Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 218
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Br J Surg ; 108(10): 1154-1161, 2021 10 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476480

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The lack of an effective continuing professional development programme for qualified surgeons, specifically one that enhances non-technical skills (NTS), is an issue receiving increased attention. Peer-based coaching, used in multiple professions, is a proposed method to deliver this. The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the literature to summarize the quantity and quality of studies involving surgical coaching of NTS in qualified surgeons. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Collaboration and PsychINFO. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data for the included studies was independently extracted by two reviewers and the quality of the studies evaluated using the Medical Education and Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). RESULTS: Some 4319 articles were screened from which 19 met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies involved coaching of individual surgeons and nine looked at group coaching of surgeons as part of a team. Group coaching studies used non-surgeons as coaches, included objective assessment of NTS, and were of a higher quality (average MERSQI 13.58). Individual coaching studies focused on learner perception, used experienced surgeons as coaches and were of a lower quality (average MERSQI 11.58). Individual coaching did not show an objective improvement in NTS for qualified surgeons in any study. CONCLUSION: Surgical coaching of qualified surgeons' NTS in a group setting was found to be effective. Coaching of individual surgeons revealed an overall positive learner perception but did not show an objective improvement in NTS for qualified surgeons.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Mentoring/methods , Peer Group , Surgeons/education , Awareness , Clinical Decision-Making , Communication , Humans , Leadership , Patient Care Team
2.
Anaesthesia ; 76(4): 480-488, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33027534

ABSTRACT

Postoperative complications are common and may be under-recognised. It has been suggested that enhanced postoperative care in the recovery room may reduce in-hospital complications in moderate- and high-risk surgical patients. We investigated the feasibility of providing advanced recovery room care for 12-18 h postoperatively in the post-anaesthesia care unit. The primary hypothesis was that a clinical trial of advanced recovery room care was feasible. The secondary hypothesis was that this model may have a sustained impact on postoperative in-hospital and post-discharge events. This was a multicentre, prospective, feasibility before-and-after trial of moderate-risk patients (predicted 30-day mortality of 1-4%) undergoing non-cardiac surgery and who were scheduled for postoperative ward care. Patients were managed using defined assessment checklists and goals of care in an advanced recovery room care setting in the immediate postoperative period. This utilised existing post-anaesthesia care unit infrastructure and staffing, but extended care until the morning of the first postoperative day. The advanced recovery room care trial was deemed feasible, as defined by the recruitment and per protocol management of > 120 patients. However, in a specialised cancer centre, recruitment was slow due to low rates of eligibility according to narrow inclusion criteria. At a rural site, advanced recovery room care could not be commenced due to logistical issues in establishing a new model of care. A definitive randomised controlled trial of advanced recovery room care appears feasible and, based on the indicative data on outcomes, we believe this is warranted.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Feasibility Studies , Female , Heart Diseases/mortality , Heart Diseases/surgery , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission , Postoperative Period , Recovery Room , Risk
3.
World J Surg ; 42(7): 1997-2000, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29299646

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification system was developed for assessing anaesthetic risk, but is often also used to estimate surgical death risk. Patients with low ASA grades (ASA 1 or 2) are expected to have better surgical outcomes than patients with higher ASA grades (ASA ≥ 4). This study examined the course to death in patients classified as ASA 1 or 2 was examined, to investigate possible factors in unexpected deaths, in addition to evaluating the use of ASA grades by clinicians. METHODS: Patient data from the national surgical mortality audit of Australian hospitals were examined. The patient group was listed as ASA grade 1 or 2 by surgeons. Patients over 60 or under 20 were excluded in the final analysis, as were cases from New South Wales due to data not being available. A total of 357 cases were examined. Assessor summaries of the cases were examined, and ASA score reassessed to determine accuracy. RESULTS: More than 95% (n = 339) of cases listed as ASA 1 or 2 were found to have an incorrectly low grade, with 17.6% (n = 63) of cases listed as "expected" deaths. CONCLUSION: ASA grades appear to be misunderstood in the reporting of patient surgical risk. Many patient summaries list patients with severe systemic disease or expected deaths as ASA 1 or 2, contrary to the intended use of this classification system. Improved education on the use of the ASA grading system would be beneficial to clinicians.


Subject(s)
Health Status Indicators , Medical Errors/mortality , Surgical Procedures, Operative/mortality , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment
4.
Br J Surg ; 104(6): 777-785, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28295215

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In addition to technical expertise, surgical competence requires effective non-technical skills to ensure patient safety and maintenance of standards. Recently the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons implemented a new Surgical Education and Training (SET) curriculum that incorporated non-technical skills considered essential for a competent surgeon. This study sought to compare the non-technical skills of experienced surgeons who completed their training before the introduction of SET with the non-technical skills of more recent trainees. METHODS: Surgical trainees and experienced surgeons undertook a simulated scenario designed to challenge their non-technical skills. Scenarios were video recorded and participants were assessed using the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) scoring system. Participants were divided into subgroups according to years of experience and their NOTSS scores were compared. RESULTS: For most NOTSS elements, mean scores increased initially, peaking around the time of Fellowship, before decreasing roughly linearly over time. There was a significant downward trend in score with increasing years since being awarded Fellowship for six of the 12 NOTSS elements: considering options (score -0·015 units per year), implementing and reviewing decisions (-0·020 per year), establishing a shared understanding (-0·014 per year), setting and maintaining standards (-0·024 per year), supporting others (-0·031 per year) and coping with pressure (-0·015 per year). CONCLUSION: The drop in NOTSS score was unexpected and highlights that even experienced surgeons are not immune to deficiencies in non-technical skills. Consideration should be given to continuing professional development programmes focusing on non-technical skills, regardless of the level of professional experience.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Education, Medical , Medical Staff, Hospital/standards , Surgeons/standards , Curriculum , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Staff, Hospital/education , Simulation Training , South Australia , Surgeons/education
5.
Br J Surg ; 108(11): 1263-1264, 2021 11 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34550335
6.
7.
Ann Surg ; 261(2): 304-8, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24646530

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This article outlines the formation of the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) and describes its objectives, governance, functioning and challenges. BACKGROUND: A nationwide audit of surgical mortality provides an overview of the leading causes of death in patients who require surgical care. It identifies system or process errors, trends in deficiency of care and helps develop strategies to reduce deaths in the surgical arena. METHODS: A standardized tool is used to systematically collect data after every surgical death. Patient details are reviewed by a peer surgeon (and in certain cases a second) to identify issues with patient management and hospital processes. The treating surgeon is then offered confidential feedback and alternate views on patient management. RESULTS: From January 2009 to December 2012, 19,096 deaths were reported to the ANZASM. Eighty-six percent of the audited deaths occurred in patients requiring an emergency admission. Significant criticism of patient care was reported in 13% of cases with 16% of clinical issues perceived to be preventable. Western Australia, which first began the audit process, has shown a 30% reduction in surgical deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide mortality audits are a useful and worthwhile exercise. Recommendations identified in the audit reports direct educational workshops and seminars to address these issues. They allow Departments of Health to make informed decisions in their hospitals. Through this model, and the lessons learnt, we would encourage other countries planning to set up their own audits to follow a similar concept.


