The impact of diabetes mellitus on spinal fracture with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) are susceptible to spinal column injuries with neurological deterioration. Previous studies indicated that the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with DISH was higher than that in patients without DISH. This study investigates the impact of DM on surgical outcomes for spinal fractures in patients with DISH. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 177 spinal fractures in patients with DISH (132 men and 45 women; mean age, 75 ± 10 years) who underwent surgery from a multicenter database. The subjects were classified into two groups according to the presence of DM. Perioperative complications, neurological status by Frankel grade, mortality rate, and status of surgical site infection (SSI) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: DM was present in 28.2% (50/177) of the patients. The proportion of men was significantly higher in the DM group (DM group: 86.0% vs. non-DM group: 70.1%) (p = 0.03). The overall complication rate was 22.0% in the DM group and 19.7% in the non-DM group (p = 0.60). Poisson regression model revealed that SSI was significantly associated with DM (DM group: 10.0% vs. non-DM group: 2.4%, Relative risk: 4.5) (p = 0.048). Change in neurological status, mortality rate, instrumentation failure, and nonunion were similar between both groups. HbA1c and fasting blood glucose level (SSI group: 7.2% ± 1.2%, 201 ± 67 mg/dL vs. non-SSI group: 6.6% ± 1.1%, 167 ± 47 mg/dL) tended to be higher in patients with SSI; however, there was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: In spinal fracture in patients with DISH, although DM was an associated factor for SSI with a relative risk of 4.5, DM did not negatively impact neurological recovery. Perioperative glycemic control may be useful for preventing SSI because fasting blood glucose level was high in patients with SSI.

Predictors for quality of life improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a prospective multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) can significantly impair a patient's quality of life (QOL). In this study, we aimed to identify predictors associated with QOL improvement after surgery for DCM. METHODS: This study included 148 patients who underwent surgery for DCM. The European QOL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score, the Japanese Orthopedic Association for the assessment of cervical myelopathy (C-JOA) score, and the Nurick grade were used as outcome measures. Radiographic examinations were performed at enrollment. The associations of baseline variables with changes in EQ-5D scores from preoperative to 1-year postoperative assessment were investigated using a multivariable linear regression model. RESULTS: The EQ-5D and C-JOA scores and the Nurick grade improved after surgery (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Univariable analysis revealed that preoperative EQ-5D and C-JOA scores were significantly associated with increased EQ-5D scores from preoperative assessment to 1 year after surgery (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.045). Multivariable regression analysis showed that the independent preoperative predictors of change in QOL were lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA). According to the prediction model, the increased EQ-5D score from preoperatively to 1 year after surgery = 0.308 - 0.493 × EQ-5D + 0.006 × LL - 0.008 × SS + 0.004 × TPA. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative LL, SS, and TPA significantly impacted the QOL of patients who underwent surgery for DCM. Less improvement in QOL after surgery was achieved in patients with smaller LL and TPA and larger SS values. Patients with these risk factors may therefore require additional support to experience adequate improvement in QOL.

Predictors associated with neurological recovery after anterior decompression with fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) has often been performed for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) in patients with poor cervical spine alignment and/or anterior cord compression. We aimed to identify clinical and radiological predictors associated with neurological recovery after ADF. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis from a prospective multicenter study included patients who were scheduled for ADF for DCM. The patients who received other surgeries (laminoplasty, posterior decompression and fusion) were excluded. The associations between baseline clinical and radiographic variables (age, sex, body mass index, etiology, cervical lordosis, range of motion, C7 slope, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA], thoracic kyphosis [TK], lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, SVA, pelvic tilt, T1 pelvic angle [TPA], the Japanese Orthopedic Association score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy [C-JOA], European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Scale [EQ-5D], Neck Disability Index [NDI], Physical Component Summary of the SF-36 [PCS], and Mental Component Summary of the SF-36) and the recovery rates as the outcome variables were investigated in the univariate regression analysis. Then, the independent predictors for increased recovery rates were evaluated using a stepwise multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 37 patients completed the 1 year follow-up. The recovery rate was significantly correlated with SVA (p = 0.001) and TPA (p = 0.03). Univariate regression analyses showed that age (Regression coefficient = - 0.92, p = 0.049), SVA (Regression coefficient  = - 0.57, p = 0.004) and PCS (Regression coefficient = 0.80, p = 0.03) score were significantly associated with recovery rate. Then, a stepwise multiple regression analysis identified the independent predictors of recovery rate after ADF as TK (p = 0.01), PCS (p = 0.03), and SVA (p = 0.03). According to this prediction model, the following equation was obtained: recovery rate = - 8.26 + 1.17 × (TK) - 0.45 × (SVA) + 0.85 × (PCS) (p = 0.002, R2 = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Patients with lower TK, lower PCS score, and higher SVA were more likely to have poor neurological recovery after ADF. Therefore, patients with DCM and these predictors who undergo ADF should be warned about poor recovery and be required to provide adequate informed consent.

The 5-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale predicts postoperative fall risk in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Falling is one of the main reasons for which older adults require nursing care. Locomotive syndrome (LS) predicts the need for nursing care; however, the relationship between falling and LS remains unclarified. This study aimed to determine whether the 5-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-5) predicts postoperative fall risk in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). METHODS: This study is a post hoc analysis of the data from a prospective cohort of patients undergoing surgery for DCM. Participants recorded their falls in a fall diary from the time of study enrollment (baseline) to 1 year postoperatively. Functional assessments were conducted at baseline, hospital admission for surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. Outcome measures included the GLFS-5, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, EuroQol 5 Dimensions, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. Risk factors for falls were investigated, including previous falls, number of medications, and grip strength. Fallers were divided into two categories: all fallers (≥1 falls), and recurrent fallers (≥2 falls). Variables that were significant in univariate analyses were applied in multiple logistic regression models to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: From the initial group of 168 participants, 159 attended the 1-year follow-up, and 132 fall diaries were retrieved and analyzed. Of these 132 patients, 42 (32%) reported at least one fall, while 25 (19%) reported recurrent falls during the postoperative observation period. The GLFS-5 significantly increased from baseline to admission, and significantly decreased from admission to 1 year postoperatively. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the independent predictors of postoperative recurrent falls were previous falls and a higher baseline GLFS-5. The optimal cut-off value of GLFS-5 for predicting all falls/recurrent falls was 12. CONCLUSIONS: The GLFS-5 reflected time-dependent functional changes in patients undergoing surgery for DCM. Previous falls and a higher baseline GLFS-5 were independent predictors of postoperative recurrent falls.

Risk factors for delayed diagnosis of spinal fracture associated with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: A nationwide multiinstitution survey.

BACKGROUND: Patients with DISH are susceptible to spinal fractures and subsequent neurological impairment, including after minor trauma. However, DISH is often asymptomatic and fractures may have minimal symptoms, which may lead to delayed diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for delayed diagnosis of spinal fractures in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). METHODS: The subjects were 285 patients with DISH surgically treated at 18 medical centers from 2005 to 2015. Cause of injury, imaging findings, neurological status at the times of injury and first hospital examination, and the time from injury to diagnosis were recorded. A delayed diagnosis was defined as that made >24 h after injury. RESULTS: Main causes of injury were minor trauma due to a fall from a standing or sitting position (51%) and high-energy trauma due to a fall from a high place (29%) or a traffic accident (12%). Delayed diagnosis occurred in 115 patients (40%; 35 females, 80 males; mean age 76.0 ± 10.4 years), while 170 (60%; 29 females, 141 males; mean age 74.6 ± 12.8 years) had early diagnosis. Delayed group had a significantly higher rate of minor trauma (n = 73, 63% vs. n = 73, 43%), significantly more Frankel grade E (intact neurological status) cases at the time of injury (n = 79, 69% vs. n = 73, 43%), and greater deterioration of Frankel grade from injury to diagnosis (34% vs. 8%, p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, a minor trauma fall (OR 2.08; P < 0.05) and Frankel grade E at the time of injury (OR 2.29; P < 0.01) were significantly associated with delayed diagnosis. CONCLUSION: In patients with DISH, it is important to keep in mind the possibility of spinal fracture, even in a situation in which patient sustained only minor trauma and shows no neurological deficit. This is because delayed diagnosis of spinal fracture can cause subsequent neurological deterioration.

