Rectal Ulcers and Rectoprostatic Fistulas after (125)I Low Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Radiation induced rectal ulcers and fistulas are rare but significant complications of low dose rate prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. We describe the incidence of ulcers and fistulas, and associated risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 4,690 patients with localized prostate cancer who were treated with low dose rate (125)I prostate brachytherapy to a dose of 144 Gy with or without 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. Patient, disease, comorbidity, treatment, dosimetric and posttreatment intervention factors were analyzed for an association with ulcer or fistula formation. RESULTS: At a median followup of 53 months 21 cases were identified, including 15 rectal ulcer cases, of which 6 progressed to fistulas, and an additional 6 cases of fistulas with no prior documented ulcers. Overall 9 rectal ulcer cases (0.19%) and 12 fistula cases (0.26%) were identified. In 8 of 15 patients ulcers healed with conservative management. No fistulas healed without surgical management. Two patients with fistulas died. Eight patients diagnosed with rectal ulcers subsequently underwent rectal biopsies, after which fistulas developed in 3. One patient with a de novo fistula underwent a preceding biopsy. Urinary interventions such as transurethral resection of the prostate were performed after brachytherapy in 5 of 12 patients with fistulas compared to 0 of 9 with ulcers alone. Argon plasma coagulation of the rectum for hematochezia was performed after brachytherapy in 3 of 12 patients with fistulas. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of post-brachytherapy rectal ulcers and fistulas are low as previously described. Post-brachytherapy interventions such as rectal biopsy, argon coagulation and urinary intervention may increase the risk of fistulas.

Population-based 10-year oncologic outcomes after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to report the rates of disease-free survival (DFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival after low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy (PB). METHODS: Data from 1006 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who received LDR-PB and underwent implantation on or before October 23, 2003 were extracted from a prospective database on November 11, 2011. The selected patients had low-risk (58%) or intermediate-risk (42%) disease according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. The Phoenix threshold was used to define biochemical relapse. Sixty-five percent of patients received 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and 3 months of concomitant ADT. Univariate and multivariate analyses are reported in relation to patient, tumor, and treatment variables. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 7.5 years. By using Fine and Gray competing risks analysis, the 5-year and 10-year actuarial DFS rates were 96.7% (95% confidence interval, 95.2%-97.7%) and 94.1% (95% confidence interval, 92%-95.6%), respectively. When applied to the whole cohort, none of the usual prognostic variables, including dose metrics, were correlated with DFS. However, in both univariate and multivariate models, increasing dose was the only covariate that correlated with improved DFS for the subset of men (N = 348) who did not receive ADT (P = .043). The actuarial 10-year CSS rate was 99.1% (95% confidence interval, 97.3%-99.7%). The overall survival rate was 93.8% at 5 years (95% confidence interval, 92%-95.1%) and 83.5% at 10 years (95% confidence interval, 79.8%-86.6%). Only age at implantation (P = .0001) was correlated with overall survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In a consecutive cohort of 1006 men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, the actuarial rate of recurrent disease after LDR-PB was approximately 3% at 5 years and 6% at 10 years.

Treatment options for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To describe treatment options for clinically localized prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy, prostate brachytherapy, external beam radiation, and active surveillance. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcomes presented are from non-randomized, cohort, and other comparisons trials (level II evidence). We describe PSA outcomes from Canadian centres when they are available. One small randomized controlled trial (level I evidence) in localized prostate cancer is available to compare radical prostatectomy with brachytherapy. MAIN MESSAGE: Treatment choice in prostate cancer is based on initial PSA level, clinical stage of disease, and Gleason score, together with baseline urinary function, comorbidities, and patient age. In this article, we describe patients' eligibility for and the common side effects of all treatment options. Prostate brachytherapy and active surveillance have evolved as new standard treatments of localized prostate cancer. We give a brief overview of the brachytherapy procedure, side effects, and PSA outcomes across Canada, as well as active surveillance guidelines. CONCLUSION: Prostate cancer treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach, with input from both urology and radiation oncology. Input from family physicians is often as important in helping guide patients through the treatment decision process.

An Updated Analysis of the Survival Endpoints of ASCENDE-RT.

PURPOSE: Using the primary endpoint of time to biochemical progression (TTP), Androgen Suppression Combined with Elective Nodal and Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy (ASCENDE-RT) randomized National Comprehensive Cancer Network patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer to low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (LDR-PB) or dose-escalated external beam boost (DE-EBRT). Randomization to the LDR-PB arm resulted in a 2-fold reduction in biochemical progression compared with the DE-EBRT group at a median follow-up of 6.5 years (P < .001). Herein, the primary endpoint and secondary survival endpoints of the ASCENDE-RT trial are updated at a 10-year median follow-up. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either the LDR-PB or the DE-EBRT arm (1:1). All patients received 1 year of androgen deprivation therapy and 46 Gy in 23 fractions of pelvic RT. Patients in the DE-EBRT arm received an additional 32 Gy in 16 fractions, and those in the LDR-PB arm received an 125I implant prescribed to a minimum peripheral dose of 115 Gy. Two hundred patients were randomized to the DE-EBRT arm and 198 to the LDR-PB arm. RESULTS: The 10-year Kaplan-Meier TTP estimate was 85% ± 5% for LDR-PB compared with 67% ± 7% for DE-EBRT (log rank P < .001). Ten-year time to distant metastasis (DM) was 88% ± 5% for the LDR-PB arm and 86% ± 6% for the DE-EBRT arm (P = .56). There were 117 (29%) deaths. Ten-year overall survival (OS) estimates were 80% ± 6% for the LDR-PB arm and 75% ± 7% for the DE-EBRT arm (P = .51). There were 30 (8%) patients who died of prostate cancer: 12 (6%) in the LDR-PB arm, including 2 treatment-related deaths, and 18 (9%) in the DE-EBRT arm. CONCLUSIONS: Men randomized to the LDR-PB boost arm of the ASCENDE-RT trial continue to experience a large advantage in TTP compared with those randomized to the DE-EBRT arm. ASCENDE-RT was not powered to detect differences in its secondary survival endpoints (OS, DM, and time to prostate cancer-specific death) and none are apparent.

Multi-Frequency 3D Shear Wave Absolute Vibro-Elastography (S-WAVE) System for the Prostate.

This article describes a novel system for quantitative and volumetric measurement of tissue elasticity in the prostate using simultaneous multi-frequency tissue excitation. Elasticity is computed by using a local frequency estimator to measure the three-dimensional local wavelengths of steady-state shear waves within the prostate gland. The shear wave is created using a mechanical voice coil shaker which transmits simultaneous multi-frequency vibrations transperineally. Radio frequency data is streamed directly from a BK Medical 8848 transrectal ultrasound transducer to an external computer where tissue displacement due to the excitation is measured using a speckle tracking algorithm. Bandpass sampling is used that eliminates the need for an ultra-fast frame rate to track the tissue motion and allows for accurate reconstruction at a sampling frequency that is below the Nyquist rate. A roll motor with computer control is used to rotate the transducer and obtain 3D data. Two commercially available phantoms were used to validate both the accuracy of the elasticity measurements as well as the functional feasibility of using the system for in vivo prostate imaging. The phantom measurements were compared with 3D Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE), where a high correlation of 96% was achieved. In addition, the system has been used in two separate clinical studies as a method for cancer identification. Qualitative and quantitative results of 11 patients from these clinical studies are presented here. Furthermore, an AUC of 0.87±0.12 was achieved for malignant vs. benign classification using a binary support vector machine classifier trained with data from the latest clinical study with leave one patient out cross-validation.

Limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with abbreviated systemic therapy and consolidation radiotherapy: involved-field versus involved-node radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: For limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), treatment decisions are often influenced by toxicity profiles. One strategy that minimizes chemotherapy-induced toxicities is abbreviated chemotherapy plus consolidation involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT). Involved-node radiotherapy (INRT) is a new concept to DLBCL, aimed to reduce radiotherapy-induced toxicities. We retrospectively review the long-term outcomes of limited-stage DLBCL treated with abbreviated systemic therapy and radiotherapy focusing on field size: IFRT versus INRT. METHODS: The British Columbia Cancer Agency Lymphoid Cancer Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with limited-stage DLBCL (stage I/II, without B-symptoms; bulk < 10 cm) from 1981 to 2007. Patients were prescribed 3 cycles of chemotherapy plus IFRT (1981-1996) or INRT≤5 cm (1996-2007), defined as INRT to the prechemotherapy involved nodes with margins ≤ 5 cm. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients were identified: 56% were aged >60 years, 34% had stage II disease, 55% had extranodal disease, 19% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, and 15% received rituximab. The two radiotherapy groups were IFRT (138 patients; 48%) and INRT≤5cm (150 patients; 52%); median follow-up was 117 and 89 months, respectively. Distant relapse was the most common site of failure in both groups. After INRT≤5 cm, marginal recurrence was infrequent (2%). Time to progression (P = .823), progression-free survival (P = .575), and overall survival (P = .417) were not significantly different between the radiotherapy cohorts. Radiotherapy field size was not a significant prognostic factor on multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This research is the first known body of work to apply the concept of INRT to limited-stage DLBCL. Reducing the field size from IFRT to INRT≤5 cm maintains a low marginal recurrence risk with no impact on overall outcome.

Incomplete testosterone suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: does it happen and does it matter?

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Previous reports, with small numbers of patients, have described the problem of incomplete testosterone suppression (>1.1 or 1.7 nmol/L) with LHRH agonists. Various predisposing factors have been suggested: different drug agents and patient factors such as age, pretreatment testosterone levels and weight. Such incomplete testosterone suppression has been shown in one small report to be associated with increased PSA failure rates and in another report in those with metastases, with worse survival. This study used testosterone assays that are more accurate at low levels than those used in most previous reports in a large dataset of 2196 men, and confirmed incomplete testosterone suppression (breakthrough) rates >1.7 nmol/L of 3.4% and >1.1 nmol/L of 6.6%. We showed that younger age was strongly associated with the risk of breakthrough, with a minor effect of increasing body mass index. Repeated breakthroughs were more common (16%) in those who had already had one breakthrough. Interim measures of cancer control (PSA kinetics during LHRH therapy) were inferior in those with a breakthrough, and those with breakthroughs between 1.1 and 1.7 nmol/L had worse long-term biochemical control rates. OBJECTIVES: • To describe breakthrough rates above castrate levels of testosterone, in a population-based series of men undergoing adjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist therapy with curative radiation therapy. • To explore the predisposing factors for such breakthroughs and their impact on subsequent outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • All men treated for prostate cancer between 1998 and 2007 with curative radiation in the province of British Columbia, Canada were potentially eligible (n= 11752). Of these, 2196 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. • Serial testosterone measurements were obtained during continuous LHRH therapy. • Breakthrough rates >1.1 nmol/L and >1.7 nmol/L were calculated for each LHRH injection and for each patient course. • Predisposing factors were identified, and early surrogates of oncological outcome (neoadjuvant nadir and post-treatment nadir) were determined. RESULTS: • The risk of a breakthrough >1.1 nmol/L was 6.6%, and >1.7 nmol/L was 3.4% per patient course and 5.4% and 2.2% per LHRH injection (inclusive ranges). • Repeated breakthroughs occurred in 16% of patients. • Younger men were more liable to breakthroughs (P < 0.001). • Early PSA kinetic surrogates of cancer control were inferior in those with breakthroughs. • Neither overall biochemical non-evidence of disease (bNED) nor survival were compromised, although subgroup analysis showed inferior 5-year bNED in those with breakthroughs of 1.1-1.7 nmol/L vs those without (58% vs 73%, respectively; P= 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: • Breakthroughs with LHRH agonists occur occasionally per injection, but occur commonly per patient course of treatment, and adversely affect early surrogate measures of outcome. • The monitoring of testosterone levels during therapy is therefore advised.

Prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetry: seed orientation and the impact of dosimetric anisotropy in stranded implants.

PURPOSE: In postimplant dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy, dose is commonly calculated using the TG-43 1D formalism, because seed orientations are difficult to determine from CT images, the current standard for the procedure. However, the orientation of stranded seeds soon after implantation is predictable, as these seeds tend to maintain their relative spacing, and orient themselves along the implant trajectory. The aim of this study was to develop a method for determining seed orientations from reconstructed strand trajectories, and to use this information to investigate the dosimetric impact of applying the TG-43 2D formalism to clinical postimplant analysis. METHODS: Using in-house software, the preplan to postimplant seed correspondence was determined for a cohort of 30 patients during routine day-0 CT-based postimplant dosimetry. All patients were implanted with stranded-seed trains. Spline curves were fit to each set of seeds composing a strand, with the requirement that the distance along the spline between seeds be equal to the seed spacing within the strand. The orientations of the seeds were estimated by the tangents to the spline at each seed centroid. Dose distributions were then determined using the 1D and 2D TG-43 formalisms. These were compared using the TG-137 recommended dose metrics for the prostate, prostatic urethra, and rectum. RESULTS: Seven hundred and sixty one strands were analyzed in total. Defining the z-axis to be cranial-positive and the x-axis to be left-lateral positive in the CT coordinate system, the average seed had an inclination of 21° ± 10° and an azimuth of -81° ± 57°. These values correspond to the average strand rising anteriorly from apex to base, approximately parallel to the midsagittal plane. Clinically minor but statistically significant differences in dose metrics were noted. Compared to the 2D calculation, the 1D calculation underestimated prostate V100 by 1.1% and D90 by 2.3 Gy, while overestimating V150 and V200 by 1.6% and 1.3%, respectively. Urethral and rectal dose quantifiers tended to be underestimated by the 1D calculation. The most pronounced differences were in the urethral D30 and rectal D2cc, which rose by 3.8 and 1.9 Gy, respectively, using the 2D calculation. The total volume of the 100% isodose region as a percentage of the prostate volume was found to increase by 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Stranded seeds in the supine patient are not oriented in a uniformly random manner, nor are they aligned along the axis of the CT scanner. Instead, this study identified a consistent anterior pitch that is likely attributable to differences in patient pose between implant and CT imaging. The angle of the ultrasound probe with respect to the patient during implant may have also been a contributing factor. The dose metrics derived using the 1D formalism were found to be within 2%, on average, of those derived using the 2D formalism. For greater accuracy, 2D dosimetry can be pursued using the strand-fitting method described in this work. If a 1D representation is used, integrating over the empirically determined seed orientation density reported here may be more appropriate than assuming that seed inclinations are distributed uniformly.

Registration of trans-perineal template mapping biopsy cores to volumetric ultrasound.

PURPOSE: Pathology from trans-perineal template mapping biopsy (TTMB) can be used as labels to train prostate cancer classifiers. In this work, we propose a framework to register TTMB cores to advanced volumetric ultrasound data such as multi-parametric transrectal ultrasound (mpTRUS). METHODS: The framework has mainly two steps. First, needle trajectories are calculated with respect to the needle guiding template-considering deflections in their paths. In standard TTMB, a sparsely sampled ultrasound volume is taken prior to the procedure which contains the template overlaid on top of it. The position of this template is detected automatically, and the cores are mapped following the calculated needle trajectories. Second, the TTMB volume is aligned to the mpTRUS volume by a two-step registration method. Using the same transformations from the registration step, the cores are registered from the TTMB volume to the mpTRUS volume. RESULTS: TTMB and mpTRUS of 10 patients were available for this work. The target registration errors (TRE) of the volumes using landmarks picked by three research assistants (RA) and one radiation oncologist (RO) were on average 1.32 ± 0.7 mm and 1.03 ± 0.6 mm, respectively. Additionally, on average, our framework takes only 97 s to register the cores. CONCLUSION: Our proposed framework allows a quick way to find the spatial location of the cores with respect to volumetric ultrasound. Furthermore, knowing the correct location of the pathology will facilitate focal treatment and will aid in training imaging-based cancer classifiers.

