEYNOTE-590 study, first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy provided statistically significant improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate compared with chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Prespecified health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes are reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Change from baseline to week 18 in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status/QoL (GHS/QoL) and QLQ-Esophageal cancer module (OES18) dysphagia, pain, and reflux scales were evaluated. RESULTS: The HRQoL analysis included 730 patients who received treatment and completed ≥1 HRQoL assessment. Least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 18 was similar between treatment groups for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and physical functioning and QLQ-OES18 reflux scales. The QLQ-OES18 dysphagia (LSM difference, -5.54; 95% CI, -10.93 to -0.16) and pain (LSM difference, -2.94; 95% CI, -5.86 to -0.02) scales favored pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy over placebo plus chemotherapy. Median time to confirmed deterioration (TTD) was similar between treatment groups for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and physical functioning and QLQ-OES18 dysphagia and reflux scales. Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy prolonged median TTD, as seen on the QLQ-OES18 pain scale (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.95). CONCLUSION: The use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy maintained HRQoL at week 18 relative to baseline and was comparable with placebo plus chemotherapy. These HRQoL results together with published reports of efficacy, support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID: NCT03189719.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas, namely, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, Barrett True-K for keratoconus, Kane formula, and Kane formula for keratoconus, for cataract with keratoconus in Japanese eyes. SETTING: Five surgical sites in Japan. DESIGN: A retrospective case series. METHODS: Eyes with keratoconus undergoing cataract surgery were included. Postoperative refraction was compared with the prediction by the formulas. Visual acuity, manifest spherical equivalent, prediction error (PE), and mean absolute errors (MAEs) were determined 1 month postoperatively. The PE within 0.50 diopter (D), 1.00 D, and 2.00 D were compared between IOL formulas. Subgroup analysis based on the steepest keratometry (stage 1, ≤ 48 D; stage 2, > 48 D and ≤ 53 D; and stage 3, > 53 D) was performed. The relationship between PE and preoperative biometric data were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty eyes were included. The MAE of the Barrett True-K for keratoconus, Kane keratoconus, and Kane formulas were significantly lower than that of Haigis. A statistically significant difference in the prediction accuracy within ± 0.50 D was found between Kane keratoconus and Haigis. The prediction accuracy of the Barrett True-K for keratoconus, SRK/T, and Kane within ± 1.00 D was statistically significant compared with that of Haigis. In stage 3, the Barrett True-K for keratoconus had a significantly lower MAE than SRK/T and Haigis. CONCLUSION: Keratoconus-specific formulas were more accurate than existing formulas in Japanese eyes. The Barrett True-K formula for keratoconus had higher prediction accuracy in severe keratoconus.
Subject(s)
Corneal Topography , Keratoconus , Lenses, Intraocular , Refraction, Ocular , Visual Acuity , Humans , Keratoconus/diagnosis , Keratoconus/physiopathology , Keratoconus/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Female , Japan/epidemiology , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Corneal Topography/methods , Adult , Biometry/methods , Optics and Photonics , Aged , Cornea/pathology , Cornea/surgery , Follow-Up StudiesABSTRACT
Pendrin and prestin are evolutionary-conserved membrane proteins that are essential for normal hearing. Dysfunction of these proteins results in hearing loss in humans, and numerous deafness-associated pendrin and prestin variants have been identified in patients. However, the pathogenic impacts of many of these variants are ambiguous. Here, we report results from our ongoing efforts to experimentally characterize pendrin and prestin variants using in vitro functional assays. With previously established fluorometric anion transport assays, we determined that many of the pendrin variants identified on transmembrane (TM) 10, which contains the essential anion binding site, and on the neighboring TM9 within the core domain resulted in impaired anion transport activity. We also determined the range of functional impairment in three deafness-associated prestin variants by measuring nonlinear capacitance (NLC), a proxy for motor function. Using the results from our functional analyses, we also evaluated the performance of AlphaMissense (AM), a computational tool for predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants. AM prediction scores correlated well with our experimental results; however, some variants were misclassified, underscoring the necessity of experimentally assessing the effects of variants. Together, our experimental efforts provide invaluable information regarding the pathogenicity of deafness-associated pendrin and prestin variants.
