Management of Patients at Risk for and With Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Despite the many advances in cardiovascular medicine, decisions concerning the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of left ventricular (LV) thrombus often remain challenging. There are only limited organizational guideline recommendations with regard to LV thrombus. Furthermore, management issues in current practice are increasingly complex, including concerns about adding oral anticoagulant therapy to dual antiplatelet therapy, the availability of direct oral anticoagulants as a potential alternative option to traditional vitamin K antagonists, and the use of diagnostic modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, which has greater sensitivity for LV thrombus detection than echocardiography. Therefore, this American Heart Association scientific statement was commissioned with the goals of addressing 8 key clinical management questions related to LV thrombus, including the prevention and treatment after myocardial infarction, prevention and treatment in dilated cardiomyopathy, management of mural (laminated) thrombus, imaging of LV thrombus, direct oral anticoagulants as an alternative to warfarin, treatments other than oral anticoagulants for LV thrombus (eg, dual antiplatelet therapy, fibrinolysis, surgical excision), and the approach to persistent LV thrombus despite anticoagulation therapy. Practical management suggestions in the form of text, tables, and flow diagrams based on careful and critical review of actual study data as formulated by this multidisciplinary writing committee are given.

Clinical outcomes associated with type II myocardial infarction caused by bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Type ll myocardial infarction (T2MI) is caused by a mismatch between myocardial oxygen supply and demand. One subset of individuals is T2MI caused by acute hemorrhage. Traditional MI treatments including antiplatelets, anticoagulants, and revascularization can worsen bleeding. We aim to report outcomes of T2MI patients due to bleeding, stratified by treatment approach. METHODS: The MGB Research Patient Data Registry followed by manual physician adjudication was used to identify individuals with T2MI caused by bleeding between 2009 and 2022. We defined 3 treatment groups: (1) invasively managed, (2) pharmacologic, and (3) conservatively managed Clinical parameters and outcomes for 30-day, mortality, rebleeding, and readmission were abstracted compared between the treatment groups. RESULTS: We identified 5,712 individuals coded with acute bleeding, of which 1,017 were coded with T2MI during their admission. After manual physician adjudication, 73 individuals met the criteria for T2MI caused by bleeding. 18 patients were managed invasively, 39 received pharmacologic therapy alone, and 16 were managed conservatively. The invasively managed group experienced lower mortality (P = .021) yet higher readmission (P = .045) than the conservatively managed group. The pharmacologic group also experienced lower mortality (P= .017) yet higher readmission (P = .005) than the conservatively managed group. CONCLUSION: Individuals with T2MI associated with acute hemorrhage are a high-risk population. Patients treated with standard procedures experienced higher readmission but lower mortality than conservatively managed patients. These results raise the possibility of testing ischemia-reduction approaches for such high-risk populations. Future clinical trials are required to validate treatment strategies for T2MI caused by bleeding.

Inflammatory biomarkers and risk of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation, measured by traditional biomarkers such as C-reactive protein, has been linked to cardiovascular (CV) events. Recent technological advancement has allowed for measuring larger numbers of inflammatory biomarkers. A contemporary evaluation with established and novel biomarkers of inflammation is needed. METHODS: 1,090 individuals who underwent coronary angiography were enrolled. Twenty-four inflammatory biomarkers were collected prior to angiography. Unsupervised machine learning cluster analyses determined unique patterns of inflammatory biomarkers. Cox proportional hazard regression assessed both association of inflammatory biomarker clusters and individual biomarker associations with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, and CV death) during a median follow-up of 3.67 years. RESULTS: Four distinct clusters were recognized. Incremental increases in inflammatory biomarkers were observed from cluster 1 to cluster 4. During follow-up, 263 MACE were ascertained. Considering cluster 1 as a reference, study participants with inflammatory cluster 2 (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.37), cluster 3 (HR 1.89, CI: 1.25-2.85), and cluster 4 (HR 2.93, CI: 1.95-4.42) were at increased risk of MACE. Interleukin (IL)-1α IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, Adhesion molecule-1 high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, ferritin, myeloperoxidase, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1a, MIP 3, and macrophage colony-stimulating factor-1 were independently associated with MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Among persons undergoing coronary angiography procedures, distinct clusters of inflammatory biomarker distributions with significant prognostic meaning may be identified. These results may identify unique targets for anti-inflammatory treatments aimed at CV disease.

Lifelong Aspirin for All in the Secondary Prevention of Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Still Sacrosanct or Is Reappraisal Warranted?

Four decades have passed since the first trial suggesting the efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. Further trials, collectively summarized by the Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration, solidified the historical role of aspirin in secondary prevention. Although the benefit of aspirin in the immediate phase after a myocardial infarction remains incontrovertible, a number of emerging lines of evidence, discussed in this narrative review, raise some uncertainty as to the primacy of aspirin for the lifelong management of all patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). For example, data challenging the previously unquestioned role of aspirin in CCS have come from recent trials where aspirin was discontinued in specific clinical scenarios, including early discontinuation of the aspirin component of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention and the withholding of aspirin among patients with both CCS and atrial fibrillation who require anticoagulation. Recent primary prevention trials have also failed to consistently demonstrate net benefit for aspirin in patients treated to optimal contemporary cardiovascular risk factor targets, indicating that the efficacy of aspirin for secondary prevention of CCS may similarly have changed with the addition of more modern secondary prevention therapies. The totality of recent evidence supports further study of the universal need for lifelong aspirin in secondary prevention for all adults with CCS, particularly in stable older patients who are at highest risk for aspirin-induced bleeding.

The rise and fall of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Aspirin is one of the most frequently used drugs worldwide and is generally considered effective for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. By contrast, the role of aspirin in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is controversial. Early trials evaluating aspirin for primary prevention, done before the turn of the millennium, suggested reductions in myocardial infarction and stroke (although not mortality), and an increased risk of bleeding. In an effort to balance the risks and benefits of aspirin, international guidelines on primary prevention of cardiovascular disease have typically recommended aspirin only when a substantial 10-year risk of cardiovascular events exists. However, in 2018, three large randomised clinical trials of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease showed little or no benefit and have even suggested net harm. In this narrative Review, we reappraise the role of aspirin in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, contextualising data from historical and contemporary trials.

Gender differences in industry payments among cardiologists.

BACKGROUND: There is a wage gap among men and women practicing cardiology. Differences in industry funding can be both a consequence of and a contributor to gender differences in salaries. We sought to determine whether gender differences exist in the distribution, types, and amounts of industry payments among men and women in cardiology. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis, we used the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payment program database to obtain 2016 industry payment data for US cardiologists. We also used UK Disclosure data to obtain 2016 industry payments to UK cardiologists. Outcomes included the proportions of male and female cardiologists receiving industry funding and the mean industry payment amounts received by male and female cardiologists. Where possible, we also assessed 2014 and 2015 data in both locations. RESULTS: Of the 22,848 practicing Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services US cardiologists in 2016, 20,037 (88%) were men and 2,811 (12%) were women. Proportionally more men than women received industry payments in 2016 (78.0% vs 68.5%, respectively; P < .001). Men received higher overall mean industry payments than women ($6,193.25 vs. $2,501.55, P < .001). Results were similar in 2014 and 2015. Among UK cardiologists, more men (24.4%) than women (13.5%) received industry payments in 2016 (P < .001). However, although the difference in overall industry payments was numerically larger among men compared to women, this did not achieve statistical significance (£2,348.31 vs £1,501.37, respectively, P = .35). CONCLUSIONS: Industry payments to cardiologists are common, and there are gender differences in these payments on both sides of the Atlantic.

Blood kidney injury molecule-1 predicts short and longer term kidney outcomes in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary and/or peripheral angiography-Results from the Catheter Sampled Blood Archive in Cardiovascular Diseases (CASABLANCA) study.

BACKGROUND: Kidney injury is common in patients with cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVES: We determined whether blood measurement of kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), would predict kidney outcomes in patients undergoing angiographic procedures for various indications. METHODS: One thousand two hundred eight patients undergoing coronary and/or peripheral angiography were prospectively enrolled; blood was collected for KIM-1 measurement. Peri-procedural acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined as AKI within 48 hours of contrast exposure. Non-procedural AKI was defined as AKI beyond 48 hours. Development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as progression to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 milliliters/minute/1.73 m2 by study conclusion. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of non-procedural AKI, while univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate peri-procedural AKI and predictors of progression to CKD. RESULTS: During mean follow up of 4 years, peri-procedural AKI occurred in 5.0%, non-procedural AKI in 27.3%, and 12.4% developed new reduction in eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Higher KIM-1 concentrations were associated with prevalent comorbidities associated with risk in cardiovascular disease and worse left ventricular function. In adjusted analyses, elevated pre- and post-procedural KIM-1 concentrations predicted not only peri-procedural AKI (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-2·18, P = .01 and OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10-2.15, P = .01, respectively) and non-procedural AKI (hazard ratio [HR] 1·49, 95% CI 1·24-1·78, P < .001 and HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23-1.74, P < .001, respectively), but also progression to CKD (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.32-2.99, P = .001 and OR 2·02, 95% CI 1·35-3·03, P = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a typical at-risk population undergoing coronary and/or peripheral angiography, blood concentrations of KIM-1 may predict incident peri-procedural and non-procedural AKI, as well as progression to CKD.

Association between pre-ablation bariatric surgery and atrial fibrillation recurrence in morbidly obese patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.

AIMS: Obesity decreases arrhythmia-free survival after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation by mechanisms that are not fully understood. We investigated the impact of pre-ablation bariatric surgery (BS) on AF recurrence after ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective observational cohort study, 239 consecutive morbidly obese patients (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 or ≥35 kg/m2 with obesity-related complications) were followed for a mean of 22 months prior to ablation. Of these patients, 51 had BS prior to ablation, and our primary outcome was whether BS was associated with a lower rate of AF recurrence during follow-up. Adjustment for confounding was performed with multivariable Cox proportional hazard models and propensity-score based analyses. During a mean follow-up of 36 months after ablation, 10/51 patients (20%) in the BS group had recurrent AF compared with 114/188 (61%) in the non-BS group (P < 0.0001). In the BS group, 6 patients (12%) underwent repeat ablation compared with 77 patients (41%) in the non-BS group, (P < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, the association between BS and lower AF recurrence remained significant. Similarly, after weighting and adjusting for the inverse probability of the propensity score, BS was still associated with a lower hazard of AF recurrence (hazard ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.39; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery is associated with a lower AF recurrence after ablation. Morbidly obese patients should be considered for BS prior to AF ablation, though prospective multicentre studies should be performed to confirm our novel finding.

Is Myocardial Infarction Overdiagnosed?

This Viewpoint examines whether overdiagnosis rather than underdiagnosis may now be the dominant form of myocardial infarction misdiagnosis.

Biomarkers in stable coronary artery disease.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. Patients with stable CAD can have an unpredictable clinical trajectory; thus, additional tools to prognosticate risk in this cohort are warranted. In recent years, a wide range of biomarkers has been recognized for their diagnostic capabilities in patients with stable CAD, identifying those with obstructive disease who may require more intensive preventive therapies or even consideration of percutaneous coronary intervention in some circumstances. In addition, a multiple-biomarker approach may identify stable CAD patients at highest risk for future major adverse cardiac events. Thus, randomized controlled trials to assess biomarker-guided preventive therapy in this cohort appear warranted.

Endothelin-1 Measurement in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography-Results from the Catheter Sampled Blood Archive in Cardiovascular Diseases (CASABLANCA) Study.

BACKGROUND: Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a vasoconstrictor produced by vascular endothelial cells and may play a role in risk for development of coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF). In a cohort of 1084 patients referred for coronary angiography, we investigated cross-sectional associations between ET-1 concentrations and prevalent CAD, as well as value of ET-1 for prognostication of future cardiovascular events. METHODS: Associations between ET-1 and presence/severity of CAD were assessed. Patients were followed for a median of 4 years for outcomes including incident HF, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The median concentration of ET-1 was 2.57 ng/L. Patients with ET-1 concentrations above the median were more likely to have higher risk clinical features. Among those without prevalent MI at presentation, ET-1 concentrations were not associated with presence or severity of CAD. In adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses, log-transformed ET-1 concentrations predicted incident HF [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.51 per increase in log-SD; 95% CI, 1.06-2.15; P = 0.02] and all-cause mortality (HR = 1.61 per increase in log-SD; 95% CI, 1.03-2.53; P = 0.04). Concentrations of ET-1 above the median were associated with shorter time to incident HF, MI, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and the composite of incident HF/MI/cardiovascular mortality (all log-rank P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite epidemiologic links to CAD, we found no cross-sectional association between biologically active ET-1 and prevalent coronary atherosclerosis in an at-risk population referred for coronary angiography. Increased ET-1 concentrations independently predict incident HF and death and are associated with more near-term cardiovascular events.

In-hospital outcomes in invasively managed acute myocardial infarction patients who receive morphine.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze the association between morphine and in-hospital outcomes in invasively managed ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients. BACKGROUND: Morphine is commonly used for analgesia in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS); however, recently its utility in ACS has come under closer scrutiny. METHODS: We identified all STEMI and NSTE-ACS patients undergoing coronary angiogram +/- percutaneous intervention between January 2009 and July 2016 in our center and recorded patient characteristics and inpatient outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 3027 patients were examined. Overall, STEMI patients who received morphine had no difference in in-hospital mortality [4.18% vs. 7.54%, odds ratio (OR): 0.36, P = 0.19], infarct size (mean troponin level 0.75 ng/mL vs. 1.29 ng/mL, P = 0.32) or length of hospital stay (P = 0.61). The NSTE-ACS patients who received morphine had a longer hospital stay (mean 6.58 days vs. 4.78 days, P < 0.0001) and larger infarct size (mean troponin 1.16 ng/mL vs. 0.90 ng/mL, P = 0.02). Comparing matched patients, the use of morphine was associated with larger infarct size (mean troponin 1.14 ± 1.92 ng/mL vs. 0.83 ± 1.49 ng/mL, P = 0.01), longer hospital stay (6.5 ± 6.82 days vs. 4.89 ± 5.36 days, P = 0.004) and a trend towards increased mortality (5% vs. 2%, OR: 2.55, P = 0.06) in NSTE-ACS patients but morphine did not affect outcomes in the propensity matched STEMI patients. CONCLUSION: In a large retrospective study, morphine was associated with larger infarct size, a longer hospital stay and a trend towards increased mortality in invasively managed NSTE-ACS patients even after adjustment for clinical characteristics.

Type 2 Myocardial Infarction　- An Evolving Entity.

Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) refers to myocardial necrosis caused by an imbalance in myocardial oxygen supply and demand and in the absence of acute coronary thrombosis. Despite growing recognition of this entity, there remains little understanding of the pathophysiology and uncertainty over the diagnostic criteria for this subtype of MI. Alarmingly, recent studies suggest that a diagnosis of T2MI pertains a prognosis similar to, if not worse than, type 1 MI. With increasing clinical use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays, the frequency of recognition of T2MI is expected to increase. Yet, there remains a scarcity of prospective studies examining this cohort of patients, let alone randomized clinical trials identifying optimum treatment strategies. Further evaluation of the prevalence, pathophysiology and management of this patient cohort is warranted by the scientific community.

Soluble ST2 in Heart Failure.

Suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) is a member of the interleukin (IL)-1 receptor family, whose role was originally established in the context of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. More recently, testing for ST2 has been used in the setting of cardiovascular disease. The soluble form of ST2 is a decoy receptor that inhibits beneficial cardioprotective effects of IL-33; such inhibition results in cardiac hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, and ventricular dysfunction. Measurement of soluble ST2 has utility for assessing heart failure severity and prognosis. In this review, we examine the role of soluble ST2 in both acute and chronic heart failure.

The on- and off-target effects of morphine in acute coronary syndrome: A narrative review.

With potent analgesic properties, perceived hemodynamic benefits and limited alternatives, morphine is the analgesic mainstay for patients with nitrate resistant chest pain due to acute Myocardial Infarction (MI). However, observational data suggest that morphine administration during MI may have negative consequences. While vomiting, hypotension and respiratory depression are established side effects, recent reports have demonstrated attenuated and delayed oral anti-platelet agent absorption, as well as suboptimal reperfusion after MI, all of which may translate into adverse cardiovascular outcomes. These data have resulted in reduced support for morphine in recent European and U.S. clinical practice guidelines for MI; despite the absence of any prospective randomized outcomes trials addressing this question. As such, randomized trials are now necessary to confirm whether or not morphine, which is administered in up to 30% of MI cases, causes adverse clinical outcomes in these patients. However, given that placebo-controlled randomized trial designs evaluating morphine in MI are limited by an ethical requirement for appropriate analgesia, alternative investigational approaches may be necessary. In this article we review the updated evidence for morphine in MI and outline novel strategies that may facilitate future investigation of this clinical dilemma.