Postoperative Decrease in Bone Marrow Lesion Associated With Better Clinical Outcomes Following Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: To assess serial changes of preoperative bone marrow lesion (BML) following medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) up to 2 years and evaluate whether postoperative change of BML affected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 2 years' follow-up. Factors related to the postoperative changes in BML also were evaluated. METHODS: The current study retrospectively assessed prospectively collected data of consecutive patients between December 2016 and March 2018 who underwent MOWHTO for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis with varus malalignment (≥5°) and a minimum 2-year follow-up. Serial magnetic resonance imaging scans at preoperative and postoperative 3, 6, 18, and 24 months were performed, and the extent of BML was evaluated consecutively using 2 validated methods. Clinically, preoperative and postoperative PROMs and their achievement of minimal clinically important difference values were evaluated. The associations of the extent of BMLs with PROMs at each follow-up period over time were analyzed using a linear mixed model. Furthermore, factors related to the postoperative changes of BML were assessed. RESULTS: Of 26 patients, 21 (80.8%) had preoperative BML at medial femoral and tibial condyles. The postoperative decrease in BML was noted in 17 (81.0%) and 18 (85.7%) at medial femoral and tibial condyles. The BML decreased at postoperative 3 months and, thereafter, the extent of BML gradually reduced until postoperative 24 months. The proportion of patients achieved minimal clinically important difference was 84.6% for total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores and 80.8%, 76.9%, and 84.6% for KOOS symptom, pain, and activity of daily living subscales. Postoperative decrease in BML was significantly associated with better PROMs over postoperative 24 months. Furthermore, normo-correction (2°-5° valgus) was a significant factor for decreased BML following MOWHTO. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative BML gradually decreased with time following MOWHTO, and the postoperative decrease in BML related with better PROMs over postoperative 24 months. Moreover, postoperative valgus alignment was a significant factor relating the postoperative decrease of BML. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Moderate-Intensity Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Combination versus Quadruple-Dose Rosuvastatin Monotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.

PURPOSE: There are few studies in the literature on the dosage of statin that equivalently reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) compared to an ezetimibe combination and whether such regimens have differences in safety. We compared the lipid-modifying efficacy and safety of 5 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe to those of 20 mg rosuvastatin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Sciences, and SCOPUS databases up to December 2021. Human studies investigating the two aforementioned regimens with a randomized controlled design were selected. Outcome variables included the percentage reduction in LDL-C and other lipid parameters and rates of composite adverse events (AEs), including muscle-related symptoms. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed after heterogeneity testing between studies. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The percentage LDL-C reduction did not differ between the combination and monotherapy groups [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to 0.26; p=0.35]. The risk of composite AEs (odds ratio 0.50; 95% CI 0.15 to 1.72; p=0.27) of the combination was not different compared to the monotherapy group. The percentage of total cholesterol reduction was greater in the combination group (SMD 0.22; p=0.02), whereas that of triglyceride reduction and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol elevation did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that 5 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe had largely comparable lipid-modifying efficacy and tolerability as 20 mg rosuvastatin.

Statin therapy in individuals with intermediate cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND: As intermediate cardiovascular risk group accounts for a large part of the total population, determining appropriate cholesterol target in this population is critical. Herein, we investigated the optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level in individuals with intermediate cardiovascular risk after statin therapy. METHODS: This was a nationwide observational and validation cohort study (median duration of follow-up: 7.5 and 8.7 years, respectively), using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service and a tertiary hospital database. Among individuals who underwent regular health examinations, those with ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors except diabetes mellitus, LDL-C 100-189 mg/dL, and newly used statins were enrolled. Of the 358,694 screened people, 57,594 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 27,793 were finally analyzed. The study population was stratified according to post-treatment LDL-C levels as follows: <100, 100-119, 120-139, and ≥ 140 mg/dL. The primary outcome variable was composite cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke). From the patients screened of Severance Hospital cohort, 1859 meeting inclusion criteria were used for validation. RESULTS: The rates of composite events ranged from 7.74 to 9.10 (mean 8.38)/1000 person-years in the three lower LDL-C groups. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) ranged from 0.78 to 0.95 in the three groups with lower LDL-C, and a lower event risk was more evident in the groups that achieved LDL-C levels <120 mg/dL (p = 0.001-0.009). The total mortality risk did not differ between groups. In the validation cohort, the mean rate of composite events was 10.83/1000 person-years. aHRs ranged from 0.52 to 0.78 in the groups with lower LDL-C, and a lower risk was more obvious in patients who achieved LDL-C levels <100 mg/dL (p = 0.006-0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with intermediate cardiovascular risk who achieved LDL-C levels <120 mg/dL after statin therapy had lower event risk. This result provides clinically useful evidence on target LDL-C levels in this population.