Thalamic input to mesial and superior area 6 in the macaque monkey.

The aim of the present study was to define the origin of the thalamocortical projections to each of the mesial and superior area 6 areas. To this purpose, restricted injections of neuronal tracers were made into areas F3, F6, F2, and F7 after physiological identification of the injection sites. The results showed that each of these areas receives afferents from a set of thalamic nuclei and that this set differs, qualitatively and quantitatively, according to the injected area. The main inputs to F3 [supplementary motor area properly defined (SMA-proper)] originate in the nuclei ventral lateral, pars oralis (VLo), ventral posterior lateral, pars oralis (VPLo), and ventral lateral, pars caudalis (VLc) as well as in caudal parts of the VPLo and VLc (VPLo/VLc complex). F6 (pre-SMA) is mainly the target of nucleus ventral anterior, pars parvocellularis (VApc), and area X of Olszewski. The input to F2 originates mainly in the VPLo/VLc complex, in VLc, and in VLo. The dorsal part of F7 (supplementary eye field) mainly receives from area X, VApc, and nucleus ventral anterior, pars magnocellularis (VAmc), whereas the ventral F7 is connected with VApc, area X, VLc, and the VPLo/VLc complex. All of the injected areas receive a strong projection from the medial dorsal nucleus (MD). It is concluded that each cortical area is a target of both cerebellar and basal ganglia circuits. F3 and F2 are targets of the so-called "motor" basal ganglia circuit and a cerebellar circuit originating in dorsorostral sectors of dentate and interpositus nuclei. In contrast, F6 and ventral F7 receive a basal ganglia input mainly from the so-called "complex" circuit and a cerebellar input originating in the ventrocaudal sectors of dentate and interpositus nuclei. Finally, with respect to the rest of F7, dorsal F7 also receives a basal ganglia input from the "oculomotor circuit."

Architecture of superior and mesial area 6 and the adjacent cingulate cortex in the macaque monkey.

The agranular frontal cortex is formed by several distinct functional areas. There is no agreement, however, on its cytoarchitectonic organization. The aim of this study was to redefine the cytoarchitectonic organization of superior and mesial area 6 and the adjacent cingulate cortex in the macaque monkey. A particular goal was to find out whether the so-called supplementary motor area (SMA) is cytoarchitectonically different from the rest of area 6 and whether it can be considered as a single, independent cytoarchitectonic area. The results showed that, rostral to F1 (area 4), four architectonic areas can be recognized in the superior (dorsal) and mesial area 6. Two fo them are located on mesial cortical surface (F3 caudally and F6 rostrally) and two on superior cortical convexity (F2 caudally and F7 rostrally). The main cytoarchitectonic features of the five identified areas can be summarized as follows. F1: (1) giant pyramidal cells organized in multiple rows, (2) columnar pattern extending from the white matter to the superficial layers, (3) low cellular density in the lower part of layer III. F3: (1) high cellular density in the lower part of layer III, which fuses with a dense Va, (2) columnar pattern present only in the deepest layer, (3) occasional presence of giant pyramidal cells in layer Vb. F6: (1) prominent layer V, (2) absence of sublayer Vb, (3) homogeneous cell density in superficial layers. F2: (1) thin row of medium-size pyramids in the lowest part of layer III, (2) columnar pattern extending to the superficial layers, (3) dense layer Va, (4) few, scattered giant pyramids in layer Vb. F7: (1) prominent layer V, (2) bipartite layer VI. Areas F1, F2, and F3, as defined cytoarchitectonically, coincided with the homonymous histochemical areas. The present data showed also that area 24 is formed by four subareas: 24a, b, c and d. Areas 24a and b occupy the ventral part of area 24, whereas its dorsal part is formed by area 24c, located rostrally, and area 24d, located caudally. The following features distinguish area 24d from area 24c: (1) larger pyramidal cells in layer V, (2) presence of medium-size pyramidal cells in the lower part of layer III, (3) more prominent columnar pattern, (4) higher myelinization with the presence of an evident horizontal plexus. Mesial area 6 is usually considered as a single functional entity (SMA). Our findings show that this cortical region is formed by two distinct cytoarchitectonic areas.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Afferent and efferent projections of the inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey.

The rostral part of the agranular frontal cortex (area 6) can be subdivided on the basis of its cytoarchitecture, enzymatic properties, and connections into two large sectors: a superior region, lying medial to the spur of the arcuate sulcus, and an inferior region, lying lateral to it. In this study we traced the afferent and efferent connections of the inferior region of area 6 by injecting small amounts of wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) and fluorescent tracers (fast blue and diamidino yellow) into restricted parts of inferior area 6 and in physiologically determined fields of area 4. There is an ordered topographic pattern of connections between inferior area 6 and area 4. The region near the spur of the arcuate sulcus (hand field) projects to the area 4 hand field while the lateral part of inferior area 6 (mouth field) is connected with the corresponding field in area 4. The organization of the connections between the two fields is, however, different. The hand fields in area 6 and 4 have direct reciprocal projections, whereas the mouth field in the postarcuate cortex relays information to area 4 via a zone intermediate between the arcuate and the central sulcus. This zone corresponds to the cytochrome oxidase area F4 (Matelli, Luppino, and Rizzolatti: Behav. Brain Res. 18: 125-137, '85). The inferior area 6 also has topographically organized connections with the supplementary motor area. The inferior area 6 receives and sends fibers to a series of discrete cortical areas located in the lower cortical moiety (Sanides: The Structure and Function of the Nervous Tissue, Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press, pp 329-453, '72). These areas that form a broad ring around the central sulcus are the ventral bank of the principal sulcus and the adjacent area 46, the precentral operculum (PrOC), area SII (Jones and Burton: J. Comp. Neurol. 168:197-248, '76), the parietal operculum, and the rostral part of the inferior parietal lobule including the lower bank of the intraparietal sulcus. Finally, the inferior area 6 has sparse but consistent connections with insular and cingulate cortices. The functional significance of this complex pattern of connections is discussed.

Thalamic input to inferior area 6 and area 4 in the macaque monkey.

Recent cytoarchitectonic, histochemical, and hodological studies in primates have shown that area 6 is formed by three main sectors: the supplementary motor area, superior area 6, which lies medial to the spur of the arcuate sulcus, and inferior area 6, which is located lateral to it. Inferior area 6 has been further subdivided into two histochemical areas: area F5, located along the inferior limb of the arcuate sulcus, and area F4, located between area F5 and area 4 (area F1). The present study traced the thalamocortical projections of inferior area 6 and the adjacent part of area 4 by injecting small amounts of WGA-HRP in specific sectors of the agranular frontal cortex. Our data showed that each histochemical area receives a large projection from one nucleus of the ventrolateral thalamus (motor thalamus) and additional projections from other nuclei of this thalamic sector. Area F5 receives a large projection from area X of Olszewski ('52) and additional projections from the caudal part of the nucleus ventralis posterior lateralis, pars oralis (VPLo), and the nucleus ventralis lateralis, pars caudalis (VLc) (VPLo-VLc complex). Area F4 receives a large projection from the nucleus ventralis lateralis, pars oralis (VLo), and additional projections from area X and the VPLo-VLc complex. The rostral part of area F1 is innervated chiefly by VLo, plus smaller contributions from rostral VPLo and the VPLo-VLc complex. The caudal part of F1 receives its greatest input from VPLo, with a small contribution from VLo. In addition, each histochemical area receives projections originating from the intralaminar thalamic nuclei, the posterior thalamus, and--for area F4 and area F5--also from the nucleus medialis dorsalis (MD). Analysis of the physiological properties of the various histochemical areas in relation to their main thalamic input showed that those cortical fields in which distal movements are predominant (area F5, caudal part of area F1) are innervated chiefly by area X and VPLo, whereas those cortical fields in which proximal movements are predominant receive their main input from VLo. Because VPLo and area X are targets of cerebellothalamic pathways, whereas VLo receives a pallidal input, we propose that the cortical fields in which distal movements are most heavily represented are mainly under the influence of the cerebellum, whereas the cortical fields in which proximal movements are most heavily represented are mainly under the influence of the basal ganglia.

Corticocortical connections of area F3 (SMA-proper) and area F6 (pre-SMA) in the macaque monkey.

The monkey mesial area 6 comprises two distinct cytoarchitectonic areas: F3 [supplementary motor area properly defined (SMA-proper)], located caudally, and F6 (pre-SMA), located rostrally. The aim of the present study was to describe the corticocortical connections of these two areas. To this purpose restricted injections of neuronal tracers (wheat germ-agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, fluorescent tracers) were made in different somatotopic fields of F3, F6, and F1 (area 4) and their transport plotted. The results showed that F3 and F6 differ markedly in their cortical connections. F3 is richly linked with F1 and the posterior premotor and cingulate areas (F2, F4, 24d). Connections with the anterior premotor and cingulate areas (F6, F7, F5, 24c) although present, are relatively modest. There is no input from the prefrontal lobe. F3 is also connected with several postrolandic cortical areas. These connections are with areas PC, PE, and PEa in the superior parietal lobule, cingulate areas 23 and PEci, the opercular parietal areas (PFop, PGop, SII) and the granular insula. F6 receives a rich input from the anterior premotor areas (especially F5) and cingulate area 24c, whereas its input from the posterior premotor and cingulate areas is very weak. A strong input originates from area 46. There are no connections with F1. The connections with the postrolandic areas are extremely meagre. They are with areas PG and PFG in the inferior parietal lobule, the disgranular insula, and the superior temporal sulcus. A further result was the demonstration of a differential connectivity pattern of the cingulate areas 24d and 24c. Area 24d is strongly linked with F1 and F3, whereas area 24c is connected mostly with F6. The present data support the notion that the classical SMA comprises two functionally distinct areas. They suggest that F6 (the rostral area) is responsible for the "SMA" so-called high level motor functions, whereas F3 (the caudal area) is more closely related to movement execution.

Cholinergic projections from the midbrain reticular formation and the parabigeminal nucleus to the lateral geniculate nucleus in the tree shrew.

The distribution and sources of putative cholinergic fibers within the lateral geniculate nucleus (GL) of the tree shrew have been examined by using the immunocytochemical localization of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT). ChAT-immunoreactive fibers are found throughout the thalamus but are particularly abundant in the GL as compared to other principal sensory thalamic nuclei (medial geniculate nucleus, ventral posterior nucleus). Individual ChAT-immunoreactive fibers are extremely fine in caliber and display numerous small swellings along their lengths. Within the GL, ChAT-immunoreactive fibers are more numerous in the layers than in the interlaminar zones and, in most cases, the greatest density is found in layers 4 and 5. Two sources for the ChAT-immunoreactive fibers in the GL have been identified--the parabigeminal nucleus (Pbg) and the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPT)--and the contribution that each makes to the distribution of ChAT-immunoreactive fibers in GL was determined by combining immunocytochemical, axonal transport, and lesion methods. The projection from the Pbg is strictly contralateral, travels via the optic tract, and terminates in layers 1, 3, 5, and 6 as well as the interlaminar zones on either side of layer 5. The projection from PPT is bilateral (ipsilateral dominant) and terminates throughout the GL as well as in other thalamic nuclei. Lesions of the Pbg eliminate the ChAT-immunoreactive fibers normally found in the optic tract but have no obvious effect on the density of ChAT-immunoreactive fibers in the contralateral GL. In contrast, lesions of PPT produce a conspicuous decrease in the number of ChAT-immunoreactive fibers in the GL and in other thalamic nuclei on the side of the lesion but have no obvious effect on the number of ChAT-immunoreactive fibers in the optic tract. These results suggest that there are two sources of cholinergic projections to the GL in the tree shrew which are likely to play different roles in modulating the transmission of visual activity to the cortex. The Pbg is recognized as a part of the visual system by virtue of its reciprocal connections with the superficial layers of the superior colliculus, while the PPT is a part of the midbrain reticular formation and is thought to play a non-modality-specific role in modulating the activity of neurons throughout the thalamus and in other regions of the brainstem.

Multiple representations of body movements in mesial area 6 and the adjacent cingulate cortex: an intracortical microstimulation study in the macaque monkey.