After ASCENDE-RT: Biochemical and survival outcomes following combined external beam radiotherapy and low-dose-rate brachytherapy for high-risk and unfavourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, a population-based analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of unfavorable intermediate-risk (UIR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer patients treated with combined external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A population-based cohort of 568 prostate cancer patients treated with combined EBRT and LDR-PB from 2010 to 2016 was analyzed. All patients received EBRT followed by LDR-PB boost. Outcomes were compared with the results for the brachytherapy arm of the ASCENDE-RT trial. RESULTS: The median followup was 4.5 years. Sixty-nine percent (N = 391) had HR disease. Ninety-four percent of the HR and 57% of UIR were treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with a median duration of 12 months. The 5-year K-M biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) were 84 ± 2%, 90 ± 2%, and 88 ± 2%, similar to 89 ± 5%, 94 ± 4%, and 92 ± 4% for the ASCENDE-RT LDR-PB arm. The likelihood of achieving a PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL at 4 years was 88%, similar to 86% in the ASCENDE-RT LDR-PB arm. Thirty-three men (5.8%) would have been ineligible for ASCENDE-RT due to high-risk features. The 5-year K-M b-PFS, MFS and OS estimates were 86 ± 2%, 92 ± 1% and 89 ± 2% for the ASCENDE-RT eligible versus 56 ± 10% (p < 0.001), 73 ± 8% (p < 0.001), and 77 ± 9% (p = 0.098) for the ineligible patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort, combining LDR-PB with pelvic EBRT (+/- ADT) achieves very favorable b-PFS that compares to the LDR-PB arm of the ASCENDE-RT, supporting the generalizability of those results. Men ineligible for ASCENDE-RT, based on prognostic features, have a much higher risk of biochemical recurrence and metastatic relapse.

Prostate implant reconstruction from C-arm images with motion-compensated tomosynthesis.

PURPOSE: Accurate localization of prostate implants from several C-arm images is necessary for ultrasound-fluoroscopy fusion and intraoperative dosimetry. The authors propose a computational motion compensation method for tomosynthesis-based reconstruction that enables 3D localization of prostate implants from C-arm images despite C-arm oscillation and sagging. METHODS: Five C-arm images are captured by rotating the C-arm around its primary axis, while measuring its rotation angle using a protractor or the C-arm joint encoder. The C-arm images are processed to obtain binary seed-only images from which a volume of interest is reconstructed. The motion compensation algorithm, iteratively, compensates for 2D translational motion of the C-arm by maximizing the number of voxels that project on a seed projection in all of the images. This obviates the need for C-arm full pose tracking traditionally implemented using radio-opaque fiducials or external trackers. The proposed reconstruction method is tested in simulations, in a phantom study and on ten patient data sets. RESULTS: In a phantom implanted with 136 dummy seeds, the seed detection rate was 100% with a localization error of 0.86 ± 0.44 mm (Mean ± STD) compared to CT. For patient data sets, a detection rate of 99.5% was achieved in approximately 1 min per patient. The reconstruction results for patient data sets were compared against an available matching-based reconstruction method and showed relative localization difference of 0.5 ± 0.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The motion compensation method can successfully compensate for large C-arm motion without using radio-opaque fiducial or external trackers. Considering the efficacy of the algorithm, its successful reconstruction rate and low computational burden, the algorithm is feasible for clinical use.

A biochemical definition of cure after brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To identify a PSA threshold value at an intermediate follow-up time after low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy associated with cure, defined as long-term (10-15 year) freedom from prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 7 institutions for 14,220 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with LDR brachytherapy, either alone (8552) or with external beam radiotherapy (n = 1175), androgen deprivation (n = 3165), or both (n = 1328), were analyzed. Risk distribution was 42.4% favorable, 49.2% intermediate, and 8.4% high-risk. Patients with clinical failure before 3.5 years were excluded. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used with clinical failure (local, distant, regional or biochemical triggering salvage) as an endpoint for each of four PSA categories: PSA ≤ 0.2, >0.2 to ≤0.5, >0.5 to ≤1.0, and >1.0 ng/mL. PSA levels at 4 years (±6 months) in 8746 patients without clinical failure were correlated with disease status at 10-15 years. RESULTS: For the 77.1% of patients with 4-year PSA ≤ 0.2, the freedom-from-recurrence (FFR) rates were 98.7% (95% CI 98.3-99.0) at 10 years and 96.1% (95% CI 94.8-97.2) at 15 years. Three independent validation cohorts confirmed 97-99% 10-year FFR rates with 4-year PSA ≤ 0.2. Successive PSA categories were associated with diminished disease-free rates at 10 and 15 years. PSA category was strongly associated with treatment success (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Since 98.7% of patients with PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at 4 years after LDR prostate brachytherapy were disease-free beyond 10 years, we suggest adopting this biochemical definition of cure for patients with ≥4 years' follow-up after LDR brachytherapy.

Using a surgical prostate-specific antigen threshold of >0.2 ng/mL to define biochemical failure for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with definitive radiation therapy in the ASCENDE-RT randomized control trial.

PURPOSE: To compare biochemical failure using a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold of >0.2 ng/mL to that using Phoenix threshold (nadir+2 ng/mL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose-escalated radiation therapy (the ASCENDE-RT trial) is a randomized control trial in which 276 high-risk and 122 intermediate-risk patients were randomized to (1) a standard arm with 12 months of androgen deprivation therapy, pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to 46 Gy, and an EBRT boost (dose-escalated EBRT [DE-EBRT]) to 78 Gy, or (2) an experimental arm which substituted a low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy boost (LDR-PB). The primary endpoint was biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS) using the Phoenix threshold. In this reanalysis of ASCENDE-RT, the b-PFS using phoenix is compared to the surgical PSA threshold of >0.2 ng/mL. RESULTS: Compared to nadir+2 ng/mL, the >0.2 ng/mL PSA threshold doubled the number of relapse events from 69 to 139. However, the increase was confined to the DE-EBRT subjects. The 7-year Kaplan-Meier b-PFS after DE-EBRT declined from 76% using nadir+2 ng/mL to 38% using the >0.2 ng/mL threshold (p < 0.001). Among the LDR-PB subset, there was no significant difference in b-PFS; the 7-year Kaplan-Meier b-PFS was 85% (>0.2 ng/mL) versus 88% (nadir+2 ng/mL) (p = 0.319). CONCLUSIONS: Replacing Phoenix with a surgical threshold greatly increased biochemical failure after DE-EBRT boost but had no effect after LDR-PB. As a result of this finding, PSA outcomes after surgery or brachytherapy can be directly compared by using the surgical definition of PSA failure. In this context, a brachytherapy boost appears to produce superior b-PFS compared to contemporary surgical series.

Brachytherapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer, Androgen Deprivation, and the Risk of Death.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the use of 6 months' adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with brachytherapy for intermediate-risk (IR) and low-risk (LR) prostate cancer is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from men treated in the British Columbia Cancer Agency brachytherapy program from 1998 to 2012. Men were categorized by risk group and ADT use. Cardiac and other comorbidities were recorded and compared between groups. Biochemical control (Phoenix definition, nadir + 2 ng/mL) was ascertained. Overall, prostate, cardiac, and other-cause mortality were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Fine and Gray competing-risk analysis. RESULTS: The study included 3155 men (1142 with LR cancer and 2013 with IR cancer) who have been followed up for a median of 7.9 years. ADT was received by 47% of IR patients and 37% of LR patients for a median of 6 months. Men with IR cancer were older and had more cardiac and other comorbidities than LR cases (P<.01). Biochemical control improved from 86% to 89% at 10 years with the use of ADT (P=.006). Overall survival was inferior in patients receiving ADT (84% vs 86% at 10 years, P=.0274), and on competing-risk analysis, cardiovascular mortality in patients receiving ADT was higher in IR cases, 5.2% versus 3.6% at 10 years (P=.0493), but not in LR cases. Multivariate analysis confirmed increased cardiac mortality in IR patients receiving ADT (hazard ratio, 1.95 [95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.34]; P=.014). CONCLUSIONS: ADT adds little meaningful benefit in terms of biochemical control for IR men treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy but likely decreases overall survival because of increased cardiac mortality. IR patients were older and had more cardiac risk factors than LR prostate cases; this may be because of a screening effect, case selection, or common etiologic cause.