Spinal fractures in patients with Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis:A nationwide multi-institution survey.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) increases the spine's susceptibility to unstable fractures that can cause neurological deterioration. However, the detail of injury is still unclear. A nationwide multicenter retrospective study was conducted to assess the clinical characteristics and radiographic features of spinal fractures in patients with DISH. METHODS: Patients were eligible for this study if they 1) had DISH, defined as flowing ossification along the anterolateral aspect of at least four contiguous vertebral bodies, and 2) had an injury in the ankylosing spine. This study included 285 patients with DISH (221 males, 64 females; mean age 75.2 ± 9.5 years). RESULTS: The major cause of injury was falling from a standing or sitting position; this affected 146 patients (51.2%). Diagnosis of the fracture was delayed in 115 patients (40.4%). Later neurological deterioration by one or more Frankel grade was seen in 87 patients (30.5%). The following factors were significantly associated with neurological deficits: delayed diagnosis (p = 0.033), injury of the posterior column (p = 0.021), and the presence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) (p < 0.001). The majority of patients (n = 241, 84.6%) were treated surgically, most commonly by conventional open posterior fixation (n = 199, 69.8%). Neurological improvement was seen in 20.0% of the conservatively treated patients, and in 47.0% of the patients treated surgically. CONCLUSIONS: Minor trauma could cause spinal fractures in DISH patients. Delayed diagnosis, injury of the posterior column, and the presence of OPLL were significantly associated with neurological deterioration. Patients with neurological deficits or unstable fractures should be treated by fixation surgery.

The 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale predicts the risk of recurrent falls in postoperative patients with cervical myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Fall-induced injuries represent a major public health concern for older individuals. The relationship between risk of falling and the severity of locomotive syndrome (LS) remains largely unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone surgery from January 2012 to December 2013 and completed at least 1 year of follow-up at 12 participating institutes. Patients completed a questionnaire survey regarding their fall experience during a routine postoperative follow-up. Questionnaire items included the number of falls during the prior postoperative year and the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25). The severity of cervical myelopathy was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. We analyzed the association between the incidence of falling and the severity of LS measured by the GLFS-25. RESULTS: Of 360 patients, 61 (16.9%) experienced 1 fall; 31 (8.6%), 2-3 falls; 4 (1.1%), 4-5 falls; and 6 (1.7%), ≥6 falls during the first postoperative year. Thus, 102 (28%) patients experienced at least 1 fall, and 41 (11%) experienced recurrent falls (2 or more falls) during the time period. The mean GLFS-25 score was 30.2 ± 22.7, and 242 (62%) patients had GLFS-25 scores of 16 or higher, which fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for LS. When subjects were categorized into recurrent fallers and non-recurrent fallers, recurrent fallers had a significantly higher GLFS-25 score and a significantly lower extremity motor function score of the JOA score than non-recurrent fallers. The GLFS-25 and lower extremity motor function score of the JOA score yielded the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.674 and 0.607, respectively, to differentiate recurrent fallers from non-recurrent fallers. CONCLUSION: Postoperative patients with cervical myelopathy had a 62% prevalence of LS. The GLFS-25 may be useful to predict the risk of recurrent falls in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Risk factors for development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic cord compression.

PURPOSE: To clarify risk factors for the development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic cord compression. METHOD: The authors reviewed articles in which risk factors for the development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic cord compression were discussed. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) was also reviewed as a disease which causes cervical cord compression to clarify pathomechanism of the development of myelopathy. RESULTS: Cervical motion segment disorders are considered to be multifactorial, and developmental size of the canal and foramina, pathological encroachment, biomechanical effects, and circulatory deficiencies are always present to some degree. Static and dynamic factors should be considered for the development of myelopathy. To clarify the pathomechanism of the development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic spinal cord compression, the exact natural history of CSM should be understood. CONCLUSION: Several predictable risk factors for the development of myelopathy have been proposed in CSM or OPLL studies, but they were not definitive. Further prospective population-based study is needed to clarify the mechanism.

Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) as an outcome measure for patients with low back pain: reference values in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: In 2007, the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was established to overcome the limitations of the original JOA scoring system developed in 1986. Although this new self-administered questionnaire is a more accurate outcome measure for evaluating patients with low back pain, physicians were unable to as certain the exact status of a patient at a single time point because of a lack of reference values. This study aimed to establish the reference values of JOABPEQ in different age and gender groups using data obtained from healthy volunteers. METHODS: This study was conducted in 21 university hospitals and affiliated hospitals from October 2012 to July 2013. The JOABPEQ includes 25 questions that yield five domains to evaluate individuals with low back pain from five different perspectives. A total of 1,456 healthy volunteers (719 men, 737 women; age range, 20-89 years) answered the questionnaire. The differences in scores according to age and gender were examined by non-parametric tests. RESULTS: The JOABPEQ scores significantly decreased with age in the domains of lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, and social life dysfunction. In these three domains, the median scores approached the 100 possible points in individuals aged 20-70 for both genders. However, the median scores for lumbar spine dysfunction and social life dysfunction decreased to 83.0 and 65.0-78.0 points, respectively, in individuals in their 80 s and 70-80 s, respectively; and the scores for gait disturbance decreased to 93.0 and 71.0 points for males and females in their 80 s. Overall, the median scores for pain-related and psychological disorders were 100 and 60.0-72.0 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: The reference values for JOABPEQ according to age and gender were established herein. Patients with low back pain should be evaluated with this new self-administered questionnaire taking these reference values into account.

New classification system for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament using CT images.

BACKGROUND: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is most frequently seen in the cervical spine. The types of cervical OPLL are classified into continuous, mixed, segmental, and other based on plain lateral X-ray. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is often used in clinical practice for evaluating ossified lesions as it can detect their precise location, size, and shape. However, to date, no CT classification of OPLL lesions has been proposed. METHODS: One hundred and forty-four patients diagnosed with cervical OPLL by plain radiograph were included in this study. Sagittal and axial CT images of the cervical spine were obtained. We propose three classification systems: A, B, and axial. Classification A comprises two lesion types: bridge and nonbridge. Classification B requires examiners to describe all vertebral and intervertebral levels where OPLL exits in the cervical spine. Axial classification comprises central and lateral lesions identified on axial CT images. Seven observers evaluated CT images using this classification system, and intra- and interrater reliability were examined. RESULTS: Averaged Fleiss' kappa coefficient of interrater agreement was 0.43 ± 0.26 among the seven observers, averaged intrarater reliability for the existence of OPLL was 72.4 ± 8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 67.5-76.8]. Fifty-four patients (37.5%) had the bridge type and 90 the nonbridge type according to Classification A; 102 (70.8%) had central and 42 (29.2%) lateral OPLL in the axial classification. Four representative cases defined according to the three classification types are reported here. CONCLUSION: Subcommittee members of the Investigation Committee on the Ossification of the Spinal Ligaments of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare propose three new classification systems of cervical OPLL based on CT imaging: A, B, and axial.

An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): an average score of healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: An outcome measure to evaluate the neurological function of patients with cervical myelopathy was proposed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA score) and has been widely used in Japan. However, the JOA score does not include patients' satisfaction, disability, handicaps, or general health, which can be affected by cervical myelopathy. In 2007, a new outcome measure, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), which is a self-administered questionnaire, was developed. However, the influence of age and gender on the scores has not been fully examined. The purpose of this study was to establish the standard value of the JOACMEQ by age using healthy volunteers. METHODS: This study was conducted in 23 university hospitals and their affiliated hospitals from September to December 2011. The questionnaire included 24 questions for evaluation of physical function of the cervical spine and spinal cord. A total of 1,629 healthy volunteers were recruited for the study. The ages ranged from 20 to 89 years old. RESULTS: The volunteers comprised 798 men and 831 women. In the elderly healthy volunteers, the JOACMEQ scores decreased with age. In general, the scores for cervical spine function and upper/lower extremity function were retained up to the 60s, then decreased in the 70s and 80s. The scores for quality of life were retained up to the 70s; however, the score for bladder function was retained up to the 40s, then declined with age from the 50s to 80s. CONCLUSION: The standard values of the JOACMEQ by age were established. Differences in the scores were found among different generations. Patients with cervical myelopathy should be evaluated with this new self-administered questionnaire taking into account the standard values according to different ages.

Residual Neuropathic Pain in Postoperative Patients With Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multi-institutional observational study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate and identify risk factors for residual neuropathic pain after surgery in patients with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (c-OPLL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with c-OPLL often require surgery for numbness and paralysis of the extremities; however, postoperative neuropathic pain can considerably deteriorate their quality of life. METHODS: Out of 479 patients identified from multicenter c-OPLL registries between 2014 and 2017, 292 patients who could be followed up for 2 years postoperatively were reviewed, after excluding patients with nervous system comorbidities. Demographic details; medical history; radiographic factors including the K-line, spinal canal occupancy rate of OPLL, cervical kyphosis angle, and presence of spinal cord myelomalacia; preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score; surgical procedure (fusion or decompression surgery); postoperative neurological deterioration; and the visual analogue scale for pain and numbness in the upper extremities (U/E) or trunk/lower extremities (L/E) at baseline and at 2 years postoperatively were assessed. Patients were grouped into residual and non-residual groups based on a postoperative visual analogue scale ≥40 mm. Risk factors for residual neuropathic pain were evaluated by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of U/E and L/E residual pain in postoperative c-OPLL patients was 51.7% and 40.4%, respectively. The U/E residual group had a poor preoperative JOA score and longer illness duration, and fusion surgery was more common in the residual group than in non-residual group. The L/E residual group was older with a poorer preoperative JOA score. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for U/E residual pain were long illness duration and poor preoperative JOA score, whereas those for L/E residual pain were age and poor preoperative JOA score. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for residual spinal neuropathic pain after c-OPLL surgery were age, long duration of illness, and poor preoperative JOA score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Factors Negatively Influencing Postoperative Improvement After Laminoplasty in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to characterize a population of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and a history of poor postoperative neurological recovery and to identify risk factors associated with poor neurological recovery after laminoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Kyphotic cervical alignment has been considered a relative contraindication to laminoplasty in recent years; hence, laminoplasty has been decreasingly performed for the treatment of DCM in patients with cervical kyphosis. However, the effect of global spinal alignment on postoperative outcomes has not been extensively investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients who were scheduled for laminoplasty for DCM. Outcome (at enrollment and 1 y after surgery) and risk factor analyses were performed by comparing the good recovery and poor recovery groups. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationships between the recovery rate and the preoperative radiographic factors. RESULTS: In total, 101 patients completed the 1-year follow-up. Regarding clinical outcomes, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, and Neck Disability Index scores improved postoperatively. The recovery rate was significantly correlated with the preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA). The patients in the poor recovery group were older than those in the good recovery group. Univariate analyses showed that the SVA and T1 pelvic angle were significantly higher in the poor recovery group. Lastly, stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that a higher SVA was an independent predictor of poor recovery after laminoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The SVA and T1 pelvic angle were significantly higher in the poor recovery group. A high preoperative SVA is an independent predictor for poor recovery after laminoplasty. Therefore, indications for laminoplasty in elderly DCM patients with a high preoperative SVA should be carefully considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Factors contributing to neck pain in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: A prospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Although the understanding of the mechanisms of low back pain due to spinopelvic sagittal imbalance has strengthened, the understanding of the mechanisms of neck pain remains insufficient. Thus, this study aimed to identify the factors associated with preoperative and postoperative neck pain in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy who underwent laminoplasty. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, we prospectively enrolled patients who were scheduled for laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy. The associations between different variables and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) scores for neck pain were investigated using univariate and multiple linear regression models. RESULTS: In total, 92 patients were included in the current study. The univariate analysis showed that age, sex, cervical lordosis in neutral and extension, and thoracic kyphosis were significantly associated with the preoperative NRS score for neck pain; moreover, preoperative cervical lordosis in extension and range of motion and postoperative cervical lordosis in neutral, flexion, and extension were significantly associated with the postoperative NRS Scale score for neck pain. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the independent factors contributing to preoperative neck pain were preoperative cervical lordosis in extension, sex, and age. The independent preoperative predictor and contributor to postoperative neck pain were preoperative cervical lordosis in extension and postoperative cervical lordosis in extension, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical lordosis in extension showed significant association with neck pain in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Therefore, when performing laminoplasty for patients with a low cervical lordosis in extension, attention should be paid to residual postoperative neck pain.

Is anterior decompression and fusion more beneficial than laminoplasty for K-line (+) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament? An analysis using propensity score matching.

OBJECTIVE: It is unclear whether anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ADF) or laminoplasty (LMP) results in better outcomes for patients with K-line-positive (+) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The purpose of the study is to compare surgical outcomes and complications of ADF versus LMP in patients with K-line (+) OPLL. METHODS: The study included 478 patients enrolled in the Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament and who underwent surgical treatment for cervical OPLL. The patients who underwent anterior-posterior combined surgery or posterior decompression with instrumented fusion were excluded. The patients with a follow-up period of fewer than 2 years were also excluded, leaving 198 patients with K-line (+) OPLL. Propensity score matching was performed on 198 patients with K-line (+) OPLL who underwent ADF (44 patients) or LMP (154 patients), resulting in 39 pairs of patients based on the following predictors for surgical outcomes: age, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, C2-7 angle, and the occupying ratio of OPLL. Clinical outcomes were assessed 1 and 2 years after surgery using the recovery rate of the JOA score. Complications and reoperation rates were also investigated. RESULTS: The mean recovery rate of the JOA score 1 year after surgery was 55.3% for patients who underwent ADF and 42.3% (p = 0.06) for patients who underwent LMP. Two years after surgery, the recovery rate was 53.4% for those who underwent ADF and 38.7% for LMP (p = 0.07). Although both surgical procedures yielded good results, the mean recovery rate of JOA scores tended to be higher in the ADF group. The incidence of surgical complications, however, was higher following ADF (33%) than LMP (15%; p = 0.06). The reoperation rate was also higher in the ADF group (15%) than in the LMP group (0%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes were good for both ADF and LMP, indicating that ADF and LMP are appropriate procedures for patients with K-line (+) OPLL. Clinical outcomes of ADF 1 and 2 years after surgery tended to be better than LMP, but the analysis did not detect any significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups. Conversely, patients who underwent ADF had a higher incidence of surgery-related complications. When considering indications for ADF or LMP, benefits and risks of the surgical procedures should be carefully weighed.

Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament.

This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in order to address the controversy surrounding the role of instrumented fusion in cases of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. 478 patients were considered for participation in the study; from among them, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the participants in terms of patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments. The overall risk of perioperative complications was found to be lower with LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and the rate of C5 palsy occurrence was significantly lower with LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than with PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients who had PF was significantly smaller than in those who had LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference among the participants in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in the LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). Both LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL had resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at 2 years after surgery.

Severity of Myelopathy is Closely Associated With Advanced Age and Signal Intensity Change in Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Nationwide Investigation.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, nationwide case series. OBJECTIVE: To identify preoperative factors associated with myelopathy and neurological impairment in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Various studies have reported clinical outcomes following the surgical treatment of OPLL. However, there has been no large-scale study of preoperative clinical features in patients with cervical OPLL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from 28 institutions nationwide in Japan. In total, 512 patients with neurological impairment caused by cervical OPLL requiring surgery were enrolled. Basic demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, diabetes status, body mass index, smoking history, and disease duration were collected. C2-7 lordotic angle, canal narrowing ratio, range of motion in flexion-extension at C2-7, and type of OPLL were evaluated on lateral radiographs to identify factors influencing the clinical features of patients with OPLL in whom surgery was planned. RESULTS: Complete documentation was available for 490 patients (362 male, 128 female). In total, 34 patients had the localized type, 181 had the segmental type, 64 had the continuous type, and 211 had the mixed type. Although there were no significant differences in age, body mass index, disease duration, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and lordotic angle at C2-7 according to the type of OPLL, significant differences were observed in a range of motion at C2-7 and the canal narrowing ratio among the 4 types. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the JOA score was significantly associated with age and signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large-scale, prospective, multicenter case series study to investigate factors influencing preoperative neurological status in patients with OPLL. Age and signal intensity change on magnetic resonance images were significantly associated with JOA score in patients requiring surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Predictors of Falls in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Prospective Multi-institutional Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize a population of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) combined with a history of falling, and to identify the predictors associated with those falls. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Falls among patients with DCM are common and can lead to the worsening of neurological symptoms. However, there are no prospective studies that have investigated the risk factors for falls in these patients. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients scheduled for surgery for DCM and evaluated the significance of various preoperative measures for predicting falls. We then examined the correlation between the number of falls and the preoperative factors. Lastly, we performed stepwise logistic regression analysis to assess the concurrent effects of various factors on the occurrence of falls. RESULTS: Among the 135 patients analyzed, 64 experienced one or more falls from the time of enrollment to 1 year postoperatively. Univariate analysis showed that the preoperative potassium and albumin levels, handgrip strength, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score) were lower and Nurick grade was higher in the fallers group. Serum potassium level, handgrip strength, C-JOA score, Nurick grade, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) score, t1 pelvic angle, and sagittal vertical axis had weak correlations with the number of falls. The fallers group had a lower C-JOA and EQ-5D scores and a lower recovery rate at one year postoperatively. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis identified preoperative potassium level and handgrip strength as the independent preoperative predictors for falling. CONCLUSION: We identified preoperative lower serum potassium level and weaker handgrip strength as significant predictors of falls in patients with DCM. Therefore, DCM patients with these risk factors should be cautious about falls and might be candidates for immediate surgical intervention.Level of Evidence: 3.

Machine Learning Approach in Predicting Clinically Significant Improvements After Surgery in Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to create a prognostic model for surgical outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) using machine learning (ML). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Determining surgical outcomes helps surgeons provide prognostic information to patients and manage their expectations. ML is a mathematical model that finds patterns from a large sample of data and makes predictions outperforming traditional statistical methods. METHODS: Of 478 patients, 397 and 370 patients had complete follow-up information at 1 and 2 years, respectively, and were included in the analysis. A minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as an acquired Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score of ≥2.5 points, after which a ML model that predicts whether MCID can be achieved 1 and 2 years after surgery was created. Patient background, clinical symptoms, and imaging findings were used as variables for analysis. The ML model was created using LightGBM, XGBoost, random forest, and logistic regression, after which the accuracy and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: The mean JOA score was 10.3 preoperatively, 13.4 at 1 year after surgery, and 13.5 at 2 years after surgery. XGBoost showed the highest AUC (0.72) and high accuracy (67.8) for predicting MCID at 1 year, whereas random forest had the highest AUC (0.75) and accuracy (69.6) for predicting MCID at 2 years. Among the included features, total preoperative JOA score, duration of symptoms, body weight, sensory function of the lower extremity sub-score of the JOA, and age were identified as having the most significance in most of ML models. CONCLUSION: Constructing a prognostic ML model for surgical outcomes in patients with OPLL is feasible, suggesting the potential application of ML for predictive models of spinal surgery.Level of Evidence: 4.

Perioperative Complications in Posterior Surgeries for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Nationwide Investigation.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative complications of posterior surgeries for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical treatment for cervical OPLL has a high risk of various complications. Laminoplasty (LAMP) and posterior decompression and instrumented fusion (PDF) are effective for multilevel cervical OPLL; however, few studies have focused on the surgical complications of these 2 procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively included 380 patients undergoing posterior surgeries for cervical OPLL (LAMP: 270 patients, PDF: 110 patients), and investigated the systemic and local complications, including neurological complications. We further evaluated risk factors related to the neurological complications. RESULTS: Motor palsy was found in 40 patients (10.5%), and motor palsy in the upper extremity was most frequent (8.9%), especially in patients who received PDF (14.5%). Motor palsies involving the lower extremities was found in 6 patients (1.6%). Regarding local complications, dural tears (3.9%) and surgical site infections (2.6%) were common. In the univariate analysis, body mass index, preoperative cervical alignment, fusion surgery, and the number of operated segments were the factors related to motor palsy. Multivariate analysis revealed that fusion surgery and a small preoperative C2-C7 angle were the independent factors related to motor palsy. Motor palsy involving the lower extremities tended to be found at early time points after the surgery, and all the patients fully recovered. Motor palsy in the upper extremities occurred in a delayed manner, and 68.8% of patients with PDF showed good recovery, whereas 81.3% of patients with LAMP showed good recovery. CONCLUSIONS: In posterior surgeries for cervical OPLL, segmental motor palsy in the upper extremity was most frequently observed, especially in patients who received PDF. Fusion and a small preoperative C2-C7 angle were the independent risk factors for motor palsy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.