Long-term clinical impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after cryoballoon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) within the 90-day blanking period on long-term outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is controversial. This study aimed to assess the relationship between ERAT and late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (LRAT) post-CBA. METHODS: Utilizing data from a multicenter registry in Korea (May 2018 to June 2022), we analyzed the presence and timing of ERAT (<30, 30-60, and 60-90 days) and its association with LRAT risk after CBA. LRAT was defined as any recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting more than 30 s beyond the 90 days. RESULTS: Out of 2636 patients, 745 (28.2%) experienced ERAT post-CBA. Over an average follow-up period of 21.2 ± 10.3 months, LRAT was observed in 874 (33.1%) patients. Patients with ERAT had significantly lower 1-year LRAT freedom compared to those without ERAT (42.6% vs. 85.5%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified ERAT as a potential predictor of LRAT, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.47-4.57). Significant associations were noted across all examined time frames (HR, 3.84; 95% CI, 3.32-4.45 in <30 days, HR, 5.53; 95% CI, 4.13-7.42 in 30-60 days, and HR, 4.29; 95% CI, 3.12-5.89 in 60-90 days). This finding was consistently observed across all types of AF. CONCLUSION: ERAT during the 90-day blanking period strongly predicts LRAT in AF patients undergoing CBA, indicating a need to reconsider the clinical significance of this period.

Association between body mass index and results of cryoballoon ablation in Korean patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis from the Korean Heart Rhythm Society Cryoablation registry.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation using cryoablation is effective and safe in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although both obesity and underweight are associated with a higher risk for incident AF, there is limited data on the efficacy and safety following cryoablation according to body mass index (BMI) especially in Asians. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Korean Heart Rhythm Society Cryoablation registry, a multicentre registry of 12 tertiary hospitals, we analysed AF recurrence and procedure-related complications after cryoablation by BMI (kg/m2) groups (BMI < 18.5, underweight, UW; 18.5-23, normal, NW; 23-25, overweight, OW; 25-30, obese Ⅰ, OⅠ; ≥30, obese Ⅱ, OⅡ). A total of 2648 patients were included (median age 62.0 years; 76.7% men; 55.6% non-paroxysmal AF). Patients were categorized by BMI groups: 0.9% UW, 18.7% NW, 24.8% OW, 46.1% OI, and 9.4% OII. Underweight patients were the oldest and had least percentage of non-paroxysmal AF (33.3%). During a median follow-up of 1.7 years, atrial arrhythmia recurred in 874 (33.0%) patients (incidence rate, 18.9 per 100 person-years). After multivariable adjustment, the risk of AF recurrence was higher in UW group compared with NW group (adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval; 2.55, 1.18-5.50, P = 0.02). Procedure-related complications occurred in 123 (4.7%) patients, and the risk was higher for UW patients (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval; 2.90, 0.94-8.99, P = 0.07), mainly due to transient phrenic nerve palsy. CONCLUSION: Underweight patients showed a higher risk of AF recurrence after cryoablation compared with NW patients. Also, careful attention is needed on the occurrence of phrenic nerve palsy in UW patients.

Perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has increased significantly in recent years. Consequently, more patients with CIEDs will undergo surgery during their lifetime, and thus the involvement of anesthesiologists in the perioperative management of CIEDs is increasing. With ongoing advancements in technology, many types of CIEDs have been developed, including permanent pacemakers, leadless pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemakers/defibrillators, and implantable loop recorders. The functioning of CIEDs exposed to an electromagnetic field can be affected by electromagnetic interference, potential sources of which can be found in the operating room. Thus, to prevent potential adverse events caused by electromagnetic interference in the operating room, anesthesiologists must have knowledge of CIEDs and be able to identify each type. This review focuses on the perioperative management of patients with CIEDs, including indications for CIED implantation to determine the baseline cardiovascular status of patients; concerns associated with CIEDs before and during surgery; perioperative management of CIEDs, including magnet application and device reprogramming; and additional perioperative provisions for patients with CIEDs. As issues such as variations in programming capabilities and responses to magnet application according to device can be challenging, this review provides essential information for the safe perioperative management of patients with CIEDs.

Real-World Outcomes of a Rhythm Control Strategy for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (<50%).

Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of a rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 50%) in real-world practice remains uncertain. Our objective was to evaluate the real-world outcomes of a rhythm control strategy in patients with AF and reduced LVEF, focusing on changes in LV systolic function and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 80 patients with concurrent AF and reduced LVEF who underwent rhythm control therapy between March 2015 and December 2021. Results: The patients had an average age of 63.6 years and an initial LVEF of 34.3%. Sinus rhythm was restored using anti-arrhythmic drugs (38, 47.5%) or electrical cardioversion (42, 52.5%). Over a follow-up period of 53.0 months, AF recurred in 65% of patients, with 57.7% undergoing catheter ablation. Significant improvements were noted in LVEF (from 34.3% to 55.1%, p < 0.001) and BNP levels (from 752 pg/mL to 72 pg/mL, p < 0.001) at the last follow-up. Nearly all patients (97.5%) continued with the rhythm control strategy during the follow-up period. Conclusions: In real-world settings, a rhythm control strategy proves to be feasible and effective for improving LVEF and reducing BNP levels in AF patients with reduced LVEF.

Association of typical atrial flutter and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation on clinical recurrence after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Typical atrial flutter commonly occurs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Limited information exists regarding the effects of concurrent atrial flutter on the long-term outcomes of rhythm control. This study investigated the association between concurrent typical atrial flutter and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation and the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. The data were obtained from a multicenter registry of cryoballoon ablation for AF (n = 2,689). Patients who were screened for typical atrial flutter were included in the analysis (n = 1,907). All the patients with typical atrial flutter underwent CTI ablation. The primary endpoint was the late recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, including AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia. Among the 1,907 patients, typical atrial flutter was detected in 493 patients (25.9%). Patients with concurrent atrial flutter had a lower incidence of persistent AF and a smaller size of the left atrium. Patients with atrial flutter had a significantly lower recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmia (19.7% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.001). In patients with atrial flutter, the recurrence rate of atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter was more frequent (7.3% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.028), but the recurrence rate of AF was significantly lower (17.0% vs. 29.4%, p < 0.001). Atrial flutter has been identified as an independent predictor of the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.704; 95% confidence interval, 0.548-0.906; p = 0.006). Typical atrial flutter in patients with AF may serve as a positive marker of the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, and performing CTI ablation in this population is associated with a reduced likelihood of AF recurrence. Performing routine screening and ablation procedures for coexisting atrial flutter may improve the clinical outcomes of AF.