ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In this pictorial essay, we discuss and illustrate normal and aberrant positioning of nonvascular support and monitoring devices frequently used in critically ill patients, including endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes, chest tubes, and nasogastric and nasoenteric tubes, as well as their inherent complications. CONCLUSION: The radiographic evaluation of the support and monitoring devices used in patients in the ICU is important because the potentially serious complications arising from their introduction and use are often not clinically apparent. Familiarity with normal and abnormal radiographic findings is critical for the detection of these complications.
Subject(s)
Chest Tubes , Intensive Care Units , Intubation , Radiography, Thoracic , Tracheostomy , Chest Tubes/adverse effects , Critical Illness , Humans , Intubation/adverse effects , Tracheostomy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In this pictorial essay, we discuss and illustrate normal and aberrant positioning of the cardiovascular support and monitoring devices frequently used in critically ill patients, including central venous catheters, pulmonary artery catheters, left atrial catheters, transvenous pacemakers, automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators, intraaortic counterpulsation balloon pump, and ventricular assist devices, as well as their inherent complications. CONCLUSION: The radiographic evaluation of the support and monitoring devices used in patients in the ICU is important, because the potentially serious complications arising from their introduction and use are often not clinically apparent. Familiarity with normal and abnormal radiographic findings is critical for the detection of these complications.
Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous , Catheterization, Swan-Ganz , Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart-Assist Devices , Intensive Care Units , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping , Pacemaker, Artificial , Radiography, Thoracic , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Swan-Ganz/adverse effects , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/adverse effects , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of using a lossy Joint Photographic Experts Group standard for wavelet image compression, JPEG2000, on pulmonary nodule detection at low-dose computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sets of lung CT data ("cases") were compressed to 30:1, 20:1, and 10:1 levels by using a wavelet-based JPEG2000 method, resulting in 400 test cases. Each case consisted of nine 1.25-mm sections that had been obtained with 20-40 mAs. Four thoracic radiologists independently interpreted the test case images. Performance was measured by using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Az) and conventional sensitivity and specificity analyses. RESULTS: There were 51 cases with and 49 without lung nodules. Az values were 0.984, 0.988, 0.972, 0.921, respectively, for original and 10:1, 20:1, and 30:1 compressed images. Az values decreased significantly at 30:1 (P =.014) but not at 10:1 compression, with a trend toward significant decrease at 20:1 (P =.051). Specificity values were unaffected by compression (>98.0% at all compression levels). Sensitivity values were 86.3% (176 of 204 test cases with nodules), 77.9% (159 of 204 cases), 76.5% (156 of 204 cases), and 70.1% (143 of 204 cases), respectively, for original and 10:1, 20:1, and 30:1 compressed images. Results of logistic regression model analysis confirmed the significant effects of compression rate and nodule attenuation, size, and location on sensitivity (P <.05). CONCLUSION: While no reduction in nodule detection at 10:1 compression levels was demonstrated by using ROC analysis, a significant decrease in sensitivity was identified. Further investigation is needed before widespread use of image compression technology in low-dose chest CT can be recommended.