ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a significant public health problem adversely affecting mothers, their newborns, and other members of the family. Although PPD is common and potentially dangerous, only a minority of the cases are identified in primary health care settings during routine care, and the majority of depressed mothers in the community lies unrecognized and therefore untreated. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this study, a total of 1500 mothers were approached randomly, 808 accepted to participate, and 504 were within the inclusion criteria (women who had a birth of a singleton full-term healthy infant, had an uncomplicated pregnancy, and were within their one week to six months postpartum). The participants completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. RESULTS: A total of 168 women had an EPDS score ≥10, yielding a crude prevalence rate of 33%. The prevalence of suicidal ideation was 14 out of 504 (3%), among which 11 (79%) had EPDS score of ≥10. We fitted multiple linear regression models to evaluate the predictors of variables measured on the EPDS scale. This model was statistically significant p<0.0001 in predicting the total EPDS score. Women's employment status, baby's birth weight, stressful life event and marital conflict were statistically significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study are anticipated to entail the government and policy makers in the region to pay more attention to the apparently high prevalence of unrevealed PPD in the community. It is crucial to enhance screening mechanisms for early detection, providing interventions to manage symptoms, and at the same time mandating local guidelines to address the PPD pathology as a high priority for the UAE population.
Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/ethnology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Mothers , Pregnancy , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risk Factors , United Arab EmiratesSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Literacy , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Telemedicine , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Pandemics , Role , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48684.].
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medical trainees are at the forefront of end-of-life care provision in the hospital setting but often feel unprepared to manage the complex emotions after patient death. OBJECTIVES: To systematically identify and synthesize the published literature on interventions to support medical trainees dealing with patient death. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Psych Info, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, and ERIC from inception to June 30, 2023. English language peer-reviewed publications of interventions to support medical students and residents/fellows dealing with patient death. Studies of practicing clinicians and nonphysician healthcare trainees were excluded. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus and a third reviewer served as a tiebreaker if needed. RESULTS: Of the 9107 articles retrieved, 973 underwent full-text review, and 50 studies met inclusion criteria. Most interventions targeted residents (n = 32; 64%) and were conducted in North America (n = 45, 90%). Types of interventions included preventive measures involving educational lectures and workshops (n = 19; 38%), clinical placements (n = 10; 20%), and postventions (n = 16; 32%), including debriefing and memorial services. Several interventions incorporated the arts (n = 5; 10%), including movies, drama, and artwork, and most incorporated reflective narratives (n = 16; 32%). Most interventions were limited in frequency and duration. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified several interventions to support trainees through the experience of patient death but also highlighted areas for improvement. Strengthening support for medical trainees will foster emotionally resilient physicians who are better equipped to deliver high-quality, empathetic care to dying patients and their families.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Despite modern healthcare infrastructure, there is a paucity of information about the clinical research framework supporting healthcare in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Therefore, this study aimed to assess research performance productivity, and the clinical research framework, complementing medical residency, at the nation's hub for clinical research. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective review of records from the research database of the institution was conducted to assess productivity, and framework development, and data analyzed. RESULTS: The migration of global healthcare providers, and the pharmaceutical industry offices, the adoption of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines, and electronic medical records established a research culture. Following the development of the governance framework, a total of 1,328 research projects were submitted to the ethics committee until 2023. Approximately 63% of the total studies were of minimal risk, followed by industry-sponsored clinical trials (4.9%, 58/1,163), and prospective interventional studies (3.5%, 39/1,163). Almost half (48.3%, 28/58) of the total industry-sponsored clinical trials were phase II and phase III. The number of peer-reviewed indexed publications, a measure of research productivity, indicated that the periods between 2011 and 2015, 2016 and 2020, and 2021 and 2023 witnessed a 3.8-, 9.3-, and 7.9-fold increase compared to the baseline period (1995-2005). The implementation of the Focus on International Research Strategy, Teaching, Evaluation, and Mentoring (FIRSTEM) strategy, to accommodate mandatory research activity requirements for residents by the physician licensing boards, observed substantial increases in output. The number of international peer-reviewed indexed publications/resident projects doubled from 10.8% (2010-2015) to 24% (2016-2020) and reached 40.1% in 2023. CONCLUSION: This is the first research governance model established in the UAE, a country with an increasing prevalence of diabetes, and cardiovascular and genetic diseases. The model indicates that the medical trainees differentiate the best research evidence in making decisions about the clinical care of patients. The study outcomes may potentially be useful for other countries in developing a clinical research framework.
ABSTRACT
Background and objective The negligible side effects of paracetamol along with its ease of availability have catapulted paracetamol to be a widely used medication in emergency room management to reduce pain and subsequent elevations in blood pressure (BP). Our study aimed to address the challenges in informed clinical decision-making in the emergency room following paracetamol intravenous infusion. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study involving the extraction of data from electronic medical records of patients who received intravenous paracetamol infusion between January 2022 and May 2022. Demographic information and BP-related data were collected for analysis. Results We initially considered a total of 162 patient records, with 132 of them eventually meeting the inclusion criteria. Among patients receiving paracetamol infusion for 15 minutes or less, 34% showed a drop of 1-5 mmHg in systolic BP (SBP), while 26% experienced a drop of 6-10 mmHg. However, infusion time longer than 16 minutes did not significantly reduce SBP. Diastolic BP (DBP) was not significantly affected by the duration of the paracetamol infusion. Analysis of the drop in SBP revealed no significant associations with age, gender, or ethnicity. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was not significantly affected by the duration of paracetamol infusion. Conclusion Our findings suggest that intravenous paracetamol infusion does not significantly lower BP in adults in the emergency room, except for infusions of shorter durations. However, various factors, including infusion rate, patient characteristics, and concomitant medications, may influence BP measurements. The study emphasizes the need for establishing standardized criteria and conducting further research to assess intravenous paracetamol's hemodynamic effects accurately.
ABSTRACT
Background and objective There is a dearth of studies on the knowledge and awareness among mothers on childhood development in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Maternal knowledge of childhood development is a critical determinant of children's development and behavior. In light of this, we conducted this study to determine the level of maternal knowledge about childhood development. Methodology We employed a cross-sectional study design involving 200 mothers of all ages recruited using stratified random sampling. After obtaining informed consent, the participants were required to complete a questionnaire adapted from the "Ages and Stages" questionnaire, which covered demographics and items on developmental milestones. The questionnaire was validated and checked for reliability by using a focus group. Inferential statistics were used, and the association between the variables was analyzed using the Chi-squared test. Results Our findings indicated that the knowledge among mothers regarding child development is relatively low in the UAE. Two-thirds of the respondents were knowledgeable about gross motor skills (62% of the mothers knew the age at which a child could lift his/her head). Less than half of the mothers were well-informed about fine motor skills such as writing and drawing (44% of the mothers were aware of the age at which a child should be able to scribble on paper). The respondents demonstrated a lack of knowledge regarding children's speech and language skills. Regarding social skills, only 8% of the mothers were aware of the correct age at which a child should start to dress by himself/herself. Conclusion Although mothers in the UAE were knowledgeable about certain aspects of childhood development such as gross motor development, they were less knowledgeable regarding other aspects such as social and language skills. The gaps identified in our study highlight the need to implement effective health education programs so that mothers are better informed to help improve child development outcomes in the community.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Delays in hospital discharge occur when patients are medically cleared but continue to remain hospitalized. Discharge delays can result in reduced levels of treatment, placing patients at risk of functional decline, falls and hospital-related adverse events. The Institute of Medicine has highlighted timely, efficient, and safe hospital discharge as a marker for quality care. Hospitals, however, are often unable to meet discharge targets. Research has shown improvements in discharge planning through system-level approaches that integrate health care and social work. The purpose of this study is to describe the development and implementation of a multidisciplinary team intervention to overcome discharge barriers for patients with prolonged hospitalization. We also evaluated the impact of the intervention on length of stay, readmission rates and care team satisfaction and morale. METHODS: A multidisciplinary discharge coordination team met weekly to proactively raise and resolve patient-related discharge issues for all patients admitted to the general medicine wards. Members included hospitalists, case managers, social workers, hospital finance representatives, and patient representatives. One of the hospital physicians facilitated the meetings. RESULTS: Barriers to discharge included patient and family reluctance to discharge, medical delays in performing diagnostic tests or procedures, long-term care facility acceptance delays, and prolonged wait times for insurance approvals. Our multipronged approach decreased length of stay in our delayed discharge patient population from 15.45 days to 9.04 days, a 41.5% reduction, without an increase in readmissions. The healthcare team perceived the weekly multidisciplinary team meetings quite positively; 90% of respondents agreed that the meetings improved communication and increased their sense of support. CONCLUSION: Our intervention was successful in improving hospital processes to overcome barriers to patient discharge. We believe that similar multidisciplinary meetings can be implemented in hospitals throughout the region to decrease risks of prolonged hospitalization and, ultimately, improve hospital efficiency and care delivery.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To explore resident perceptions of factors contributing to pass rates on a high-stake licensing objective structured clinical exam (OSCE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to all 51 applicants of the April 2019 internal medicine Arab Board OSCE examination in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE), and included questions on preparedness, stress level, and prior educational experiences. Exposures were evaluated for correlation against Arab Board pass rates using Pearson correlation and the two-tailed significance was recorded. RESULTS: All 51 examinees completed the survey (100% response rate). Participants were primarily female n = 35 (67%) and all completed residency training in the UAE. Gender differences were noted, with higher pass rates for the male residents (13/35, 37% females vs. 8/16, 50% males, P < 0.05). Further, 65% (P < 0.001) of female examinees reported higher levels of anxiety than male residents. Examinees reported regular exposure during residency to clinical skills training (74%), standardized patients (71%), simulation (66%), and OSCEs (72%) but none of these educational modalities correlated with higher pass rates. Of multiple exam preparation modalities, only self-directed learning with deliberate practice, the intentional repetition of a task with feedback, was associated with higher pass rates. CONCLUSION: Clinical exam skills are vital for trainees to deliver high-quality primary healthcare services. National licensure OSCEs have become the norm in the Arab world for assessing resident clinical exam skills. Our results suggest that residency programs should encourage residents' intentional deliberate practice and mastery learning in the acquisition and retention of physical examination techniques.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic has caused fear and panic worldwide, forcing healthcare systems to disregard conventional practices and adopt innovation to contain the infection and death. Globally, there has been a rapid proliferation of research studies and clinical trials assessing risks, infectivity and treatment. METHODS: This review assesses the opportunities and challenges in the Middle East North Africa (MENA) region to engage in the conduct of high quality clinical trials during the Covid-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Opportunities are abundant for conducting clinical trials in MENA countries, including substantial cost savings, academic health centers, integrated health information systems, international accreditation, and international collaborations. Yet, the MENA region has missed out on opportunities to advance patient research during prior infectious disease outbreaks caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Ebola, and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, as evidenced by the lack of concerted research and clinical trials from the region. A large vulnerable population, especially the poor expatriate work force, the current isolation of the health centers, and the lack of an expert network or field trained task force, all contribute to challenges preventing the formation of a pan Arab research enterprise for epidemics. CONCLUSION: Quality clinical research is critical during public health emergencies to identify treatments and solutions. The efficient conduct of clinical trials requires innovative strategies in research design, approval, and dissemination. Many countries in the MENA region have an opportunity to quickly ramp up research capacity and contribute significantly to the fight against the Covid-19 global threat.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Academic Medical Centers , Africa, Northern , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Cost Savings , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola , Humans , Informed Consent , International Cooperation , Middle East , Research Personnel , SARS-CoV-2 , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Vulnerable PopulationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Moral competencies and ethical practices of medical professionals are among the desired outcomes of academic training. Unfortunately, academic dishonesty and misconduct are reported from medical colleges across the world. This study investigates the level of academic dishonesty/misconduct among multicultural medical students. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the level of academic dishonesty/misconduct among multicultural medical students. DESIGN: Validated and customized version of Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory-1 detailing lapses of professionalism in undergraduate health professions education was used to determine the perceived prevalence and self-reported lapses of academic integrity in this study. RESULTS: This study shows that the majority (458/554, 83%) of medical students have admitted to acts of academic dishonesty mentioned in the questionnaire. Approximately 42% (231/554) of the students have given proxy for attendance and 71% of them considered this as an offense. Similarly, 12% (66/554) have copied from the record books of others, and 86% (477/554) have considered it unethical. In addition, 5% (28/554) of the students revealed forging a teacher's signature in their record or logbooks, with 16% (91/554) of them reporting that they have seen others forge signatures. CONCLUSION: This is the first multi-center, multi-cultural and multi-ethnic study involving a large number of participants that addresses academic professionalism among medical students in the Middle East. Certainly, the paucity of data limits definitive conclusions about the best approach to prevent academic misconduct in the UAE medical schools. Yet, the results of our study are anticipated not only to benefit the UAE but also to find application in the Arab world, with similar medical school programs, values, culture and tradition.