The mesial agranular frontal cortex that lies rostral to area 4 (F1) is formed by two distinct cytoarchitectonic areas: F3, located caudally, and F6, located rostrally. In the present experiments we investigated the organization of F3 and F6 by observing the motor responses evoked by their intracortical electrical microstimulation. Our main purpose was to find out whether the cytoarchitectonic subdivision of the mesial agranular frontal cortex into two areas has a physiological counterpart. The result showed that F3 (the caudal area) contains a complete motor representation with hindlimb movements located caudally, forelimb movements located centrally, and orofacial movements located rostrally. The great majority of limb movements involved proximal joints. With respect to F1, F3 showed the following functional characteristics: (1) lack of segregation between proximal and distal movements, (2) larger percentage of complex movements, and (3) higher excitability threshold. Movements were more difficult to elicit from F6 (the rostral area) than from F3. However, by using a longer stimulus train duration (100 ms) 39.3% of tested sites produced body movements. This percentage increased (50.5%) when the electrical stimulation was applied during monkey natural movements instead of when the monkey was still in its chair. Most of the evoked movements concerned the forelimb. More rarely, neck and upper face movements were observed. Unlike F1 and F3 where most movements were fast, slow movements were frequently observed with stimulation of F6. Many of them mimicked natural movements of the animal. Eye movements were evoked from F7 (superior area 6) but not from F6. An additional motor representation was found in the dorsocaudal part of area 24 (24d). This area is topographically organized with a forelimb representation located caudally and ventrally and a hindlimb representation located rostrally and dorsally. The excitability threshold of area 24d is higher than that of F1 and F3. Evoked movements were occasionally observed also after stimulation of area 24c. In conclusion, on the mesial cortical wall rostral to F1, there are at least three independent motor representations. On the basis of somatotopic organization and excitability properties, we propose that the term supplementary motor area (SMA-proper) should be reserved to F3.

Superior area 6 afferents from the superior parietal lobule in the macaque monkey.

Superior area 6 of the macaque monkey frontal cortex is formed by two cytoarchitectonic areas: F2 and F7. In the present experiment, we studied the input from the superior parietal lobule (SPL) to these areas by injecting retrograde neural tracers into restricted parts of F2 and F7. Additional injections of retrograde tracers were made into the spinal cord to define the origin of corticospinal projections from the SPL. The results are as follows: 1) The part of F2 located around the superior precentral dimple (F2 dimple region) receives its main input from areas PEc and PEip (PE intraparietal, the rostral part of area PEa of Pandya and Seltzer, [1982] J. Comp. Neurol. 204:196-210). Area PEip was defined as that part of area PEa that is the source of corticospinal projections. 2) The ventrorostral part of F2 is the target of strong projections from the medial intraparietal area (area MIP) and from the dorsal part of the anterior wall of the parietooccipital sulcus (area V6A). 3) The ventral and caudal parts of F7 receive their main parietal input from the cytoarchitectonic area PGm of the SPL and from the posterior cingulate cortex. 4) The dorsorostral part of F7, which is also known as the supplementary eye field, is not a target of the SPL, but it receives mostly afferents from the inferior parietal lobule and from the temporal cortex. It is concluded that at least three separate parietofrontal circuits link the superior parietal lobule with the superior area 6. Considering the functional properties of the areas that form these circuits, it is proposed that the PEc/PEip-F2 dimple region circuit is involved in controlling movements on the basis of somatosensory information, which is the traditional role proposed for the whole dorsal premotor cortex. The two remaining circuits appear to be involved in different aspects of visuomotor transformations.

New view of the organization of the pulvinar nucleus in Tupaia as revealed by tectopulvinar and pulvinar-cortical projections.

The projections of the superficial layers of the superior colliculus to the pulvinar nucleus in Tupaia were reexamined by injecting WGA-HRP into the tectum. The main result was finding two different patterns of terminations in the pulvinar nucleus: a zone remote from the lateral geniculate nucleus, which occupies the dorsomedial and caudal poles of the pulvinar nucleus, was almost entirely filled with terminals in every case irrespective of the location of the injection site; and a second division of the pulvinar nucleus, adjacent to the lateral geniculate nucleus, contained irregular patches--much more densely populated--and the distribution of patches varied from case to case. We call the first projection "diffuse" and the patchy projection "specific." Next we injected several divisions of the extrastriate visual cortex to find the cortical target of each pathway. The diffuse path terminates in the ventral temporal area (Tv). The specific path terminates in the dorsal temporal area (Td) and area 18. We speculated about the significance of the two pathways: the specific path may be responsible for the preservation of vision after removal of the striate cortex; the diffuse path may have an important place in the evolution of the visual areas of the temporal and occipital lobe. We argued that the target of the diffuse path is in a position to relate limbic and visual impulses and relay the product of such integration to the other visual areas, striate as well as extrastriate cortex.

Receptor autoradiographic mapping of the mesial motor and premotor cortex of the macaque monkey.

This study analyzes regional and laminar distribution patterns of neurotransmitter binding sites in the motor areas of the macaque mesial frontal cortex. Differences in distribution patterns are compared with the cytoarchitectonic parcellation. Binding sites were analyzed with quantitative in vitro receptor autoradiography in unfixed brains of five macaque monkeys. Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxalone propionic acid (AMPA), kainate, and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) binding sites were labeled with [3H]AMPA, [3H]kainate, and [3H]MK-801, respectively, muscarinic binding sites with [3H]pirenzepine or [3H]oxotremorine-M, noradrenergic binding sites with [3H]prazosin or [3H]UK-14304, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A binding sites with [3H]muscimol, and serotoninergic binding sites with [3H]ketanserine. Adjacent sections were stained with a modified Nissl method for cytoarchitectonic analysis. In the motor areas F1, F3, and F6, [3H]AMPA, [3H]pirenzepine, and [3H]oxotremorine-M binding was maximal in layers II, III, and V, and [3H]kainate binding was maximal in layers V and VI. Clear-cut changes in laminar distribution patterns of [3H]AMPA, [3H]kainate, and [3H]oxotremorine-M binding sites very closely matched corresponding cytoarchitectonic borders. Mean areal binding densities of all ligands to F1, F3, and F6 were plotted as polar plots for each area. A polygon was obtained for each area ("neurochemical fingerprint") when all the density values belonging to one area were connected with each other. The "neurochemical fingerprints" of F1, F3, and F6 were virtually identical in shape but increased in size from F1 to F6. This result reflects the functional similarity of these motor-related areas and possibly correlates with their differential involvement in motor control. Areas F1, F3, and F6 can thus be grouped into one "neurochemical family" of areas.

Corticospinal projections from mesial frontal and cingulate areas in the monkey.

We injected neural tracers into the lateral funiculus of the spinal cord in order to relate the sites of origin of the spinal projections from the mesial cortical surface with the cytoarchitectonic organization of this region. We found a close correlation between the origin sites and density of corticospinal projections and the areal organization. The areas most densely labelled were F3 (SMA-proper) and area 24d, whereas F6 (pre-SMA) and area 24c showed a low density of labelling. The segmental topography of the corticospinal projections fitted well with the somatotopy of the mesial cortical areas. We conclude that in the agranular mesial cortex there are four independent motor representations: F3 and 24d where the whole body is represented, and F6 and 24c which are mostly related to arm movements.

Activation of precentral and mesial motor areas during the execution of elementary proximal and distal arm movements: a PET study.

Regional cerebral blood flow was measured using positron emission tomography (PET) in normal subjects while performing simple aimless proximal and distal arm movements. The aim of the experiment was to compare the somatotopic organization of precentral and mesial (the so called supplementary motor area, SMA) motor cortices and to evaluate whether in man, as in the monkey, the rostral and caudal sectors of SMA are functionally different. The results showed that proximal and distal arm movements are to a large extent segregated in the precentral motor cortex, but not in the SMA. They also showed that the SMA is made of at least two functional sectors. Only the caudal one is activated during simple aimless movements.

Patterns of cytochrome oxidase activity in the frontal agranular cortex of the macaque monkey.

The laminar pattern of cytochrome oxidase activity was studied in the agranular frontal cortex (area 4-6 complex) of the macaque monkey. The cortex, stained with this method, showed 6 stripes of different enzymatic activity. On the basis of their characteristics and of the presence of highly active cells, the agranular frontal cortex could be parcellated in 5 areas (F1-F5). F1 very likely corresponds to area FA of von Bonin and Bailey. Rostral to F1 two large regions could be distinguished, one located medial to the spur of the arcuate sulcus and its imaginary caudal extension, the other laterally. The superior region was formed by areas F2 and F3. The first was located on the dorsomedial cortical surface, the other on the mesial surface. F3 possibly corresponds to the supplementary motor area. The inferior region was formed by areas F4 and F5. The rostral area (F5) showed transition characteristics that rendered it somehow similar to the prefrontal areas. It may correspond to the cytoarchitectonic area FCBm. The cytocrome oxidase technique is a useful means of parcellating the agranular frontal cortex and may greatly help in physiological and behavioral experiments.

Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. I. Somatosensory responses.

The afferent properties of single neurons of the periarcuate cortex have been studied in the macaque monkey. Most of the recorded neurons responded to stimuli in one or two sensory modalities and, accordingly, they were classified as somatosensory, visual or bimodal (visual and somatosensory) neurons. Visual neurons were located rostral to the arcuate sulcus, whereas the somatosensory and the bimodal neurons were found predominantly caudal to this sulcus. Somatosensory neurons (n = 102) and bimodal neurons (n = 69) had identical somatic afferent properties. They were subdivided into 'tactile' neurons, 'joint' neurons and 'tactile and joint' neurons. 'Tactile' neurons (70%) had their receptive fields formed either by one or by two or more spatially separated responding areas. The parts of the body most represented were the hands and the mouth. 'Joint' neurons (10%) were activated by the rotation of one or, more often, of two or more articulations. The movement of the hand towards the mouth was the most frequently represented movement. 'Tactile and joint' neurons (20%) responded to both tactile and joint stimulation having receptive field locations and properties like those of the other two classes of neurons. Some 'joint' and 'tactile and joint' neurons had summing properties, i.e. their response to tactile or joint stimulation was conditional upon a simultaneous stimulation of another articulation. The data are interpreted as evidence in favor of the existence of an area in the agranular cortex that organizes the mouth and the hand to mouth movements.

Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses.

The visual response of single neurons of the periarcuate cortex have been studied in the macaque monkey. Two sets of neurons responding to visual stimuli have been found. The first set, located rostral to the arcuate sulcus, was formed by units that could be activated by stimuli presented far from the animal. These neurons had large receptive fields and were neither orientation nor direction selective. The second set, found predominantly caudal to the arcuate sulcus, was formed by units that were maximally or even exclusively activated by stimuli presented in the space immediately around the animal. These neurons were bimodal, responding also to somatosensory stimuli. According to the location of their visual responding regions the bimodal neurons were subdivided into pericutaneous (54%) and distant peripersonal neurons (46%). The former responded best to stimuli presented a few centimeters from the skin, the latter to stimuli within the animal's reaching distance. The visual responding regions were spatially related to the tactile fields. It is argued that neurons with a receptive field consisting of several responding areas, some in one sensory modality, some in another, have a praxic function and that they are involved in organizing sequences of movements.

Upper visual space neglect and motor deficits after section of the midbrain commissures in the cat.

The neurological deficits following section of the midbrain commissures were studied in the cat. After a lesion of the commissures between the superior and inferior colliculi, with or without involvement of the posterior commissure, the animals showed a long lasting inattention for stimuli in the upper visual space, lack of exploratory head movements towards the neglected space, head ventroflexion and vertical paralysis of gaze. After a lesion of the commissure between the superior colliculi or of its rostral part only, the same symptomatology appeared, but it was short lasting. After a lesion of the posterior commissure, the head was kept dorsiflexed, the exploratory head movements towards the lower visual space were reduced and the stimuli presented in this space were often neglected. There was a paralysis of vertical eye movements. The findings are discussed in the frame of a premotor theory of neglect.

The fronto-parietal cortex of the prosimian Galago: patterns of cytochrome oxidase activity and motor maps.

We mapped the motor areas of the prosimian Galago crassicaudatus using intracortical electrical microstimulation and morphological and histochemical (cytochrome oxidase) techniques. Stimulation data showed that on the brain convexity there is an area (area Frontalis posterior, F post.) from which movements could be evoked at low threshold (< 10 microA). This area is somatotopically organized, with the leg represented medially, the arm centrally and the face and mouth laterally. Proximal and distal movements are not segregated. Most of the evoked movements, even at threshold, consist of movements involving two or more joints. F post. is characterized by a three-band cytochrome oxidase activity pattern. It has an agranular structure, but it lacks pyramidal cells that are larger than those observed in other areas. In front of F post. there is an area histochemically similar to it, Frontalis intermedialis (F int.). This area consists of two cytoarchitectonic divisions: an agranular division (F int. pars caudalis) and a disgranular division (F int. pars rostralis). The excitability threshold of F int. is relatively high (10 to 30 microA). Eye, ear and neck movements are elicited from its lateral part, whereas trunk movements associated with limb movements are elicited from its medial part. Caudal to F post., there is another region from which movements can be evoked with currents between 10 to 30 microA. This region has the same medio-lateral somatotopic arrangement of F post. Typically, single joint movements are elicited from it. Proximal and distal movements are not segregated. In spite of its homogeneity in terms of motor response, the posterior excitable region is formed by two anatomically separate areas: anterior somatic area (S ant.) and posterior somatic area (S post.). S ant. has a typical koniocortex structure, whereas S post, resembles the parakoniocortex as defined by Sanides (J. Hirnforsch., 9 (1967) 225-252). Histochemically both areas are made up of four longitudinal stripes differing for enzymatic activity. The three superficial stripes tend to merge together and are sharply separated from a deeply located, light stripe. This stripe is homogeneous in S ant., whilst its central part shows an increase in activity in S post. The possible homologies between the motor and somatic areas of the galago and monkey as well as their role in movement control are discussed.

Interconnections within the postarcuate cortex (area 6) of the macaque monkey.

Small amounts of horseradish peroxidase conjugated with wheat germ were injected in restricted parts of the postarcuate premotor area of the macaque monkey. It was found that regions of this area having different somatotopic representations are richly interconnected among them. This pattern of intra-areal connectivity was not observed in the precentral motor area. It appears therefore that the postarcuate area is organized according to anatomical principles which are different from those of the primary motor cortex.

Functional neuroanatomy of the primate isocortical motor system.

The concept of the primate motor cortex based on the cytoarchitectonic subdivision into areas 4 and 6 according to Brodmann or the functional subdivision into primary motor, supplementary motor, and lateral premotor cortex has changed in recent years. Instead, this cortical region is now regarded as a complex mosaic of different areas. This review article gives an overview of the structure and function of the isocortical part of the motor cortex in the macaque and human brain. In the macaque monkey, the primary motor cortex (Brodmann's area 4 or area F1) with its giant pyramidal or Betz cells lies immediately anterior to the central sulcus. The non-primary motor cortex (Brodmann's area 6) lies further rostrally and can be subdivided into three groups of areas: the supplementary motor areas "SMA proper" (area F3) and "pre-SMA" (area F6) on the mesial cortical surface, the dorsolateral premotor cortex (areas F2 and F7) on the dorsolateral convexity, and the ventrolateral premotor cortex (areas F4 and F5) on the ventrolateral convexity. The primary motor cortex is mainly involved in controlling kinematic and dynamic parameters of voluntary movements, whereas non-primary motor areas are more related to preparing voluntary movements in response to a variety of internal or external cues. Since a structural map of the human isocortical motor system as detailed as in the macaque is not yet available, homologies between the two species have not been firmly established. There is increasing evidence, however, that a similar organizational principle (i.e., primary motor cortex, supplementary motor areas, dorso- and ventrolateral premotor cortex) also exists in humans. Imaging studies have revealed that functional gradients can be discerned within the human non-primary motor cortex. More rostral cortical regions are active when a motor task is nonroutine, whereas more routine motor actions engage more caudal areas.