Study of two approaches for the process water management from hydrothermal carbonization of swine manure: Anaerobic treatment and nutrient recovery.

Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a promising alternative to transform biomass waste into a solid carbonaceous material (hydrochar) and a process water with potential for material and energy recovery. In this study, two alternatives for process water treatment by conventional and acid-assisted HTC of swine manure are discussed. Process water from conventional HTC at 180 °C showed high biodegradability (55% COD removal) and methane production (∼290 mL STP CH4 g-1 CODadded) and the treatment in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor allowed obtaining a high methane production yield (1.3 L CH4 L-1 d-1) and COD removal (∼70%). The analysis of the microbiota showed a high concentration of Synergistota and Firmicutes phyla, with high degradation of organic nitrogen-containing organic compounds. Acid-assisted HTC proved to be a viable option for nutrient recovery (migration of 83% of the P to the process water), which allowed obtaining a solid salt by chemical precipitation with Mg(OH)2 (NPK of 4/4/0.4) and MgCl2 (NPK 8/17/0.5), with a negligible content of heavy metals. The characteristics of the precipitated solid complied with the requirements of European Regulation (2019)/1009 for fertilizers and amendments in agricultural soils, being a suitable alternative for the recycling of nutrients from wastes.

Hybrid (intravenous and oral) administration of vinorelbine plus cisplatinum followed by oral vinorelbine as first-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of alternate i.v./oral (hybrid) administration of vinorelbine (VNR) plus cisplatin (CDDP), followed by oral VNR, could result in a more suitable first-line regimen for patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in the outpatient setting. METHODS: The induction treatment consisted of CDDP 80 mg/m(2) i.v. and VNR 25 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1 and VNR 60 mg/m(2) oral day 8, every 3 weeks for 4 courses. A dose escalation of VNR to 80 mg/m(2) oral from day 8 of the second course and to 30 mg/m(2) i.v. from day 1 of the third course was planned in the absence of G3-4 toxicity. Pts with disease control after 4 courses underwent consolidation treatment with oral VNR 80 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks up to intolerance or progression. RESULTS: Fifty-three pts entered the study: 80% males; median age 63 years (range 43-71); median ECOG PS 0 (range 0-1); histotype: adenocarcinoma 59%, epidermoid 31%, undifferentiated 10%; disease stage: IIIB 22%, IV 70%, recurrent disease 8%. The objective response was as follows: 1 (2%) CR, 20 (38%) PR, 16 (30%) SD, 11 (21%) PD and 5 (9%) pts were not assessable. Median TTP and OS were 6 and 10 months, respectively. G3-4 neutropenia was observed in 23 and 24% of pts in the induction and in the consolidation phases, respectively, with febrile neutropenia in 6 pts (11%) and 2 (8%), respectively. G3-4 non-haematological toxicity was rare, being represented by nausea-vomiting and neurotoxicity in 3 pts (6%) in the induction phase. CONCLUSIONS: This combination regimen including hybrid administration of VNR plus CDDP is feasible, tolerable and effective as a first-line treatment in pts with aNSCLC.

The impact of the introduction of irinotecan and oxaliplatin on the outcome of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

The effectiveness of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer therapy has been shown by many randomized clinical trials. We developed a retrospective study on patients treated in the clinical practice. The main inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of unresectable colorectal adenocarcinoma and having undergone chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors of survival. The study included 286 consecutive patients. Three factors were associated with worse survival: high CA19-9 levels (p=0.003), schedules without new regimens (p=0.031) and weight loss (p=0.070). The use of new regimens was associated with a significant improvement in median survival (15 to 10 months, p<0.001). Although the new regimens improved survival in clinical practice, the median gain is smaller than that reported in randomized trials. The palliative intent of these therapies should not be forgotten in order to improve quality of life rather than absolute survival.

Multicenter randomized clinical trial on high-dose epirubicin plus cis-platinum versus vinorelbine plus cis-platinum in advanced non small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: High dose Epirubicin (HD-EPI) (>90 mg/m2) and Vinorelbine (VNR) demonstrated antitumor activity as single agent (about 20%) in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. This trial compares these two agents combined with cisplatin (CP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1992 to February 1996, 228 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomized to receive either EPI 120 mg/m2 as i.v. bolus plus Cisplatin (CP) 60 mg/m2 on day 1 (regimen A) or VNR 25 mg/m2 as i.v. bolus on day 1 and 8 plus CP 60 mg/m2 on day 1 (regimen B). Both treatments were recycled every 21 days up to a maximum cumulative dose of EPI of 840 mg/m2 or 12 cycles. Eligible patients were 212 and 198 patients were evaluable for objective response (95 in arm A and 103 in arm B). The main characteristics of eligible patients were: male/female 179/33; median age 61 (42-72); median Karnofsky PS 80 (70-100); stage IIIA 12%, stage IIIB 40%, stage IV 41%, recurrence 7%; histotype: epidermoid 48%, adenoca 36%, others 16%. RESULTS: The following response rates were observed in regimens A and B, respectively; CR, 1 and 2%, PR, 32 and 25% (P = 0.4567). Median CR + PR duration was 9 and 8 months, respectively. Median survival was 10.5 and 9.6 months, respectively. Grade III-IV leucopenia occurred in 38 and 21% in arm A and arm B, respectively(P = 0.01), thrombocytopenia in 6 and 0% (P = 0.02), anemia in 8 and 7% (n.s.). Non-hematological toxicity was moderate and the only difference between the treatments was alopecia (88 vs. 33% in arm A and B, respectively). Supraventricular arrhythmia occurred in three patients on regimen A; a >15% LVEF absolute decrease was observed in 9 (22.5%) and three (14%) patients on arm A and arm B, respectively (n.s.). No congestive heart failure was observed. CONCLUSION: HD-EPI+CP and VNR+CP are both active combinations in advanced NSCLC with a similar response rate, response duration and survival but regimen A was significantly more toxic (myelosuppression and alopecia).

Standard interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-alpha immunotherapy versus an IL-2 and 4-epirubicin immuno-chemotherapeutic association in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human interleukin-2 (IL-2) has a well-documented anti-tumor activity against RCC and has demonstrated a synergistic anti-tumor activity between doxorubicin and IL-2, thus providing better survival. This study investigated the toxicity and efficacy of the association between doxorubicin and IL-2, and interferon-alpha, and the immuno-chemotherapeutic association with IL-2 and 4-Epirubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologic evidence of metastatic or advanced RCC were randomized to receive either IL-2 + IFN-alpha (Arm A) or IL-2 + 4-Epi (Arm B). Arm A patients received IFN-alpha subcutaneously at doses of 3 million UI on days 1, 3 and 5 for 6 weeks. Arm B patients received 4-EPI at doses of 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36. Treatment cycles were repeated at 10 week intervals. RESULTS: Of 38 evaluable patients, we observed 2 complete responses, 2 partial responses, 1 minimal response, 1 mixed response, 21 stationary disease and 11 disease progressions. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups. However in arm B, the median overall survival for responding patients was better than that of patients who experienced a disease progression. Performance status was the only predictive prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis confirms the low response rate associated with IL-2 treatments but seems to indicate a role of anthracycline in improving the survival of responding patients with an acceptable toxicity.

Epirubicin, folinic acid, fluorouracil, and etoposide in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: phase II study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (GOIM).

In the authors' previous experience, the addition of epidoxorubicin to the FA-FU regimen obtained a better response rate than that of FA-FU alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Furthermore, considering the good efficacy and mild toxicity observed with the addition of etoposide to the FA-FU combination in the German study, the authors conducted a trial to explore the efficacy and tolerability of the ELFE regimen (epirubicin, folinic acid, fluorouracil, and etoposide) in previously untreated advanced gastric cancer patients. Of the 55 patients entered, 51 were evaluable for efficacy. Four complete responses (8%) and 21 partial responses (41%) were observed, with an overall response rate of 49% (95% CI: 35-63%). The median duration of response and survival were 6 and 8 months, respectively. Responder patients showed a significantly better median survival duration than nonresponders (12 vs. 4 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). Toxicity was evaluated in all patients: only 1 patient refused to continue therapy despite low toxicity. As expected, the major toxicities observed were gastrointestinal disturbance, leukopenia, and loss of hair. In conclusion, the ELFE combination regimen appears to be effective and well tolerated for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients.

Prospective phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in untreated elderly patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of single-agent gemcitabine in untreated elderly patients with stage IIIb/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since April 1997, 46 consecutive patients have been enrolled in this multicenter study. Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Primary patient characteristics were: male/female 38/8; median age 73 years (range: 70-82 years); median Karnofsky performance status (PS) 90 (range: 70-100); stage IIIb 61% and stage IV 39%; histotype: epidermoid 48%, adenocarcinoma 43%, and large cell carcinoma 9%. No complete response was observed, but 10 (21.7%) patients achieved partial response (PR) (95% confidence limits: 11-36%), 27 (58.7%) had stable disease (SD), and 7 (15%) progressed early (at the first evaluation). The median duration of PR and SD was 8 months (range: 4-23+ months) and 4 months (range: 2-9 months), respectively. Subjective response evaluating PS and symptoms such as dyspnea, pain, and cough was evaluated in 40 patients; 11 (27.5%) improved, 15 (37.5%) remained stable, and 14 (35%) worsened. The median time to progression was 4 months, the median survival was 9 months, and 1-year survival was 44%. After a median follow-up of 10.5 months, 14 patients are still alive. There were no grade 4 toxicities. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 19% and 2% of patients, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Grade I/II side effects of nausea/vomiting, transient fever, increase of hepatic transaminases, transient peripheral edema at lower extremity (not related to cardiac or renal disease or phlebothrombosis) were reported. This phase II study confirms the activity and favorable toxicity profile of single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase I - II study of oral idarubicin, tegafur and levo-folinate in patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer.

Thirty patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer were enrolled in a study aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose and to evaluate the efficacy of oral idarubicin (12 mg/m2/day for 3 days every 4 weeks) with tegafur and levo-folinate (200 mg/m2/day and 50 mg/day, respectively, for a minimum of 6 days, increasing the dose and duration according to a modified Fibonacci scheme). The maximum tolerated doses identified were 200 mg/m2 days 1-30 for tegafur and 50 mg days 1-30 for levo-folinate. We obtained 2 partial remissions (7%) and 12 stable disease (45%) in 27 objectively evaluable patients. The main toxicity was gastrointestinal, with no hematologic toxicity. Median time to progression was 4 months (range 2-14), median survival was 10 months (3-30). A median number of 4 cycles (1-13) was administered. The results seem to support the use of this combination in elderly and pretreated patients.

A phase II study on lonidamine combined with cisplatin and etoposide in the treatment of advanced non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma (NSCBC).

A group of 28 patients with advanced non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma (NSCBC) entered a phase II study on cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 1) plus etoposide 120 mg/m2, day 1 to 3), every 3 weeks, in combination with lonidamine (150 mg p.o. t.i.d. continuously from day 1). Seven out of twenty-seven (26%) evaluable patients obtained a partial remission (median duration 22 weeks, range 7-47). Although the side effects were mild, three patients stopped the therapy because of them. Median survival was 14 months, range 2-19. Further studies are necessary to clarify the role of "biochemical modulators" in NSCBC.

The antiemetic efficacy and the cost-benefit ratio of ondansetron calculated with a new approach to health technology assessment (real cost-benefit index).

In a phase II study including 80 patients treated with highly emetic drugs such as cisplatin, carboplatin or cyclophosphamide > 600 mg/day) we confirmed the potential of ondansetron to prevent cancer chemotherapy- related acute nausea and vomiting. With a total dose of 19.0-37.3 mg ondansetron we achieved 82%-100% acute (0-24 hours) vomiting free patients. Using ondansetron for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting increases the total chemotherapy costs by 6%. The real cost-benefit ratio for the treatment of acute nausea and vomiting shows better values for ondansetron than for all other recommended regimens.

Combined chemo-immuno-hormonotherapy of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Thirty-five patients (pts.) with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated with a combination of vinblastine (5 mg/m2/IV) plus epirubicin (50 mg/m2/IV) every 3-4 weeks, alpha-2-A-interferon (9 x 10(6) U/IM 3 times in the 1st week, then 18 x 10(6) U/IM 3 times weekly), and medroxyprogesterone acetate (2,000 mg/os/day plus 500 mg IM/week). Thirty-one patients were males and 4 were females with a median age of 63 years (range 35-75) and median performance status of 70% (range 50-90%). We observed nine partial remissions (26%) with median duration of 40 weeks (range 20-232+). Fifteen pts. had no change (43%) while 11 pts. progressed (31%). The main side-effects were: leukopenia (29/35, 83%) with median nadir of 3,100 WBC/mm3 (range 510-3,990) and fever (32/35, 91%). Thrombocytopenia occurred in 4 pts. (11%), anemia in 5 (14%), asthenia in 12 (34%), nausea/vomiting in 12 (34%), alopecia in 8 (23%) and stomatitis in 3 (8.5%). Two patients stopped the therapy with medroxyprogesterone acetate because of muscular cramps. Median survival was 65 weeks (range 6-327+). We conclude that the combination of recombinant alpha 2A-interferon-vinblastine-epirubicin and medroxyprogesterone acetate has modest but definitive activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Treatment of the cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: a critical reappraisal.

Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a combination of anorexia, tissue wasting, weight loss and poor performance status. Some CACS symptoms are due to a macrophage production of TNF and IL-1, while the metabolic effects are mainly explained by the release of IL-6 from tumor cells. Clinical treatment of CACS involves progestational agents (medroxyprogesterone acetate, MPA, megestrol acetate, MA) for long term treatment. The use of prokinetic agents (like metoclopramide) is recommended, especially if patients need concomitant opioid treatment for pain; if otherwise indicated, corticosteroids are useful for short periods. The administration of artificial nutrition should be individualized following the clinical condition of the patient and possibly taking into account the wishes of the patient. The practical evaluation criteria of the drugs employed for CACS are based on weight increase and appetite stimulation. Hence, a new approach to the mechanism of action of MPA, MA and of other agents is urgently needed.

Cisplatinum plus epirubicin alternated with cyclophosphamide plus 5-fluorouracil in ovarian cancer.

Fifty-two patients with ovarian cancer (post surgical residual tumor) were treated with the combination of platinum + epirubicin (PE) (P 50mg/m2, E 60 mg/m2) alternated with cyclophosphamide + 5-fluorouracil (CF) (C 800 mg/m2, F 600 mg/m2). The treatment was repeated every 28 days for a maximum of 10 cycles. Forty-three patients were evaluable for response. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 13 (30%) patients (evaluated by second-look), while partial remission (PR) was achieved in 6 (14%) patients for a mean duration of 27 and 14 months, respectively. Eleven out of 13 patients with CR and 5 out of the nonevaluable patients are alive and do not show signs of disease after a mean follow-up of 29 + months (range 19-36). The main factors that conditioned complete remission were the tumor residue and performance status of the patient.

A phase III study on intermittent versus weekly cisplatin and etoposide in the treatment of advanced non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma.

A group of 55 patients with advanced non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma entered a random study on combined cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (VP16), either intermittently (I = CDDP 60 mg/m2 day 1 and VP16 120 mg/m2 day 1-3 every 3-4 weeks) or weekly (W = CDDP 20 mg/m2 and VP16 120 mg/m2). Five out of 31 (16%) evaluable patients in group I and 6/27 (22%) in group W obtained partial remission (no statistical difference). Toxicity was mild and survival was similar for both groups. The authors conclude that the weekly combination of CDDP plus VP16 is neither less toxic nor more effective than the intermittent one.

Chemotherapy with cisplatin, epirubicin, methotrexate in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell cancer of the bladder (TCC).

Forty patients with advanced transitional cell cancer (TCC) of the bladder were treated with cisplatin, epirubicin, methotrexate (PEM, every 3-4 weeks). If creatinine clearance was reduced to 40 ml/min, the usual full doses of cisplatin and methotrexate, 50 mg/m2, were proportionally reduced. 23 patients had full-dose (FD) therapy, 17 had reduced dose (RD) (40-20 mg/m2). Two patients achieved complete response and 17 partial response. The overall response rate was 19/40 (47.5%), 11/23 (48%) for FD and 8/17 (47%) for RD (p = 1.000). 17/40 pts (42.5%) had no-change and 4/40 (10%) had disease progression. The median duration of CR and PR was 32 weeks, range 4-82 (22 weeks, range 12-52 for FD; 32 weeks, range 4-82 for RD, cisplatin p = .7362). The main side effect was vomiting (35/40 pts, 87.5%, 20/23 = 87% for FD, 15/17 = 90% for RD, p = 1.000). Leukopenia was observed in 12 patients (30%, nadir 3,240 range 900-3,800, 6/23 = 26% for FD, 6/17 = 35% for RD, p = .7285), alopecia in 18 patients (45%, 15/23 = 65% for FD, 3/17 = 18% for RD, p = .004). The results of this study show that a dose escalation to 50 mg/m2 for cisplatin, epirubicin and methotrexate in the PEM regimen results in an increase in overall response (OR) (19/40 = 47.5%) with respect to a historical control using the same drugs at doses of 40 mg/m2 (12/35 = 34%). In patients with normal renal function the escalated dose was tolerated without a corresponding increase in toxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Combination of paclitaxel and etoposide in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study.

Thirty-six patients (pts) with unpretreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stages IIIB and IV were enrolled in this two-stage phase I-II study aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel combined with etoposide every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 courses, increasing the dose of paclitaxel according to a modified Fibonacci scheme. Nineteen pts were enrolled in the first stage and 17 pts in the second stage. The characteristics of the pts were as follows: median age 56 years (40-70), median Karnofsky's Performance Status 80% (70-80), 11 pts were stage IIIB and 25 pts stage IV. The doses of etoposide administered were 50 mg/m2 for 15 pts and 100 mg/m2 for 21 pts. MTD has not been reached and the study proceeded with the dose of paclitaxel 250 mg/m2. We obtained 9 (25%) partial remissions (PR) and 11 (31%) stable disease (SD) in 33 objectively evaluable pts. Median time to progression (TTP) was 4 months (0.3-21), median survival was 9.3 months (0.3-27). The main toxicity was neutropenia and neurotoxicity, while the gastrointestinal toxicity was mild. Two pts deceased after the first course. The causes of death were necrotizing enteritis in the first pt and congestive heart failure in the second pt. A total of 156 courses were administered at 7 dose levels, with a median of 4 courses per patient (1-6). The results seem to support the use of this combination in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Randomized, controlled, multicenter phase III trial of standard-dose fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC), compared with time-intensive FEC (FEC-G) and mitoxantrone-methotrexate-mitomycin C (MMM-G) in metastatic breast carcinoma.

The purpose of this multicenter phase III trial was to assess the impact of a time-intensification of FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) and MMM (mitoxantrone, methotrexate, mitomycin C) regimens, supported by lenograstim (G-CSF) on the objective response rate, time to progression and survival of patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic breast cancer (mbc). Women with mbc were randomized to receive as first-line chemotherapy either standard-dose FEC (all doses in mg/m2): arm A (500, 75, 500 every 21 days), or time-intensified FEC-G: arm B (500, 75, 500 every 14 days), or time-intensified MMM-G: arm C (mitoxantrone 10, methotrexate 35 every 14 days and mitomycin C 10 every 28 days), both with support of lenograstim (G-CSF 150 microg/m2/day s.c. for 10 days). All study treatments were administered for six cycles. Eligible female patients were in the 31-70 year range with histologically proven mbc, and measurable or evaluable disease. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed. The overall response rate (CR + PR, intent-to-treat analysis) was significantly improved in the time-intensified FEC-G regimen (69%) in comparison with standard-dose FEC (41%), p=0.002. Time-intensified MMM-G (51%) did not lead to a significant improvement in the response rate. The percentage of complete responses was significantly higher in the FEC-G arm as compared to standard-dose FEC (17% vs. 4.7%; p=0.002). The median duration was longer in the intensified-dose arms without, however, achieving a statistically significant improvement. The median time to progression (TTP), and the median survival time did not differ between the three treatment arms. Grade 3-4 leukopenia was significantly higher (p<0.001) in the standard FEC regimen-treated patients. Thrombocytopenia was significantly higher (p<0.001) in both intensified regimens. Alopecia and mucositis were significantly more frequent in both anthracycline-containing regimens (p=0.003). Other hematological and non hematological toxicities were similar in the 3 treatment arms. The increase of dose-intensity of both FEC and MMM regimens improved activity, but not efficacy as compared to standard FEC regimen in our group of chemotherapy-naive, metastatic breast cancer patients.

Small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: a cyclical alternating combination of epirubicin plus cisplatin and cyclophosphamide plus etoposide.

Forty-seven patients with advanced small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma (SCLC) were treated with a combination of epirubicin (4-EPIDX) (60 mg/m2 i.v.) and cisplatin (CDDP) (50 mg/m2 i.v.) on day 1, alternated with cyclophosphamide (CTX) (800 mg/m2 i.v.) day 1 and etoposide (VP16) (120 mg/m2 i.v.) on days 21-23. Four patients (9%) obtained a complete remission and 27 (57%) a partial remission with an overall remission rate of 66%. The median duration of response was 37 weeks (range 13-150) and the median duration of survival was 43 weeks (range 10-150). No severe bone marrow depression was noted. The other side-effects were of a mild grade.

Low dose intermittent 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) in poor risk patients with advanced transitional cell bladder cancer: a pilot study.

Fifteen patients with locally advanced or metastatic bladder carcinoma and with cardiac and/or renal impairment were treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2, epirubicin, 40 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide, 400 mg/m2. No complete or partial remissions were observed among the 14 evaluable patients. The toxicity level was very low. We are now trying to "tailor" platinum-based combinations to renal function.

Salvage treatment with epirubicin and/or paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients relapsed after high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cells.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To evaluate feasibility and efficacy of paclitaxel as a single agent or in combination with epirubicin in breast cancer taxane-naive patients who have failed previous high-dose chemotherapy. METHODS: Since February 1995, we have treated 32 patients in first relapse or progression after high-dose chemotherapy. Nineteen patients had metastatic breast cancer, 12 more than 3 involved axillary lymph nodes, and 1 inflammatory breast cancer at inclusion to the program. The median time to relapse after high-dose chemotherapy was 12 months (range, 2-43). At relapse, 12 patients were treated with epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) administered on day 1 every 21 days. In 20 patients who had previously received more than 350 mg/m2 of a cumulative dose of epirubicin and in one patient pretreated with chemotherapy containing mitoxantrone, we employed paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) alone. A median number of five courses was administered (range, 2-10). RESULTS: The overall response rate after 3 courses (29 of 32 patients were assessable) was 55% and after 6 courses (21 of 32 patients were assessable) was 57%. The median time to progression was 7 months (95% CI, 5.7-9.2), and median survival was 27.5 months (95% CI, 17.8-37.0). Toxicity was recorded for 180 cycles (epirubicin + paclitaxel for 62 cycles and paclitaxel alone for 118 cycles). The main toxicity in both regimens was hematologic. We observed WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia (in 8 patients, 25%), for which G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day s.c.) was employed. WHO grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 patients (6%) and WHO grade 3 anemia in 1 patient (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that paclitaxel (alone or in combination with epirubicin) is feasible as salvage treatment in heavily pretreated patients.