Timing of fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: Rationale and design of the OPTION-STEMI trial.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend complete revascularization (CR) in hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD). With regard to the timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-infarct-related artery (non-IRA), recent randomized clinical trials have revealed that immediate CR was non-inferior to staged CR. However, the optimal timing of CR remains uncertain. The OPTION-STEMI trial compared immediate CR and in-hospital staged CR guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) for intermediate stenosis of the non-IRA. METHODS: The OPTION-STEMI is a multicenter, investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. The study included patients with at least 1 non-IRA lesion with ≥50% stenosis by visual estimation. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomized into 2 groups at a 1:1 ratio: immediate CR (i.e., PCI for the non-IRA performed during primary angioplasty) or in-hospital staged CR. In the in-hospital staged CR group, PCI for non-IRA lesions was performed on another day during the index hospitalization. Non-IRA lesions with 50%-69% stenosis by visual estimation were evaluated by FFR, whereas those with ≥70% stenosis was revascularized without FFR. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and all unplanned revascularization at 1 year after randomization. Enrolment began in December 2019 and was completed in January 2024. The follow-up for the primary endpoint will be completed in January 2025, and primary results will be available in the middle of 2025. CONCLUSIONS: The OPTION-STEMI is a multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized trial that evaluated the timing of in-hospital CR with the aid of FFR in patients with STEMI and MVD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov. Unique identifier: NCT04626882; and URL: https://cris.nih.go.kr. Unique identifier: KCT0004457.

Validation of a new risk stratification system-based management for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: analysis of a multicentre prospective study.

PURPOSE: Distinguishing between complicated and uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is therapeutically essential. However, this distinction has limitations in reflecting the heterogeneity of SAB and encouraging targeted diagnostics. Recently, a new risk stratification system for SAB metastatic infection, involving stepwise approaches to diagnosis and treatment, has been suggested. We assessed its applicability in methicillin-resistant SAB (MRSAB) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data of a 3-year multicentre, prospective cohort of hospitalised patients with MRSAB. We classified the patients into three risk groups: low, indeterminate, and high, based on the new system and compared between-group management and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 380 patients with MRSAB, 6.3% were classified as low-, 7.6% as indeterminate-, and 86.1% as high-risk for metastatic infection. No metastatic infection occurred in the low-, 6.9% in the indeterminate-, and 19.6% in the high-risk groups (P < 0.001). After an in-depth diagnostic work-up, patients were finally diagnosed as 'without metastatic infection (6.3%)', 'with metastatic infection (17.4%)', and 'uncertain for metastatic infection (76.3%)'. 30-day mortality increased as the severity of diagnosis shifted from 'without metastatic infection' to 'uncertain for metastatic infection' and 'with metastatic infection' (P = 0.09). In multivariable analysis, independent factors associated with metastatic complications were suspicion of endocarditis in transthoracic echocardiography, clinical signs of metastatic infection, Pitt bacteraemia score ≥ 4, and persistent bacteraemia. CONCLUSIONS: The new risk stratification system shows promise in predicting metastatic complications and guiding work-up and management of MRSAB. However, reducing the number of cases labelled as 'high-risk' and 'uncertain for metastatic infection' remains an area for improvement.

Prognostic Impact of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Heavily Calcified Coronary Artery Disease Receiving Rotational Atherectomy.

Background: Periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) occurs more frequently in patients with heavily calcified lesion and undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA). However, there are limited studies addressing prognostic impact of PMI in patients requiring RA due to severe coronary artery calcification (CAC). Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of PMI in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using RA. Methods: A total of 540 patients (583 lesions) who received PCI using RA were enrolled between January 2010 and October 2019. PMI was defined as elevations of creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) > 10 times the upper limited normal. Patients were divided into a PMI group and a non-PMI group. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and cerebrovascular accident. Results: Although in-hospital events occurred more frequently in the PMI group than in the non-PMI group (15 [3.0%] vs. 6 [13.3%], p = 0.005), the incidence of MACCEs at 1 month, 1-12 months, or 12 months failed to show a significant difference between the two groups (1 month, 10 [2.0%] vs. 1 [2.2%], p > 0.999; 1-12 months, 39 [7.9%] vs. 7 [15.6%], p = 0.091; 12 months, 49 [9.9%] vs. 8 [17.8%], p = 0.123). Conclusions: This study shows that PMI after RA in patients with severe CAC was associated with more frequent in-hospital events and a nonsignificant trend for more events during 1 year follow-up.

Postural change, gait, and physical function in older adults.

In a more clinical setting, abrupt posture change may be used to determine the presence of orthostatic hypotension, a hemodynamic response with relationships to physical function. Certain gait features and physical function performance are also associated with risk of falling in older adults. However, the extent to which posture change is associated with subsequent gait and physical function has received little attention in the literature. This study aims to determine the effects of posture change on spatiotemporal parameters of gait and Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) performance. METHODS: Forty-two volunteers (age 73.21 ± 6.22 years) participated in the study. A custom Tekscan Strideway (Tekscan, Boston, MA.) gait system was used to measure gait velocity (VEL), cadence (CAD), stride length (SL), and percent of time spent in active propulsion (AP). Dependent t-tests were used to compare TUG time, VEL, CAD, SL and AP after at least 10 mins of seated rest and supine rest. RESULTS: Time to complete the TUG was significantly slower after supine rest compared to seated (11.47 ± 0.51 and 10.01 ± 0.33 s, respectively, p<0.001); VEL was significantly slower after supine rest compared to seated (0.888 ± 0.042 and 1.049 ± 0.033 m/s, respectively, p=0.003); CAD was significantly slower after supine rest compared to seated (111.21 ± 2.87 and 120.97 ± 2.56spm, respectively, p=0.001); and AP was significantly lower after supine rest compared to seated (56.87 ± 4.76 and 70.79 ± 4.05 %, respectively, p<0.001). No significant differences were detected in stride length between conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Among this sample of older adults, standing from a supine posture is associated with spatiotemporal gait parameters consistent with a risk for falling and aging. Additionally, TUG performance worsens significantly after supine rest. Future studies could explore the sensitivity and specificity of falls risk screening after supine rest.

Clinical Outcome after Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: XIENCE Asia Small Vessel Study.

There are limited data on outcomes after implantation of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in East Asian patients with small vessel coronary lesions. A total of 1,600 patients treated with XIENCE EES (Abbott Vascular, CA, USA) were divided into the small vessel group treated with one ≤2.5 mm stent (n=119) and the non-small vessel group treated with one ≥2.75 mm stent (n=933). The primary end point was a patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and any repeat revascularization at 12 months. The key secondary end point was a device-oriented composite outcome (DOCO), a composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel MI, and target lesion revascularization at 12 months. The small vessel group was more often female, hypertensive, less likely to present with ST-elevation MI, and more often treated for the left circumflex artery, whereas the non-small vessel group more often had type B2/C lesions, underwent intravascular ultrasound, and received unfractionated heparin. In the propensity matched cohort, the mean stent diameter was 2.5±0.0 mm and 3.1±0.4 mm in the small and non-small vessel groups, respectively. Propensity-adjusted POCO at 12 months was 6.0% in the small vessel group and 4.3% in the non-small vessel group (p=0.558). There was no significant difference in DOCO at 12 months (small vessel group: 4.3% and non-small vessel group: 1.7%, p=0.270). Outcomes of XIENCE EES for small vessel disease were comparable to those for non-small vessel disease at 12-month clinical follow-up in real-world Korean patients.