ABSTRACT
While implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are a lifesaving therapy, they can negatively affect the patient's quality of life. Amiodarone is commonly combined with ß-blockers (BB) in ICD recipients. However, this combination therapy's efficacy in preventing shocks compared to standard BB monotherapy is not well studied. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine if combined amiodarone and BB therapy improves prevention of ICD shock delivery compared to BB monotherapy. We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases, for studies that assess the impact of amiodarone and BB versus BB monotherapy in patients with an ICD. The primary outcome was a total number of ICD shocks delivered by the end of the study period. Four studies: three retrospective studies and one randomized controlled trial (RCT), with a total of 5818 patients with ICDs, were included in the analysis. Follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 5 years. The combined amiodarone and BB group was not associated with a significantly lower number of ICD shocks compared to the BB monotherapy group (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44-1.31; P = .32). A combination therapy of amiodarone and BB was not associated with any further reduction in ICD shocks, hospitalizations, or mortality. Additional RCTs are recommended to further validate our findings.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists , Amiodarone , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents , Defibrillators, Implantable , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Amiodarone/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The annual incidence of sudden cardiac death is over 300,000 in the United States (US). Historically, inpatient implantation of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has been variable and subject to healthcare disparities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contemporary practice trends of inpatient secondary prevention ICD implants within the US on the basis of race, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: The study is a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020 of adult discharges with a primary diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular flutter, and fibrillation (VF). Adjusted ICD implantation rates based on race, sex, and SES and associated temporal trends were calculated using multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 193,600 primary VT/VF discharges in the NIS were included in the cohort, of which 57,895 (29.9%) had ICD placement. There was a significant racial and ethnic disparity in ICD placement for Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American patients as compared to White patients; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.86 [p < .01], 0.90 [p = .03], 0.81[p < .01], 0.45 [p < .01], respectively. Female patients were also less likely to receive an ICD compared to male patients (aOR: 0.75, p < .01). Disparities in ICD placement remained stable over the study period (ptrend ≥ .05 in all races, both sexes and income categories). CONCLUSION: Racial, sex, and SES disparities persisted for secondary prevention ICD implants in the US. An investigation into contributing factors and subsequent approaches are needed to address the modifiable causes of disparities in ICD implantation as these trends have not improved compared to historic data.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Low voltage areas (LVAs) on left atrial (LA) bipolar voltage mapping correlate with areas of fibrosis. LVAs guided substrate modification was hypothesized to improve the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation particularly in nonparoxysmal AF population. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies yielded mixed results. METHODS: The databases of Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases were searched from inception to August 2022. Relevant studies comparing LVA guided substrate modification (LVA ablation) versus conventional AF ablation (non LVA ablation) in patients with nonparoxysmal AF were identified and a meta-analysis was performed (Graphical Abstract image). The efficacy endpoints of interest were recurrence of AF and the need for repeat ablation at 1-year. The safety endpoint of interest was adverse events for both groups. Procedure related endpoints included total procedure time and fluoroscopy time. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies with 1597 patients were included. A significant reduction in AF recurrence at 1-year was observed in LVA ablation versus non LVA ablation group (risk ratio [RR] 0.63 (27% vs. 36%),95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.62, p < .001]. Also, redo ablation was significantly lower in LVA ablation group (RR 0.52[18% vs. 26.7%], 95% CI 0.38-0.69, p < .00133). No difference was found in the overall adverse event (RR 0.7 [4.3% vs. 5.4%], 95% CI 0.36-1.35, p = .29). CONCLUSION: LVA guided substrate modification provides significant reduction in recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias at 1-year compared with non LVA approaches in persistent and longstanding persistent AF population without increase in adverse events.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Pulmonary Veins , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Heart Atria , Fibrosis , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methods , Recurrence , Pulmonary Veins/surgeryABSTRACT
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for almost one-half of all heart failure (HF) patients and continues to increase in prevalence. While mortality with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has decreased over the past few decades with use of evidence-based HFrEF therapy, mortality related to heart failure with HFpEF has not changed significantly over the same time period. The combination of poor prognosis and lack of effective treatment options creates a pressing need for novel strategies for better patient characterization. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived T1 relaxation time and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) in HFpEF patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched for relevant studies. The primary outcomes of interest were hospitalization for HF and all-cause mortality. Five studies with 2741 patients were included. Four studies reported correlation of outcomes with ECV, 2 studies reported correlation of outcomes with native T1 time, and 1 study reported correlation of outcomes with post-contrast T1 time. All five studies showed significant correlation of CMR-derived parameters with adverse outcomes including event-free survival to cardiac event, all cause, and cardiac mortality. CMR-determined ECV is strongly correlated with adverse outcomes in HFpEF cohorts.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine , Myocardium , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Whether revascularization should be performed as multivessel intervention at the time of index procedure (MV-index), staged procedure (MV-staged), or culprit only intervention (COI) in patients with multivessel disease (MVD) presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unclear. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the optimal revascularization strategy in this patient population. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were systematically searched to identify all relevant studies. The outcomes assessed were major cardiac adverse events (MACE), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was used to calculate odds ratio (OR) with credible interval (CrI). RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 8,066 patients were included in the analysis. There was a decreased risk of MACE (MV-index vs. COI: OR, 0.35; 95% CrI, 0.23-0.55; MV-staged vs COI: OR, 0.52; 95% CrI, 0.31-0.81) and revascularization (MV-index vs. COI: OR, 0.27; 95% CrI, 0.15-0.49; MV-staged vs. COI: OR, 0.38; 95% CrI, 0.19-0.70) with MV-index intervention and MV-staged intervention compared with COI. However, MV-index intervention and not MV-staged intervention was associated with a decreased risk of MI (MV-index vs. COI: OR, 0.35; 95% CrI, 0.12-0.93; MV-staged vs. COI: OR, 0.65; 95% CrI, 0.24-1.59) compared with COI. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that multivessel intervention either at index procedure or as staged intervention may be more efficacious compared to COI in patients with MVD presenting with ACS.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Myocardial Revascularization , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Acute Coronary Syndrome/mortality , Bayes Theorem , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Humans , Myocardial Revascularization/adverse effects , Myocardial Revascularization/mortality , Network Meta-Analysis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Orthostatic intolerance is a broad term that represents a spectrum of dysautonomic disorders, including postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and orthostatic hypotension (OH), as manifestations of severe autonomic failure. While the etiology of orthostatic intolerance has not yet fully been uncovered, it has been associated with multiple underlying pathological processes, including peripheral neuropathy, altered renin-aldosterone levels, hypovolemia, and autoimmune processes. Studies have implicated adrenergic, cholinergic, and angiotensin II type I autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of orthostatic intolerance. Several case series have demonstrated that immunomodulation therapy resulted in favorable outcomes, improving autonomic symptoms in POTS and OH. In this review, we highlight the contemporary literature detailing the association of autoimmunity with POTS and OH.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and dysautonomia following a SARS-CoV-2 infection have been recently reported. The underlying mechanism of dysautonomia is not well understood. The impact of this viral illness on the underlying autonomic symptoms has not been studied in patients with a pre-existing POTS diagnosis. Our study aims to report the impact of a COVID-19 infection on patients with preexisting POTS, both during the acute phase of the disease and post-recovery. METHODS: Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained to access charts of the study subjects. All patients with known POTS disease who acquired COVID-19 infection between April 2020 and May 2021 were included. The end point of the study was worsening POTS related symptoms including orthostatic dizziness, palpitation, fatigue and syncope/ presyncope post COVID-19 infection that required escalation of therapy. Basic demographics, details of POTS diagnosis, medications, Additional information regarding COVID 19 infection, duration of illness, need for hospitalization, worsening of POTS symptoms, need for ED visits, the type of persisting symptoms and vaccination status were obtained from the retrospective chart review. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were studied. The alpha-variant was the most common causing SARS-CoV-2 infection. 27% (11 patients) of them had tested positive for COVID- 19 infection more than once. About 38 (92.7%) of them reported having worsening of their baseline POTS symptoms during the active infection phase. About 28 patients (68%) experienced worsening of their dysautonomia symptoms for at least 1-6 months post infection. Nearly 30 patients (73.2%) required additional therapy for their symptom control and improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pre-existing POTS, most experienced a worsening of their baseline autonomic symptoms after suffering the COVID-19 infection which required additional pharmacotherapy for their symptom improvement.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Orthostatic Intolerance , Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome , Humans , Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome/diagnosis , Orthostatic Intolerance/diagnosis , Orthostatic Intolerance/complications , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , SyncopeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition characterized by the sudden obstruction of one or more coronary arteries, resulting in diminished blood flow to the heart muscle. This acute ischemic event demands swift and precise intervention to minimize myocardial damage and preserve cardiac function. Opioids, a class of potent analgesic medications, are frequently utilized in the management of STEMI-related chest pain. Despite their efficacy in alleviating discomfort, their use in this context warrants careful consideration due to potential adverse effects and interactions. Methods:â¯In this large nationwide retrospective observational study, we evaluated the effect of opioid dependence on inpatient mortality, length of hospitalization, and cost of hospitalization of patients with STEMI. Data was collected for 2019 from various hospitals across the United States using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) through the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Using the International Classification of Diseases-10 codes (ICD-10), we identified a primary diagnosis of STEMI in patients over the age of 18, as well as a secondary diagnosis of opioid dependence.⯠Complex samples and multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to determine the association of opioid dependence on inpatient mortality, length of hospitalization, and cost of hospitalization of patients with STEMI. Of the patients who fit our criteria, we identified other comorbidities and diagnoses associated with them as potential confounders including drug abuse, hypertension, diabetes, alcohol use, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic lung disease. Other confounders that were adjusted for include race, Charlson Comorbidity index, median household income, insurance, hospital region in the US, hospital bed size, and teaching status of the hospital. Results:â¯A total of 661,990 patients presented to a hospital with a primary diagnosis of STEMI in 2019. The majority of the patients were male with a mean age of 62.5+/-3.4 and were Caucasian American. Patients who were opioid dependent were found to be on average younger, earned less than the 25th percentile household income, had a higher history of illicit drug and alcohol use, and had Medicaid. They were also found to have higher rates of chronic lung disease at 39.2%, compared to 21.4.% in patients who were not opioid-dependent. Patients who were not opioid dependent were found to have higher rates of hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Inpatient mortality and cost of hospitalization in STEMI patients with opioid dependence were not statistically different compared to those who were not opioid dependent. However, STEMI patients who were opioid dependent did have an associated longer length of hospitalization. Conclusion:â¯Opioid use for pain relief in acute coronary syndrome, particularly STEMI, is a mainstay of treatment. Our retrospective cohort dived into assessing the relationship between opioid dependence on its effect on inpatient mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalization in STEMI patients. Our study showed that opioid dependence has no significant impact on inpatient mortality. However, it was associated with a longer length of hospital stay in STEMI patients. Further studies may be warranted into the effects of opioid dependence on the length of hospitalization in STEMI patients.â¯.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence is supportive of early atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to maintain sinus rhythm. Disparities in health care between rural and urban areas in the United States are well known. Catheter ablation (CA) of AF is a complex procedure and its outcomes among rural versus urban areas has not been studied in the past. METHODS: The national inpatient sample database 2016-2020 was queried for all hospitalization with the primary diagnosis of AF who underwent AF catheter ablation at the index hospitalization. Then, hospitalizations were stratified into rural versus urban. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were total hospitalization costs and likelihood for longer length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 78,735 patients underwent inpatient CA of AF between January 2016 and December 2020, mean age was 68.5 ± 11 with 44 % being females. 27,180 (35 %) CA were performed in rural areas, while the remaining CA 51,555 (65 %) were done in urban areas. While, there was very low risk of mortality, patients who underwent CA in rural areas had more comorbidities and also was associated with a 79 % increase in post-procedural in-hospital mortality compared with urban areas (aOR 1.79, 0.8 % vs 0.4 %, CI: 1.15-2.78, P < 0.01). CA of AF in rural areas had a longer length of hospital stay (aOR 1.11, 4.21 vs 3.79 days, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.2, P = 0.02), lower overall cost compared with urban areas (49,698 ± 1251 vs. $53,252 ± 1339, P = 0.03). Multivariate regression analysis showed end stage renal disease and congestive heart failure were independent risk factors associated with increase in post CA in-hospital mortality exceeding two-fold. CONCLUSION: Inpatient CA of AF in rural areas was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, longer length of stay and a lower overall cost when compared with urban areas.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Female , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Male , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Inpatients , Hospitalization , Length of Stay , Catheter Ablation/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is commonly seen in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of pacemaker implantation among patients with SND and AF treated with catheter ablation (CA) versus anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). METHODS: The 2013-2022 Optum Clinformatics database, an administrative claims database for commercially insured individuals in the United States (US), was used for this study. Patients with AF and SND and a history of at least one AAD prescription were identified and classified into CA or AAD cohorts based on subsequent treatment received. Inverse probability treatment weighting was applied to balance socio-demographic and clinical characteristics between the cohorts. Weighted Cox regression modeling was used to evaluate the differential risk of incident permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Sub-analyses were performed by AF type (paroxysmal versus persistent). RESULTS: A total of 1206 patients in the AAD cohort and 1624 patients in the CA cohort were included. Study cohorts were well-balanced post-weighting. The incidence rate of PPM implantation (per 1000 person-year) was 55.8 for the CA cohort and 117.8 for the AAD cohort. Regression analysis demonstrated that the CA cohort had 42% lower risk of incident PPM implantation than those treated with AADs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.72, p < 0.001). CA-treated patients had lower risks of PPM implantation versus AAD-treated patients among those with paroxysmal AF (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34-0.69, p < 0.001) and persistent AF (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.81, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF and SND treated with CA have significantly lower risks of incident PPM implantation compared with those treated with an AAD.
ABSTRACT
Antibodies to Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of both autoimmune Limbic Encephalitis (LE) and Stiff Person Syndrome (SPS). However, their association is quite rare. We present a case of a 48-year-old Caucasian female who presented with symptoms of recurrent severe headaches, behavioral and cognitive dysfunction, and an episode of seizure. She was found to have high titers of anti-GAD65 antibodies in both cerebrospinal fluid and serum. She was diagnosed with LE and SPS, and was started on immunosuppressive therapy with steroids and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG). The patient responded well to treatment with improvement in her symptoms.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Limbic Encephalitis , Stiff-Person Syndrome , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Stiff-Person Syndrome/complications , Stiff-Person Syndrome/diagnosis , Stiff-Person Syndrome/drug therapy , Autoantibodies/cerebrospinal fluid , Autoimmune Diseases/complications , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Limbic Encephalitis/complications , Limbic Encephalitis/diagnosis , Limbic Encephalitis/therapy , HeadacheABSTRACT
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is indicated for high-risk patients with severe degenerative aortic stenosis (AS). Given the shared risk factors and coexistence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and AS, there is inconsistent clinical data regarding potential survival benefits of paired percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with TAVR procedures. We performed a literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception through June 2023 assessing the impact of concomitant PCI in patients with obstructive CAD undergoing TAVR. The primary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day cardiovascular mortality, and 6 months-1 year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding complications, and acute kidney injury (AKI). A total of 11 studies involving 2804 patients were included in the final analysis. Compared to patients undergoing TAVR alone, the TAVR+PCI group showed no significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality (RR 0.90, CI 0.66, 1.22, P = 0.49), 30-day cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.71 CI 0.44, 1.14, P = 0.16), or 6 months-1 year all-cause mortality (RR 0.94, CI 0.75, 1.18, P = 0.57). Regarding secondary outcomes, 30-day myocardial infarction was higher in the TAVR+PCI group (RR 3.09, CI 1.26, 7.57, P = 0.01), with no significant differences noted in rates of 30-day stroke (RR 1.14, CI 0.56, 2.33, P = 0.72), major bleeding/vascular complications (RR 1.11, CI 0.79, 1.56, P = 0.55), and AKI (RR 1.07, CI 0.75, 1.54, P = 0.71). Concomitant PCI does not confer any mortality benefit in patients with obstructive CAD and high-grade AS undergoing TAVR. Further trials are needed to confirm our findings.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Aortic Valve Stenosis , Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Stroke , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Aortic Valve/surgery , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Risk Factors , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Hemorrhage/etiologyABSTRACT
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are frequent co-morbid conditions. In patients with symptomatic AF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction the clinical diagnosis of HFpEF may be difficult, as history, examination, and echocardiography are not sensitive or specific. This study sought to assess the prevalence of HFpEF in patients undergoing AF ablation utilizing resting and post-tachycardia pacing left atrial pressure (LAP) measurements. This retrospective cohort study consisted of consecutive patients with symptomatic AF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who had invasive hemodynamic assessment (IHA) of LAP under resting and post-tachycardia pacing conditions while undergoing AF ablation from 2020 to 2022 at a tertiary care academic medical center. Elevated LAP was defined as ≥15 mm Hg at rest and ≥15 mm Hg post-tachycardia pacing. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) normal resting and post-tachycardia pacing LAP (control group), (2) elevated resting LAP (apparent HFpEF), (3) normal resting but elevated post-tachycardia pacing LAP (occult HFpEF). A total of 78 patients were included with age 64.6 ± 9.1 years, 28 (36%) female, body mass index 33.3 ± 6.5 kg/m2, 5 (6%) paroxysmal and 73 (94%) persistent AF, and CHA2DS2-VASc 3.0 ± 1.5. IHA categorized 31 (40%), 32 (41%), and 15 patients (19%) into groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Notably, while only 9 patients (12%) were diagnosed with HFpEF based on clinical evaluation, 47 patients (60%) were diagnosed by IHA. IHA in patients undergoing AF ablation suggests a high prevalence of clinically undiagnosed HFpEF through a novel methodology measuring resting and post-tachycardia pacing LAP.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Heart Failure , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Male , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Stroke Volume , Atrial Pressure , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Ventricular Function, Left , TachycardiaABSTRACT
The timing of when to perform ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation while receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) during the same hospitalization has not been explored. This study aimed to investigate the use and outcomes of VT catheter ablation in patients with sustained VT receiving ICD in the same hospital stay. The Nationwide Readmission Database 2016 to 2019 was queried for all hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of VT with subsequent ICD during the same admission. Hospitalizations were later stratified according to whether a VT ablation was performed. All catheter ablation of VT were performed before ICD implantation. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmission. A total of 29,385 VT hospitalizations were included. VT ablation was performed with subsequent ICD placement in 2,255 (7.6%), whereas 27,130 (92.3%) received an ICD only. No differences were found regarding in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35 to 1.9, p = 0.67) and all-cause 90-day readmission rate (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.3, p = 0.16). An increase in readmission because of recurrent VT was noted in the VT ablation group (aOR 1.53, 8% vs 5% CI 1.2 to 1.9, p <0.01); the VT ablation group encompassed a higher number of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (p <0.01), cardiogenic shock (p <0.01), and mechanical circulatory support use (p <0.01). In conclusion, the use of VT ablation in patients admitted with sustained VT is low and reserved for higher risk patients with significant co-morbidities. Despite the higher risk profile of VT ablation cohort, no differences were found in the short-term mortality and readmission rate between the groups.
Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Defibrillators, Implantable , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Patient Readmission , Tachycardia, Ventricular/epidemiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/surgery , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is associated with high mortality rates. Data has shown that intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support does not provide a survival benefit over optimal medical therapy in AMICS. Despite lack of supportive evidence, IABP is still commonly used in these clinical situations. The Impella percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) (Abiomed, Denver, MA) rapidly deploys superior mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with AMICS. However, the safety and efficacy of Impella in AMICS is a matter of ongoing investigation, and its role in AMICS management is not yet fully established. METHODS: The databases of Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases were searched from inception to March 2020. Relevant randomized trials and observational studies comparing Impella versus IABP in AMICS were identified and a meta-analysis was performed using the random effect model. The efficacy endpoint of interest was short-term mortality (defined as in-hospital or 30-day mortality). The safety endpoints of interest were major bleeding, limb complications, stroke and hemolysis. RESULTS: A total of 2 randomized trials and 5 observational studies with 3921 patients were included. No difference in short-term mortality between the two groups [RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.87-1.33, P = 0.49] was found. For safety endpoints, Impella was associated with significantly higher incidence of major bleeding [RR: 2.03, 95% CI 1.56-2.64, P < 0.0001], limb complications [RR: 3.67, 95% CI 1.56-8.65, P = 0.003] as well as hemolysis [RR: 9.46, 95% CI 1.75-51.22, P = 0.009] compared with IABP. No significant difference was observed for the incidence of stroke [RR: 1.07 95% CI 0.34-3.31 P = 0.91]. CONCLUSION: Impella support in AMICS patients was associated with a significantly increased risk of bleeding, limb complications and hemolysis without an improved short-term survival advantage compared with IABP.
Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Myocardial Infarction , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/adverse effects , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Progressive remodeling of left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) plays an important role in the pathology of persistent/ long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. The role of pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) and adjunctive LAPW isolation using cryothermal energy in non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is yet to be established. The databases of Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases were searched from inception to April 2022. Relevant randomized trials and observational studies comparing de novo cryoballoon PVI only versus PVI+LAPWI in patients with non paroxysmal AF were identified and a meta-analysis was performed using the random effect model. The efficacy endpoints of interest were recurrence of AF, recurrence of non-AF and all atrial arrhythmias at 1-year post ablation. The safety endpoint of interest was all adverse events between the two groups. A total of 6 studies (3 prospective trials and 3 observational studies) with 1037 patients were included. A significant reduction in AF recurrence at 1-year was observed in PVI+LAPWI group (OR 0.36 (17% vs 39%), 95% CI 0.26-0.49, P < 0.001). Also, lower incidence of overall atrial arrhythmias was found in PVI+LAPWI (OR 0.37 (23% vs 47%),95% CI 0.28-0.49, P < 0.001). For safety endpoints, the overall adverse event rate was low without the significant difference between the groups (OR: 0.86, (3% vs 3.5%) 95% CI 0.36-2.07, Pâ¯=â¯0.74). Cryoballoon LAPWI plus PVI provides a significant reduction in recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias and AF at 1-year compared with PVI alone in non paroxysmal AF population without increase in adverse events rate.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Pulmonary Veins , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Heart Atria/surgeryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Magnesium Citrate (MC) is not FDA approved as a colonoscopy preparation. Advantages include low cost, small volume and accessibility without prescription. We retrospectively evaluated bowel preparations used in a private gastroenterology practice. The sample size is the largest for any similar studies (n =19,173). METHODS: Electronic Medical Records were queried for colonoscopies between 2010-2016. Bowel preps, indications (screening vs. other) and preparation adequacy were all recorded. Adequacy rates were calculated and compared using generalized linear modeling. Data were analyzed using SAS. RESULTS: The most common prep used was MC 2 bottles; screening (n=6,064, with 98.94% adequacy) and non-screening (n=3,251, with 99.29% adequacy), followed by MC 3 bottles; screening (n=2,757 with 90.35% adequacy), and non-screening (n=1,925 with 92.92% adequacy). CONCLUSION: MC bowel preparation is adequate, well tolerated, and inexpensive. In a large retrospective analysis, it compares favorably to other preparations.
Subject(s)
Cathartics , Organometallic Compounds , Cathartics/therapeutic use , Citric Acid/therapeutic use , Humans , Organometallic Compounds/therapeutic use , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel tool for the treatment of calcified vascular stenosis. Recently, IVL has been successfully used for modification of calcified plaque in coronary and lower extremity peripheral arteries with promising results. However, experience in subclavian and innominate peripheral arterial disease is limited. This study aims to report our initial experience of IVL use in calcified subclavian and innominate vasculature. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all the cases of IVL performed in subclavian and innominate arteries at the Miriam Hospital, Providence, between January 2019 and May 2020. Data on the baseline and procedural characteristics were collected. The primary endpoint was procedural success defined as residual stenosis of <20% after stenting. Other endpoints of interest were; 1) procedural complications, including dissections, perforations, abrupt closure, slow or no-reflow, thrombosis, and distal embolization; 2) in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke/transient ischemic attack. RESULTS: A total of 7 patients with 13 lesions undergoing IVL were included. Of these, 5 (71%) were women, the mean age was 74.6 ± 12.9, and the mean BMI was 25.1 ± 6.7. IVL was successfully delivered to all the target lesions with a mean 252.9 ± 54.4 pulses delivered per patient. Procedural success was achieved in 100% of the treated lesions. No procedure-related complications or in-hospital MACE occurred in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center retrospective analysis, IVL facilitated acute procedural success without any procedural complications in severely calcified stenoses of the subclavian and innominate vasculature. Larger studies with an active comparator and longer follow-up are needed to establish the relative efficacy and safety of IVL use in this vascular bed.
Subject(s)
Lithotripsy , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Vascular Calcification , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Constriction, Pathologic , Female , Humans , Lithotripsy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/etiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Calcification/etiology , Vascular Calcification/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel endovascular treatment for calcified common femoral artery disease (CFA). Data on midterm effectiveness for clinically driven target lesions revascularization (CD-TLR) is lacking. This study investigated CD-TLR during 18-month follow-up in patients requiring IVL for CFA disease treatment. METHODS: In a single-center retrospective cohort study, electronic medical record of patients undergoing IVL for CFA disease from January 2018 to March 2020 were reviewed. Primary outcome was CD-TLR estimated by Kaplan-Meier method during 18-month follow-up. Univariate logistic regression was used to compare differences in CD-TLR by the type of adjunct therapy used. RESULTS: Among 54 CFA lesions in 50 patients, mean age (SD) was 75(8) years, gender and race were predominantly male (74%, n = 37) and white (94%, n = 47), respectively. Rutherford class III claudication was most common (70%, n = 35) with mean ABI of 0.66 (0.26) and mean angiographic stenosis of 77% (13%). Adjunct use of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty was 83% (n = 45) and atherectomy was 39% (n = 21). Residual angiographic stenosis was <30% in all cases. Complications included dissection requiring stent placement (2%, n = 1). After 18-months, 18% (n = 9) died unrelated to procedural complications and 6% (n = 3) were lost to follow-up. 18-month cumulative freedom from CD-TLR was 80.6% (95% CI: 69.1%, 92%). Univariate logistic regression did not reveal a statistically significant difference in CD-TLR with type of adjunct therapy used (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: IVL with adjunct use of DCB and/or atherectomy is safe and effective in treatment of calcified CFA disease. Randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Lithotripsy , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Constriction, Pathologic , Female , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lithotripsy/adverse effects , Male , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/etiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Popliteal Artery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
COVID-19 and granulomatosis with polyangiitis share many clinical and radiological features, making it challenging for clinicians to distinguish between the two. In this case report, we describe a patient who was diagnosed with COVID-19 in October 2020. One month later, she presented with persistent fatigue, shortness of breath and anaemia with worsening renal functions, found to have elevated antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and antiproteinase 3 antibodies, and diagnosed with granulomatosis with polyangiitis.