COVoc and COVTriage: novel resources to support literature triage.

MOTIVATION: Since early 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has confronted the biomedical community with an unprecedented challenge. The rapid spread of COVID-19 and ease of transmission seen worldwide is due to increased population flow and international trade. Front-line medical care, treatment research and vaccine development also require rapid and informative interpretation of the literature and COVID-19 data produced around the world, with 177 500 papers published between January 2020 and November 2021, i.e. almost 8500 papers per month. To extract knowledge and enable interoperability across resources, we developed the COVID-19 Vocabulary (COVoc), an application ontology related to the research on this pandemic. The main objective of COVoc development was to enable seamless navigation from biomedical literature to core databases and tools of ELIXIR, a European-wide intergovernmental organization for life sciences. RESULTS: This collaborative work provided data integration into SIB Literature services, an application ontology (COVoc) and a triage service named COVTriage and based on annotation processing to search for COVID-related information across pre-defined aspects with daily updates. Thanks to its interoperability potential, COVoc lends itself to wider applications, hopefully through further connections with other novel COVID-19 ontologies as has been established with Coronavirus Infectious Disease Ontology. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data at https://github.com/EBISPOT/covoc and the service at https://candy.hesge.ch/COVTriage.

SIB Literature Services: RESTful customizable search engines in biomedical literature, enriched with automatically mapped biomedical concepts.

Thanks to recent efforts by the text mining community, biocurators have now access to plenty of good tools and Web interfaces for identifying and visualizing biomedical entities in literature. Yet, many of these systems start with a PubMed query, which is limited by strong Boolean constraints. Some semantic search engines exploit entities for Information Retrieval, and/or deliver relevance-based ranked results. Yet, they are not designed for supporting a specific curation workflow, and allow very limited control on the search process. The Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Literature Services (SIBiLS) provide personalized Information Retrieval in the biological literature. Indeed, SIBiLS allow fully customizable search in semantically enriched contents, based on keywords and/or mapped biomedical entities from a growing set of standardized and legacy vocabularies. The services have been used and favourably evaluated to assist the curation of genes and gene products, by delivering customized literature triage engines to different curation teams. SIBiLS (https://candy.hesge.ch/SIBiLS) are freely accessible via REST APIs and are ready to empower any curation workflow, built on modern technologies scalable with big data: MongoDB and Elasticsearch. They cover MEDLINE and PubMed Central Open Access enriched by nearly 2 billion of mapped biomedical entities, and are daily updated.

Comparing Sequence-Based and Literature-Based Pathogenicity Scoring Methods for Human Variants.

Assessing the pathogenicity of genetic variants is a critical aspect of genomic medicine and precision healthcare. Over the last decades, the identification of genetic variants and their characterization has become simpler (advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies, analysis, and visualization support tools, etc.). However, the quality of assessments to distinguish benign from pathogenic variants is critical to inform clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. In this article, we investigate the relationships using correlation tests between the characterization of genetic variants in the literature and their pathogenicity scores computed by two state-of-the-art assessment tools (SIFT and PolyPhen-2).

Multilingual RECIST classification of radiology reports using supervised learning.

Objectives: The objective of this study is the exploration of Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing techniques to support the automatic assignment of the four Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) scales based on radiology reports. We also aim at evaluating how languages and institutional specificities of Swiss teaching hospitals are likely to affect the quality of the classification in French and German languages. Methods: In our approach, 7 machine learning methods were evaluated to establish a strong baseline. Then, robust models were built, fine-tuned according to the language (French and German), and compared with the expert annotation. Results: The best strategies yield average F1-scores of 90% and 86% respectively for the 2-classes (Progressive/Non-progressive) and the 4-classes (Progressive Disease, Stable Disease, Partial Response, Complete Response) RECIST classification tasks. Conclusions: These results are competitive with the manual labeling as measured by Matthew's correlation coefficient and Cohen's Kappa (79% and 76%). On this basis, we confirm the capacity of specific models to generalize on new unseen data and we assess the impact of using Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) on the accuracy of the classifiers.

Designing an Optimal Expansion Method to Improve the Recall of a Genomic Variant Curation-Support Service.

The importance of genomic data for health is rapidly growing but accessing and gathering information about variants from different sources is hindered by highly heterogeneous representations of variants, as outlined by clinical associations (AMP/ASCO/CAP) in their recommendations. To enable a smooth and effective retrieval of variant-containing documents from different resources, we developed a tool (https://goldorak.hesge.ch/synvar/) that generates for any given SNP - including variant not present in existing databases - its corresponding description at the genome, transcript and protein levels. It provides variant descriptions in the HGVS format as well as in many non-standard formats found in the literature along with database identifiers. We present the SynVar service and evaluate its impact on the recall of a genomic variant curation-support service. Using SynVar to search variants in the literature enables to increase the recall by +133.8% without a strong impact on precision (i.e. 93%).

Classification of Oncology Treatment Responses from French Radiology Reports with Supervised Machine Learning.

The present study shows first attempts to automatically classify oncology treatment responses on the basis of the textual conclusion sections of radiology reports according to the RECIST classification. After a robust and extended manual annotation of 543 conclusion sections (5-to-50-word long), and after the training of several machine learning techniques (from traditional machine learning to deep learning), the best results show an accuracy score of 0.90 for a two-class classification (non-progressive vs. progressive disease) and of 0.82 for a four-class classification (complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease) both with Logistic Regression approach. Some innovative solutions are further suggested to improve these scores in the future.

Text-Mining Services of the Swiss Variant Interpretation Platform for Oncology.

The Swiss Variant Interpretation Platform for Oncology is a centralized, joint and curated database for clinical somatic variants piloted by a board of Swiss healthcare institutions and operated by the SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics. To support this effort, SIB Text Mining designed a set of text analytics services. This report focuses on three of those services. First, the automatic annotations of the literature with a set of terminologies have been performed, resulting in a large annotated version of MEDLINE and PMC. Second, a generator of variant synonyms for single nucleotide variants has been developed using publicly available data resources, as well as patterns of non-standard formats, often found in the literature. Third, a literature ranking service enables to retrieve a ranked set of MEDLINE abstracts given a variant and optionally a diagnosis. The annotation of MEDLINE and PMC resulted in a total of respectively 785,181,199 and 1,156,060,212 annotations, which means an average of 26 and 425 annotations per abstract and full-text article. The generator of variant synonyms enables to retrieve up to 42 synonyms for a variant. The literature ranking service reaches a precision (P10) of 63%, which means that almost two-thirds of the top-10 returned abstracts are judged relevant. Further services will be implemented to complete this set of services, such as a service to retrieve relevant clinical trials for a patient and a literature ranking service for full-text articles.

Accelerating annotation of articles via automated approaches: evaluation of the neXtA5 curation-support tool by neXtProt.

The development of efficient text-mining tools promises to boost the curation workflow by significantly reducing the time needed to process the literature into biological databases. We have developed a curation support tool, neXtA5, that provides a search engine coupled with an annotation system directly integrated into a biocuration workflow. neXtA5 assists curation with modules optimized for the thevarious curation tasks: document triage, entity recognition and information extraction.Here, we describe the evaluation of neXtA5 by expert curators. We first assessed the annotations of two independent curators to provide a baseline for comparison. To evaluate the performance of neXtA5, we submitted requests and compared the neXtA5 results with the manual curation. The analysis focuses on the usability of neXtA5 to support the curation of two types of data: biological processes (BPs) and diseases (Ds). We evaluated the relevance of the papers proposed as well as the recall and precision of the suggested annotations.The evaluation of document triage by neXtA5 precision showed that both curators agree with neXtA5 for 67 (BP) and 63% (D) of abstracts, while curators agree on accepting or rejecting an abstract ~80% of the time. Hence, the precision of the triage system is satisfactory.For concept extraction, curators approved 35 (BP) and 25% (D) of the neXtA5 annotations. Conversely, neXtA5 successfully annotated up to 36 (BP) and 68% (D) of the terms identified by curators. The user feedback obtained in these tests highlighted the need for improvement in the ranking function of neXtA5 annotations. Therefore, we transformed the information extraction component into an annotation ranking system. This improvement results in a top precision (precision at first rank) of 59 (D) and 63% (BP). These results suggest that when considering only the first extracted entity, the current system achieves a precision comparable with expert biocurators.

Improving average ranking precision in user searches for biomedical research datasets.

Database URL: https://biocaddie.org/benchmark-data.

Triage by ranking to support the curation of protein interactions.

Database URL: http://candy.hesge.ch/nextA5.

neXtA5: accelerating annotation of articles via automated approaches in neXtProt.

The rapid increase in the number of published articles poses a challenge for curated databases to remain up-to-date. To help the scientific community and database curators deal with this issue, we have developed an application, neXtA5, which prioritizes the literature for specific curation requirements. Our system, neXtA5, is a curation service composed of three main elements. The first component is a named-entity recognition module, which annotates MEDLINE over some predefined axes. This report focuses on three axes: Diseases, the Molecular Function and Biological Process sub-ontologies of the Gene Ontology (GO). The automatic annotations are then stored in a local database, BioMed, for each annotation axis. Additional entities such as species and chemical compounds are also identified. The second component is an existing search engine, which retrieves the most relevant MEDLINE records for any given query. The third component uses the content of BioMed to generate an axis-specific ranking, which takes into account the density of named-entities as stored in the Biomed database. The two ranked lists are ultimately merged using a linear combination, which has been specifically tuned to support the annotation of each axis. The fine-tuning of the coefficients is formally reported for each axis-driven search. Compared with PubMed, which is the system used by most curators, the improvement is the following: +231% for Diseases, +236% for Molecular Functions and +3153% for Biological Process when measuring the precision of the top-returned PMID (P0 or mean reciprocal rank). The current search methods significantly improve the search effectiveness of curators for three important curation axes. Further experiments are being performed to extend the curation types, in particular protein-protein interactions, which require specific relationship extraction capabilities. In parallel, user-friendly interfaces powered with a set of JSON web services are currently being implemented into the neXtProt annotation pipeline.Available on: http://babar.unige.ch:8082/neXtA5Database URL: http://babar.unige.ch:8082/neXtA5/fetcher.jsp.