Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Nature ; 603(7899): 166-173, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35197630

ABSTRACT

Combinations of anti-cancer drugs can overcome resistance and provide new treatments1,2. The number of possible drug combinations vastly exceeds what could be tested clinically. Efforts to systematically identify active combinations and the tissues and molecular contexts in which they are most effective could accelerate the development of combination treatments. Here we evaluate the potency and efficacy of 2,025 clinically relevant two-drug combinations, generating a dataset encompassing 125 molecularly characterized breast, colorectal and pancreatic cancer cell lines. We show that synergy between drugs is rare and highly context-dependent, and that combinations of targeted agents are most likely to be synergistic. We incorporate multi-omic molecular features to identify combination biomarkers and specify synergistic drug combinations and their active contexts, including in basal-like breast cancer, and microsatellite-stable or KRAS-mutant colon cancer. Our results show that irinotecan and CHEK1 inhibition have synergistic effects in microsatellite-stable or KRAS-TP53 double-mutant colon cancer cells, leading to apoptosis and suppression of tumour xenograft growth. This study identifies clinically relevant effective drug combinations in distinct molecular subpopulations and is a resource to guide rational efforts to develop combinatorial drug treatments.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Colonic Neoplasms , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/genetics , Drug Combinations , Drug Synergism , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics
2.
Mol Syst Biol ; 16(7): e9405, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32627965

ABSTRACT

Low success rates during drug development are due, in part, to the difficulty of defining drug mechanism-of-action and molecular markers of therapeutic activity. Here, we integrated 199,219 drug sensitivity measurements for 397 unique anti-cancer drugs with genome-wide CRISPR loss-of-function screens in 484 cell lines to systematically investigate cellular drug mechanism-of-action. We observed an enrichment for positive associations between the profile of drug sensitivity and knockout of a drug's nominal target, and by leveraging protein-protein networks, we identified pathways underpinning drug sensitivity. This revealed an unappreciated positive association between mitochondrial E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MARCH5 dependency and sensitivity to MCL1 inhibitors in breast cancer cell lines. We also estimated drug on-target and off-target activity, informing on specificity, potency and toxicity. Linking drug and gene dependency together with genomic data sets uncovered contexts in which molecular networks when perturbed mediate cancer cell loss-of-fitness and thereby provide independent and orthogonal evidence of biomarkers for drug development. This study illustrates how integrating cell line drug sensitivity with CRISPR loss-of-function screens can elucidate mechanism-of-action to advance drug development.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Drug Development/methods , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor/methods , Gene Regulatory Networks/drug effects , Genetic Fitness/drug effects , Protein Interaction Maps/drug effects , Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Biomarkers/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Gene Knockout Techniques , Gene Regulatory Networks/genetics , Genetic Fitness/genetics , Genomics , Humans , Linear Models , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Myeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , Pharmaceutical Preparations/metabolism , Software , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/genetics , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/metabolism
3.
iScience ; 27(7): 110330, 2024 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39055933

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to reduce mortality but with substantial overdiagnosis, leading to unnecessary biopsies. The identification of a highly specific biomarker using liquid biopsies, represents an unmet need in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer. In this study, we employed a method that enriches for methylated cell-free DNA fragments coupled with a machine learning algorithm which enabled the detection of metastatic and localized cancers with AUCs of 0.96 and 0.74, respectively. The model also detected 51.8% (14/27) of localized and 88.7% (79/89) of patients with metastatic cancer in an external dataset. Furthermore, we show that the differentially methylated regions reflect epigenetic and transcriptomic changes at the tissue level. Notably, these regions are significantly enriched for biologically relevant pathways associated with the regulation of cellular proliferation and TGF-beta signaling. This demonstrates the potential of circulating tumor DNA methylation for prostate cancer detection and prognostication.

4.
Cell Rep Med ; 5(8): 101687, 2024 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39168097

ABSTRACT

Combining drugs can enhance their clinical efficacy, but the number of possible combinations and inter-tumor heterogeneity make identifying effective combinations challenging, while existing approaches often overlook clinically relevant activity. We screen one of the largest cell line panels (N = 757) with 51 clinically relevant combinations and identify responses at the level of individual cell lines and tissue populations. We establish three response classes to model cellular effects beyond monotherapy: synergy, Bliss additivity, and independent drug action (IDA). Synergy is rare (11% of responses) and frequently efficacious (>50% viability reduction), whereas Bliss and IDA are more frequent but less frequently efficacious. We introduce "efficacious combination benefit" (ECB) to describe high-efficacy responses classified as either synergy, Bliss, or IDA. We identify ECB biomarkers in vitro and show that ECB predicts response in patient-derived xenografts better than synergy alone. Our work here provides a valuable resource and framework for preclinical evaluation and the development of combination treatments.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Drug Synergism , Neoplasms , Humans , Cell Line, Tumor , Animals , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor/methods , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Mice , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL