ABSTRACT
Microbial life abounds on surfaces in both natural and industrial environments, one of which is the food industry. A solid substrate, water and some nutrients are sufficient to allow the construction of a microbial fortress, a so-called biofilm. Survival strategies developed by these surface-associated ecosystems are beginning to be deciphered in the context of rudimentary laboratory biofilms. Gelatinous organic matrices consisting of complex mixtures of self-produced biopolymers ensure the cohesion of these biological structures and contribute to their resistance and persistence. Moreover, far from being just simple three-dimensional assemblies of identical cells, biofilms are composed of heterogeneous sub-populations with distinctive behaviours that contribute to their global ecological success. In the clinical field, biofilm-associated infections (BAI) are known to trigger chronic infections that require dedicated therapies. A similar belief emerging in the food industry, where biofilm tolerance to environmental stresses, including cleaning and disinfection/sanitation, can result in the persistence of bacterial pathogens and the recurrent cross-contamination of food products. The present review focuses on the principal mechanisms involved in the formation of biofilms of food-borne pathogens, where biofilm behaviour is driven by its three-dimensional heterogeneity and by species interactions within these biostructures, and we look at some emergent control strategies.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Physiological Phenomena , Biofilms , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Food Microbiology , HumansABSTRACT
The standard test methods used to assess the efficiency of a disinfectant applied to surfaces are often based on counting the microbial survivors sampled in a liquid, but total cell removal from surfaces is seldom achieved. One might therefore wonder whether evaluations of microbial survivors in liquid-sampled cells are representative of the levels of survivors in whole populations. The present study was thus designed to determine the "damaged/undamaged" status induced by a peracetic acid disinfection for Bacillus atrophaeus spores deposited on glass coupons directly on this substrate and to compare it to the status of spores collected in liquid by a sampling procedure. The method utilized to assess the viability of both surface-associated and liquid-sampled spores included fluorescence labeling with a combination of Syto 61 and Chemchrome V6 dyes and quantifications by analyzing the images acquired by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The principal result of the study was that the viability of spores sampled in the liquid was found to be poorer than that of surface-associated spores. For example, after 2 min of peracetic acid disinfection, less than 17% ± 5% of viable cells were detected among liquid-sampled cells compared to 79% ± 5% or 47% ± 4%, respectively, when the viability was evaluated on the surface after or without the sampling procedure. Moreover, assessments of the survivors collected in the liquid phase, evaluated using the microscopic method and standard plate counts, were well correlated. Evaluations based on the determination of survivors among the liquid-sampled cells can thus overestimate the efficiency of surface disinfection procedures.
Subject(s)
Bacillus/drug effects , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Environmental Microbiology , Microbial Viability/drug effects , Spores/drug effects , Bacterial Load/methods , Fluorescent Dyes/metabolism , Glass , Peracetic Acid/pharmacology , Staining and Labeling/methodsABSTRACT
AIMS: To evaluate the impact of the mode of contamination in relation with the nature of solid substrates on the resistance of spores of Bacillus atrophaeus -selected as surrogates of Bacillus anthracis- to a disinfectant, peracetic acid. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six materials confronted in urban and military environments were selected for their different structural and physicochemical properties. In parallel, two modes of contamination were examined, i.e. deposition and immersion. Deposition was used to simulate contamination by an aerosol and immersion by an extended contact with liquids. A pronounced difference in the biocontamination levels and spatial organization of spores was observed depending on the mode of contamination and the nature of the solid substrate considered, with consequences on decontamination. Contamination by immersion led to lower efficiency of peracetic acid decontamination than contamination by deposition. Infiltration of spores into porous materials after immersion is one reason. In contrast, the deposition mode aggregates cells at the surface of materials, explaining the similar disinfecting behaviour of porous and nonporous substrates when considering this inoculation route. CONCLUSIONS: The inoculation route was shown to be as influential a parameter as material characteristics (porosity and wettability) for decontamination efficacy. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These results provide comparative information for the decontamination of B. atrophaeus spores in function of the mode of contamination and the nature of solid substrates.
Subject(s)
Bacillus anthracis/physiology , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/physiology , Equipment Contamination , Peracetic Acid/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Manufactured Materials/microbiology , Spores, Bacterial/physiologyABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the microbial disinfection efficacy of a plasmachemical solution obtained by the activation of water with gliding electric discharges. METHODS AND RESULTS: Distilled water was activated for 5 min by a nonthermal quenched plasma of the glidarc type operating in humid air and at atmospheric pressure. The plasma-activated water (PAW) was then used to treat planktonic and adherent cells of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides (as models of Gram-positive bacteria), Hafnia alvei (a Gram-negative bacteria) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (as a yeast model). The treatments were less efficient on adherent cells than on planktonic cells in the case of bacteria, but not of S. cerevisiae. Inactivation was more effective for bacteria than for the yeast. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reductions in microbial populations were achieved in all cases, demonstrating the effectiveness of this new approach to treat contaminated media. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: PAW is a promising solution with potential application to the decontamination of equipment and surfaces.
Subject(s)
Disinfection/methods , Microbial Viability , Water Microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Electricity , Hafnia alvei/growth & development , Leuconostoc/growth & development , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/growth & development , Staphylococcus epidermidis/growth & developmentABSTRACT
AIMS: To determine the efficiency of an electric discharge of the gliding arc type for the destruction of Staphylococcus epidermidis planktonic, adherent and biofilm cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bacterial cells were treated in humid air and at atmospheric pressure by a nonthermal quenched plasma of the glidarc type. The kinetics of destruction (followed by plating) were modelled by an Add-inn for Microsoft Excel, GInaFiT. For planktonic cells, log-linear destruction was obtained, whereas biphasic kinetics were observed for sessile cells. An increased resistance of biofilm cells was observed: the reduction of 6 logarithm units of the population was obtained in 15, 30 and 70 min for planktonic, adherent and biofilm cells, respectively. The experiments also show that the cells destruction did not depend on the adhesion surface but was governed by the gap between the target and the plasma source. CONCLUSION: The complete destruction of planktonic, adherent and more resistant biofilm cells of Staph. epidermidis is achieved by a glidarc air plasma at atmospheric pressure. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The glidarc plasma technology is a promising candidate among the emerging nonthermal techniques for decontamination, as it can destroy even biofilms that are known as particularly resistant to various antimicrobials.
Subject(s)
Biofilms , Plankton/physiology , Staphylococcus epidermidis/physiology , Bacterial Adhesion/physiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Culture Media , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electrodes , Humidity , Kinetics , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning/methods , Models, Biological , Plankton/ultrastructure , Staphylococcus epidermidis/ultrastructureABSTRACT
The relative distribution of the modes of hydrocarbon uptake, used by bacteria of the environment for the degradation of long-chain alkanes, has been evaluated. The first mode of uptake, direct interfacial accession, involves contact of cells with hydrocarbon droplets. In the second mode, biosurfactant-mediated transfer, cell contact takes place with hydrocarbons emulsified or solubilized by biosurfactants. Sixty-one strains growing on hexadecane were isolated from polluted and non-polluted soils and identified. The majority (61%) belonged to the Corynebacterium-Mycobacterium-Nocardia group. Criteria selected for characterizing hexadecane uptake were cell hydrophobicity, interfacial and surface tensions and production of glycolipidic extracellular biosurfactants. These properties were determined in flask cultures on an insoluble (hexadecane) and on a soluble (glycerol or succinate) carbon source for a subset of 23 representative strains. Exclusive direct interfacial uptake was utilized by 47% of studied strains. A large proportion of strains (53%) produced biosurfactants. The data on cellular hydrophobicity suggested the existence of two distinct alkane transfer mechanisms in this group. Accordingly, tentative assignments of biosurfactant-mediated micellar transfer were made for 11% of the isolated strains, and of biosurfactant-enhanced interfacial uptake for 42%.