Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Neurol ; 29(10): 3117-3123, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35763378

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Enterovirus infections pose a serious threat for patients with humoral deficiencies and may be lethal, whilst the efficacy of proposed treatment options such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins and fluoxetine remains debated. METHODS: Viral clearance was investigated in a patient with rituximab-induced B-cell depletion and chronic echovirus 13 (E13) meningoencephalitis/myofasciitis in response to intravenous immunoglobulins and fluoxetine using sequential semi-quantitative E13 viral load measurements by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Fluoxetine concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid were determined by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Intravenous immunoglobulins appeared ineffective in this case of E13 infection, whereas virus clearance in cerebrospinal fluid was obtained after 167 days of oral fluoxetine. Since treatment with corticosteroids resulted in a flare of symptoms, rechallenge with viral load measurements was not attempted. CONCLUSION: In this report of a patient with rituximab-associated chronic echovirus 13 meningoencephalitis, viral clearance in response to single treatment options is assessed for the first time. Our observations further support the in vivo efficacy of fluoxetine against enteroviral infections. More research is needed to establish its efficacy in different enterovirus strains.


Subject(s)
Echovirus Infections , Enterovirus Infections , Meningitis, Aseptic , Meningoencephalitis , Myositis , Antiviral Agents , Echovirus Infections/cerebrospinal fluid , Enterovirus B, Human , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Meningoencephalitis/cerebrospinal fluid , Meningoencephalitis/drug therapy , Rituximab/therapeutic use
2.
Ther Adv Med Oncol ; 15: 17588359231189133, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37885461

ABSTRACT

Background: Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positron emission tomography (PET) is a cornerstone of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management. Hybrid PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now available for NET-imaging, next to PET/computed tomography (CT). Objectives: To determine whether CT or MRI is the best hybrid partner for [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET. Design: Monocentric, prospective study. Methods: Patients received a same-day [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI, for suspicion of NET, (re)staging or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy-selection. The union (PETunion) of malignant lesions detected on PETCT and PETMRI was the reference standard. Concordance of detection of malignant lesions in an organ was measured between PETunion and CT and PETunion and MRI. Seven bins were used to categorize the number of malignant lesions, containing following ordinal variables: 0, 1, 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, >20 countable and diffuse/uncountable. The difference in number of malignant lesions was obtained as the difference in bin level ('Δbin') between PETunion and CT and PETunion and MRI with a Δbin closer to zero implying a higher concordance rate. Results: Twenty-nine patients were included. Primary tumors included 17 gastroenteropancreatic-NETs, 1 colon neuroendocrine carcinoma, 7 lung-NETs and 2 meningiomas. Patient level concordance with PETunion was 96% for MRI and 67% for CT (p = 0.039). Organ level concordance with PETunion was 74% for MRI and 40% for CT (p < 0.0001). In bone, there was a higher concordance rate for MRI compared to CT, 92% and 33%, respectively (p = 0.016). Overall, a mean Δbin of 0.5 ± 1.1 for PETunion/MRI and 1.4 ± 1.2 for PETunion/CT (p < 0.0001) was noted. In liver, a mean Δbin of 0.0 ± 1.1 for PETunion/MRI and 1.7 ± 1.2 for PETunion/CT was observed (p = 0.0078). In bone, a mean Δbin closer to zero was observed for PETunion/MRI compared to PETunion/CT, 0.6 ± 1.4 and 2.0 ± 1.5, respectively (p = 0.0098). Conclusions: Compared to SSTR PET/CT, SSTR PET/MRI had a higher patient and organ level concordance for malignant tumoral involvement and number of malignant lesions, with a clear added value in bone and liver specifically.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL