Once-daily extended-release levetiracetam as adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients with epilepsy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Double-blind randomized trial to assess efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended-release levetiracetam (LEV XR) tablets (2 x 500 mg) as add-on therapy in patients (12-70 years old) with partial-onset seizures (POS) refractory to one to three antiepileptic drugs. METHODS: After an 8-week prospective baseline-period, eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to once-daily LEV XR 1,000 mg/day or placebo for 12 weeks. Evaluations included changes from baseline in POS-frequency/week, responders (>or=50% reduction in POS-frequency/week), seizure-freedom, adverse events, laboratory tests, physical and neurologic examinations, vital signs, body-weight, and 12-lead electrocardiogram. RESULTS: Of 188 patients screened, 158 were randomized (intention-to-treat population): LEV XR (n = 79) or placebo (n = 79). Seventy-one (89.9%) LEV XR and 72 (91.1%) placebo patients completed the trial. Median POS-frequency/week reduction was 46.1% on LEV XR and 33.4% on placebo. Estimated reduction with LEV XR over placebo was 14.4% (p = 0.038). Thirty-four (43%) LEV XR and 23 (29.1%) placebo patients experienced >or=50% reduction in POS-frequency/week. Eight (10.1%) patients receiving LEV XR and one (1.3%) receiving placebo were free of POS during the 12-week treatment period. Forty-one (53.2%) LEV XR and 43 (54.4%) placebo patients reported >or=1 adverse event. Adverse events reported with an incidence >5% and seen more often with LEV XR than with placebo were somnolence, influenza, irritability, nasopharyngitis, dizziness, and nausea. DISCUSSION: Once-daily LEV XR 1,000 mg was effective and well-tolerated as adjunct therapy in patients with POS. Ten percent of patients randomized to LEV XR experienced freedom from POS. These results support the clinical value of this new LEV XR formulation.

Prospective assessment of levetiracetam pharmacokinetics during dose escalation in 4- to 12-year-old children with partial-onset seizures on concomitant carbamazepine or valproate.

PURPOSE: To assess the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam and its major metabolite ucb L057 in children with partial-onset seizures and determine whether it is affected by adjunctive carbamazepine or valproate. To correlate levetiracetam concentrations in plasma and saliva and to assess its safety and clinical response. METHODS: Design was an open-label, multicenter study. Twenty-one children (4-12 years old) with epilepsy taking carbamazepine (13) or valproate (8) received adjunctive levetiracetam. Levetiracetam was initiated at 20 mg/(kg day) and titrated at 2-week intervals to 40 and then 60 mg/(kg day). Twelve-hour pharmacokinetics were determined at the end of each 2-week period. Efficacy was estimated from the partial seizure frequency per week and Global Evaluation Scale. RESULTS: Levetiracetam was rapidly absorbed following oral dosing, with median t(max) of 0.5 h. Dose proportional increases were observed for C(max) and AUC((0-12)) over the dose range; t(1/2) was 4.9 h. Pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam and ucb L057 were not markedly different with concomitant carbamazepine or valproate; clearance was only 7-13% faster and AUC was decreased by only 15-24% in those on carbamazepine compared to valproate. Levetiracetam did not affect trough carbamazepine or valproate. Concentration in saliva and plasma were strongly correlated. Seizure frequency declined by 50% or more in 43% of subjects in the intent-to-treat population (n=21) and in 56% of those with seizures at baseline (n=16). Marked or moderate improvement occurred in 80% and 75% of patients based on Global Evaluation Scale ratings by investigators and parents/guardians, respectively. Levetiracetam was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam exhibits simple pharmacokinetics in children, with rapid absorption and dose-proportional kinetics. Small but not clinically relevant differences were observed between subjects receiving carbamazepine and valproate, suggesting significant dose adjustment is usually not necessary. This substantiates prior assessments that levetiracetam clearance is higher in children than adults, necessitating a higher dose in children on a mg/kg basis, and suggests it is useful add-on therapy for children with partial-onset seizures regardless of baseline therapy.

Levetiracetam: relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of a 10% oral solution (750 mg) and 750-mg tablets.

Levetiracetam, an antiepileptic drug, is used worldwide as an adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures. The availability of a new oral solution formulation would provide an additional treatment option for patients who have difficulty swallowing tablets. A phase I single-center, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover, single-dose study was conducted to confirm that a 10% oral solution of levetiracetam was bioequivalent to the 750-mg oral tablet and to characterize its pharmacokinetics. Each of 24 healthy subjects received a single oral 750-mg dose of the randomized levetiracetam formulation (7.5 mL of 10% solution or 750-mg tablet) on day 1 and a single oral dose of the alternate formulation on day 8. Serial blood samples were collected from 0 to 36 hours after each dose administration for determination of plasma levetiracetam concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated, and bioequivalence of the two formulations was evaluated. The mean levetiracetam plasma concentration-time curves and pharmacokinetic parameters essentially were identical for the oral 10% solution and tablet and consistent with previously reported levetiracetam pharmacokinetics. The 90% confidence limits of the geometric mean ratio of the two formulations for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable time point, and maximum plasma concentration were within the 80% to 125% range, demonstrating bioequivalence of the two formulations. Both levetiracetam formulations were well tolerated. The levetiracetam 10% oral solution is a bioequivalent, well-tolerated alternative to the tablet formulation in patients who have difficulty swallowing.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in healthy Chinese male subjects.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Levetiracetam has been evaluated for epilepsy since 1992. * Pharmacokinetic studies of levetiracetam have been conducted in healthy volunteers, in adults, children and elderly patients with epilepsy, and in patients with renal and hepatic impairment. * Although this antiepileptic has been well studied in Western countries, this paper describes the first such trial of the drug in a Chinese population. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * Information is given on the pharmacokinetics, dose proportionality, safety and tolerability profile of levetiracetam in healthy male Chinese volunteers, and the results are compared with published data obtained in White subjects. * The pharmacokinetics and the pattern of adverse events of levetiracetam in Chinese subjects are similar to the data reported in White subjects. AIMS: The main aims of this study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in healthy male Chinese volunteers and to assess the dose proportionality between the 500-mg and 1500-mg single doses. METHODS: This was a randomized, single-centre, single-dose, two-way crossover study. Twenty-six healthy male Chinese subjects were enrolled. All subjects received a single dose of 500 mg or 1500 mg levetiracetam tablet(s) on the dosing day, and the wash-out period was 7 days. Blood was obtained for a 36-h pharmacokinetic evaluation. RESULTS: Following single-dose administration of 500 mg and 1500 mg of levetiracetam, the median t(max) was 0.5 and 0.5 h; t(1/2) was 7.3 +/- 0.8 and 7.3 +/- 0.7 h; C(max) was 13.6 +/- 3.2 and 47.1 +/- 12.1 microg ml(-1); AUC(0-infinity) was 109.3 +/- 14.1 and 340.4 +/- 50.6 microg h(-1) ml(-1); and AUC(0-t) was 105.7 +/- 13.3 and 329.0 +/- 47.9 microg h(-1) ml(-1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both C(max) and AUCs were dose-proportional over the range of 500-1500 mg. The pharmacokinetic data obtained in these Chinese subjects were similar to the historical data from a matched group of White subjects.

Pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in infants and young children with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To assess the single-dose pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam and its major metabolite ucb L057 in infants and young children with epilepsy. METHODS: Eligible patients with a stable regimen of antiepileptic medications received a single oral dose of levetiracetam 20 mg/kg administered as a 10% oral solution followed by a 24-hour pharmacokinetic evaluation. RESULTS: Thirteen subjects (age 2.3-46.2 months) enrolled and received levetiracetam; 12 provided evaluable pharmacokinetic data. Levetiracetam was rapidly absorbed and reached peak plasma concentration (t(max)) 1.4 +/- 0.9 hours after dosing. The mean half-life (t(1/2)) of levetiracetam was 5.3 +/- 1.3 hours, and the apparent clearance was 1.46 +/- 0.42 mL/min/kg. Graphical differences were observed among three age subgroups (1 to <6 months, 6 to <24 months, and 24 to <48 months); however, statistical analysis was limited due to each subgroup's small sample size. No significant gender differences were detected. Treatment-emergent adverse events were seen in three patients (23.1%) but were not considered to be related to levetiracetam. CONCLUSIONS: The mean t(1/2) of levetiracetam was shorter and its apparent clearance was more rapid for infants and young children than that previously reported for adults. When determining dosage, age-dependent drug clearance should be considered; these findings suggest that a larger dose of levetiracetam (corrected for body weight) needs to be considered for infants and young children with epilepsy than that given to adults with epilepsy. A single dose of levetiracetam was well tolerated in this study population.

Levetiracetam intravenous infusion: a randomized, placebo-controlled safety and pharmacokinetic study.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) administered intravenously (IV) at higher doses and/or at a faster infusion rate than proposed. The secondary objective was to assess LEV pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Single ascending doses of LEV administered by IV infusion (2,000, 3,000, 4,000 mg over 15 min; 1,500, 2,000, 2,500 mg over 5 min) were evaluated in 48 healthy subjects in a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study. RESULTS: All randomized subjects completed the study. Adverse events reported after IV administration of LEV (