Subject(s)
Deafness , Mutation, Missense , Humans , Sulfate Transporters , Proteins/metabolism , Anions/metabolismABSTRACT
Tight junction (TJ) protein cingulin (CGN) and transcription factor forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) contribute to the development of various cancers. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have a potential therapeutic role for some cancers. HDAC inhibitors affect the expression of both CGN and FOXO1. However, the roles and regulatory mechanisms of CGN and FOXO1 are unknown in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and normal human lung epithelial (HLE) cells. In the present study, to investigate the effects of CGN and FOXO1 on the malignancy of NSCLC, we used A549 cells as human lung adenocarcinoma and primary human lung epithelial (HLE) cells as normal lung tissues and performed the knockdown of CGN and FOXO1 by siRNAs. Furthermore, to investigate the detailed mechanisms in the antitumor effects of HDAC inhibitors for NSCLC via CGN and FOXO1, A549 cells and HLE cells were treated with the HDAC inhibitors trichostatin A (TSA) and Quisinostat (JNJ-2648158). In A549 cells, the knockdown of CGN increased bicellular TJ protein claudin-2 (CLDN-2) via mitogen-activated protein kinase/adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (MAPK/AMPK) pathways and induced cell migration, while the knockdown of FOXO1 increased claudin-4 (CLDN-4), decreased CGN, and induced cell proliferation. The knockdown of CGN and FOXO1 induced cell metabolism in A549 cells. TSA and Quisinostat increased CGN and tricellular TJ protein angulin-1/lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR) in A549. In normal HLE cells, the knockdown of CGN and FOXO1 increased CLDN-4, while HDAC inhibitors increased CGN and CLDN-4. In conclusion, the knockdown of CGN via FOXO1 contributes to the malignancy of NSCLC. Both HDAC inhibitors, TSA and Quisinostat, may have potential for use in therapy for lung adenocarcinoma via changes in the expression of CGN and FOXO1.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Forkhead Box Protein O1 , Hydroxamic Acids , Lung Neoplasms , Tight Junction Proteins , Humans , A549 Cells , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Forkhead Box Protein O1/genetics , Forkhead Box Protein O1/metabolism , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/metabolism , Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Tight Junction Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has a poor prognosis, with limited second-line systemic therapy options, and represents an increasing disease burden in Japan. In the phase 3 RATIONALE-302 study, the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, tislelizumab, significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced/metastatic ESCC. Here, we report the Japanese patient subgroup results. METHODS: Patients with advanced/metastatic ESCC, with disease progression during/after first-line systemic therapy were randomized 1:1 to open-label tislelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks or investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel/docetaxel). Efficacy and safety were assessed in all randomized Japanese patients. RESULTS: The Japanese subgroup comprised 50 patients (n = 25 per arm). Tislelizumab improved OS versus chemotherapy (median: 9.8 vs. 7.6 months; HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.31, 1.12). Among patients with programmed death-ligand 1 score ≥ 10%, median OS was 12.5 months with tislelizumab (n = 10) versus 2.9 months with chemotherapy (n = 6) (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.09, 1.03). Tislelizumab improved progression-free survival versus chemotherapy (median: 3.6 vs. 1.7 months, respectively; HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.27, 0.95). Objective response rate was greater with tislelizumab (32.0%) versus chemotherapy (20.0%), and responses were more durable (median duration of response: 8.8 vs. 2.6 months, respectively). Fewer patients experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events with tislelizumab (24.0%) versus chemotherapy (47.8%). Tislelizumab demonstrated an improvement in health-related quality of life versus chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: As second-line therapy for advanced/metastatic ESCC, tislelizumab improved OS versus chemotherapy, with a favorable safety profile, in the Japanese patient subgroup, consistent with the overall population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03430843.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/drug therapy , Japan/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: First-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembrolizumab-chemotherapy) demonstrated improved efficacy and a manageable safety profile versus placebo plus chemotherapy (placebo-chemotherapy) in the subgroup analysis of Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer in KEYNOTE-590 at a median follow-up of 24.4 months. Longer-term data from the Japanese subgroup analysis of KEYNOTE-590 are reported. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for ≤ 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/day). Endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS; investigator-assessed per RECIST v1.1; dual primary) and safety (secondary). Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) were assessed post hoc. RESULTS: Overall, 141 patients were enrolled in Japan. As of July 9, 2021, median follow-up was 36.6 months (range, 29.8-45.7). Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy showed a trend toward favorable OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-1.03) and PFS (0.57; 0.39-0.83) versus placebo-chemotherapy. In the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group, patients with ETS ≥ 20% (55/74; 74.3%) versus < 20% (19/74; 25.7%) had favorable OS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI 0.12-0.42) and PFS (0.24; 0.13-0.43). Patients with DpR ≥ 60% (31/74; 41.9%) versus < 60% (43/74; 58.1%) had favorable OS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI 0.20-0.68) and PFS (0.24; 0.13-0.43). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55/74 patients (74.3%) with pembrolizumab-chemotherapy and 41/67 patients (61.2%) with placebo-chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: With longer-term follow-up of Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer, efficacy continued to favor pembrolizumab-chemotherapy compared with placebo-chemotherapy, with no new safety signals observed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Cisplatin , Esophageal Neoplasms , Fluorouracil , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Japan/epidemiology , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Double-Blind Method , Neoplasm Metastasis , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , East Asian PeopleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation during neoadjuvant therapy has the potential to improve clinical outcomes. However, information on its global dissemination status is limited. This Japanese nationwide survey investigated the implementation status of and barriers to prehabilitation during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer in hospitals. METHODS: This multicenter nationwide survey was conducted by post. The eligible facilities were 155 Japanese hospitals that had been certified within the last 10 years as authorized institutes for board-certified esophageal surgeons by the Japan Esophageal Society. We administered an original questionnaire to investigate the current status of prehabilitation during NAC. RESULTS: The response rate was 75% (117/155 facilities). Forty-six facilities (39%) provided prehabilitation during NAC. The most frequently selected reasons for not providing or providing insufficient prehabilitation were lack of human resources, issues with the reimbursement of medical fees, difficulty in providing continuous prehabilitation during repeated inpatient and outpatient care, the lack of established standard prehabilitation programs, challenges in providing multidisciplinary prehabilitation, and difficulty in managing physical symptoms. CONCLUSION: We observed that the implementation rate of prehabilitation during NAC was low. Critical reasons were not only the lack of medical resources but also the lack of evidence-based standard prehabilitation programs during NAC and the lack of evidence for how to continuously deliver prehabilitation during NAC to patients with physical symptoms.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The options for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma are scarce, and the outcomes remain poor. The anti-PD-1 antibody, tislelizumab, has shown antitumour activity in previously treated patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We report interim analysis results from the RATIONALE-306 study, which aimed to assess tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: This global, randomised, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was conducted at 162 medical centres across Asia, Europe, Oceania, and North America. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (regardless of PD-L1 expression), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and measurable or evaluable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1) were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using permuted block randomisation (block size of four) and stratified by investigator-chosen chemotherapy, region, and previous definitive therapy, to tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks on day 1, together with an investigator-chosen chemotherapy doublet, comprising a platinum agent (cisplatin 60-80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1) plus a fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil [750-800 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1-5] or capecitabine [1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14]) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Investigators, patients, and sponsor staff or designees were masked to treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all randomly assigned patients) and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03783442. FINDINGS: Between Dec 12, 2018, and Nov 24, 2020, 869 patients were screened, of whom 649 were randomly assigned to tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (n=326) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=323). Median age was 64·0 years (IQR 59·0-69·0), 563 (87%) of 649 participants were male, 86 (13%) were female, 486 (75%) were Asian, and 155 (24%) were White. 324 (99%) of 326 patients in the tislelizumab group and 321 (99%) of 323 in the placebo group received at least one dose of the study drug. As of data cutoff (Feb 28, 2022), median follow-up was 16·3 months (IQR 8·6-21·8) in the tislelizumab group and 9·8 months (IQR 5·8-19·0) in the placebo group, and 196 (60%) of 326 patients in the tislelizumab group versus 226 (70%) of 323 in the placebo group had died. Median overall survival in the tislelizumab group was 17·2 months (95% CI 15·8-20·1) and in the placebo group was 10·6 months (9·3-12·1; stratified hazard ratio 0·66 [95% CI 0·54-0·80]; one-sided p<0·0001). 313 (97%) of 324 patients in the tislelizumab group and 309 (96%) of 321 in the placebo group had treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (99 [31%] in the tislelizumab group vs 105 [33%] in the placebo group), decreased white blood cell count (35 [11%] vs 50 [16%]), and anaemia (47 [15%] vs 41 [13%]). Six deaths in the tislelizumab group (gastrointestinal and upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage [n=2], myocarditis [n=1], pulmonary tuberculosis [n=1], electrolyte imbalance [n=1], and respiratory failure [n=1]) and four deaths in the placebo group (pneumonia [n=1], septic shock [n=1], and unspecified death [n=2]) were determined to be treatment-related. INTERPRETATION: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma provided superior overall survival with a manageable safety profile versus placebo plus chemotherapy. Given that the interim analysis met its superiority boundary for the primary endpoint, as confirmed by the independent data monitoring committee, this Article represents the primary study analysis. FUNDING: BeiGene.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Paclitaxel , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Double-Blind MethodABSTRACT
This phase I study was designed to: (1) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor futibatinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors, and (2) examine the antitumor activity of the RD in patients with gastric cancer (GC) or other advanced solid tumors who have FGFR or FGF/FGFR abnormalities, respectively. In the dose-escalation phase, patients were assigned to 21-day cycles of oral futibatinib 8-160 mg three times a week (TIW) or 16 or 20 mg once daily (QD). In the expansion phase, patients received oral futibatinib 56, 80, or 120 mg TIW, or 16 or 20 mg QD. Eighty-three patients received futibatinib TIW (n = 40) or QD (n = 43). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed according to the final study protocol definition, and the MTD was not reached. The most common adverse events with both regimens were hyperphosphatemia (TIW, 82.5%; QD, 100.0%) and decreased appetite (TIW, 40.0%; QD, 58.1%). Hyperphosphatemia was asymptomatic, not leading to futibatinib discontinuation. The overall response rate (ORR) was 11.5% in patients with FGF/FGFR abnormalities. Notably, in GC patients harboring FGFR2 copy number (CN) ≥10, the ORR was 36.4% versus 0 in patients with CN <10. Therefore, futibatinib had a generally predictable and manageable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors. Antitumor activity was seen in patients with FGF/FGFR abnormalities, particularly those with GC and high FGFR2 CNs. Thus, futibatinib 20 mg QD was chosen as the RD for phase II studies.