Subject(s)
Medical Audit/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Surgical Procedures, Operative/mortality , Australia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , New Zealand/epidemiology , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards
8.
Br J Surg ; 102(6): 708-15, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25790065

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An important factor that may influence an individual's performance is self-efficacy, a personal judgement of capability to perform a particular task successfully. This prospective study explored newly qualified surgeons' and surgical trainees' self-efficacy in non-technical skills compared with their non-technical skills performance in simulated scenarios. METHODS: Participants undertook surgical scenarios challenging non-technical skills in two simulation sessions 6 weeks apart. Some participants attended a non-technical skills workshop between sessions. Participants completed pretraining and post-training surveys about their perceived self-efficacy in non-technical skills, which were analysed and compared with their performance in surgical scenarios in two simulation sessions. Change in performance between sessions was compared with any change in participants' perceived self-efficacy. RESULTS: There were 40 participants in all, 17 of whom attended the non-technical skills workshop. There was no significant difference in participants' self-efficacy regarding non-technical skills from the pretraining to the post-training survey. However, there was a tendency for participants with the highest reported self-efficacy to adjust their score downwards after training and for participants with the lowest self-efficacy to adjust their score upwards. Although there was significant improvement in non-technical skills performance from the first to second simulation sessions, a correlation between participants' self-efficacy and performance in scenarios in any of the comparisons was not found. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that new surgeons and surgical trainees have poor insight into their non-technical skills. Although it was not possible to correlate participants' self-belief in their abilities directly with their performance in a simulation, in general they became more critical in appraisal of their abilities as a result of the intervention.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Continuing , General Surgery/education , Operating Rooms/standards , Self Efficacy , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Psychometrics , Retrospective Studies , South Australia , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace
9.
Br J Surg ; 101(12): 1509-17, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25200002

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Portal-systemic shunts (PSSs) are rarely seen in healthy individuals or patients with non-cirrhotic liver disease. They may play an important role in hepatic metabolism as well as in the spread of gastrointestinal metastatic tumours to specific organs. Small spontaneous PSSs may be more common than generally thought. However, epidemiological data are scarce and inconclusive. This systematic review examined the prevalence of reported PSSs and the associated detection methods. METHODS: Literature up to 2011 was reviewed for adult patients with proven congenital or acquired PSSs. Only PSSs in normal livers were analysed for the methods of diagnosis. Eligible studies were identified by searching relevant databases, including PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. The selection of eligible articles was carried out using predefined inclusion criteria (adult, non-surgical PSS) and a set of search terms that were established before the articles were identified. RESULTS: Eighty studies were included describing 112 patients with congenital or acquired PSSs. The majority were diagnosed incidentally using Doppler ultrasound imaging and CT. CONCLUSION: Congenital and acquired PSSs are rare. They are usually clinically asymptomatic and discovered incidentally by radiological techniques. They may be clinically relevant owing to drug, tumour cell, metabolic and pathogen shunting.


Subject(s)
Liver/blood supply , Portal Vein/abnormalities , Vascular Malformations/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidental Findings , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Vascular Malformations/diagnosis , Young Adult
10.
Br J Surg ; 101(9): 1063-76, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24827930

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training assumes that skills are directly transferable to the patient-based setting, but few studies have correlated simulated performance with surgical performance. METHODS: A systematic search strategy was undertaken to find studies published since the last systematic review, published in 2007. Inclusion of articles was determined using a predetermined protocol, independent assessment by two reviewers and a final consensus decision. Studies that reported on the use of surgical simulation-based training and assessed the transferability of the acquired skills to a patient-based setting were included. RESULTS: Twenty-seven randomized clinical trials and seven non-randomized comparative studies were included. Fourteen studies investigated laparoscopic procedures, 13 endoscopic procedures and seven other procedures. These studies provided strong evidence that participants who reached proficiency in simulation-based training performed better in the patient-based setting than their counterparts who did not have simulation-based training. Simulation-based training was equally as effective as patient-based training for colonoscopy, laparoscopic camera navigation and endoscopic sinus surgery in the patient-based setting. CONCLUSION: These studies strengthen the evidence that simulation-based training, as part of a structured programme and incorporating predetermined proficiency levels, results in skills transfer to the operative setting.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Computer Simulation , Endoscopy/education , General Surgery/education , Laparoscopy/education , Transfer, Psychology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Endoscopy/standards , General Surgery/standards , Humans , Laparoscopy/standards
11.
World J Surg ; 38(6): 1484-90, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24378551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at a low-volume specialised Hepato Pancreato Biliary (HPB) unit. Volume outcome analyses show significantly better results for patients undergoing PD at high-volume centres (Begg et al. JAMA 280:1747-1751, 1998; Finlayson et al. Arch Surg 138:721-725, 2003; Birkmeyer et al. N Engl J Med 346:1128-1137, 2002; Gouma et al. Ann Surg 232:786-795, 2000). Centralisation of PD seems to be the logical conclusion to be drawn from these results. In countries like Australia with a small and widely dispersed population, centralisation may not be always feasible. Alternative strategy would be to have similar systems in place to those in high-volume centres to achieve similar results at low-volume centres. Many Australian tertiary care centres perform low to medium volumes of PD (Chen et al. HPB 12:101-108, 2010; Kwok et al. ANZ J Surg 80:605-608, 2010; Barnett and Collier ANZ J Surg 76:563-568, 2006; Samra et al. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 10:415-421, 2011). Most of these have a specialised HPB unit, accredited by the Australia and New Zealand Hepatic pancreatic and biliary association (ANZHPBA), as training units for post fellowship training in HPB surgery. It is imperative to perform outcome-based analyses in these units to ensure safety and high quality of care. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of database for periampullary carcinoma (1998 till date) was performed in an ANZHPBA accredited HPB unit based at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Australia. Because age older than 74 years is shown to be a predictive marker of increased morbidity and mortality after a PD, we analysed the outcomes in this subset of patients separately. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients underwent PD in 14 years. Overall mortality was 3.8 %. The last in hospital mortality was in 1999. The morbidity rates and the oncologic outcomes were similar to those in high-volume units. CONCLUSIONS: PD can be safely performed in a low-volume specialised unit at centres where the amenities and processes at high-volume centres can be replicated.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/mortality , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Surgery Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Workload , Age Factors , Aged , Animals , Australia , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Br J Cancer ; 109(5): 1338-43, 2013 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23860523

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients who relapse after potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer tend to relapse within 5 years. There is, however, a group of patients who relapse beyond 5 years after resection and this late relapsing group may have a different behaviour and prognosis. METHODS: We analysed data from a prospective population-based registry to compare the characteristics and survival of relapsed patients with metachronous mCRC. Patients were categorised into relapse at <2, 2-5 and >5 years following their initial surgery. Univariate log-rank tests and multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine whether time to relapse (TTR) and other factors were associated with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 750 metachronous mCRC patients were identified. In all, 56% relapsed ≤2 years, 32.4% at 2-5 years and 11.6% >5 years. Median survival time from the time of diagnosis of mCRC for the three groups was 17.6, 26.1 and 27.5 months, respectively. Short TTR (<2 years) was significantly associated with survival (HR=0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.60-0.93 and HR=0.73, 95% CI=0.53-1.01, respectively, for 2-5 and >5 years vs <2 years, P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in survival between patients who relapsed at 5 years or later compared with those who relapsed between 2 and 5 years (HR=0.98, 95% CI=0.69-1.38, P=0.90). CONCLUSION: TTR within 2 years is an independent predictor of shorter survival time for mCRC patients who experience a relapse. These data do not support the hypothesis that patients who have late relapse late (>5 years) have a 'better' biology or survival compared with patients with a TTR of 2-5 years.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
13.
Hernia ; 26(5): 1293-1299, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35286510

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the link between bacterial biofilms and negative outcomes of hernia repair surgery. As biofilms are known to play a role in mesh-related infections, we investigated the presence of biofilms on hernia meshes, which had to be explanted due to mesh failure without showing signs of bacterial infection. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, 20 paraffin-embedded tissue sections from explanted groin hernia meshes were analysed. Meshes have been removed due to chronic pain, hernia recurrence or mesh shrinkage. The presence and bacterial composition of biofilms were determined. First, specimens were stained with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) probes, specific for Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, and visualised by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Second, DNA was extracted from tissue and identified by S. aureus and S. epidermidis specific PCR. RESULTS: Confocal microscopy showed evidence of bacterial biofilms on meshes in 15/20 (75.0%) samples, of which 3 were positive for S. aureus, 3 for coagulase-negative staphylococci and 9 for both species. PCR analysis identified biofilms in 17/20 (85.0%) samples, of which 4 were positive for S. aureus, 4 for S. epidermidis and 9 for both species. Combined results from FISH/microscopy and PCR identified staphylococci biofilms in 19/20 (95.0%) mesh samples. Only 1 (5.0%) mesh sample was negative for bacterial biofilm by both techniques. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that staphylococci biofilms may be associated with hernia repair failure. A silent, undetected biofilm infection could contribute to mesh complications, chronic pain and exacerbation of disease.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Staphylococcal Infections , Biofilms , Coagulase , Hernia , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Humans , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus , Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Surgical Mesh/microbiology
14.
Br J Surg ; 98(9): 1210-24, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21766289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite being one of the commonest causes of cancer-related death around the world, only 20 per cent of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are amenable to curative treatment (surgical resection or liver transplantation). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a popular therapy for unresectable HCC. There is evidence that the disparity in survival after curative RFA and surgery for HCC, especially tumours smaller than 3 cm in diameter, is narrowing. This review examined the survival and disease recurrence rates after RFA for HCC over the past decade. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Methodology Register and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects from January 2000 until November 2010. Papers reporting on patients with HCC who were treated with RFA, either in comparison or in combination with other interventions, such as surgery or percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), were eligible for inclusion. Outcome data collected were overall survival, disease-free survival and disease recurrence rates. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and non-randomized comparative studies with more than 12 months' follow-up were included. RESULTS: Forty-three articles, including 12 RCTs, were included in the review. The majority of the articles reported the use of RFA for unresectable HCC, often in combination with other treatments such as PEI, transarterial chemoembolization and/or surgery. Overall and disease-free survival rates continue to improve, despite an increase in the size and numbers of tumours treated. More recently some clinicians have used RFA to treat selected patients with resectable HCC, with good outcomes. CONCLUSION: RFA provides a valuable treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC. It improves survival in those previously considered to have advanced disease. As progress continues to be made, RFA is gradually being used to treat resectable HCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Catheter Ablation/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Catheter Ablation/methods , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Interferons/therapeutic use , Laparoscopy/mortality , Laser Therapy/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Microwaves/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Sclerotherapy/mortality , Treatment Outcome
15.
BJS Open ; 5(4)2021 07 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34355242

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus (COVID-19) forced surgical evolution worldwide. The extent to which national evidence-based recommendations, produced by the current authors early in 2020, remain valid, is unclear. To inform global surgical management and a model for rapid clinical change, this study aimed to characterize surgical evolution following COVID-19 through a multifaceted systematic review. METHODS: Rapid reviews were conducted targeting intraoperative safety, personal protective equipment and triage, alongside a conventional systematic review identifying evidence-based guidance for surgical management. Targeted searches of PubMed and Embase from 31 December 2019 were repeated weekly until 7 August 2020, and systematic searches repeated monthly until 30 June 2020. Literature was stratified using Evans' hierarchy of evidence. Narrative data were analysed for consistency with earlier recommendations. The systematic review rated quality using the AGREE II and AMSTAR tools, was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020205845. Meta-analysis was not conducted. RESULTS: From 174 targeted searches and six systematic searches, 1256 studies were identified for the rapid reviews and 21 for the conventional systematic review. Of studies within the rapid reviews, 903 (71.9 per cent) had lower-quality design, with 402 (32.0 per cent) being opinion-based. Quality of studies in the systematic review ranged from low to moderate. Consistency with recommendations made previously by the present authors was observed despite 1017 relevant subsequent publications. CONCLUSION: The evidence-based recommendations produced early in 2020 remained valid despite many subsequent publications. Weaker studies predominated and few guidelines were evidence-based. Extracted clinical solutions were globally implementable. An evidence-based model for rapid clinical change is provided that may benefit surgical management during this pandemic and future times of urgency.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Organizational Innovation , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards
16.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 50(1): 1-6, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773113

ABSTRACT

Survival rates for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has remained stagnant in recent years and improving surgical mortality could be an avenue to enhance outcomes. This systematic review aims to identify the causes of mortalities, determine both the modifiable and non-modifiable factors involved and target a reduction in postoperative 30-day mortality. In May 2019, a comprehensive search of key databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library was conducted. Blinded selection by two researchers identified papers that included participants who received oral squamous cell carcinoma resection and suffered an in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Selection identified two relevant papers that meet the inclusion criteria. One study had one death in its population sample but only had the cause of death described. Another study had an overall surgical mortality rate of 1% in a population of 21,681. Patients with multiple factors had the highest mortality rates; 4.6% in patients >85 years old and have a T4 diagnosis, 3.9% in patients with a Comorbidity Index ≥1 and a T4 diagnosis. These studies did not determine relationships between factors and causes of death. There are significant knowledge gaps in the literature, that can be addressed through further population analysis studies.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Survival Rate
17.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 40(5): 572-9, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20691617

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review assessed the efficacy of centralisation for the treatment of unruptured and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Patient outcomes achieved by low and high volume hospitals/surgeons, including morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay, were used as proxy measures of efficacy. DESIGN: Systematic review was designed to identify, assess and report on peer-reviewed articles reporting outcomes from unruptured and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. No language restriction was placed on the databases searched. MATERIALS: Only peer-reviewed journals articles were included. METHODS: To ensure the contemporary nature of this review, only studies published between January 1997 and June 2007 were sought. Studies were included if they reported on at least one volume type and patient outcome. RESULTS: Twenty two studies were included in this review. In the majority of group assessments, the number of studies reporting statistical significance was similar to the number of studies reporting no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The paucity of studies reporting statistically significant results demonstrates that although this evidence exists, its potential to be overstated must also be taken into account when drawing conclusions as to its efficacy for twenty first century healthcare systems.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/epidemiology , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
19.
Br J Surg ; 96(2): 128-36, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19160349

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this review was to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic procedures for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: Literature databases including Medline, Embase and PubMed were searched up to May 2006 without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies with at least ten patients in each study arm, and case series studies of at least ten patients, were included. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies examining seven endoscopic procedures (Stretta procedure, Bard EndoCinch, Wilson-Cook Endoscopic Suturing Device, NDO Plicator, Enteryx, Gatekeeper Reflux Repair System and Plexiglas) were included in the review. Of the three procedures that were tested against sham controls (Stretta procedure, Bard EndoCinch and Enteryx), patient outcomes in the treatment group were either as good as, or significantly better than, those of control patients in terms of heartburn symptoms, quality of life and medication usage. However, for the two procedures that were tested against laparoscopic fundoplication (Stretta) procedure and Bard EndoCinch), outcomes for patients in the endoscopic group were either as good as, or inferior to, those for the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSION: At present there is insufficient evidence to determine the safety and efficacy of endoscopic procedures for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, particularly in the long term.


Subject(s)
Esophagoscopy/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Gastroscopy/methods , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Gastroscopy/adverse effects , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Suture Techniques , Treatment Outcome
20.
Dig Dis Sci ; 54(6): 1184-98, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18770035

ABSTRACT

Peri-ampullary and hepatic malignancies will frequently present with obstructive jaundice. For unresectable tumors, effective and lasting decompression of the biliary tree is essential to improve quality of life and survival. An overview of present treatment modalities for palliation of obstructive jaundice is provided, including a systematic review of the English literature regarding the optimum choice of palliation.


Subject(s)
Jaundice, Obstructive/complications , Jaundice, Obstructive/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/complications , Palliative Care/methods , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL