Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 36(12): 3027-3033, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32322974

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in children is an extrapolation of the guidelines suggested for adult population. Lumbar puncture (LP) plays a crucial role in the diagnosis. The diagnosis of IIH at times is solely dependent on the interpretation of the opening pressure (OP). Unfortunately, LP-OP can vary due circumstantial parameters and therefore may be an unreliable form of intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement. Confirming the diagnosis based (as suggested by guidelines) on LP-OP in a doubtful clinical situation would be inappropriate. The aim of our study was to analyse the reliability of LP-OP and importance of ICP monitoring in situations where diagnosis of IIH was questionable. METHODS: Retrospective review of all children with diagnosis of IIH over a 10-year period was conducted. Children who underwent ICP monitoring (ICPM) were selected. We considered 2 LP-OP values-last LP (lLP) and the mean LP (mLP) for analysis. ICPM and LP-OP were compared. Follow-up till last clinic visit was also considered for long-term outcome. RESULTS: Eleven children (male 3; female 8) were included in the study. Mean delay between LP and ICPM was 112.8 days (17-257 days). There was lack of correlation between LP-OP and ICP in 9 children. ICP monitoring refuted the diagnosis of IIH in 80% of children and prevented exposure to unnecessary medical and surgical intervention. There was 1complication with ICPM. In 90% of children, there was no progression of symptoms following a decision based on ICP monitoring on long-term follow-up (mean, 36.5 months). CONCLUSION: When the diagnosis of IIH is in doubt, LP may be unreliable and formal ICP monitoring is advised.


Subject(s)
Pseudotumor Cerebri , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Intracranial Pressure , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Skull
2.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 53(7): 102778, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570115

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefit of surgical management of patients with endometriosis infiltrating pelvic nerves in terms of pain, analgesic consumption, and quality of life (QOL). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study In an Endometriosis referral center at a tertiary care university affiliated medical center. Patients diagnosed with endometriosis that underwent laparoscopic neurolysis for chronic pain were included. Patients rated their pain before and after surgery and differentiated between chronic pain and acute crises. Patients were requested to maintain a record of analgesic consumption and to evaluate their quality-of-life (QOL). RESULTS: Of the 21 patients in our study 15 (71.5 %) had obturator nerve involvement, 2 (9.5 %) had pudendal nerve involvement and 4 (19 %) had other pelvic nerve involvement. Median postoperative follow - up was of 8 months. All but 2 patients (9.6 %) had significant chronic pain improvement with a mean decrease of VAS of 3.05 (±2.5). Analgesic habits changed postoperatively with a significant decrease of 66 % of patients' daily consumption of any analgesics. Surgery improved QOL in 12 cases (57.1 %) and two patients (9.6 %) completely recovered with a high QOL. CONCLUSION: Neurolysis and excision of endometriosis of pelvic nerves could results in significant improvement of quality of life.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Endometriosis , Laparoscopy , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , Endometriosis/surgery , Endometriosis/complications , Pilot Projects , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Laparoscopy/methods , Chronic Pain/surgery , Chronic Pain/etiology , Pelvic Pain/surgery , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Cohort Studies , Middle Aged , Analgesics/therapeutic use
3.
World Neurosurg ; 151: 39-43, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33892164

ABSTRACT

Nearly 250 years ago, Antonio Scarpa became a professor of anatomy and surgery only 2 years after he graduated from the University of Padua. The young lecturer soon became one of the most renowned anatomists in Italy and a director of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Pavia. He worked in the fields of general surgery and ophthalmology. Several anatomic structures have been named after him, mainly Scarpa fascia and Scarpa triangle. His interest in neuroanatomy was ardent, despite being occasionally neglected. Scarpa's contributions to the fields of neurosciences have been significant. He was the first to describe the round window and the secondary tympanic membrane, and he eventually focused on the auditory and olfactory organs. Notably, the vestibular ganglion is now known as Scarpa ganglion. Scarpa's magnum opus was the book Tabulae Neurologicae, in which he described the path of several cranial nerves including the vagus nerve and innervation of the heart. Since his death in 1832, Scarpa's head has been preserved at the University History Museum of the University of Pavia. In this historical vignette, we aim to describe Antonio Scarpa's troubled life and brilliant career, focusing on his core contributions to neuroanatomy, neurosurgery, and otoneurosurgery.


Subject(s)
Neuroanatomy/history , Neurosurgery/history , Otologic Surgical Procedures/history , Vestibular Nerve/anatomy & histology , Vestibular Nerve/surgery , Cranial Nerves/anatomy & histology , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , Humans , Italy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL