The Clinicopathological and Molecular Associations of PD-L1 Expression in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of a Series of 10,005 Cases Tested with the 22C3 Assay.

PD-L1 expression testing is mandatory prior to pembrolizumab prescription in non-small cell lung cancer. Our service offers PD-L1 testing using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay, in parallel with EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and (in some cases) KRAS testing. We correlate PD-L1 expression in 10,005 tumours with patient age and sex, with tumour histological subtypes, with the sampling modality and type of tissue, and with the presence of other molecular alterations. PD-L1 expression testing was performed using the aforementioned assay; tumour proportion scores (TPS) of 1 and 50% were taken as cut-offs for low and high positivity, respectively. EGFR testing was performed using the cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2. ALK testing was performed using the VENTANA ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay. KRAS testing was performed using pyrosequencing. TPS <1% was seen in 44.4% of tumours, 1-49% in 25.0% and ≥ 50% in 30.6%. We identified no significant relationship with age. Female patients were slightly more likely to express PD-L1. Poorly-differentiated tumour histology and ALK translocation were significantly associated with PD-L1 expression. Rare EGFR mutations tended to be associated with PD-L1 expression. Pleural and nodal metastases were more likely to express PD-L1 than primary tumours, but biopsy and cytological specimens did not show different PD-L1 expression rates. Our data show that the means of acquiring a tumour sample (biopsy versus cytology) does not have a significant impact on PD-L1 expression. However, we found that certain metastatic sites were associated with significantly higher expression rates, which has substantial implications for selection of tissue for testing.

Large-Scale EGFR Mutation Testing in Clinical Practice: Analysis of a Series of 18,920 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cases.

We make use of a very large dataset of non-small cell lung cancer specimens to examine the molecular epidemiology of EGFR mutations, particularly with respect to rare and compound mutations, and to non-adenocarcinoma histological subtypes. We also demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale EGFR mutation screening using the full range of specimens encountered in routine practice. We retrospectively reviewed 18,920 unselected EGFR mutation results from our centre between July 2009 and October 2016, using Qiagen's therascreen EGFR RGQ PCR Kit. Mutation rates were correlated with patient demographics and tumour histology. Our testing success rate was 93.9%, with similar success rates using histological and cytological specimens. Rare, potentially-targetable mutations accounted for 9.5% of all mutations detected. We identified a 2.5% mutation rate in tumours diagnosed as squamous cell carcinomas. There was a trend towards increasing EGFR mutation rates with increasing age, and while Del19 was the commonest mutation in the young, L858R predominated in the elderly. We found that EGFR mutation heterogeneity is rare within tumours and between primary and metastatic deposits. Our data demonstrate that large-scale, reflex EGFR mutation testing is feasible and affordable in the context of a publicly-funded health system. Furthermore, we have shown that the use of techniques sensitive only to classical mutations and selection of patients on the grounds of age, sex and histology denies patients access to potentially beneficial TKI therapy.