2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Diagnostic Imaging of Suspected Acute Diverticulitis in Adults and Pregnant People.

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute diverticulitis. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Risk Assessment in Adults and Children.

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides a recommendation for risk stratification according to severity of illness score. The panel's recommendation is based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adheres to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Diagnostic Imaging of Suspected Acute Intra-abdominal Abscess in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This article is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this article, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute intra-abdominal abscess. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Utility of Intra-abdominal Fluid Cultures in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for obtaining cultures of intra-abdominal fluid in patients with known or suspected intra-abdominal infection. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Utility of Blood Cultures in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This article is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this guideline, the panel provides recommendations for obtaining blood cultures in patients with known or suspected intra-abdominal infection. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Diagnostic Imaging of Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute appendicitis. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intraabdominal Infections: Diagnostic Imaging of Suspected Acute Cholecystitis and Acute Cholangitis in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This article is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intraabdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this article, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute cholecystitis and acute cholangitis. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Risk Assessment, Diagnostic Imaging, and Microbiological Evaluation in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

As the first part of an update to the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the panel presents 21 updated recommendations. These recommendations span risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

A guide to using technological applications to facilitate systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review (SR) synthesizes evidence in a reproducible way and informs evidence-based decision-making. SRs are time-intensive, particularly with respect to staying organized, maintaining records, and managing different phases of the process. Although there are numerous methodological guides to lead researchers in the approach to SRs to minimize bias and enhance rigor, there is less focus on technological approaches that can make the SR process easier for researchers. AIM: To guide researchers through the currently available technological applications that can assist with the SR process and synthesis of scientific literature. METHODOLOGY: Key ways that technological applications can facilitate the SR process are examined. RESULTS: Specific applications are discussed and stratified by their support of one or multiple phases of the systematic review process. Key features, strengths, and limitations are provided for technological applications that support the SR process. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: This paper guides researchers in different ways technology can support SRs. Through use of these applications, the researcher can complete SRs in a timely manner and manage the process effectively.

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Puberty and Fertility in Girls with Turner Syndrome.

Women with Turner Syndrome (TS) have a variety of medical needs throughout their lives; however, the peripubertal years are particularly challenging. From a medical perspective, the burden of care increases during this time due to growth optimization strategies, frequent health screenings, and puberty induction. Psychologically, girls begin to comprehend the long-term implications of the condition, including their diminished fertility potential. Unfortunately, clear guidelines for how to best approach this stage have not been established. It remains to be determined what is the best age to begin treatment; the best compound, dose, or protocol to induce puberty; how, when or what to discuss regarding fertility and potential fertility preservation options; and how to support them to accept their differences and empower them to take an active role in their care. Given the complexity of this life stage, a multidisciplinary treatment team that includes experts in endocrinology, gynecology, and psychology is optimal.

Discharging Asthma Patients on 3-Hour ß-Agonist Treatments: A Quality Improvement Project.

OBJECTIVES: Asthma exacerbations are a leading cause of hospitalization among children. Despite the existence of hospital protocols and national guidelines, little guidance is available regarding appropriate short-acting ß-agonist (SABA) frequency discharge criteria. Our aim was to reduce the median length of stay (LOS) for children hospitalized with asthma exacerbations by 4 hours by changing the discharge requirement SABA frequency. METHODS: Multiple plan-do-study-act cycles based on findings in our key driver diagram were used to decrease LOS. Our primary intervention was reducing the SABA administration frequency discharge requirement from every 4 hours to every 3 hours. After a feasibility pilot, this change was implemented throughout the hospital. Our intervention bundle included updating our evidence-based guidelines, electronic health record order sets and note templates, house-wide education, and a new process for respiratory therapists to notify physicians of discharge readiness. Our primary metric was LOS, with 3-, 7-, and 14-day same-cause emergency department (ED) revisits and hospital readmissions as balancing metrics. Statistical process control charts and nonparametric testing were performed for data analysis. RESULTS: Median hospital LOS was significantly lower in the postintervention period compared with the preintervention period (30.18 vs 36.14 hours respectively; P < .001). Statistical process control charts indicated special cause variation was achieved. No significant differences were observed in rates of ED revisits or hospital readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the discharge requirement of SABA frequency from every 4 hours to every 3 hours resulted in a reduction in LOS, with no increase in ED recidivism or hospital readmission rates.