Prostate brachytherapy post-implant dosimetry: a comparison between higher and lower source density.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare post-implant dosimetry between high density source implants (HDI) and low density source implants (LDI). MATERIALS AND METHOD: Dosimetric analysis of the whole prostate (V200, V150, V100, D90, D80, contiguous V200 and V150, external index), prostate quadrants (V200, V150, V100, D90), rectum (V150, V120, V100, V80, V60) and deviated surrogate urethra (V200, V150, V120, V100, V80) was performed on 39 consecutive prostate brachytherapy LDI and 39 volume matched HDI over the same time period. The distinction between LDI and HDI was based on differing prescribed dose using 125-Iodine sources, with MPD of 115 and 144 Gy, respectively, using a fixed source strength of 0.424 U (0.334 mCi). Cases were contoured by two independent blinded observers. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to look at the effects of treatment arm, observer and their interaction. RESULTS: Whole prostate (WP) volume did not differ significantly between the treatment arms, mean of 25.4 cc for LDI and 26.6 cc for HDI. There was no significant difference in any of the measured post-implant dosimetric parameters for the WP or quadrants, surrogate urethra or rectum. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in post-implant dosimetric parameters was observed between Iodine 125 LDI and HDI. Neither dose homogeneity nor conformality is compromised with a lower source density. Higher strength sources have the potential for considerable cost saving and reduced morbidity.

Clinical impact of second pathology opinion: a longitudinal study of central genitourinary pathology review before prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical impact of pathology review before prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Original and reviewing pathologists' reports were retrospectively collected from 1323 men treated with prostate brachytherapy between July 1998 and October 2005 at one institution. Statistical analysis was performed pre- and post-January 2002. The clinical impact of pathology review was evaluated. RESULTS: Gleason Score (GS) change (GS(Delta)) occurred in 25.2% (334) of cases; GS increased in 21.6%, decreased in 2.4%, and diagnosed malignancy in 1.2% of cases. Post-2002, concordance in attributed GS improved, with GS(Delta) of 31.9-20.6%, respectively (p<0.001), and a reduction in the average GS(Delta) (p<0.001). The clinical impact was substantial with management changing in 14.8% of cases. CONCLUSION: Concordance between the original and reviewing pathologists' GS has improved during the study period. Nevertheless, discordance persists in one of five cases. Pathology review remains essential, if treatment decisions hinge on GS.

High-intermediate prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy.

PURPOSE: To describe outcomes of men with unfavorable (high-tier) intermediate risk prostate cancer (H-IR) treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, with or without 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with H-IR prostate cancer, treated before 2012 with LDR brachytherapy without external radiation are included. Baseline tumor characteristics are described. Outcomes between groups receiving ADT are measured by Phoenix (nadir +2 ng/mL), and threshold 0.4 ng/mL biochemical relapse definitions (bNEDs), as well as clinical end points. Standard descriptive and actuarial statistics are used. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty men were eligible, 139 (53%) did not receive ADT and 121 (47%) did. Median follow-up was 5 years. Men treated with ADT had higher T stage and percent positive cores but lower pathologic grade group. bNED rates with and without ADT at 5 years are 86% and 85% (p = 0.52) with the Phoenix definition, and 83% and 78% (p = 0.13) with the threshold definition. Local recurrence or metastasis were rare in both groups (<5%, p = not significant). Death from prostate cancer only occurred in 4 patients, 2 in each group. Overall survival was 85% in those treated with ADT and 93% without at 8 years, p = 0.15. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 6 months of ADT to LDR brachytherapy for H-IR prostate cancer does not improve 5 year prostate specific antigen control, and we no longer routinely recommended it.

ASCENDE-RT: An Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life for a Randomized Trial Comparing Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost With Dose-Escalated External Beam Boost for High- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: To report the patient-reported health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) outcomes for a multicenter randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of 2 different techniques for dose escalation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 357 men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer were stratified by risk group and randomized (1:1) to either a dose-escalated external beam (DE-EBRT) boost (n=177) or a low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) boost (n=180) as part of combined modality therapy. The HR-QoL was assessed using the SF36v2 questionnaire, with additional scales for urinary, bowel, and sexual function. Date of starting androgen deprivation therapy was considered time zero, the median follow-up of 6 years. Scales were scored from 0 to 100; a decline in a mean score ≥10 compared with baseline was considered a clinically significant decline. This was an intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Mean domain scores at baseline were well balanced between the 2 treatment arms. A clinically significant decline in mean scores in both the arms compared with baseline was noted for role physical (DE-EBRT [-11.4] and LDR-PB [-15.3]) and sexual function scale (DE-EBRT [-15.1] and LDR-PB [-19.2]). There was a significantly larger drop in mean scores in the LDR-PB group compared with the DE-EBRT group for physical function (-15.3 vs -6.9; P=.03), urinary function (-3.6 vs -0.5; P=.04). CONCLUSION: At 6 years' follow up, there were no significant differences in mean scores in 9 of 11 scales compared with baseline in both arms. A clinically significant decline in mean scores was noted in both arms for role physical and sexual function scales. There was a statistically significant decline in physical function and urinary function scales in the LDR-PB arm compared with the DE-EBRT arm.

Androgen Suppression Combined with Elective Nodal and Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): An Analysis of Survival Endpoints for a Randomized Trial Comparing a Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost to a Dose-Escalated External Beam Boost for High- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: To report the primary endpoint of biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS) and secondary survival endpoints from ASCENDE-RT, a randomized trial comparing 2 methods of dose escalation for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: ASCENDE-RT enrolled 398 men, with a median age of 68 years; 69% (n=276) had high-risk disease. After stratification by risk group, the subjects were randomized to a standard arm with 12 months of androgen deprivation therapy, pelvic irradiation to 46 Gy, followed by a dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (DE-EBRT) boost to 78 Gy, or an experimental arm that substituted a low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) boost. Of the 398 trial subjects, 200 were assigned to DE-EBRT boost and 198 to LDR-PB boost. The median follow-up was 6.5 years. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis, men randomized to DE-EBRT were twice as likely to experience biochemical failure (multivariable analysis [MVA] hazard ratio [HR] 2.04; P=.004). The 5-, 7-, and 9-year Kaplan-Meier b-PFS estimates were 89%, 86%, and 83% for the LDR-PB boost versus 84%, 75%, and 62% for the DE-EBRT boost (log-rank P<.001). The LDR-PB boost benefited both intermediate- and high-risk patients. Because the b-PFS curves for the treatment arms diverge sharply after 4 years, the relative advantage of the LDR-PB should increase with longer follow-up. On MVA, the only variables correlated with reduced overall survival were age (MVA HR 1.06/y; P=.004) and biochemical failure (MVA HR 6.30; P<.001). Although biochemical failure was associated with increased mortality and randomization to DE-EBRT doubled the rate of biochemical failure, no significant overall survival difference was observed between the treatment arms (MVA HR 1.13; P=.62). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 78 Gy EBRT, men randomized to the LDR-PB boost were twice as likely to be free of biochemical failure at a median follow-up of 6.5 years.

ASCENDE-RT: An Analysis of Treatment-Related Morbidity for a Randomized Trial Comparing a Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost with a Dose-Escalated External Beam Boost for High- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: To report the genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) morbidity and erectile dysfunction in a randomized trial comparing 2 methods of dose escalation for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: ASCENDE-RT (Androgen Suppression Combined with Elective Nodal and Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy) enrolled 398 men, median age 68 years, who were then randomized to either a standard arm that included 12 months of androgen deprivation therapy and pelvic irradiation to 46 Gy followed by a dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (DE-EBRT) boost to 78 Gy, or an experimental arm that substituted a low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) boost. At clinic visits, investigators recorded GU and GI morbidity and information on urinary continence, catheter use, and erectile function. Exclusion of 15 who received nonprotocol treatment and correction of 14 crossover events left 195 men who actually received a DE-EBRT boost and 188, an LDR-PB boost. Median follow-up was 6.5 years. RESULTS: The LDR-PB boost increased the risk of needing temporary catheterization and/or requiring incontinence pads. At 5 years the cumulative incidence of grade 3 GU events was 18.4% for LDR-PB, versus 5.2% for DE-EBRT (P<.001). Compared with the cumulative incidence, the 5-year prevalence of grade 3 GU morbidity was substantially lower for both arms (8.6% vs 2.2%, P=.058). The 5-year cumulative incidence of grade 3 GI events was 8.1% for LDR-PB, versus 3.2% for DE-EBRT (P=.124). The 5-year prevalence of grade 3 GI toxicity was lower than the cumulative incidence for both arms (1.0% vs 2.2%, respectively). Among men reporting adequate baseline erections, 45% of LDR-PB patients reported similar erectile function at 5 years, versus 37% after DE-EBRT (P=.30). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute and late GU morbidity was higher after LDR-PB boost, and there was a nonsignificant trend for worse GI morbidity. No differences in the frequency of erectile dysfunction were observed.