Management of infectious disease syndromes in thoracic organ transplants and mechanical circulatory device recipients: a Delphi panel.

PURPOSE: Antimicrobial misuse contributes to antimicrobial resistance in thoracic transplant (TTx) and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) recipients. This study uses a modified Delphi method to define the expected appropriate antimicrobial prescribing for the common clinical scenarios encountered in TTx and MCS recipients. METHODS: An online questionnaire on managing 10 common infectious disease syndromes was submitted to a multidisciplinary Delphi panel of 25 experts from various disciplines. Consensus was predefined as 80% agreement for each question. Questions where consensus was not achieved were discussed during live virtual live sessions adapted by an independent process expert. RESULTS: An online survey of 62 questions related to 10 infectious disease syndromes was submitted to the Delphi panel. In the first round of the online questionnaire, consensus on antimicrobial management was reached by 6.5% (4/62). In Round 2 online live discussion, the remaining 58 questions were discussed among the Delphi Panel members using a virtual meeting platform. Consensus was reached among 62% (36/58) of questions. Agreement was not reached regarding the antimicrobial management of the following six clinical syndromes: (1) Burkholderia cepacia pneumonia (duration of therapy); (2) Mycobacterium abscessus (intra-operative antimicrobials); (3) invasive aspergillosis (treatment of culture-negative but positive BAL galactomannan) (duration of therapy); (4) respiratory syncytial virus (duration of antiviral therapy); (5) left ventricular assist device deep infection (initial empirical antimicrobial coverage) and (6) CMV (duration of secondary prophylaxis). CONCLUSION: This Delphi panel developed consensus-based recommendations for 10 infectious clinical syndromes seen in TTx and MCS recipients.

Survey of treatment practices for immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 in Australasia.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in immunocompromised patients can lead to severe and prolonged illness. Data are limited with regard to management of COVID-19 in this setting, particularly in persistent or recrudescent infection. The authors conducted an online survey among infectious diseases doctors to determine current approaches to treatment across Australasia. There was marked variability in responses relating to the diagnostic modalities and use of antiviral agents in patients with immunocompromise, highlighting the need for high-quality studies to guide treatment decisions in this group.

Human immunodeficiency virus and solid organ transplantation: a 15-year retrospective audit at a tertiary Australian transplant centre.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of end-stage organ disease in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH) is increasing, as people live longer due to potent, tolerable antiretroviral therapy (ART). Consequently, the number of PLWH who would benefit from solid organ transplant (SOT) is rising. The SOT experience in PLWH in Australia remains limited. Aim To retrospectively review the outcomes for SOT in PLWH at our service, in Victoria, Australia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of PLWH undergoing SOT over a 15-year period was performed. Adult PLWH age >18 years were eligible and identified from the Victorian HIV Service database. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise baseline demographics and clinical data, and outcomes following SOT. RESULTS: Nine virologically suppressed PLWH underwent SOT from HIV-negative donors (five kidneys, two livers and two bilateral sequential lung transplants). All patients were male, with a median age of 57.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) = 54.3-60.1) and CD4 count of 485 (IQR = 342-835) at transplantation, and comorbidities were common at baseline. After a median follow up of 3.9 years (IQR = 2.7-7.6), 8 (89%) patents were alive, 7 (78%) had functioning grafts, although 5 (56%) experienced organ rejection. Infections were common. Two patients required modification to their ART due to significant drug-drug interactions prior to transplant, while 5 (56%) had modifications post-SOT. No patients experienced HIV virologic failure. CONCLUSION: PLWH with end-stage organ disease experience good clinical and functional outcomes and should be considered for SOT where indicated. However, multidisciplinary planning and care is essential to optimise care in this patient group.

Treatment of invasive IMP-4 Enterobacter cloacae infection in transplant recipients using ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam: A case series and literature review.

Infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are an emerging threat in both solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients. Invasive CPE infections in transplant recipients are associated with a high mortality, often due to limited therapeutic options and antibacterial toxicities. One of the most therapeutically challenging group of CPE are the metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria, which are now found worldwide, and often need treatment with older, highly toxic antimicrobial regimens. Newer ß-lactamase inhibitors such as avibactam have well-established activity against certain carbapenemases such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC), but have no activity against MBL-producing organisms. Conversely, aztreonam has activity against MBL-producing organisms but is often inactivated by other co-existing ß-lactamases. Here, we report four cases of invasive MBL-CPE infections in transplant recipients caused by IMP-4-producing Enterobacter cloacae who were successfully treated with a new, mechanism-driven antimicrobial combination of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam. This novel antimicrobial combination offers a useful treatment option for high-risk patients with CPE infection, with reduced drug interactions and toxicity.

Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of invasive fungal disease due to moulds other than Aspergillus in the haematology/oncology setting, 2021.

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) due to moulds other than Aspergillus is a significant cause of mortality in patients with malignancies or post haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. The current guidelines focus on the diagnosis and management of the common non-Aspergillus moulds (NAM), such as Mucorales, Scedosporium species (spp.), Lomentospora prolificans and Fusarium spp. Rare but emerging NAM including Paecilomyces variotii, Purpureocillium lilacinum and Scopulariopsis spp. are also reviewed. Culture and histological examination of tissue biopsy specimens remain the mainstay of diagnosis, but molecular methods are increasingly being used. As NAM frequently disseminate, blood cultures and skin examination with biopsy of any suspicious lesions are critically important. Treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach with surgical debridement as a central component. Other management strategies include control of the underlying disease/predisposing factors, augmentation of the host response and the reduction of immunosuppression. Carefully selected antifungal therapy, guided by susceptibility testing, is critical to cure. We also outline novel antifungal agents still in clinical trial which offer substantial potential for improved outcomes in the future. Paediatric recommendations follow those of adults. Ongoing epidemiological research, improvement in diagnostics and the development of new antifungal agents will continue to improve the poor outcomes that have been traditionally associated with IFD due to NAM.