ABSTRACT
A validation study the Iranian Modified Barthel Index (MBI) in hospitalized acute stroke elderly by classical test theory approach and investigate Rasch analysis for both Iranian version MBI and BI and compare the hierarchical item difficulty of them. Face-to-face interview with 100 geriatric stroke inpatients 60+ or their caregivers was done in a cross-sectional study. First, construct validity of MBI analyzed by the classical test theory, then Rasch analysis were done for BI and MBI. The reliability of the Iranian MBI was significant at 0.955. One factor achieved by the variance of 83.2%. In Rasch analysis for MBI, the most difficult item was stair climbing, whereas the simplest items were bowel and bladder control. In BI, the most difficult items were toilet use and ambulation. The Iranian MBI is very accurate and reliable; therefore the use of MBI to measure better outcomes in stroke elderly inpatients is recommended comparing with BI.
Subject(s)
Stroke/diagnosis , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Aged , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Stroke/pathologyABSTRACT
Since abuse screening is difficult among the elderly with dementia, detection of elder abuse is a serious issue; meanwhile, the number of available tools to assess elder abuse by caregivers is limited. The aim was to evaluate validity and reliability of the Iranian version Caregiver Abuse Screen (CASE) tool. After the translating process of the tool to the Farsi language for 236 dementia participants ≥60 years old and their informal caregivers' from outpatient' clinics, in a cross-sectional method then the validity, reliability and factorial structure of the CASE was evaluated. The translated Iranian version CASE reveals a good psychometric property (α = 0.868) with strong internal consistency and reliability. Some variables (depression, burden, dementia intensity, and ADLs) were associated with abuse in dementia elderly. The two-factor structure was obtained in exploratory factor analysis labeled interpersonal abuse and neglect. Generally, the Iranian version of CASE approved with sufficient validity and reliability as a suitable instrument to find the risk of elder abuse among dementia caregivers.
Subject(s)
Dementia/complications , Elder Abuse/diagnosis , Psychometrics/standards , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dementia/psychology , Elder Abuse/psychology , Elder Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Iran , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , TranslatingABSTRACT
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors play a key role in the treatment of patients who have acute coronary syndromes and undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. However, its serious complication is diffused alveolar hemorrhage. A 73-year-old diabetic woman presented with chest pain and dynamic ST elevation in ECG and positive troponin. She had occlusion in two coronary arteries and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. The eptifibatide was administered. After hours, she showed respiratory symptoms, as well as drop of blood pressure and hemoglobin. All differential diagnoses suggested for her clinical presentation were evaluated, and finally, on the sixth day diffuse alveolar hemorrhage was diagnosed. Although respiratory symptoms such as hemoptysis and dyspnea may occur as complications of pulmonary edema and/or pneumonia, assumed clinical suspicion for pulmonary hemorrhage leading to early detection of it. Moreover, there is no definitive guideline for decreased bleeding complications and treatment of alveolar hemorrhage caused by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors.