Single- vs multiple-layer wound closure for flank incisions: results of a prospective, randomised, double-blinded multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of postoperative flank bulges between patients with multiple-layer closure and single superficial-layer closure after retroperitoneal surgery via open flank incision in the SIngle versus MUltiple-LAyer wound Closure for flank incision (SIMULAC) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a randomised controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded, multicentre trial. Between May 2015 and February 2017, 225 patients undergoing flank incisions were randomised 1:1 to a multiple-layer closure (SIMULAC-I) or a single superficial-layer closure (SIMULAC-II) group. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a flank bulge 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 177 patients (90 in SIMULAC-I, 87 in SIMULAC-II) were eligible for final assessment. The cumulative incidence of a flank bulge was significantly higher in the SIMULAC-II group (51.7%) compared to the SIMULAC-I group [34.4%; odds ratio (OR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-3.73; P = 0.02]. Rate of severe postoperative complications (4.4% SIMULAC-I vs 10.3% SIMULAC-II; P = 0.21) or hernia (6.7% SIMULAC-I vs 10.3% SIMULAC-II; P = 0.59) was similar between the groups. There was no difference in pain (visual analogue scale) and the requirement for pain medication at 6 months postoperatively. Quality of life assessed with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Questionnaire was higher in the SIMULAC-I group compared to the SIMULAC-II group at 6 months postoperatively, with a (median range) score of 80 (30-100) vs 75 (5-100) (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The overall risk of a flank bulge after flank incision is high. Multiple-layer closure after flank incision should be performed as a standard procedure.

Direct Observation versus Endoscopic Video Recording-Based Rating with the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Training of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

PURPOSE: The validated Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score is used for evaluating laparoscopic surgical performance. It consists of two subscores, a Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a Specific Technical Skills (STS) scale. The OSATS has accepted construct validity for direct observation ratings by experts to discriminate between trainees' levels of experience. Expert time is scarce. Endoscopic video recordings would facilitate assessment with the OSATS. We aimed to compare video OSATS with direct OSATS. METHODS: We included 79 participants with different levels of experience [58 medical students, 15 junior residents (novices), and 6 experts]. Performance of a cadaveric porcine laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was evaluated with OSATS by blinded expert raters by direct observation and then as an endoscopic video recording. Operative time was recorded. RESULTS: Direct OSATS rating and video OSATS rating correlated significantly (x03C1; = 0.33, p = 0.005). Significant construct validity was found for direct OSATS in distinguishing between students or novices and experts. Students and novices were not different in direct OSATS or video OSATS. Mean operative times varied for students (73.4 ± 9.0 min), novices (65.2 ± 22.3 min), and experts (46.8 ± 19.9 min). Internal consistency was high between the GRS and STS subscores for both direct and video OSATS with Cronbach's α of 0.76 and 0.86, respectively. Video OSATS and operative time in combination was a better predictor of direct OSATS than each single parameter. CONCLUSION: Direct OSATS rating was better than endoscopic video rating for differentiating between students or novices and experts for LC and should remain the standard approach for the discrimination of experience levels. However, in the absence of experts for direct rating, video OSATS supplemented with operative time should be used instead of single parameters for predicting direct OSATS scores.

Awareness and Use of ChatGPT and Large Language Models: A Prospective Cross-sectional Global Survey in Urology.

BACKGROUND: Since its release in November 2022, ChatGPT has captivated society and shown potential for various aspects of health care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential use of ChatGPT, a large language model (LLM), in urology by gathering opinions from urologists worldwide. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An open web-based survey was distributed via social media and e-mail chains to urologists between April 20, 2023 and May 5, 2023. Participants were asked to answer questions related to their knowledge and experience with artificial intelligence, as well as their opinions of potential use of ChatGPT/LLMs in research and clinical practice. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data are reported as the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables, and the frequency and percentage for categorical variables. Charts and tables are used as appropriate, with descriptions of the chart types and the measures used. The data are reported in accordance with the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 456 individuals completed the survey (64% completion rate). Nearly half (47.7%) reported that they use ChatGPT/LLMs in their academic practice, with fewer using the technology in clinical practice (19.8%). More than half (62.2%) believe there are potential ethical concerns when using ChatGPT for scientific or academic writing, and 53% reported that they have experienced limitations when using ChatGPT in academic practice. CONCLUSIONS: Urologists recognise the potential of ChatGPT/LLMs in research but have concerns regarding ethics and patient acceptance. There is a desire for regulations and guidelines to ensure appropriate use. In addition, measures should be taken to establish rules and guidelines to maximise safety and efficiency when using this novel technology. PATIENT SUMMARY: A survey asked 456 urologists from around the world about using an artificial intelligence tool called ChatGPT in their work. Almost half of them use ChatGPT for research, but not many use it for patients care. The resonders think ChatGPT could be helpful, but they worry about problems like ethics and want rules to make sure it's used safely.

Systemic inflammatory biomarkers as predictive and prognostic factors in men with metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer treated with docetaxel therapy: a comprehensive analysis in a German real-world cohort.

PURPOSE: Advances in therapy of metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer (mCRPC) resulted in more therapeutic options and led to a higher need of predictive/prognostic biomarkers. Systemic inflammatory biomarkers could provide the basis for personalized treatment selection. This study aimed to assess the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), the neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in men with mCRPC under docetaxel. METHODS: Patients with mCRPC and taxane chemotherapy at a tertiary care centre between 2010 and 2019 were screened retrospectively. The biomarkers mGPS, NLR, PLR and SII were assessed and analyzed for biochemical/radiologic response and survival. RESULTS: We included 118 patients. Of these, 73 (61.9%) had received docetaxel as first-line, 31 (26.2%) as second-line and 14 (11.9%) as third-line treatment. For biochemical response, mGPS (odds ratio (OR) 0.54, p = 0.04) and PLR (OR 0.63, p = 0.04) were independent predictors in multivariable analysis. SII was significant in first-line cohort only (OR 0.29, p = 0.02). No inflammatory marker was predictive for radiologic response. In multivariable analysis, mGPS and NLR (hazard ratio (HR) 1.71 and 1.12, both p < 0.01) showed significant association with OS in total cohort and mGPS in the first-line cohort (HR 2.23, p < 0.01). Haemoglobin (Hb) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) showed several significant associations regarding 1 year, 3 year, OS and biochemical/radiologic response. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment mGPS seems a promising prognostic biomarker. A combination of mGPS, NLR and further routine markers (e.g., Hb and AP) could yield optimized stratification for treatment selection. Further prospective and multicentric assessment is needed.

Changes in neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictive and prognostic biomarker in metastatic prostate cancer treated with taxane-based chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the predictive and prognostic value of changes in longitudinal neutrophile-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratios in men receiving taxane-based chemotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: Retrospective, unicentric cohort study of patients treated with either docetaxel for metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (mHSPC) or docetaxel or cabazitaxel for metastatic castration-refractory PC (mCRPC) at a tertiary referral hospital between 2010 and 2019. NLR ratios were calculated for each cycle. Next, slopes over the first three (NLR3) and over six cycles (NLR6) were calculated and analysed for biochemical/radiologic response and survival. RESULTS: A total of 36 mHSPC (docetaxel), 118 mCRPC (docetaxel) and 38 mCRPC (cabazitaxel) patients were included. NLR3 was significantly associated with 1-year-survival, radiographic and biochemical response in mCRPC (docetaxel) in uni- and multivariable analyses. In mCRPC (docetaxel), positive NLR3s were associated with favourable 1-year-survival. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated NLR3 as a prognostic marker in men receiving docetaxel for mCRPC. NLR3 might be a clinical tool to reflect the individual's response to taxane-based chemotherapy. Thereby, NLR3 could complement existing biomarkers and help to early identify treatment failure before complications arise. Further prospective and multicentric studies are needed to extend and confirm the presented results.

Interrupted versus Continuous Suturing for Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) is a crucial step during radical prostatectomy (RP). Generally, either a continuous (CS) or an interrupted suture (IS) is used. However, there is no clear evidence if one technique is superior to the other. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide a systematic overview and comparison between IS and CS for the VUA during RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The study was conducting according to the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic data base search (Pubmed, Embase, and Central) was performed. Outcomes included catheterization time, extravasation, anastomotic time, length of hospital stay, continence, and development of strictures. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 2021 studies were retrieved, of which nine studies (1475 patients) were included in analysis. Results showed a shorter catheterization time (2.06 d; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-3.57; p=0.007), anastomotic time (6.39min; 95% CI: 3.68-9.10; p<0.001), and a lower rate of extravasation (odds ratio [OR]: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.26-4.43; p<0.007) in favor of CS. There were no differences between groups concerning length of hospital stay (0.40 d; 95% CI: -1.41-2.20; p=0.670) or continence at 3 mo (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.83-1.44; p=0.540), 6 mo (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.67-1.61; p=0.870) or 12 mo (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.92-2.24; p=0.110), respectively. The incidence of urethral strictures was not different between the techniques (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.42-2.40; p=1.000). The quality of evidence according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool was rated as low. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed advantages of CS for catheterization time, anastomotic time, and rate of extravasation without compromising other parameters. Although CS seems to offer favorable results, its technical challenge in open RP and the generally low quality of data makes a clear recommendation impossible. PATIENT SUMMARY: Continuous and interrupted suturing are safe suture techniques for the vesicourethral anastomosis during radical prostatectomy. The choice of the suture technique should be based on surgeon's experience and technical approach. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42017076126.

Successful learning of surgical liver anatomy in a computer-based teaching module.

AIM: To analyze factors influencing the learning of surgical liver anatomy in a computer-based teaching module (TM). METHODS: Medical students in their third to fifth year of training (N [Formula: see text] 410) participated in three randomized trials, each with a different primary hypothesis, comparing two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) presentation modes in a TM for surgical liver anatomy. Computed tomography images were presented according to the study and allocation group. Students had to answer eleven questions on surgical liver anatomy and four evaluative questions. Scores and time taken to answer the questions were automatically recorded. Since the three studies used the same 15 questions in the TM, a pooled analysis was performed to compare learning factors across studies. RESULTS: 3D groups had higher scores (7.5 ± 1.7 vs. 5.6 ± 2.0; p < 0.001) and needed less time (503.5 ± 187.4 vs. 603.1 ± 246.7 s; p < 0.001) than 2D groups. Intensive training improved scores in 2D (p < 0.001). Men gave more correct answers than women, independent of presentation mode (7.2 ± 2.0 vs. 6.5 ± 2.1; p [Formula: see text] 0.003). An overall association was found between having fun and higher scores in 11 anatomical questions (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, 3D groups had more fun than 2D groups (84.7 vs. 65.1 %; p < 0.001). If given the option, more students in the 2D groups (58.9 %) would have preferred a 3D presentation than students in the 3D group (35.9 %) would have preferred 2D (p  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 3D was superior to 2D for learning of surgical liver anatomy. With training 2D showed similar results. Fun and gender were relevant factors for learning success.