Effectiveness, safety and overall satisfaction of early postpartum placement of hormonal IUD compared with standard procedure: An open-label, randomized, multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: In this open-label, randomized controlled, non-inferiority, multicenter study we aimed to study the risk of termination of pregnancy within 1 year postpartum, the safety profile and patient acceptability after early postpartum insertion of a hormonal intrauterine device (LNG-IUS, Mirena®) compared with standard placement 6-8 weeks postpartum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: April 2018 to January 2020 women with uncomplicated vaginal delivery at four urban birth centers in Sweden, were randomized to either early placement within 48 h after delivery (early group) or standard placement 6-8 weeks postpartum (standard group) of a hormonal intrauterine device. The main outcome measure was the proportion of terminations of pregnancies in each group during the first year after placement of the intrauterine device. Registration EudraCT database no. 2017-001945-29. RESULTS: The study was prematurely stopped according to the protocol due to an expulsion rate >20% in the early group. No pregnancies occurred. Fifty-two women were randomized to early and 49 women to standard insertion. In the early group, 23/52 (44.2%) of the intrauterine devices were expelled. After expulsion, 10 women chose to have another hormonal intrauterine device placed but still significantly fewer women (39/52, 75%, p = 0.22) in the early group used the hormonal intrauterine device method at study completion. No expulsions occurred in the standard group, but 5/49 (10.2%) requested removal and 41/49 (83.7%, p = 0.22) had used the hormonal intrauterine device method continuously for 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Early hormonal intrauterine device insertion after vaginal delivery is associated with high expulsion rates. Despite this, a high continuation rate of the hormonal intrauterine device method is seen among women once choosing the method. In the light of high continuation rates, the advantages of early insertion could balance the risk of expulsion for well-informed women.

Risk of abortion within 1-2 years after childbirth in relation to contraceptive choice: a retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: The primary objective of the study was to investigate whether the choice of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) was associated with the risk of abortion over a period of 24 months postpartum. The secondary objective was to analyse whether other significant factors were affecting the risk of abortion during this period.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed 11,066 women who had delivered in three Swedish cities during 2013 and 2014. Demographic and medical variables were obtained from medical records. Attendance at the postpartum visit, choice of postpartum contraception and history of abortion was noted. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with the risk of abortion. The main outcome measure was the proportion of women with abortion up to 24 months postpartum.Results: Data from 11,066 women were included in the final analysis. Within 12-24 months after delivery 2.5% of women had an abortion. The choice of LARC after childbirth reduced the risk of subsequent abortion (odds ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60, 0.91; p =  .005). Smoking, age <25 years and have had a previous abortion significantly increased the risk of abortion during follow-up, whereas exclusive breastfeeding decreased the risk.Conclusions: Increasing the proportion of women who choose LARC postpartum could decrease the risk of abortion for up to 2 years after childbirth.

Women's experiences of postpartum contraceptive services when elective caesarean section is the method of birth: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The unmet need for postpartum contraception is a global challenge. Postpartum placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) within 48 hours of vaginal delivery is available in many settings worldwide, but is not routinely practised in Sweden. To improve contraceptive services and facilitate the informed choice of IUD placement at the time of a caesarean section (CS), we performed this study to identify and describe women's experiences of contraceptive services before, during and after an elective CS. METHODS: A qualitative design and methodology was used. We interviewed 20 women aged 28-42 years who underwent elective CS in Sweden. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The three main themes found were (1) receptivity to contraceptive counselling in the context of CS, (2) communication and decision-making about postpartum contraception before CS and (3) lack of support and guidance to receive contraceptive services before and after CS. The participants described readiness and interest regarding postpartum contraception. They prefered counselling from around 25 weeks of gestation. Despite this finding, antenatal communication and contraceptive decision-making seemed rare. Participants reported a lack of support and guidance which necessitated a need by women to navigate the contraceptive services themselves in order to receive information about contraception before CS and to receive postpartum support. CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal contraceptive counselling including information about IUD placement during CS was appreciated and welcomed by women with elective CS as their birth method. Most of the women whom we interviewed would prefer to receive contraception counselling on postpartum use during the second half of their pregnancy.