Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Mov Disord ; 2024 Jun 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934216

ABSTRACT

Neuroimaging studies in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) can inform fundamental questions about the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD). Across modalities, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) may be better suited to identify changes between neural networks in the earliest stages of Lewy body diseases when structural changes may be subtle or absent. This review synthesizes the findings from all fMRI studies of RBD to gain further insight into the pathophysiology and progression of Lewy body diseases. A total of 32 studies were identified using a systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines between January 2000 to February 2024 for original fMRI studies in patients with either isolated RBD (iRBD) or RBD secondary to PD. Common functional alterations were detectable in iRBD patients compared with healthy controls across brainstem nuclei, basal ganglia, frontal and occipital lobes, and whole brain network measures. Patients with established PD and RBD demonstrated decreased functional connectivity across the whole brain and brainstem nuclei, but increased functional connectivity in the cerebellum and frontal lobe compared with those PD patients without RBD. Finally, longitudinal changes in resting state functional connectivity were found to track with disease progression. Currently, fMRI studies in RBD have demonstrated early signatures of neurodegeneration across both motor and non-motor pathways. Although more work is needed, such findings have the potential to inform our understanding of disease, help to distinguish between prodromal PD and prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies, and support the development of fMRI-based outcome measures of phenoconversion and progression in future disease modifying trials. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

2.
Transl Neurosci ; 15(1): 20220336, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708096

ABSTRACT

Background: Freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease (PD) has a poorly understood pathophysiology, which hinders treatment development. Recent work showed a dysfunctional fronto-striato-limbic circuitry at rest in PD freezers compared to non-freezers in the dopamine "OFF" state. While other studies found that dopaminergic replacement therapy alters functional brain organization in PD, the specific effect of dopamine medication on fronto-striato-limbic functional connectivity in freezers remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate how dopamine therapy alters resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the fronto-striato-limbic circuitry in PD freezers, and whether the degree of connectivity change is related to freezing severity and anxiety. Methods: Twenty-three PD FOG patients underwent MRI at rest (rsfMRI) in their clinically defined "OFF" and "ON" dopaminergic medication states. A seed-to-seed based analysis was performed between a priori defined limbic circuitry ROIs. Functional connectivity was compared between OFF and ON states. A secondary correlation analyses evaluated the relationship between Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-Anxiety) and FOG Questionnaire with changes in rsFC from OFF to ON. Results: PD freezers' OFF compared to ON showed increased functional coupling between the right hippocampus and right caudate nucleus, and between the left putamen and left posterior parietal cortex (PPC). A negative association was found between HADS-Anxiety and the rsFC change from OFF to ON between the left amygdala and left prefrontal cortex, and left putamen and left PPC. Conclusion: These findings suggest that dopaminergic medication partially modulates the frontoparietal-limbic-striatal circuitry in PD freezers, and that the influence of medication on the amygdala, may be related to clinical anxiety in freezer.

3.
EClinicalMedicine ; 69: 102474, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361993

ABSTRACT

Background: New non-pharmacological treatments for improving non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) are urgently needed. Previous light therapies for modifying sleep behaviour lacked standardised protocols and were not personalised for an individual patient chronotype. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a biologically-directed light therapy in PD that targets retinal inputs to the circadian system on sleep, as well as other non-motor and motor functions. Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled trial at the Queensland University of Technology, Australia, participants with mild to moderate PD were computer randomised (1:1) to receive one of two light therapies that had the same photometric luminance and visual appearance to allow blinding of investigators and participants to the intervention. One of these biologically-directed lights matched natural daylight (Day Mel), which is known to stimulate melanopsin cells. The light therapy of the other treatment arm of the study, specifically supplemented the stimulation of retinal melanopsin cells (Enhanced Mel), targeting deficits to the circadian system. Both lights were administered 30 min per day over 4-weeks and personalised to an individual patient's chronotype, while monitoring environmental light exposure with actigraphy. Co-primary endpoints were a change from baseline in mean sleep macrostructure (polysomnography, PSG) and an endocrine biomarker of circadian phase (dim light melatonin secretion onset, DLMO) at weeks 4 and 6. Participants data were analysed using an intention to treat principle. All endpoints were evaluated by applying a mixed model analysis. The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12621000077864. Findings: Between February 4, 2021 and August 8, 2022, 144 participants with PD were consecutively screened, 60 enrolled and randomly assigned to a light intervention. There was no significant difference in co-primary outcomes between randomised groups overall or at any individual timepoint during follow-up. The mean (95% CI) for PSG, N3% was 24.15 (19.82-28.48) for Day Mel (n = 23) and 19.34 (15.20-23.47) for the Enhanced Mel group (n = 25) in week 4 (p = 0.12); and 21.13 (16.99-25.28) for Day Mel (n = 26) and 18.48 (14.34-22.62) for the Enhanced Mel group (n = 25) in week 6, (p = 0.37). The mean (95% CI) DLMO (decimal time) was 19.82 (19.20-20.44) for Day Mel (n = 22) and 19.44 (18.85-20.04) for the Enhanced Mel group (n = 24) in week 4 (p = 0.38); and 19.90 (19.27-20.53) for Day Mel (n = 23) and 19.04 (18.44-19.64) for the Enhanced Mel group (n = 25) in week 6 (p = 0.05). However, both the controlled daylight (Day Mel) and the enhanced melanopsin (Enhanced Mel) interventions demonstrated significant improvement in primary PSG sleep macrostructure. The restorative deep sleep phase (PSG, N3) significantly improved at week 6 in both groups [model-based mean difference to baseline (95% CI): -3.87 (-6.91 to -0.83), p = 0.04]. There was a phase-advance in DLMO in both groups which did not reach statistical significance between groups at any time-point. There were no safety concerns or severe adverse events related to the intervention. Interpretation: Both the controlled daylight and melanopsin booster light showed efficacy in improving measures of restorative deep sleep in people with mild to moderate PD. That there was no significant difference between the two intervention groups may be due to the early disease stage. The findings suggest that controlled indoor daylight that is personalised to the individuals' chronotype could be effective for improving sleep in early to moderate PD, and further studies evaluating controlled daylight interventions are now required utilising this standardised approach, including in advanced PD. Funding: The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, Shake IT Up Australia, National Health and Medical Research Council, and Australian Research Council.

4.
NPJ Parkinsons Dis ; 10(1): 123, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38918434

ABSTRACT

Identifying biological factors which contribute to the clinical progression of heterogeneous motor and non-motor phenotypes in Parkinson's disease may help to better understand the disease process. Several lipid-related genetic risk factors for Parkinson's disease have been identified, and the serum lipid signature of Parkinson's disease patients is significantly distinguishable from controls. However, the extent to which lipid profiles are associated with clinical outcomes remains unclear. Untargeted high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry identified >900 serum lipids in Parkinson's disease subjects at baseline (n = 122), and the potential for machine learning models using these lipids to predict motor and non-motor clinical scores after 2 years (n = 67) was assessed. Machine learning models performed best when baseline serum lipids were used to predict the 2-year future Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale part three (UPDRS III) and Geriatric Depression Scale scores (both normalised root mean square error = 0.7). Feature analysis of machine learning models indicated that species of lysophosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine, platelet-activating factor, sphingomyelin, diacylglycerol and triacylglycerol were top predictors of both motor and non-motor scores. Serum lipids were overall more important predictors of clinical outcomes than subject sex, age and mutation status of the Parkinson's disease risk gene LRRK2. Furthermore, lipids were found to better predict clinical scales than a panel of 27 serum cytokines previously measured in this cohort (The Michael J. Fox Foundation LRRK2 Clinical Cohort Consortium). These results suggest that lipid changes may be associated with clinical phenotypes in Parkinson's disease.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL