In-Hospital Violence and Its Impact on Critical Care Practitioners.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a narrative review of hospital violence (HV) and its impact on critical care clinicians. DATA SOURCES: Detailed search strategy using PubMed and OVID Medline for English language articles describing HV, risk factors, precipitating events, consequences, and mitigation strategies. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that specifically addressed HV involving critical care medicine clinicians or their practice settings were selected. The time frame was limited to the last 15 years to enhance relevance to current practice. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant descriptions or studies were reviewed, and abstracted data were parsed by setting, clinician type, location, social media events, impact, outcomes, and responses (agency, facility, health system, individual). DATA SYNTHESIS: HV is globally prevalent, especially in complex care environments, and correlates with a variety of factors including ICU stay duration, conflict, and has recently expanded to out-of-hospital occurrences; online violence as well as stalking is increasingly prevalent. An overlap with violent extremism and terrorism that impacts healthcare facilities and clinicians is similarly relevant. A number of approaches can reduce HV occurrence including, most notably, conflict management training, communication initiatives, and visitor flow and access management practices. Rescue training for HV occurrences seems prudent. CONCLUSIONS: HV is a global problem that impacts clinicians and imperils patient care. Specific initiatives to reduce HV drivers include individual training and system-wide adaptations. Future methods to identify potential perpetrators may leverage machine learning/augmented intelligence approaches.

The Nurse-Implemented Chronotherapeutic Bundle in Critically Ill Children, RESTORE Resilience (R2): Pilot Testing in a Two-Phase Cohort Study, 2017-2021.

OBJECTIVES: Pilot test the nurse-led chronotherapeutic bundle in critically ill children, RESTORE Resilience (R2). DESIGN: A two-phase cohort study was carried out from 2017 to 2021. SETTING: Two similarly sized and organized PICUs in the United States. PATIENTS: Children 6 months to 17 years old who were mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure. INTERVENTIONS: R2 seven-item chronotherapeutic bundle, including: 1) replication of child's pre-hospital daily routine (i.e., sleep/wake, feeding, activity patterns); 2) cycled day-night light/sound modulation; 3) minimal effective sedation; 4) night fasting with bolus enteral daytime feedings; 5) early progressive mobility; 6) nursing care continuity; and 7) parent diaries. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Children underwent environmental (light, sound) and patient (actigraphy, activity log, salivary melatonin, electroencephalogram) monitoring. Parents completed the Child's Daily Routine and Sleep Survey (CDRSS) and Family-Centered Care Scale. The primary outcome was post-extubation daytime activity consolidation (Daytime Activity Ratio Estimate [DARE]). Twenty baseline-phase (2017-2019) and 36 intervention-phase (2019-2021) participants were enrolled. During the intervention phase, nurses used the CDRSS to construct children's PICU schedules. Overall compliance with nurse-implemented R2 elements 1-5 increased from 18% (interquartile range, 13-30%) at baseline to 63% (53-68%) during the intervention phase (p < 0.001). Intervention participants were exposed to their pre-hospitalization daily routine (p = 0.002), cycled day-night light/sound modulation (p < 0.001), and early progressive mobility on more PICU days (p = 0.02). Sedation target identification, enteral feeding schedules, and nursing care continuity did not differ between phases. Parent diaries were seldom used. DARE improved during the intervention phase and was higher pre-extubation (median 62% vs. 53%; p = 0.04) but not post-extubation (62% vs. 57%; p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: In the PICU, implementation of an individualized nurse-implemented chronotherapeutic bundle is feasible. Children who received the R2 bundle had increased pre-extubation daytime activity consolidation compared to children receiving usual care. Given variation in protocol adherence, further R2 testing should include interprofessional collaboration, pragmatic trial design, and implementation science strategies.

Delirium Screening in Critically Ill Children: Secondary Analysis of the Multicenter PICU Up! Pilot Trial Dataset, 2019-2020.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the patient-level factors associated with performing daily delirium screening in PICUs with established delirium screening practices. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of 2019-2020 prospective data from the baseline phase of the PICU Up! pilot stepped-wedge multicenter trial (NCT03860168). SETTING: Six PICUs in the United States. PATIENTS: One thousand sixty-four patients who were admitted to a PICU for 3 or more days. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 1064 patients, 74% (95% CI, 71-76%) underwent delirium screening at least once during their PICU stay. On 57% of the 8965 eligible patient days, screening was conducted. The overall prevalence of delirium was 46% across all screened days, and 64% of screened patients experienced delirium at some point during their PICU stay. Factors associated with greater adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of increased daily delirium screening included PICU stay longer than 15 days compared with 1-3 days (aOR 3.36 [95% CI, 2.62-4.30]), invasive mechanical ventilation as opposed to room air (aOR 1.67 [95% CI, 1.32-2.12]), dexmedetomidine infusions (aOR 1.23 [95% CI, 1.04-1.44]) and propofol infusions (aOR 1.55 [95% CI, 1.08-2.23]). Conversely, decreased aOR of daily delirium screening was associated with female gender (aOR 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63-0.96]), and the administration of continuous infusions of opioids (aOR 0.75 [95% CI, 0.63-0.90]) or ketamine (aOR 0.48 [95% CI, 0.29-0.79]). Neither patient age, the presence of family or physical restraints, or benzodiazepine infusions were associated with daily delirium screening rates. CONCLUSIONS: In the 2019-2020 PICU UP! cohort, across six PICUs, delirium screening occurred on only 57% of days, despite the presence of established practices. Female gender, patients in the early stages of their PICU stay, and patients not receiving mechanical ventilation were associated with lower odds of daily delirium screening. Our results highlight the need for structured quality improvement processes to both standardize and increase the frequency of delirium screening.

Preemptive airway management planning: A retrospective evaluation of the pediatric difficult airway consultation service.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The pediatric Difficult Airway Consultation Service (pDACS) was created in 2017 to identify patients with potentially difficult airways and create airway management plans prior to airway management. METHODS: Consults were either nurse-initiated, physician-initiated, or both nurse-and-physician-initiated and were examined for demographic and clinical factors. If a child had difficult airway risk factors, a consult note with airway management recommendations was completed. RESULTS: We included 419 consults from the 4-year study period for analysis. Sixty-one patients had chronic tracheostomies in place and thus, were analyzed separately. Of the remaining 358 consults, 50% (n = 179) were nurse-initiated, 30.2% (n = 108) physician-initiated, and 19.8% (n = 71) nurse-and-physician-initiated consults. Differences in observed frequency of airway edema (difference, 6.3%; 95%CI 0.1%-12.5%; p = .04), cleft lip/palate (difference, 8.1%; 95%CI 0.07%-16.3%, p = .04), craniofacial abnormalities (difference, 12.3%; 95%CI 1.9%-22.7%, p = .02), and trauma/burn (difference, 6.5%; 95%CI 0.09%-12.8%, p = .04) were calculated. Observed frequencies were higher in physician-initiated compared to nurse-initiated consults. Airway edema was also more prevalent in dual nurse-and-physician-initiated consults (difference, 8.7%; 95%CI 1.6%-15.8%; p = .01). Physician-initiated consults were associated with a greater proportion of high-risk difficult airways than nurse-initiated consults (difference, 26.7%; 95%CI 14.0%-39.4%, p < .001). Approximately 41.9% of patients at high-risk for having a difficult airway were identified by nurse-screening only. Using bag-valve-mask was often the primary ventilation recommendation (89.3%, n = 108) and supraglottic airway placement was the most common tertiary plan (74.2%, n = 83). Direct laryngoscopy (47.1%, n = 65) and videolaryngoscopy (40.6%, n = 56) were the most recommended modes of intubation. Three patients with airway emergencies had previously documented airway management plans and were successfully intubated without complications following the primary intubation technique recommended in their consult note. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, nurse-screening identified patients at high-risk for a difficult airway that would likely not have been identified prior to initiation of a screening protocol. Furthermore, airway management plans outlined prior to an emergent difficult airway event may increase first-attempt success at securing the difficult airway, reducing morbidity and mortality.

Repositioning Guidelines to Decrease Pressure Injury in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to develop and implement repositioning guidelines that reduce pressure injury (PI) in hemodynamically unstable pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: All PICU patient ages 0 to 36 months who required sedation for invasive mechanical ventilation and had a Braden Q score ≤ 18 were eligible for inclusion. The project was implemented in 116 patients preimplementation and 100 postimplementation. Their median t age was 5 months (interquartile range 2-13 months). The QI project setting was an academic hospital PICU with a Level I trauma center located in the Mid-Atlantic Region of the United States. APPROACH: A pre-post observational design was used to compare the at-risk population for 21 weeks before (August-December 2018) and after (August-December 2019) implementing repositioning guidelines. Turn attempts were undertaken every 2 hours. Repositioning attempts were defined as (1) full (30°); (2) partial (15°); (3) unable to turn owing to hemodynamic instability; or (4) noncompliance. The primary outcome was incidence of Stage II or higher PI. OUTCOMES: We found a significant reduction in the incidence of PI before and after implementation of the repositioning intervention (16.4% vs 2.0%, P = .0003). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A structured intervention for repositioning hemodynamically unstable PICU patients has the potential to significantly lower PI incidence in a group of hemodynamically unstable children.

Pediatric Critical Care Illness Severity Toolkit: Stata Commands for Calculation of Pediatric Index of Mortality and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction Scores.

Introduction: Illness severity scoring tools, such as PRISM III/IV, PIM-3, and PELOD-2, are widely used in pediatric critical care research. However, their application is hindered by complex calculation processes, privacy concerns with third-party online calculators, and challenges in accurate implementation within statistical packages. Methods: We have developed a comprehensive, open-source toolkit for implementing the PIM-3, Simplified PIM-3, and PELOD-2 scores. The toolkit includes the pim3 and pelod2 commands and is compatible with Stata versions 12 and above. It features robust data validation, error messaging, a graphical interface, and support for SI and Imperial units. The toolkit's accuracy was validated through unit testing and synthetic data, comparing results with existing implementations. Results: In performance tests, the toolkit exhibited a median processing time of 21.82 seconds for PELOD-2, 14.06 seconds for PIM-3, and 9.74 seconds for Simplified PIM-3, when applied to datasets of 10,000,000 records. It consistently achieved 100% accuracy in both synthetic data tests and manual spot checks. Conclusion: The toolkit decreases processing time and improves accuracy in calculating pediatric critical care severity scores such as PELOD-2, PIM-3, and Simplified PIM-3. Its application in large datasets and validation highlights its utility as a tool for streamlining pediatric critical care research.

Gender and authorship of publications from Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI).

Introduction: Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) is a network fostering clinical research to optimize care for critically ill children. We aim to examine the efforts of the PALISI Network to increase gender parity in research, as evidenced by authorship. Methods: The first and senior authors of all published PALISI articles from 2002 to 2021 were analyzed for gender of presentation. Funding sources, impact factors, professional roles, and location were extracted. Results: We identified 303 articles, 61 published from 2002 to 2011, and 242 from 2012 to 2021. There were 302 first authors, representing 188 unique individuals, and 283 senior authors, representing 119 unique individuals. Over half (55.6%, n = 168) of the first authors were women. More women were first authors from 2012 to 2021 (n = 145, 60.2%) as compared to the years 2002-2011 [37.7%, n = 23, OR = 2.50 (95% CI: 1.40, 4.45, p = 0.002)]. Senior authors were 36.0% (n = 102) women, with no change over time. Women senior authors had a higher proportion of women first authors (67.7% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.017). No gender differences were noted based on article type or impact factor. The majority of authors came from institutions in the United States. Women had comparatively more NIH and CDC funding but received less funding from foundations and AHRQ. Discussion: In PALISI publications, first authorship by women has increased over time, such that it now exceeds both the proportion of women pediatric intensivists and women first authors in critical care publications. Senior authorship by women has been stagnant. A multifactorial approach by individuals, institutions, networks, and journals is needed to bring senior women authors to parity.