Sensitivity of Each Index of Doppler, Cross, Uncollapsible, Parallel, and Superficial Fascia in Lymphatic Ultrasound.

Background: Recently, the usefulness of lymphatic ultrasound has been reported. It is beneficial not only to identify lymphatic vessels but also to evaluate lymphatic degeneration and diagnose lymphedema. We previously proposed D-CUPS (Doppler, Cross, Uncollapsible, Parallel, and Superficial fascia) to identify the lymphatic vessels on ultrasound. The purpose of this study was to clarify the sensitivity of each index of D-CUPS. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 27 patients (44 limbs, 98 sites) with lower extremity lymphedema, who underwent lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA). We performed a lymphatic ultrasound the day before surgery. We used a linear probe commonly used for venous ultrasound (Noblus EUP-L65; Hitachi Medical Corp., Tokyo, Japan). We applied the D-CUPS index to identify the lymphatic vessels on ultrasound. We checked whether lymphatic vessels consistent with preoperative lymphatic ultrasound findings were observed during the LVA. We also calculated the sensitivity of each D-CUPS index. Results: All the 27 patients were women, with a mean age of 59.7 years. Totally, 98 incisions were made (59 incisions on the thigh and 39 incisions on the lower leg). During LVA, lymphatic vessels consistent with the preoperative lymphatic ultrasound findings were observed at all the sites. The sensitivities of each indicator of D-CUPS were 100.0%, 100.0%, 68.4%, 19.4%, and 100.0%, respectively. Conclusion: The sensitivity was 100.0% in D, C, and S. Although each index separately was not perfect, by combining them appropriately, we were able to identify lymphatic vessels with certainty.

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis map established using lymphatic ultrasound and multi-lymphosome indocyanine green lymphography.

BACKGROUND: Although the usefulness of lymphaticovenous anasotmosis (LVA) for lymphedema has been reported, it is difficult to determine where the LVA is to be performed, especially for inexperienced surgeons. This study aimed to establish a map of the LVA site. METHOD: A total of 105 limbs from 64 patients who underwent lower limb LVA were retrospectively reviewed. Multi-lymphosome indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography (in 35 patients) and lymphatic ultrasound (in all patients) were performed preoperatively and the incision site was determined where dilated lymph vessels and appropriate veins were located in close proximity. The LVA location was identified using a post-operative photograph. Additionally, the degree of lymphatic degeneration at the LVA site was recorded based on the normal, ectasis, contraction, and sclerosis type (NECST) classification. RESULT: A total of 206 skin incisions were analyzed. Among them, 161 (75.9%) were medial and 45 (21.2%) were lateral. Among the 85 sites on the calf, 52 (61.2%) were medial and 33 (38.8%) were lateral. Among the 117 sites on the thigh, 106 (90.6%) were medial and 11 (9.4%) were lateral. As the severity of lymphedema progressed, the probability of performing LVA on the lateral calf increased. Among the 202 locations where LVA was performed on the thigh and lower leg, ectasis type was found in 164 sites (81.2%). CONCLUSION: We established an LVA map of the legs based on multi-lymphosome ICG lymphography and lymphatic ultrasound data. Using this LVA map, surgeons can easily predict the location of lymph vessels, thereby improving the success rate of LVA.

Lymphatic Mapping for LVA with Noncontrast Lymphatic Ultrasound: How We Do It.

Recently, lymphatic ultrasonography has received increasing attention. Although there are several reports on contrast-enhanced lymphatic ultrasound as a preoperative examination for lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), we have been reporting the usefulness of preoperative noncontrast lymphatic ultrasound. In this article, the detailed procedure for conducting lymphatic ultrasound during the preoperative examination of LVA is thoroughly described. The only items required for lymphatic ultrasound are an ultrasound device, an echo jelly, a straw for marking, and a marker. We use an ordinary ultrasound device with an 18-MHz linear probe. We apply the Doppler, Crossing, Uncollapsible, Parallel, and Superficial fascia index to identify the lymphatic vessels. While imagining the course of the lymph vessels, we position the probe perpendicular to the long axis of the lymphatic vessels. When a vessel is found under the superficial fascia, the probe is moved proximally to trace the vessel's path. If the vessel transverses a nearby vein without connecting to it, it is most likely a lymphatic vessel. To confirm, we ensure that the vessel does not exhibit coloration in the Doppler mode. As LVA is most effective when the dilated lymph vessels are anastomosed, we use lymphatic ultrasound to identify the most dilated lymphatic vessels in each lymphosome, and mark incision lines where suitable veins are in close proximity. No contrast agent is required; therefore, medical staff such as nurses and ultrasound technicians can autonomously conduct the test.

Combination of Supramicrosurgical Lymphatico-Venular Anastomosis (sLVA) and Lymph-Sparing Liposuction in Treating Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Rationale for a Regional One-Stage Approach.

Objective: Cancer-related lymphedema represents a potential complication of cancer treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of lymphatico-venular anastomosis and liposuction in the treatment of secondary lymphedema. Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of patients affected by cancer-related unilateral limb lymphedema. Inclusion criteria included previous neoplastic pathology with the consequent development of unilateral limb lymphedema, while the exclusion criteria included the presence of comorbidities and the persistence of cancer, as well as previous lymphatic surgery. The outcomes to be included were a reduction in the limb volume and lymphangitis rate, and an improvement in the quality of life. Patients' data were assessed before surgery and 1 year after surgery. Perioperative management included clinical and ultrasonographical evaluations. Under local anesthesia, lymphatico-venular anastomosis with the supramicrosurgical technique and the liposuction of the affected limb was performed in the same surgical session. Results: A total of 24 patients were enrolled in the study. One year after the surgery, an average volume reduction of 37.9% was registered (p = 0.0000000596). The lymphangitis rate decreased after surgery from 4.67 to 0.95 per year (p = 0.000007899). The quality-of-life score improved from 68.7 to 16 according to the LLIS scale. Conclusions: The combination of LVA and liposuction represents a valid strategy for treating cancer-related lymphedema, ensuring stable results over time. In addition, it can be performed under local anesthesia, resulting in being minimally invasive and well-tolerated by patients. This paper reports on the short-term efficacy of this combined technique.

A 53-year-old Man with Idiopathic Bilateral Chylothorax Refractory to Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis: A Case Report.

A 53-year-old man with chronic dyspnea and bilateral pleural effusion was subsequently diagnosed with idiopathic chylothorax. Lymphatic scintigraphy confirmed lymphatic fluid leakage at the left venous angle, prompting management with lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA). Although the left pleural effusion was controlled, the right pleural effusion continued to increase, resulting in bilateral leg lymphedema that was refractory to LVA. Approximately three years and three months after the presentation, the patient succumbed to CO2 narcosis and renal failure. It is crucial to study additional cases in order to uncover new causes and develop pathology-based treatments for this condition.