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , East Asian People , Hyperphosphatemia/chemically induced , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1 , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is now a common disease, but its pathogenesis remains unknown. Blood circulating proteins reflect host defenses against COVID-19. We investigated whether evaluation of longitudinal blood proteomics for COVID-19 and merging with clinical information would allow elucidation of its pathogenesis and develop a useful clinical phenotype. METHODS: To achieve the first goal (determining key proteins), we derived plasma proteins related to disease severity by using a first discovery cohort. We then assessed the association of the derived proteins with clinical outcome in a second discovery cohort. Finally, the candidates were validated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in a validation cohort to determine key proteins. For the second goal (understanding the associations of the clinical phenotypes with 28-day mortality and clinical outcome), we assessed the associations between clinical phenotypes derived by latent cluster analysis with the key proteins and 28-day mortality and clinical outcome. RESULTS: We identified four key proteins (WFDC2, GDF15, CHI3L1, and KRT19) involved in critical pathogenesis from the three different cohorts. These key proteins were related to the function of cell adhesion and not immune response. Considering the multicollinearity, three clinical phenotypes based on WFDC2, CHI3L1, and KRT19 were identified that were associated with mortality and clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: The use of these easily measured key proteins offered new insight into the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and could be useful in a potential clinical application.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Critical Illness , Prognosis , Phenotype , Blood Proteins , Chitinase-3-Like Protein 1ABSTRACT
Controlling axonal mitochondria is important for maintaining normal function of the neural network. Oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD), a model used for mimicking ischemia, eventually induces neuronal cell death similar to axonal degeneration. Axonal mitochondria are disrupted during OGD-induced neural degeneration; however, the mechanism underlying mitochondrial dysfunction has not been completely understood. We focused on the dynamics of mitochondria in axons exposed to OGD; we observed that the number of motile mitochondria significantly reduced in 1 h following OGD exposure. In our observation, the decreased length of stationary mitochondria was affected by the following factors: first, the halt of motile mitochondria; second, the fission of longer stationary mitochondria; and third, a transformation from tubular to spherical shape in OGD-exposed axons. Motile mitochondria reduction preceded stationary mitochondria fragmentation in OGD exposure; these conditions induced the decrease of stationary mitochondria in three different ways. Our results suggest that mitochondrial morphological changes precede the axonal degeneration while ischemia-induced neurodegeneration.
Subject(s)
Glucose , Oxygen , Rats , Animals , Oxygen/metabolism , Glucose/metabolism , Ganglia, Spinal/metabolism , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Axons/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Mitochondria/metabolismABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe a simple technique for the implantation of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) with increased stability during ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) removal. METHODS: The technique was performed on 20 eyes with 20 patients (mean age: 77.9 ± 9.21 years). The patients had cataract surgery with implantation of a single-piece, acrylic IOL (AcrySof Toric IOL, SN6A; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.). The intraoperative IOL rotation during OVD removal, rotational error of toric IOL axis at 30 min and 24 h after surgery, and mean preoperative and postoperative IOP were evaluated. Images were captured before and after removal of OVD from surgical video, and used to evaluate intraoperative IOL rotation. RESULTS: The mean amount of IOL rotation during OVD removal with the current technique was 0.88 ± 0.93°, which was less than the 10.25 ± 5.50° previously reported for the conventional technique. The rotational error of toric IOL axis at 30 min and 24 h were 3.90 ± 3.71 and 3.05 ± 3.22°, respectively. The mean preoperative IOP and postoperative IOP were 13.84 ± 2.39 and 14.15 ± 4.68 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With the current technique, the toric IOL is stable during OVD removal and repositioning of the IOL during surgery is less likely to be required.
Subject(s)
Astigmatism , Cataract , Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Visual Acuity , Phacoemulsification/methods , Astigmatism/surgery , Refraction, OcularABSTRACT
The efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) therapy, a previous candidate drug for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was denied in the global guideline. The risk of severe cardiac events associated with HCQ was inconsistent in previous reports. In the present case series, we show the tolerability of HCQ therapy in patients treated in our hospital, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of HCQ therapy for patients with COVID-19. A representative case was a 66-year-old woman who had become infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and was diagnosed as having COVID-19 pneumonia via polymerase chain reaction. She was refractory to treatment with levofloxacin, lopinavir, and ritonavir, while her condition improved after beginning HCQ therapy without severe side effects. We show the tolerability of HCQ therapy for 27 patients treated in our hospital. In total, 21 adverse events occurred in 20 (74%) patients, namely, diarrhea in 11 (41%) patients, and elevated levels of both aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase in 10 (37%) patients. All seven grade ≥ 4 adverse events were associated with the deterioration in COVID-19 status. No patients discontinued HCQ treatment because of HCQ-related adverse events. Two patients (7%) died of COVID-19 pneumonia. In conclusion, HCQ therapy that had been performed for COVID-19 was well-tolerated in our case series.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Aged , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Insufficient evidence exists regarding the efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis), a class of targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs), in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). Herein, we present a case of RA-ILD refractory to previous treatments that exhibited favorable response to upadacitinib. A 69-year-old man, former smoker, was diagnosed with RA-ILD based on persistent symmetric polyarthritis, elevated C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, reduced diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide/alveolar volume (DLCO 69.9%), and bilateral ground-glass attenuation with traction bronchiectasis, predominantly in the lower lung lobe. Initial treatment with oral prednisolone and methotrexate was started; however, the patient showed worsening dyspnea, chest high-resolution computed tomography abnormalities, and decreased pulmonary function. The dose of prednisolone was increased, and methotrexate was shifted to tacrolimus; however, tacrolimus was eventually discontinued because of renal dysfunction. Subsequent treatment changes included abatacept followed by intravenous cyclophosphamide, but ILD activity continued to worsen and met the criteria of progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Approximately 4.5 years after the RA diagnosis, dyspnea, radiological abnormalities, and DLCO improved following treatment switch to upadacitinib, one of JAKis. JAKi therapy may have potential as a treatment option for refractory RA-ILD.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Male , Humans , Aged , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/drug therapy , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , DyspneaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-based treatments are approved for several cancers. CheckMate 648, a global, phase 3 trial, showed that first-line nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) or nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NIVO + Chemo) significantly increased survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) without new safety signals versus chemotherapy alone (Chemo). METHODS: We evaluated the Japanese subpopulation of CheckMate 648 (n = 394/970), randomized to receive first-line NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, or Chemo. Efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in Japanese patients with tumor-cell programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% and in all randomized Japanese patients. RESULTS: In the Japanese population, 131, 126, and 137 patients were treated with NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo, and 66, 62, and 65 patients had tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, respectively. In patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (20.2 months; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.46 [0.30-0.71]) and NIVO + Chemo (17.3 months; 0.53 [0.35-0.82]) versus Chemo (9.0 months). In all randomized patients, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (17.6 months; 0.68 [0.51-0.92]) and NIVO + Chemo (15.5 months; 0.73 [0.54-0.99]) versus Chemo (11.0 months). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 37%, 49%, and 36% of all patients in the NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Survival benefits with acceptable tolerability observed for NIVO + IPI and NIVO + Chemo treatments strongly support their use as a new standard first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced ESCC. GOV ID: NCT03143153.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , B7-H1 Antigen , East Asian People , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/drug therapy , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Ipilimumab/adverse effects , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Nivolumab/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We herein investigated the association between early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer treated with 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (bDCF) using data from the JCOG0807, a phase I/II trial of bDCF as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic esophageal cancer. METHODS: ETS was defined as a percent decrease in the sum of the target lesions' longest diameter after 8 weeks, whereas DpR was defined as a percentage of the maximal tumor shrinkage during the treatment course. Multivariable analyses were conducted to identify significant prognostic variables in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS): one for ETS and covariates, and another for DpR and covariates. RESULTS: Among 53 patients, 35 patients with ETS ≥ 20% (66.0%) had longer PFS (7.5 vs. 3.4 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.26, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.14-0.49), OS (13.8 vs. 6.1 months, HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.11-0.39), and PPS (6.4 vs. 2.8 months, HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.72) than those with ETS < 20%. In addition, 37 patients with DpR ≥ 30% (69.8%) had longer PFS (7.5 vs. 2.9 months, HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.08-0.34), OS (13.8 vs. 6.0 months, HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.27), and PPS (6.8 vs. 2.8 months, HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.58) than those with DpR < 30%. Multivariable analyses revealed that each ETS and DpR was an independent factor of longer PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: ETS and DpR might be associated with clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer treated with bDCF.