Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Lancet ; 396(10262): 1563-1573, 2020 11 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189178

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Selinexor combined with dexamethasone has shown activity in patients with heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma. In a phase 1b/2 study, the combination of oral selinexor with bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor) and dexamethasone induced high response rates with low rates of peripheral neuropathy, the main dose-limiting toxicity of bortezomib. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of weekly selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus standard bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma. METHODS: This phase 3, randomised, open-label trial was done at 123 sites in 21 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older, who had multiple myeloma, and who had previously been treated with one to three lines of therapy, including proteasome inhibitors, were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive selinexor (100 mg once per week), bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 once per week), and dexamethasone (20 mg twice per week), or bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 twice per week for the first 24 weeks and once per week thereafter) and dexamethasone (20 mg four times per week for the first 24 weeks and twice per week thereafter). Randomisation was done using interactive response technology and stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, lines of treatment, and multiple myeloma stage. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the safety population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03110562. The trial is ongoing, with 55 patients remaining on randomised therapy as of Feb 20, 2020. FINDINGS: Of 457 patients screened for eligibility, 402 were randomly allocated-195 (49%) to the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 207 (51%) to the bortezomib and dexamethasone group-and the first dose of study medication was given between June 6, 2017, and Feb 5, 2019. Median follow-up durations were 13·2 months [IQR 6·2-19·8] for the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 16·5 months [9·4-19·8] for the bortezomib and dexamethasone group. Median progression-free survival was 13·93 months (95% CI 11·73-not evaluable) with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone and 9·46 months (8·11-10·78) with bortezomib and dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·53-0·93], p=0·0075). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (77 [39%] of 195 patients in the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group vs 35 [17%] of 204 in the bortezomib and dexamethasone group), fatigue (26 [13%] vs two [1%]), anaemia (31 [16%] vs 20 [10%]), and pneumonia (22 [11%] vs 22 [11%]). Peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or above was less frequent with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (41 [21%] patients) than with bortezomib and dexamethasone (70 [34%] patients; odds ratio 0·50 [95% CI 0·32-0·79], p=0·0013). 47 (24%) patients in the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 62 (30%) in the bortezomib and dexamethasone group died. INTERPRETATION: A once-per-week regimen of selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is a novel, effective, and convenient treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma who have received one to three previous lines of therapy. FUNDING: Karyopharm Therapeutics.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Hydrazines/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Triazoles/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Hydrazines/adverse effects , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Triazoles/adverse effects
2.
Am J Hematol ; 96(6): 708-718, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33755235

ABSTRACT

Elderly and frail patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are more vulnerable to the toxicity of combination therapies, often resulting in treatment modifications and suboptimal outcomes. The phase 3 BOSTON study showed that once-weekly selinexor and bortezomib with low-dose dexamethasone (XVd) improved PFS and ORR compared with standard twice-weekly bortezomib and moderate-dose dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with previously treated MM. This is a retrospective subgroup analysis of the multicenter, prospective, randomized BOSTON trial. Post hoc analyses were performed to compare XVd versus Vd safety and efficacy according to age and frailty status (<65 and ≥65 years, nonfrail and frail). Patients ≥65 years with XVd had higher ORR (OR 1.77, p = .024), ≥VGPR (OR, 1.68, p = .027), PFS (HR 0.55, p = .002), and improved OS (HR 0.63, p = .030), compared with Vd. In frail patients, XVd was associated with a trend towards better PFS (HR 0.69, p = .08) and OS (HR 0.62, p = .062). Significant improvements were also observed in patients <65 (ORR and TTNT) and nonfrail patients (PFS, ORR, ≥VGPR, and TTNT). Patients treated with XVd had a lower incidence of grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy in ≥65 year-old (22% vs. 37%; p = .0060) and frail patients (15% vs. 44%; p = .0002). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were not observed more often in older compared to younger patients, nor in frail compared to nonfrail patients. XVd is safe and effective in patients <65 and ≥65 and in nonfrail and frail patients with previously treated MM.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Frailty/complications , Hydrazines/adverse effects , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Triazoles/adverse effects , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Frailty/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Diseases/chemically induced , Hematologic Diseases/chemically induced , Humans , Hydrazines/administration & dosage , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Progression-Free Survival , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Triazoles/administration & dosage
3.
Am J Hematol ; 96(9): 1120-1130, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34062004

ABSTRACT

In the phase 3 BOSTON study, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after 1-3 prior regimens were randomized to once-weekly selinexor (an oral inhibitor of exportin 1 [XPO1]) plus bortezomib-dexamethasone (XVd) or twice-weekly bortezomib-dexamethasone (Vd). Compared with Vd, XVd was associated with significant improvements in median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and lower rates of peripheral neuropathy, with trends in overall survival (OS) favoring XVd. In BOSTON, 141 (35.1%) patients had MM with high-risk (presence of del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], or ≥4 copies of amp1q21) cytogenetics (XVd, n = 70; Vd, n = 71), and 261 (64.9%) exhibited standard-risk cytogenetics (XVd, n = 125; Vd, n = 136). Among patients with high-risk MM, median PFS was 12.91 months for XVd and 8.61 months for Vd (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, (0.4673, 1.1406)], p = 0.082), and ORRs were 78.6% and 57.7%, respectively (OR 2.68; p = 0.004). In the standard-risk subgroup, median PFS was 16.62 months for XVd and 9.46 months for Vd (HR 0.61; p = 0.004), and ORRs were 75.2% and 64.7%, respectively (OR 1.65; p = 0.033). The safety profiles of XVd and Vd in both subgroups were consistent with the overall population. These data suggest that selinexor can confer benefits to patients with MM regardless of cytogenetic risk. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03110562.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Hydrazines/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Cytogenetic Analysis , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hydrazines/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Progression-Free Survival , Treatment Outcome , Triazoles/adverse effects , Young Adult
5.
Life Sci Alliance ; 6(9)2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37524526

ABSTRACT

Among glucocorticoids (GCs), dexamethasone (Dex) is widely used in treatment of multiple myelomas. However, despite a definite benefit, all patients relapse. Moreover, the molecular basis of glucocorticoid efficacy remains elusive. To determine genomic response to Dex in myeloma cells, we generated bulk and single-cell multi-omics data and high-resolution contact maps of active enhancers and target genes. We show that a minority of glucocorticoid receptor-binding sites are associated with enhancer activity gains, increased interaction loops, and transcriptional activity. We identified and characterized a predominant enhancer enriched in cohesin (RAD21) and more accessible upon Dex exposure. Analysis of four gene-specific networks revealed the importance of the CTCF-cohesin couple and the synchronization of regulatory sequence openings for efficient transcription in response to Dex. Notably, these epigenomic changes are associated with cell-to-cell transcriptional heterogeneity, in particular, lineage-specific genes. As consequences, BCL2L11-encoding BIM critical for Dex-induced apoptosis and CXCR4 protective from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis are rather up-regulated in different cells. In summary, our work provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in Dex escape.


Subject(s)
Dexamethasone , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Glucocorticoids , Apoptosis , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics
6.
Leukemia ; 33(1): 159-170, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29967379

ABSTRACT

Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with high-risk disease are in need of new treatment strategies to improve the outcomes. Multiple clinical, cytogenetic, or gene expression features have been used to identify high-risk patients, each of which has significant weaknesses. Inclusion of molecular features into risk stratification could resolve the current challenges. In a genome-wide analysis of the largest set of molecular and clinical data established to date from NDMM, as part of the Myeloma Genome Project, we have defined DNA drivers of aggressive clinical behavior. Whole-genome and exome data from 1273 NDMM patients identified genetic factors that contribute significantly to progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (cumulative R2 = 18.4% and 25.2%, respectively). Integrating DNA drivers and clinical data into a Cox model using 784 patients with ISS, age, PFS, OS, and genomic data, the model has a cumlative R2 of 34.3% for PFS and 46.5% for OS. A high-risk subgroup was defined by recursive partitioning using either a) bi-allelic TP53 inactivation or b) amplification (≥4 copies) of CKS1B (1q21) on the background of International Staging System III, comprising 6.1% of the population (median PFS = 15.4 months; OS = 20.7 months) that was validated in an independent dataset. Double-Hit patients have a dire prognosis despite modern therapies and should be considered for novel therapeutic approaches.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Chromosome Aberrations , Genome, Human , Genomics/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
7.
Genome Med ; 8(1): 49, 2016 04 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27121964

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bacteremia, or bloodstream infection (BSI), is a leading cause of death among patients with certain types of cancer. A previous study reported that intestinal domination, defined as occupation of at least 30 % of the microbiota by a single bacterial taxon, is associated with BSI in patients undergoing allo-HSCT. However, the impact of the intestinal microbiome before treatment initiation on the risk of subsequent BSI remains unclear. Our objective was to characterize the fecal microbiome collected before treatment to identify microbes that predict the risk of BSI. METHODS: We sampled 28 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) prior to administration of chemotherapy and characterized 16S ribosomal RNA genes using high-throughput DNA sequencing. We quantified bacterial taxa and used techniques from machine learning to identify microbial biomarkers that predicted subsequent BSI. RESULTS: We found that patients who developed subsequent BSI exhibited decreased overall diversity and decreased abundance of taxa including Barnesiellaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, Faecalibacterium, Christensenella, Dehalobacterium, Desulfovibrio, and Sutterella. Using machine-learning methods, we developed a BSI risk index capable of predicting BSI incidence with a sensitivity of 90 % at a specificity of 90 % based only on the pretreatment fecal microbiome. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the gut microbiota can identify high-risk patients before HSCT and that manipulation of the gut microbiota for prevention of BSI in high-risk patients may be a useful direction for future research. This approach may inspire the development of similar microbiome-based diagnostic and prognostic models in other diseases.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteria/classification , Feces/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteria/genetics , Female , Genetic Variation , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Incidence , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/microbiology , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Machine Learning , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
8.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 7(1): 43-53, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24392968

ABSTRACT

Induction therapy followed by intensification with ASCT is the standard of care in younger patients with multiple myeloma. Three-drug induction regimens combining novel agents (VTD, VRD, VCD, PAD) have shown a high CR rate both, pretransplant and posttransplant. Patients with high-risk cytogenetics continues to have an inferior outcome even when treated with novel agents. The role of tandem autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is not well established, although some studies show a better outcome with tandem ASCT as compared to single auto. The high response rate obtained with novel agents also raises the question if autologous transplant has a role in front-line therapy or if it should be used as savage therapy after relapse.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cytogenetics , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Remission Induction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL