ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for patients with end-stage cardiac failure awaiting heart transplantation has become increasingly common. However, ventricular assist device-related infections remain a major problem complicating their long-term use. Retrospective review has previously shown a decrease in lifetime return to operating room (RTOR) with no change in 90-day complications when a muscle or omental flap is used for coverage after washout for infection. We wished to determine if early plastic surgery intervention led to a decreased length of stay for these patients. METHODS: Patients with LVAD readmitted for LVAD infection at a single institution from 2008 to 2021 were identified using a preexisting database. Patients were followed retrospectively for an average of 3.2 years. Patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis/disease state, type of ventricular assist device inserted, postoperative day of ventricular assist device infection onset, definitive device coverage, timing of coverage procedure after the initial washout for infection, type of flap used for coverage, 90-day complications after definitive coverage, and lifetime return to operating room for infection were reviewed. Comparison analysis with χ2 and analysis of variance testing was used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: Of 568 patients admitted with an LVAD infection, 104 underwent operative debridement and closure by plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) or cardiothoracic surgery (CTS). Fifty-three underwent PRS closure, and 51 underwent CTS closure. There was an increased incidence of diabetes among the PRS group (P < 0.001); otherwise, there was no difference in baseline characteristics. There was increased RTOR over a lifetime with CTS closure compared with PRS (P = 0.03) and increased 90-day risk of infection (P = 0.007). Patients with PRS closure had an increased risk of postoperative hematoma (P = 046). Plastic and reconstructive surgery was typically consulted on hospital day 10. Both PRS and CTS closure patients were discharged on postoperative day 7, on average (P = 0.542). CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgery involvement with surgical decision making and closure of infected LVAD devices has a decrease in lifetime RTOR and decreased 90-day complications related to infections. There may be a benefit to earlier PRS consultation for coverage assessment.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Heart-Assist Devices , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Surgery, Plastic , Humans , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Operating Rooms , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Failure/etiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Facial palsy is a condition that affects the facial nerve, the seventh of the 12 cranial nerves. Its main function is to control the muscles of facial expression. This involves the ability to express emotion through controlling the position of the mouth, the eyebrow, nostrils, and eye closure. The facial nerve also plays a key role in maintaining the posture of the mouth and as such, people with facial paralysis often have problems with drooling, speech, and dental hygiene.Due to the devastating effects on the quality of life of individuals with facial palsy, there are a multitude of various treatment options for the paralyzed face. This article reviews current management strategies and points towards promising future directions for research in the field of facial reanimation.
ABSTRACT
Postparalysis facial synkinesis (PPFS) can develop in any facial palsy and is associated with significant functional and psychosocial consequences for affected patients. While the prevention of synkinesis especially after Bell's palsy has been well examined, much less evidence exists regarding the management of patients with already established synkinesis. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to summarize the available literature and to provide an overview of the current therapeutic options for facial palsy patients with established synkinesis. A systematic literature review was undertaken, following the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines. MEDLINE via PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched using the following strategy: ([facial palsy] OR [facial paralysis] OR [facial paresis]) AND (synkinesis) AND ([management] OR [guidelines] OR [treatment]). The initial search yielded 201 articles of which 36 original papers and 2 meta-analyses met the criteria for inclusion. Overall, the included articles provided original outcome data on 1,408 patients. Articles were divided into the following treatment categories: chemodenervation (12 studies, 536 patients), facial therapy (5 studies, 206 patients), surgical (10 studies, 389 patients), and combination therapy (9 studies, 278 patients). Results are analyzed and discussed accordingly. Significant heterogeneity in study population and design, lack of control groups, differences in postoperative follow-up, as well as the use of a variety of subjective and objective assessment tools to quantify synkinesis prevent direct comparison between treatment modalities. To date, there is no consensus on how PPFS is best treated. The lack of comparative studies and standardized outcome reporting hinder our understanding of this complex condition. Until higher quality scientific evidence is available, it remains a challenge best approached in an interdisciplinary team. An individualized multimodal therapeutic concept consisting of facial therapy, chemodenervation, and surgery should be tailored to meet the specific needs of the patient.
Subject(s)
Facial Paralysis , Synkinesis , Humans , Synkinesis/etiology , Synkinesis/therapy , Facial Paralysis/therapy , Combined Modality TherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Resettled refugees are at increased risk of poor health outcomes due to acculturation challenges, logistical barriers, experiences of trauma, and other barriers to care that are poorly understood. Refugee children may be particularly vulnerable due to disruptions in health, well-being, education, and nutrition during the resettlement process.METHOD To describe the health care barriers facing refugees in the North Carolina Triangle area (comprised of Durham, Chapel Hill, Raleigh, and their surrounding areas), we conducted three focus group interviews (in Arabic, French, and Swahili) with 25 refugee parents from Syria, Iraq, Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Chad. We also administered a survey to nine organizations that provide services for refugees.RESULTS Focus group responses highlighted the multidimensional nature of health care barriers for refugee families and children, encompassing challenges with acculturation, communication, transportation, finances, and health literacy. Organizations emphasized similar challenges and described their efforts to improve access to services through increased communication, coordination, and seeking new financial support for programs.LIMITATIONS Given the geographic focus of the study, results may not be generalizable to other populations and settings. Men spoke more than women in some focus groups, and participants may have been influenced by more vocal contributors. Furthermore, this study is limited by a lack of health outcomes data.CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the health care needs of refugees living in the North Carolina Triangle area can be better met by providing comprehensive, coordinated, and culturally relevant care. This could include minimizing the number of visits by integrating multiple services under one roof, providing trauma-informed interpreters, and offering accessible transportation services.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Refugees , Child , Family , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , North CarolinaABSTRACT
Fellowship program websites pertaining to various subspecialties have been evaluated according to the amount and type of content they communicate to prospective applicants. This study aimed to evaluate what information specifically burn fellowship programs communicate through their websites and to what extent, if at all. Ten of the 30 unique burn fellowship programs, American Burn Association (ABA)-verified or otherwise, identified through the ABA website did not have official websites which could be readily located at time of data collection. Thus, twenty burn fellowship program websites were included in analysis. Burn fellowship program websites were assessed according to 23 criteria relating to recruitment, education, and social life. On average, each website contained an average of 8.5 ± 2.6 criteria (range, 2 - 13), with all of them listing a program contact email/phone, and 95% containing a program description. Only 35% of programs listed the faculty, and a single program advertised alumni job placement. Neither total number of fellows, total number of clinical faculty, nor Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accreditation status were significantly associated with amount or type of content. Geographic region was associated with a significant difference in amount of education-related content. Fellowship program websites are important to prospective applicants when comparing programs and deciding where to apply. These results show where burn fellowship programs can increase the amount of publicly-available information that applicants tend to find helpful in order to hopefully both diversify and tailor their applicant pool to those whose goals align with the programs'.