Decay kinetics of HIV-1-RNA in seminal plasma with dolutegravir/lamivudine versus dolutegravir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive people living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: This was a substudy of a Phase IV, randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04295460) aiming to compare the activity of dolutegravir/lamivudine versus dolutegravir plus tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (DTG + TAF/FTC) in the male genital tract. METHODS: Participants were asymptomatic adults without sexually transmitted diseases, treatment-naive people living with HIV (PLWH), with CD4+ T cell counts >200 cells/mm3 and plasma HIV-1-RNA levels >5000 and <500 000 copies/mL, randomized (1:1) to DTG + TAF/FTC or dolutegravir/lamivudine. Blood plasma (BP) and seminal plasma (SP) were collected at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24. HIV-1-RNA was measured in BP and SP using the Cobas 6800 system (Roche Diagnostics) with a lower detection limit of 20 copies/mL. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects with undetectable SP HIV-1-RNA at Week 12 by intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen participants in the DTG + TAF/FTC and 16 in the dolutegravir/lamivudine arms were analysed, with basal SP viral load of 4.81 (4.30-5.43) and 4.76 (4.09-5.23), P = 0.469, respectively. At Week 12, only one participant in each treatment arm had a detectable SP HIV-1-RNA (DTG + TAF/FTC, 141 copies/mL; dolutegravir/lamivudine, 61 copies/mL). Based on the estimated means, there was no significant difference in the decay of HIV-1-RNA in both BP and SP over time between the two arms of treatment (F = 0.452, P = 0.662, and F = 1.147, P = 0.185, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: After 12 weeks of treatment, there were no differences in the percentage of undetectable SP HIV-1-RNA in naive PLWH who started dolutegravir/lamivudine compared with DTG + TAF/FTC.

Incidence Rate and Risk Factors for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Cohort of People Living With HIV from 2004 to 2017: Implementation of a Screening Program.

BACKGROUND: Anal squamous cell carcinoma is rare, in general, but considerably higher in HIV-infected men who have sex with men. There is no consensus on the screening of at-risk populations. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the incidence rates of anal squamous cell carcinoma and the efficacy of a screening program. DESIGN: This is a cohort study (SeVIHanal/NCT03713229). SETTING: This study was conducted at an HIV outpatient clinic in Seville, Spain. PATIENTS: From 2004 to 2017, all patients with at least 1 follow-up visit were analyzed (follow-up group), including a subgroup of men who have sex with men who participated in a specialized program for screening and treating anal neoplasia (SCAN group) from 2011 onward. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the incidence rate of anal squamous cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Of the 3878 people living with HIV included in the follow-up group, 897 were transferred to the SCAN group; 1584 (41%) were men who have sex with men. Total follow-up was 29,228 person-years with an overall incidence rate for anal squamous cell carcinoma of 68.4/100,000 person-years (95% CI, 46.7-97.4). The changes in the incidence rate/100,000 person-years (95% CI) over time was 20.7 (3.40-80.5) for 2004 to 2006, 37.3 (13.4-87.3) for 2007 to 2010, and 97.8 (63.8-144.9) for 2011 to 2017 (p < 0.001). The strongest impact on the incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma was made by the lack of immune restoration (adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% CI): 6.59 (4.24-10); p < 0.001), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention category C (adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% CI): 7.49 (5.69-9.85); p < 0.001), and non-men who have sex with men (adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% CI): 0.07 (0.05-0.10); p < 0.001) in a Poisson analysis. From 2010 to 2017, incidence rates (95% CI) of anal squamous cell carcinoma within the SCAN group and the men who have sex with men of the follow-up group were 95.7 (39.6-202) and 201 (101-386)/100,000 person-years (adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% CI): 0.30 (0.23-0.39); p<0.001). The incidence rate ratio (95% CI) including non-men who have sex with men in the follow-up group was 0.87 (0.69-1.11); p = 0.269. LIMITATIONS: Adherence to the visits could not be quantified. CONCLUSION: Incidence rates of anal squamous cell carcinoma in people living with HIV increased significantly from 2004 to 2017, especially in men who have sex with men who were not being screened. Participation in the SCAN program significantly reduced the incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma in men who have sex with men, in whom focus should be placed, especially on those presenting with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention category C and advanced immune suppression. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B734. TASA DE INCIDENCIA Y FACTORES DE RIESGO DEL CARCINOMA ANAL A CLULAS ESCAMOSAS EN UNA COHORTE DE PERSONAS QUE VIVEN CON EL VIH DE A IMPLEMENTACIN DE UN PROGRAMA DE DETECCIN: ANTECEDENTES:El carcinoma anal a células escamosas es generalmente raro, pero considerablemente más alto en hombres infectados por el VIH que tienen relaciones sexuales con hombres. No hay consenso sobre el cribado de poblaciones en riesgo.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar las tasas de incidencia del carcinoma anal a células escamosas y la eficacia de un programa de detección.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte (SeVIHanal / NCT03713229).AJUSTE:Clínica ambulatoria de VIH en Sevilla, España.PACIENTES:De 2004 a 2017, se analizaron todos los pacientes con al menos una visita de seguimiento (grupo F / U), incluido un subgrupo de hombres que tenían relaciones sexuales con hombres que participaron en un programa especializado de cribado y tratamiento de neoplasias anales (SCAN-group) a partir de 2011.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Tasas de incidencia del carcinoma anal a células escamosas.RESULTADOS:De las 3878 personas que viven con el VIH incluidas en el grupo F / U, 897 fueron transferidas al grupo SCAN, 1584 (41%) eran hombres que tenían relaciones sexuales con hombres. El seguimiento total fue de 29228 personas-año con una tasa de incidencia general de carcinoma anal a células escamosas de 68,4 / 100000 personas-año [intervalo de confianza del 95%: 46,7-97,4]. El cambio en las tasas de incidencia / 100000 personas-año (intervalo de confianza del 95%) a lo largo del tiempo fue 20,7 (3,40-80,5) para 2004-2006, 37,3 (13,4-87,3) para 2007-2010 y 97,8 (63,8-144,9) para 2011-2017, p <0,001. El impacto más fuerte en la incidencia del carcinoma a células escamosas anal fue la falta de restauración inmunológica [índice de tasa de incidencia ajustado (intervalo de confianza del 95%): 6,59 (4,24-10); p <0,001], categoría C de los Centros de Control de Enfermedades [índice de tasa de incidencia ajustado (intervalo de confianza del 95%): 7,49 (5,69-9,85); p <0,001] y no hombres que tenían relaciones sexuales con hombres [razón de tasa de incidencia ajustada (intervalo de confianza del 95%): 0,07 (0,05-0,10); p <0,001] en el análisis de Poisson. Desde 2010-2017, las tasas de incidencia (intervalo de confianza del 95%) de carcinoma anal a células escamosas dentro del grupo SCAN y los hombres que tienen relaciones sexuales con hombres del grupo F / U fueron 95,7 (39,6-202) y 201 (101- 386) / 100000 personas-año [razón de tasa de incidencia ajustada (intervalo de confianza del 95%): 0,30 (0,23-0,39); p <0,001]. La razón de la tasa de incidencia (intervalo de confianza del 95%), incluidos los no hombres que tenían relaciones sexuales con hombres en F / U, fue de 0,87 [0,69-1,11); p = 0,269].LIMITACIONES:No se pudo cuantificar la adherencia a las visitas.CONCLUSIÓNES:La tasa de incidencia del carcinoma anal a células escamosas en personas que viven con el VIH aumentó significativamente de 2004 a 2017, especialmente en hombres que tenían relaciones sexuales con hombres que no se someten a pruebas de detección. La participación en el programa SCAN redujo significativamente la incidencia de carcinoma anal a células escamosas en hombres que tenían relaciones sexuales con hombres, en quienes se debe prestar una especial atención, sobre todo en aquellos que se presentan en la categoría C de los Centros de Control de Enfermedades con inmunodeficiencia avanzada. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B734.

Modulation of Monocyte Activation and Function during Direct Antiviral Agent Treatment in Patients Coinfected with HIV and Hepatitis C Virus.

The activation phenotypes and functional changes in monocyte subsets during hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were evaluated. Twenty-two HIV/HCV-coinfected patients on suppressive combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) achieving HCV elimination after direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy and 10 HIV-monoinfected patients were included. The activation phenotype (10 markers) and polyfunctionality (intracellular interleukin-1α [IL-1α], IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α], and IL-10 production) in three monocyte subsets (classical, intermediate, and nonclassical) were evaluated by flow cytometry before and at the end of treatment. Cell-associated HIV DNA levels were assayed by droplet digital PCR. After HCV clearance, there was a significant increase in classical monocyte and decreases in intermediate and nonclassical monocyte levels. The levels of the activation markers CD49d, CD40, and CX3CR1 were decreased after treatment in the monocyte subsets, reaching the levels in HIV-monoinfected patients. After lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation, although polyfunctionality significantly decreased in intermediate and nonclassical monocytes, some combinations, such as the IL-1α- (IL-1α-negative) IL-1ß- IL-6+ (IL-6-producing) IL-8- TNF-α- IL-10- combination, were remarkably increased at the end of treatment compared to the control group. Cell-associated HIV DNA levels correlated with activation markers before but not after treatment. HCV clearance after DAA treatment in patients on cART exerts an anti-inflammatory profile on monocyte subsets, activation phenotypes, and polyfunctionality. However, there is not a complete normalization compared with HIV-monoinfected patients.

Is immune recovery different depending on the use of integrase strand transfer inhibitor-, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase- or boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients?

OBJECTIVES: To analyse whether integrase inhibitor (InSTI)-based regimens achieve better immunological recovery than NNRTI- or boosted PI (bPI)-based regimens as initial ART. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we selected patients who initiated ART with two NRTIs plus an InSTI, an NNRTI or a bPI and maintained both the same 'third drug' and an HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL in ≥95% of determinations once undetectable viral load had been achieved. We compared CD4+ count, %CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ ratio recovery over 2 years. Data were analysed using mixed-effects regression models for repeated measures. RESULTS: Of the 836 patients included, 208, 481 and 147 initiated with InSTI, NNRTI and bPI, respectively. For CD4+, %CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ two main slopes were identified: from month 0 to month 6, with the highest increments; and from month 6 to month 24, with smaller increases every semester. Although the patients on InSTI achieved undetectable viral load faster, for CD4+ and %CD4+ there were no differences in the slopes of change according to the third drug either for the first phase (P=0.137 and P=0.393, respectively) or from month 6 onwards (P=0.834 and P=0.159, respectively). The increase in CD4+/CD8+ was slightly higher for bPI compared with InSTI (difference of 0.0119, 95% CI 0.0020-0.0205; P=0.018), but clinically negligible. From month 6 onwards, no differences were found between treatment groups (P=0.176). CONCLUSIONS: Immune restoration measured as CD4+ count, %CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ increases was independent of the third antiretroviral drug class used when given with two NRTIs.

High-risk Human Papilloma Virus Testing Improves Diagnostic Performance to Predict Moderate- to High-grade Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected Men Who Have Sex With Men in Low-to-Absent Cytological Abnormalities.

BACKGROUND: Screening methods for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) are suboptimal. We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of a composite endpoint comprising anal liquid-based cytology (aLBC) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing to predict histological high-grade SILs (hHSILs). METHODS: From the SeVIHanal cohort, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) who had an aLBC with concomitant HR-HPV testing were included. hHSILs were determined by high-resolution anoscopy (HRA)-guided biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 705 visits obtained from 426 patients were included. The prevalence of HR-HPV among aLBC results were 51.9% (133/215) normal, 87.9% (20/232) low-grade SILs (LSILs), and 90.9% (149/164) high-grade SILs; P (linear association) < .001. Low prevalence of hHSILs was only observed for the composite aLBC/HR-HPV testing endpoint "normal/noHR-HPV" (10%) and "LSIL/noHR-HPV" (4%). The prognostic values (95% confidence interval) for HR-HPV to predict hHSILs in normal cytology were positive predictive value (PPV), 29.3% (25.6%-33.3%); negative predictive value (NPV), 90.2% (82.8%-94.7%); sensitivity, 83% (69.2%-92.4%); and specificity, 44.1% (36.4%-51.9%). Corresponding figures for cytologic LSILs were PPV, 39.2% (37.4%-41.1%); NPV, 96.4% (78.9%-99.5%); sensitivity, 98.8% (93.3%-99.9%); and specificity, 17.9% (12.1%-24.9%). A positive interaction and a synergistic effect for the composite endpoint were observed (relative excess risk = 1.50, attributable proportion of histological results to interaction = 0.17, synergy index = 1.24). CONCLUSIONS: HRA should not be indicated in the setting of LSILs/noHR-HPV following aLBC-based screening. In contrast, HIV-infected MSM with normal aLBC/HR-HPV infection should be considered for HRA. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03713229.

Eradication of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Reduces Immune Activation, Microbial Translocation, and the HIV DNA Level in HIV/HCV-Coinfected Patients.

Background: There are contradictory data about the influence that hepatitis C virus (HCV) has on immune activation and inflammation in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HCV. Methods: HIV/HCV-coinfected patients receiving antiretroviral treatment who achieved a sustained virological response with interferon-free regimens were consecutively enrolled in a prospective study. The following factors were assessed before, immediately after the end of, and 1 month after the end of therapy: expression of HLA-DR/CD38, PD-1, and CD57 on CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells; measurement of the total HIV DNA load in peripheral blood mononuclear cells; and determination of plasma levels of soluble CD14 (sCD14), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA), interleukin 6 (IL-6), D-dimers, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Results: Ninety-seven patients were consecutively included. At the end of therapy and 1 month later, there were significant reductions in the expression of HLA-DR and CD38 in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as well as levels of proviral HIV DNA, sCD14, LPS, 16S rDNA, and D-dimer (P < .001). By contrast, the expression of PD-1 and CD57 in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and levels of IL-6 and hsCRP did not change. The improvement in levels of immune activation markers, proviral HIV DNA, and microbial translocation markers did not translate into an increased CD4+ T-cell count or increased ratio of the CD4+ T-cell count to the CD8+ T-cell count. Conclusions: HCV eradication in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients results in significant decreases in levels of immune activation markers, proviral HIV DNA load, microbial translocation markers, and D-dimers. These findings support the use of HCV treatment for all HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, even those with low-grade fibrosis.

Viral Kinetics in Semen With Different Antiretroviral Families in Treatment-Naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: There are several regimens for starting antiretroviral treatment, but it remains unknown whether either of them is more advantageous regarding the time course and magnitude of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA decay in semen. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differential effect of different antiretroviral drug families on viral kinetics in seminal plasma (SP) of treatment-naive HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Phase II, randomized, open-label study in which participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (DF) plus emtricitabine, and either cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir (EVGcobi), rilpivirine (RPV), or ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRVrtv). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with undetectable HIV-RNA in SP at week 12. HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA was measured in paired SP and blood plasma (BP) at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Elvitegravir (EVG), RPV, and darunavir (DRV) concentrations were quantified by the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: In SP, the HIV-RNA decay rate with RPV was as fast as with EVGcobi; by week 12, all participants in the RPV and the EVGcobi groups reached an undetectable viral load but only 58.3% in the DRVrtv arm (P = .003). The highest SP/BP drug concentration ratio was for EVG (0.43), followed-up by RPV (0.19), and DRV (0.10). For both EVG and RPV, the SP concentrations exceeded >2-fold the protein binding-adjusted EC90 for wild-type HIV-1; for DRV, only 33.7% of the SP showed concentrations above the protein binding-adjusted EC90. CONCLUSIONS: In SP, both RPV and EVGcobi, associated to tenofovir-DF and emtricitabine, behave similarly and achieve an undetectable viral load much faster than DRVrtv. REGISTRATION: European Medical Agency (No. EudraCT: 2014-001348-39).

Pharmacokinetic interactions between cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir and darunavir in HIV-infected patients.

Objectives: To evaluate if there are significant drug-drug interactions between cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir and 800 mg darunavir once daily taken simultaneously, as has been suggested previously. Methods: The study population consisted of three groups of unselected volunteers taking a regimen of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (150, 150, 200 and 300 mg, respectively) co-formulated in a single tablet plus 800 mg darunavir (group A); only co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (group B); and cobicistat-boosted darunavir (800 mg darunavir + 150 mg cobicistat) plus two nucleos(t)ide analogues (group C). Elvitegravir, cobicistat and darunavir concentrations at the end of the dosing interval ( C 24 ) were quantified using a validated LC with tandem MS method. Results: A total of 170 samples were obtained from 24, 32 and 32 patients in groups A, B and C, respectively. In group A, the elvitegravir C 24 were similar to those in group B (233.67 versus 250.39 ng/mL) ( P = 0.406) and the darunavir C 24 were similar to those in group C (1293.54 versus 1319.34 ng/mL) ( P = 0.908). The cobicistat C 24 were comparable in groups A and B (20.2 versus 20.9 ng/mL) and slightly higher in group C (27.7 ng/mL) ( P = 0.059). Conclusions: The results provide evidence of similar elvitegravir and darunavir C 24 concentrations when these drugs are co-administered as co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus 800 mg darunavir or dosed separately.

Low risk of liver decompensation among human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients with mild fibrosis in the short term.

UNLABELLED: Liver fibrosis is used to make decisions about the timing of therapy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) in routine clinical practice, which should be based on the short-term likelihood of liver decompensations. Thus, we aimed at evaluating the risk of decompensations and death among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV-coinfected individuals according to their baseline fibrosis classified by either liver biopsy or liver stiffness measurement (LSM). Patients coinfected with HIV/HCV, naive or without sustained virological response to HCV therapy, were included in this cohort. Fibrosis was classified by biopsy in 683 patients and by LSM in 1046 individuals. Reference categories were fibrosis stage 0 and LSM <6 kPa. For patients with biopsy, the adjusted subhazard ratio for decompensations and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) by fibrosis stage were as follows: stage 1, 2.3 (0.27-20.3), P = 0.443; stage 2, 2.8 (0.33-24), P = 0.345; stage 3, 4.91 (0.60-41), P = 0.137; stage 4, 9.89 (1.25-79.5), P = 0.030. For patients with LSM, the adjusted subhazard ratio and 95% CI by LSM category were as follows: 6-9.4 kPa, 1.89 (0.18-20.3), P = 0.599; 9.5-14.5 kPa, 6.59 (0.73-59.2), P = 0.092; ≥14.6 kPa, 59.5 (8.3-427), P < 0.0001. Regarding the risk of death, the adjusted hazard ratio and 95% CI for death by fibrosis stage were as follows: stage 1, 1.3 (0.4-4.11), P = 0.677; stage 2, 2.68 (0.86-8.36), P = 0.090; stage 3, 2.58 (0.82-8.15), P = 0.106; stage 4, 4.35 (1.43-13.3), P = 0.010. For patients with LSM, the adjusted hazard ratio and 95% CI for death by LSM were as follows: 6-9.4 kPa, 1.7 (0.63-4.79), P = 0.288; 9.5-14.5 kPa, 3.38 (1.2-9.5), P = 0.021; ≥14.6 kPa, 12.7 (4.9-33.6), P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Patients coinfected with HIV/HCV without advanced fibrosis are at very low risk of decompensations in the short term; deferral of HCV therapy for a few years and monitoring fibrosis progression is a safe option until cheaper, more effective, and more convenient HCV treatment becomes widely available.

Telaprevir and ribavirin interaction: higher ribavirin levels are not only due to renal dysfunction during triple therapy.

A higher incidence of anemia has been observed during the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) infection with pegylated alpha interferon (pegIFN-α), ribavirin, and telaprevir. We assessed the impacts that concomitant administration of telaprevir and changes in the glomerular filtration rate have on ribavirin plasma levels. The minimum concentrations of ribavirin in plasma (ribavirin Cmin) determined during triple therapy including telaprevir were compared with those observed after telaprevir withdrawal and those observed in the same subjects and in a large cohort during a previous course of pegIFN-α plus ribavirin. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling for ribavirin was performed at steady state during the triple-therapy phase. Ribavirin levels were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Twenty-seven HCV-1/HIV-coinfected patients were enrolled. The median ribavirin Cmin for triple therapy (4.08 µg/ml; range, 2.14 to 5.56 µg/ml) was higher than that observed after telaprevir withdrawal (1.96 µg/ml; range, 0.41 to 3.45 µg/ml) (P < 0.001) and that observed for 125 HCV-1/HIV-coinfected patients treated only with pegIFN-α plus ribavirin (1.65 µg/ml; range, 0.41 to 5.56 µg/ml) (P < 0.001). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased >20% from the baseline value in 11 of 27 patients and became normal after telaprevir removal in almost all cases. There was a negative correlation between eGFR and ribavirin clearance (r(2) = 0.257; P = 0.064) but not the ribavirin area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12) (r(2) = 0.001; P = 0.455). Thus, there is a significant pharmacokinetic interaction between telaprevir and ribavirin that results in very high ribavirin levels, which explains the excess of toxicity observed with this drug combination. A blockade of the proximal tubular transporters might be implicated in both the increase in plasma creatinine and the high ribavirin levels. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01818856.).

A 24-week treatment strategy with pegylated interferon/ribavirin in HIV/hepatitis C virus genotype 3-coinfected patients who achieved a rapid virologic response results in a high sustained virologic response rate.

We designed a study to evaluate the efficacy of a 24-week treatment strategy in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3-coinfected patients achieving rapid virologic response for a first HCV treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (peg-IFN/RBV). Our results suggest that a shorter course of peg-IFN/RBV therapy may be sufficient in this population.

Role of ritonavir in the drug interactions between telaprevir and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir.

BACKGROUND: Detrimental bidirectional pharmacokinetic interactions have been observed when telaprevir (TVR) and ritonavir (RTV)-boosted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors are coadministered in healthy volunteers. Our aim was to evaluate the role of RTV in the bidirectional TVR and atazanavir (ATV) interactions. METHOD: An open-label, sequential study was carried out in hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-coinfected patients on a RTV-boosted ATV-based (ATVr) antiretroviral regimen (300/100 mg every 24 hours) and triple therapy for chronic C hepatitis genotype 1 (TVR, 1125 mg every 12 hours, pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin). Pharmacokinetic profiles were acquired before and after switching from ATVr to unboosted ATV (200 mg every 12 hours). The plasma levels of both drugs were determined by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis and compared by geometric mean ratios and their 90% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Fourteen white HCV/HIV-coinfected males were enrolled in this study. After RTV was withdrawn, the TVR AUC(0-12) (area under the concentration-time curve), maximum concentration (C(max)), and minimum concentration (C(min)) values increased by 19% (7%-30%), 12% (0.9%-29%), and 18% (2%-34%), respectively, without any changes in the TVR terminal half-life. The ATV AUC(0-12), C(max), and C(min) values were 39% (13%-66%), 19% (8%-59%), and 48% (1%-96%) higher, respectively, with a significantly shorter terminal half-life (22.6 hours vs 10.4 hours). CONCLUSIONS: RTV is responsible for the adverse interactions that occur when TVR and ATVr are administered together, possibly by influencing either the absorption phase or first-pass metabolism of TVR. The boost effect of TVR on ATV exposure is higher than on RTV, despite its shorter terminal half-life. The coadministration of TVR and unboosted ATV results in increased exposure of both drugs compared with their coadministration with RTV. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01818856. European Medicines Agency EudraCT no. 2012-002515-25.

Long-term effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of doravirine in antiretroviral-experienced people with HIV in real life.

Real-life data on doravirine (DOR) in different drug combinations are limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of DOR plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), mainly abacavir/lamivudine, and dual therapies in people with HIV (PWH), mostly virologically suppressed. Ambispective observational study that enrolled adults PWH who initiated a DOR-based regimen from September 2020 to February 2022 at a referral center in Spain. Participants were grouped as follows: A, received DOR plus two NRTI; B, dual therapy (DT) with DOR plus dolutegravir (DTG) or darunavir/cobicistat (DRVc); C, DOR plus ≥two antiretroviral drugs. The primary endpoints were treatment effectiveness at week 48 by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analysis (OT). A cohort of 187 participants, 91% virologically suppressed, were analyzed after a median follow-up of 112 weeks (80-136). Group A received DOR plus abacavir/lamivudine (ABV/3TC) (n = 109) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TFV/3TC) (n = 45). At week 48, the effectiveness of DOR plus ABV/3TC by ITT was 90.8% (CI95, 88.0-93.6), better than with TFV/FTC [73.3% (66.7-79.9); P = 0.003]. Only one virologic failure was observed. Mild adverse effects were the cause of treatment discontinuation in 7.8%, followed by switching to a single-tablet regimen. In group B, the effectiveness by ITT was 92.9% (CI95, 88.0-97.8) at week 48. No adverse effects or virologic failure were registered in this group. DOR plus two NRTI or DT have long-term effectiveness and safety as a switching option for PWH, mostly virologically suppressed. The DOR plus ABV/3TC combination has shown even better effectiveness than TFV/FTC.IMPORTANCEDOR-based regimens have shown long-term effectiveness and safety in PWH, mostly virologically suppressed. The combination of DOR plus ABV/3TC has shown even better safety and effectiveness than TFV/FTC. DOR plus two NRTI offers cost benefits compared to other regimens.

The HIV-1 reservoir landscape in persistent elite controllers and transient elite controllers.

BACKGROUNDPersistent controllers (PCs) maintain antiretroviral-free HIV-1 control indefinitely over time, while transient controllers (TCs) eventually lose virological control. It is essential to characterize the quality of the HIV reservoir in terms of these phenotypes in order to identify the factors that lead to HIV progression and to open new avenues toward an HIV cure.METHODSThe characterization of HIV-1 reservoir from peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed using next-generation sequencing techniques, such as full-length individual and matched integration site proviral sequencing (FLIP-Seq; MIP-Seq).RESULTSPCs and TCs, before losing virological control, presented significantly lower total, intact, and defective proviruses compared with those of participants on antiretroviral therapy (ART). No differences were found in total and defective proviruses between PCs and TCs. However, intact provirus levels were lower in PCs compared with TCs; indeed the intact/defective HIV-DNA ratio was significantly higher in TCs. Clonally expanded intact proviruses were found only in PCs and located in centromeric satellite DNA or zinc-finger genes, both associated with heterochromatin features. In contrast, sampled intact proviruses were located in permissive genic euchromatic positions in TCs.CONCLUSIONSThese results suggest the need for, and can give guidance to, the design of future research to identify a distinct proviral landscape that may be associated with the persistent control of HIV-1 without ART.FUNDINGInstituto de Salud Carlos III (FI17/00186, FI19/00083, MV20/00057, PI18/01532, PI19/01127 and PI22/01796), Gilead Fellowships (GLD22/00147). NIH grants AI155171, AI116228, AI078799, HL134539, DA047034, MH134823, amfAR ARCHE and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Benefits from sustained virologic response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients with compensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of sustained virologic response (SVR) to pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) on the incidence of liver-related complications and overall mortality in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with compensated hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis. METHODS: We included in this prospective cohort study 166 coinfected patients with compensated cirrhosis, who received peg-IFN plus RBV, to assess the time from the starting date of HCV therapy to the first hepatic decompensation and death due to any cause. RESULTS: SVR was observed in 43 (25%) individuals. Two (4.6%) patients with SVR developed liver decompensation vs 33 (26.8%) individuals without SVR (P = .002). The incidence of liver-related complications was 0.89 cases per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], .11-3.1) in SVR patients and 6.4 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI, 4.5-8.9) in non-SVR patients. Factors independently associated with liver decompensation were non-SVR (hazard ratio [HR], 8.1; 95% CI, 1.08-61.5; P = .042) and MELD score ≥9 at baseline (HR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.2; P = .016). Two (4.6%) patients with SVR died due to any cause compared with 22 (17.9%) individuals without SVR (P = .02). MELD score ≥9 (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.7; P = .011) and non-SVR (HR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.07-61; P = .043) were independently associated with overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The achievement of SVR following peg-IFN plus RBV markedly reduces the incidence of liver-related decompensation and the overall mortality in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Risk of liver decompensation among HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected individuals with advanced fibrosis: implications for the timing of therapy.

BACKGROUND: Most human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients who are currently receiving boceprevir or telaprevir-based therapy against HCV show cirrhosis. However, the risk of liver decompensation (DC) among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with stage 3 fibrosis in the short term could be high enough to not allow delays. We aimed at assessing the risk of DC among HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals with advanced fibrosis (F3-F4). METHODS: Eight hundred ninety-two HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, naive or without sustained virologic response to HCV therapy, were included in this cohort. Fibrosis was staged by biopsy in 317 patients and by liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in 575 individuals. Precirrhosis was defined as an LSM of 9.5-14.6 kilopascals (kPa), and cirrhosis as an LSM of ≥14.6 kPa. RESULTS: For patients with biopsy, the probability of remaining free of DC for F3 vs F4 was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95%-100%) vs 96% (95% CI, 91%-98%) at 1 year, and 98% (95% CI, 94%-100%) vs 87% (95% CI, 81%-92%) at 3 years. The only factor independently associated with DC was fibrosis stage (F4 vs F3, subhazard ratio [SHR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.07-4.1; P = .032). For patients with LSM, the probability of remaining free of DC for precirrhosis vs cirrhosis was 99% (95% CI, 96%-100%) vs 93% (95% CI, 89%-96%) at 1 year, and 97% (95% CI, 94%-99%) vs 83% (95% CI, 77%-87%) at 3 years. Factors independently associated with DC were platelet count (<100 × 10(3) vs ≥100 × 10(3): SHR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.01-3.42; P = .046) and LSM (cirrhosis vs precirrhosis: SHR, 5.67; 95% CI, 2.27-14.1; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: As in patients with cirrhosis, immediate therapy against HCV is warranted for patients with precirrhosis and HIV coinfection, as they are at risk of DC soon after the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis.

