ABSTRACT
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) hold promise for disease risk assessment and prevention. The Genomic Medicine at Veterans Affairs (GenoVA) Study is addressing three main challenges to the clinical implementation of PRSs in preventive care: defining and determining their clinical utility, implementing them in time-constrained primary care settings, and countering their potential to exacerbate healthcare disparities. The study processes used to test patients, report their PRS results to them and their primary care providers (PCPs), and promote the use of those results in clinical decision-making are modeled on common practices in primary care. The following diseases were chosen for their prevalence and familiarity to PCPs: coronary artery disease; type 2 diabetes; atrial fibrillation; and breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers. A randomized clinical trial (RCT) design and primary outcome of time-to-new-diagnosis of a target disease bring methodological rigor to the question of the clinical utility of PRS implementation. The study's pragmatic RCT design enhances its relevance to how PRS might reasonably be implemented in primary care. Steps the study has taken to promote health equity include the thoughtful handling of genetic ancestry in PRS construction and reporting and enhanced recruitment strategies to address underrepresentation in research participation. To date, enhanced recruitment efforts have been both necessary and successful: participants of underrepresented race and ethnicity groups have been less likely to enroll in the study than expected but ultimately achieved proportional representation through targeted efforts. The GenoVA Study experience to date offers insights for evaluating the clinical utility of equitable PRS implementation in adult primary care.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Prostatic Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Male , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Primary Health Care , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Myoendothelial feedback (MEF), the endothelium-dependent vasodilation following sympathetic vasoconstriction (mediated by smooth muscle to endothelium gap junction communication), has been well studied in resistance arteries of males, but not females. We hypothesized that MEF responses would be similar between the sexes, but different in the relative contribution of the underlying nitric oxide and hyperpolarization mechanisms, given that these mechanisms differ between the sexes in agonist-induced endothelium-dependent dilation. We measured MEF responses (diameter changes) of male and female first- to second-order mouse mesenteric arteries to phenylephrine (10 µM) over 30 min using isolated pressure myography ± blinded inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) using Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME; 0.1-1.0 mM), hyperpolarization using 35 mM KCl, or transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) channels using GSK219 (0.1-1.0 µM) or RN-1734 (30 µM). MEF was similar [%dilation (means ± SE): males = 26.7 ± 2.0 and females = 26.1 ± 1.9 at 15 min] and significantly inhibited by l-NAME (1.0 mM) at 15 min [%dilation (means ± SE): males = 8.2 ± 3.3, P < 0.01; females = 6.8 ± 1.9, P < 0.001] and over time (P < 0.01) in both sexes. l-NAME (0.1 mM) + 35 mM KCl nearly eliminated MEF in both sexes (P < 0.001-0.0001). Activation of TRPV4 with GSK101 (0.1-10 µM) induced similar dilation between the sexes. Inhibition of TRPV4, which is reportedly involved in the hyperpolarization mechanism, did not inhibit MEF in either sex. Similar expression of eNOS was found between the sexes with Western blot. Thus, MEF is prominent and similar in murine first- and second-order mesenteric resistance arteries of both sexes, and reliant primarily on NOS and secondarily on hyperpolarization, but not TRPV4.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We found that female mesenteric resistance arteries have similar postconstriction dilatory responses (i.e., myoendothelial feedback) to a sympathetic neurotransmitter analog as male arteries. Both sexes use nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and hyperpolarization, but not TRPV4, in this response. Moreover, the key protein involved in this pathway (eNOS) is similarly expressed in these arteries between the sexes. These similarities are surprising given that agonist-induced endothelium-dependent dilatory mechanisms differ in these arteries between the sexes.