Comparative analysis of human gut- and blood-derived mononuclear cells: contrasts in function and phenotype.

Introduction: Alterations in the gut immune system have been implicated in various diseases.The challenge of obtaining gut tissues from healthy individuals, commonly performed via surgical explants, has limited the number of studies describing the phenotype and function of gut-derived immune cells in health. Methods: Here, by means of recto-sigmoid colon biopsies obtained during routine care (colon cancer screening in healthy adults), the phenotype and function of immune cells present in the gut were described and compared to those found in blood. Results: The proportion of CD4+, CD8+, MAIT, γδ+ T, and NK cells phenotype, expression of integrins, and ability to produce cytokine in response to stimulation with PMA and ionomycin. T cells in the gut were found to predominantly have a memory phenotype as compared to T cells in blood where a naïve phenotype predominates. Recto-sigmoid mononuclear cells also had higher PD-1 and Ki67 expression. Furthermore, integrin expression and cytokine production varied by cell type and location in blood vs. gut. Discussion: These findings demonstrate the differences in functionality of these cells when compared to their blood counterparts and validate previous studies on phenotype within gut-derived immune cells in humans (where cells have been obtained through surgical means). This study suggests that recto-sigmoid biopsies collected during colonoscopy can be a reliable yet more accessible sampling method for follow up of alterations of gut derived immune cells in clinical settings.

Clinical and serological predictors of post COVID-19 condition-findings from a Canadian prospective cohort study.

Introduction: More than 3 years into the pandemic, there is persisting uncertainty as to the etiology, biomarkers, and risk factors of Post COVID-19 Condition (PCC). Serological research data remain a largely untapped resource. Few studies have investigated the potential relationships between post-acute serology and PCC, while accounting for clinical covariates. Methods: We compared clinical and serological predictors among COVID-19 survivors with (n = 102 cases) and without (n = 122 controls) persistent symptoms ≥12 weeks post-infection. We selected four primary serological predictors (anti-nucleocapsid (N), anti-Spike, and anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG titres, and neutralization efficiency), and specified clinical covariates a priori. Results: Similar proportions of PCC-cases (66.7%, n = 68) and infected-controls (71.3%, n = 87) tested positive for anti-N IgG. More cases tested positive for anti-Spike (94.1%, n = 96) and anti-RBD (95.1%, n = 97) IgG, as compared with controls (anti-Spike: 89.3%, n = 109; anti-RBD: 84.4%, n = 103). Similar trends were observed among unvaccinated participants. Effects of IgG titres on PCC status were non-significant in univariate and multivariate analyses. Adjusting for age and sex, PCC-cases were more likely to be efficient neutralizers (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.11-4.49), and odds was further increased among cases to report deterioration in quality of life (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.64-7.31). Clinical covariates found to be significantly related to PCC included obesity (OR 2.3, p = 0.02), number of months post COVID-19 (OR 1.1, p < 0.01), allergies (OR 1.8, p = 0.04), and need for medical support (OR 4.1, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Despite past COVID-19 infection, approximately one third of PCC-cases and infected-controls were seronegative for anti-N IgG. Findings suggest higher neutralization efficiency among cases as compared with controls, and that this relationship is stronger among cases with more severe PCC. Cases also required more medical support for COVID-19 symptoms, and described complex, ongoing health sequelae. More data from larger cohorts are needed to substantiate results, permit subgroup analyses of IgG titres, and explore for differences between clusters of PCC symptoms. Future assessment of IgG subtypes may also elucidate new findings.