Lopinavir plasma concentrations and virological outcome with lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy in HIV-1-infected patients.

There is significant intra- and intersubject variability in lopinavir (LPV) plasma concentrations after standard dosing; thus, this prospective study was conducted to determine whether low plasma LPV concentrations could be associated with virological outcome throughout lopinavir-ritonavir maintenance monotherapy (mtLPVr) in the clinical practice setting. If this hypothesis would be confirmed, LPV drug monitoring could improve the efficacy of mtLPVr regimens. Patients with previous virological failure (VF) on protease inhibitor-based regimens were also included if the genotypic resistance tests showed no major resistance mutation associated with reduced susceptibility to lopinavir-ritonavir. VF was defined as 2 consecutive determinations of HIV RNA levels of >200 copies/ml. Efficacy was analyzed by per-protocol analysis. Plasma LPV trough concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography using a UV detector. A total of 127 patients were included (22% with previous failure on protease inhibitors). After 96 weeks, the efficacy rate was 82.3% (95% confidence interval [CI(95)], 75.3 to 89.3%). Virological efficacy was independent of LPV plasma concentrations even when LPVr was given once daily. An adherence of <90% (HR, 4.4 [CI(95), 1.78 to 10.8; P = 0.001]) and the presence of blips in the preceding 12 months (HR, 3.06 [CI(95), 1.17 to 8.01; P = 0.022]) were the only variables independently associated with time to VF. These findings suggest that the LPV concentrations achieved with the standard doses of LPVr are sufficient to maintain virological control during monotherapy and that measurement of LPV concentrations is not useful for predicting virological outcome. Tight control of viral replication in the previous months and strict adherence throughout the mtLPVr regimen could improve the virological efficacy of this maintenance regimen.

Hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients.

UNLABELLED: Hepatic steatosis (HS) is frequent in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) and metabolic alterations could induce HS. However, a protective effect of ART has been reported in a paired biopsy study. Thus, our aim was to examine the changes and predictors of HS progression among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with sequential biopsies. We also evaluated the rates of steatohepatitis and factors associated thereof. HIV-infected patients with detectable serum HCV RNA, who underwent two biopsies, separated at least by 1 year, were included in this retrospective study. HS progression was defined as increase in one or more HS grades. The median (interquartile range) time between biopsies was 3.3 (2.0-5.2) years. Among 146 individuals, HS at baseline was observed in 86 (60%) patients and in 113 (77%) in the follow-up biopsy (P < 0.001). Progression of HS was observed in 60 (40%) patients. HS regressed in 11 (8%) patients. Factors associated with HS progression were changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) between biopsies (per 10 mg/dL increase; odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval; CI] = 1.4 [1.04-1.8]; P = 0.024) and cumulative use of dideoxynucleoside analogs (per year; OR [95% CI] = 1.5 [1.2-1.8]; P = 0.001). Persistent steatohepatitis or progression to steatohepatitis between biopsies was observed in 27 (18%) patients. Persistence of or progression to steatohepatitis was associated with progression ≥ 1 fibrosis stages between biopsies (OR [95% CI] = 2.4 [1.01-5.7]; P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: HS progresses frequently and regression is rarely observed in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, including in those on ART. Cumulative exposure to dideoxynucleoside analogs and increases in FPG are related with HS progression. Stetatohepatitis is frequently observed in these patients and is linked to fibrosis progression.

[Safety profile of rilpivirine: general and neuropsychiatric tolerability, safety in patients with hepatitis B or C viruses, and lipid profile]. / Perfil de seguridad de rilpivirina: tolerabilidad general y neuropsiquiátrica, seguridad en pacientes coinfectados con virus de la hepatitis B/virus de la hepatitis C, y perfil lipídico.

Currently available data on the safety and tolerability of rilpivirine come from the product information document, a phase IIb, dose-finding clinical trial (TMC278-C204), the phase III ECHO and THRIVE clinical trials, and the preliminary data from the STaR and SPIRIT clinical trials, with a total of 1,728 patients. The comparator has usually been efavirenz. All studies have found a lower incidence and severity of neuropsychiatric adverse effects, a better lipid profile, and a lower number of patients with subclinical transaminase elevation in patients treated with rilpivirine. However, because of the relatively low number of patients coinfected with hepatitis B or C virus, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. Similarly, experience in patients with mild or moderate liver failure is limited and there are no safety data in patients with advanced liver failure.