Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Transpl Int ; 36: 11181, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37448449

ABSTRACT

For counseling it is important to know if pregnancy after Living Kidney Donation (LKD) affects long-term outcomes of the mono-kidney and the mother. Therefore, we performed a retrospective multicenter study in women ≤45 years who donated their kidney between 1981 and 2017. Data was collected via questionnaires and medical records. eGFR of women with post-LKD pregnancies were compared to women with pre-LKD pregnancies or nulliparous. eGFR before and after pregnancy were compared in women with post-LKD pregnancies. Pregnancy outcomes post-LKD were compared with pre-LKD pregnancy outcomes. 234 women (499 pregnancies) were included, of which 20 with pre- and post-LKD pregnancies (68) and 26 with only post-LKD pregnancies (59). Multilevel analysis demonstrated that eGFR was not different between women with and without post-LKD pregnancies (p = 0.23). Furthermore, eGFR was not different before and after post-LKD pregnancy (p = 0.13). More hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) occurred in post-LKD pregnancies (p = 0.002). Adverse fetal outcomes did not differ. We conclude that, despite a higher incidence of HDP, eGFR was not affected by post-LKD pregnancy. In line with previous studies, we found an increased risk for HDP after LKD without affecting fetal outcome. Therefore, a pregnancy wish alone should not be a reason to exclude women for LKD.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Kidney , Living Donors/psychology , Pregnancy Outcome , Tissue and Organ Harvesting
2.
J Adv Nurs ; 74(10): 2393-2405, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29869342

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This study investigated self-management challenges and support needs experienced by kidney transplant recipients. BACKGROUND: After kidney transplantation, recipients are expected to take an active role in self-management. However, evidence suggests that nurses experience difficulties operationalizing self-management support. Greater insight into the recipients' perspective could help to improve the adequacy and efficacy of nurse-led self-management support. DESIGN: A cross-sectional qualitative study. METHODS: Focus groups and individual interviews were carried out with kidney transplant recipients treated in a Dutch university hospital. Directed content analysis (DCA) was used. RESULTS: Forty-one kidney transplant recipients participated. Challenges after transplantation included becoming an expert patient, adjusting daily life activities, dealing with medical regimen, forming relationships with nurses, dealing with social consequences, dealing with emotions related to transplantation and the donor and improving self-image. To be able to deal with these challenges, participants wished to receive disease specific knowledge and instruction, share personal experiences with fellow patients, share and discuss not only medical but also emotional and social issues with nurses and wanted to be encouraged through positive feedback. "One-size fits all" education was considered insufficient in meeting their needs. CONCLUSIONS: After kidney transplantation, recipients experienced various challenges in dealing with the medical, emotional and social tasks. Current support from nurses overlooked recipients' emotional and social support needs. Nurses need adequate tools and training to be able to meet recipients' self-management support needs.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/psychology , Nurse's Role , Self-Management , Social Support , Transplant Recipients/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Emotions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Qualitative Research
3.
Patient Educ Couns ; 115: 107924, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516027

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a self-management instrument for organ transplant recipients that incorporates self-regulations skills and to determine its measurement properties. METHODS: The instrument includes concepts from social cognitive models: problem awareness, attitude, self-efficacy, motivation, social support, goal setting, goal pursuit, skills and goal affect. The measurement properties were evaluated based on the COSMIN guidelines. Face and content validity were determined through patient assessment, Three-Step Test-Interview and expert assessment using the Content Validity Index. Structural validity and reliability were tested using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was tested by comparing subscales with the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ). RESULTS: After face and content validity assessment 47 items were entered into the exploratory factor analysis. The analysis showed two meaningful factors, with internal consistency of 0.90 and 0.89. Spearman correlations between the subscales and heiQ were moderate (0.55; 0.46). The final version consists of 21 items, divided into two scales: 'Setbacks' and 'Successes'. CONCLUSIONS: The Self-regulation skills instrument in transplantation (SSIt) is a valid and reliable instrument to asses necessary skills for self-management after transplantation and may be useful for other patients as well. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Insight into self-regulation competencies can help healthcare professionals to tailor self-management support.


Subject(s)
Self-Control , Self-Management , Humans , Self Report , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Psychometrics
4.
Patient Educ Couns ; 105(2): 440-446, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34034938

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the influence of health literacy and self-management on complications, kidney function and graft failure after kidney transplantation. METHODS: We included patients who received a kidney transplant between May 2012 and May 2013 and monitored outcomes until December 2018. Health literacy was measured using the Newest Vital Sign and self-management using the Partner in Health scale (before discharge, and after 6 and 12 months). Subscales are aftercare & knowledge, coping, recognition and management of symptoms, healthy lifestyle. Complications were categorized as rejection, viral infections, and bacterial infections. Kidney function was measured using eGFR and graft survival using days until failure. RESULTS: We included 154 patients. Higher health literacy at baseline and at 12 months was related to more viral infections (p = 0.02; p < 0.01). Lower 'coping' at baseline was related to more bacterial infections (p = 0.02). Higher 'after-care and knowledge' at 6 months (p < 0.01), and 'recognition and management of symptoms' at 6 months were associated with lower graft failure (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Health literacy did not influence kidney transplant related outcomes. Higher knowledge and management of symptoms were related to lower graft failure. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Self-management support is a key focus for health care providers in the multidisciplinary team.


Subject(s)
Health Literacy , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Kidney Transplantation , Self-Management , Aftercare , Humans , Prospective Studies
5.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 26(5): 1723-8, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20940372

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to the post-transplant regime is a common problem in kidney transplant patients and may lead to rejection or even graft failure. This study investigated attitudes towards the post-transplant regime of immunosuppressive medication among the ever growing population of elderly kidney recipients. METHODS: Q methodology was used to explore attitude profiles. Participants (> 65 years) were asked to rank-order opinion statements on issues associated with (non-)adherence. The rankings were subject to by-person factor analysis, and the resulting factors were interpreted and described as attitudes. RESULTS: Twenty-six elderly renal transplant recipients participated in the study. All passed the Mini-Mental State Examination. Two attitude profiles were found: (i) satisfied and easy-going (attitude A), and (ii) reserved and concerned (attitude B). Elderly patients with attitude A want to enjoy the new life following their kidney transplant, are not very concerned about having to recommence dialysis, now and then even forget their regime, and do not really worry about it. Elderly patients with attitude B feel more insecure about their kidney transplant, are fairly concerned over issues like rejection or going back on dialysis, and try to adapt their way of life to the regime. One-third of these elderly patients forget their medication at least once a month, but there was no difference between attitude groups. CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes about the post-transplant regime differ among elderly patients, implying different needs for assistance, monitoring and risk of non-adherence to the regime. The proportion of elderly patients who forget their medication is considerable, but may be much higher among those with mild and severe cognitive limitations.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/psychology , Medication Adherence/psychology , Q-Sort , Renal Dialysis , Treatment Refusal/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL