FEEding DURing red cell transfusion (FEEDUR RCT): a multi-arm randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Necrotising Enterocolitis (NEC) is a devastating neonatal disease. A temporal association between red cell transfusion and NEC has been recognized and there have been concerns about the effects of feeding during transfusion. We aimed to assess the effect of different enteral feeding regimens on splanchnic oxygenation in preterm infants receiving red cell transfusions. METHODS: This was an open, multi-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted in a single centre in Australia. We compared three different enteral feeding regimes during a single red cell transfusion in preterm infants < 35 weeks gestational age at birth. Infants were randomised to either: (1) Withholding enteral feeds for 12 h from the start of transfusion or; (2) Continuing enteral feeds or; (3) Restriction of enteral feed volume to 120 ml/kg/day (maximum 20 kcal/30 ml) for 12 h. The primary outcome was mean splanchnic-cerebral oxygenation ratio (SCOR) and mean splanchnic fractional oxygen extraction (FOE) before (1 h prior), during (1 h into transfusion) and after (end of transfusion; 12 and 24 h post) transfusion. RESULTS: There were 60 transfusion episodes (20 transfusion episodes in each group) included in the analysis. 41 infants with a median gestational age at birth of 27 weeks (range 23-32 weeks) were enrolled. The median postnatal age was 43 days (range 19-94 days) and the median pre-transfusion haematocrit was 0.27 (range 0.22-0.32). All three groups were similar at baseline. There were no differences in mean SCOR and mean splanchnic FOE at any of the pre-specified time points. There were also no differences in clinical outcomes. There were no episodes of NEC in any infant. Across all groups the mean SCOR increased from the start to the end of each transfusion (0.97 [CI95% 0.96-0.98] vs 1.00 [CI95% 0.99-1.01]; p = 0.04) and the mean FOE decreased from the start to the end of each transfusion (0.22 [CI95% 0.21-0.23] vs 0.17 [CI95% 0.16-0.18]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in splanchnic oxygenation when enteral feeds were either withheld, continued or restricted during a transfusion. However, the successful conduct of this study supports the feasibility of a large trial powered to assess clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR, ACTRN12616000160437. Registered 10 February 2016, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370069.

Individualized vancomycin dosing in infants: prospective evaluation of an online dose calculator.

BACKGROUND: Empiric vancomycin dosing regimens fail to achieve recommended target trough concentrations of 10-20 mg/L in the majority of infants. This study assessed the performance of a model-based dosing calculator (Vanc App) in achieving target vancomycin concentrations at first steady-state level. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective study in four tertiary pediatric hospitals over an 18-month period. Infants aged 0-90 days with suspected Gram-positive sepsis requiring empiric vancomycin treatment were included if they did not meet any of the exclusion criteria: post-menstrual age (PMA) <25 weeks, weight <500 g, glycopeptide allergy, receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, vancomycin use within the previous 72 h, and renal impairment. The Vanc App used a published population pharmacokinetic model to generate a dose based on the infant's PMA, weight, creatinine, and target vancomycin concentration. RESULTS: A total of 40 infants were included; 40% were female, median (range) weight was 2505 (700-4460) g and median (range) PMA was 37.4 (25.7-49.0) weeks. The median (range) vancomycin dose was 45 (24-79) mg/kg/day. All infants had trough vancomycin concentrations measured at steady-state (24-<48 hours) and 30 (75%) infants achieved target concentrations. Five infants had supratherapeutic (median 25, range 21-38 mg/L) and five had subtherapeutic (median 6, range <5-9 mg/L) concentrations. An area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) of 400-650 mg/L.h was achieved in 33 (83%) infants. There were no infusion-related reactions or nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Individualized intermittent vancomycin dosing using a model-based online calculator resulted in 75% and 83% of infants achieving target trough and AUC0-24, respectively, at first steady-state level. There were no vancomycin-related nephrotoxicity or infusion-related reactions.

Early PARacetamol (EPAR) Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Paracetamol to Promote Closure of the Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate whether early treatment with paracetamol reduces the number of infants requiring intervention for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and assess the safety profile of paracetamol during the early postnatal period. METHODS: This was a double-blind, parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Preterm infants born at <29-week gestation with a ductus arteriosus >0.9 mm at 6 h of life were randomized to either (1) intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg initially and then 7.5 mg/kg every 6 h) or (2) intravenous dextrose for 5 days. The primary outcome was the need for any intervention for PDA up to 5 days. Secondary outcomes included ductal closure at 5 days, ductal size at 48 h, ductal reopening, mortality, and significant morbidities. RESULTS: Of 58 infants randomized, 29 were allocated to the intervention and 29 to the control group. The trial was stopped for benefit at 50% recruitment after reaching the prespecified stopping criteria. Less infants in the intervention group required intervention for PDA up to 5 days (6 [21%] vs. 17 [59%] infants [p = 0.003]; relative risk reduction 0.35 [95% CI 0.16-0.77; NNT 2.6]). The intervention group had a higher rate of ductal closure (20 [69%] vs. 8 [28%] infants [p = 0.002]) and smaller ductal size (1.0 mm [±0.8] vs. 1.4 mm [±0.9]; p = 0.04). Three deaths occurred (2 in the intervention group), which were not attributed to the intervention. No other adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Early paracetamol treatment reduced the number of infants requiring intervention for PDA. Short-term safety data were reassuring, acknowledging the small number of infants involved in the study.

Early PARacetamol (EPAR) trial: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of early paracetamol to promote closure of the ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal management of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) remains contentious. The medications used to treat PDA are often non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which are associated with a number of unwanted adverse effects. Paracetamol is a medication with an excellent safety profile in infants and has been suggested as a safe alternative medication in situations where other medications have failed or are contraindicated. There are limited data on the use of early, intravenous paracetamol in preterm infants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial aims to address whether early treatment with paracetamol will reduce the number of infants requiring intervention for PDA. This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in preterm infants <29 weeks' gestation. At 6 hours of life, infants with a ductus arteriosus >0.9 mm will be randomised to receive either (1) intravenous paracetamol at a dose of 15 mg/kg initially, followed by every 6 hours at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg for 5 days; or (2) intravenous 5% dextrose every 6 hours for 5 days. The primary outcome is the need for any intervention for management of PDA up to 5 days. Secondary outcomes include closure of the ductus arteriosus at 5 days, size of the ductus arteriosus, ductal reopening, systemic blood flow, mortality and significant morbidities. The target sample size of 100 infants yields >80% power, at the two-sided 5% level significance, to detect a 50% reduction in the need for intervention assuming that approximately 60% of infants in this study would otherwise have required intervention for PDA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A report on the results of the planned analyses will be prepared. The results of the primary analysis of all end points will be presented at medical conferences and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. Separate manuscripts pertaining to the second aim of the study may be written, and these will also be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616001517460.