Subject(s)
Cultural Diversity , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/statistics & numerical data , Ethics, Medical , Professional Misconduct/statistics & numerical data , Professionalism/standards , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/ethics , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Professional Misconduct/ethics , Professionalism/ethics , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Arab Emirates/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Global data indicate that cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. Important factors that affect interventions for early diagnosis of cervical cancer include social beliefs and values and poor knowledge. These may contribute to women's participation in screening for cervical cancer and have a significant impact on decisions to take preventive action. The present study was conducted with 599 women in the UAE between September 2016 and March 2017. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine knowledge about cervical cancer and screening, demographic characteristics and perceived barriers. Knowledge about the Pap smear test was limited, and awareness that they should undergo the Pap smear test every three years even with an initial negative/normal Pap smear result was abysmal. In spite of the positive attitude of the women towards the Pap smear test, almost 80% of the women surveyed had no knowledge of precancerous lesions. Having higher income (21/29, 72%, p=0.027) and more miscarriages were associated with better practice of Pap smears (19/26, 73%, p=0.010). Knowledge levels were significantly higher (66.3±22.2,) that values for attitude (60.5±20.9, p= 0.03, 95% CI {0.22-11.3}, Chi-square 4.38) and practice (53.7 24.1, p= 0.001, 95% CI {6.9-18.1}, Chi-square 19.7). A well-designed health education programme on cervical cancer and benefits of screening should increase the awareness among women in UAE. One point to stress is that better communication with health professionals and improvement of access to health care services should increase the rate of cervical cancer screening.
Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Papanicolaou Test/psychology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaginal Smears/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/psychology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the perceptions of medical students in a developing medical education system towards international accreditation. METHODS: Applicants to an Internal Medicine residency program in an academic medical center in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-International (ACGME-I) were surveyed between May and June 2014. The authors analysed responses using inductive qualitative thematic analysis to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 96 applicants (81%) completed the survey. The vast majority of respondents 74 (95%) reported that ACGME-I accreditation was an important factor in selecting a residency program. Five major themes were identified, namely improving the quality of education, increasing opportunities, meeting high international standards, improving program structure, and improving patient care. Seven (10%) of respondents felt they would be in a position to pursue fellowship training or future employment in the United States upon graduation from an ACGME-I program. CONCLUSIONS: UAE trainees have an overwhelmingly positive perception of international accreditation, with an emphasis on improving the quality of training provided. Misperceptions, however, exist about potential opportunities available to graduates of ACGME-I programs. As more countries adopt the standards of the ACGME-I or other international accrediting bodies, it is important to recognize and foster trainee "buy-in" of educational reform initiatives.
Subject(s)
Accreditation , Attitude , Education, Medical, Graduate , Internationality , Internship and Residency , Students, Medical/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , United Arab EmiratesSubject(s)
Clinical Competence , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Physical Examination/methods , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence/standards , Educational Measurement , Faculty, Medical/education , Faculty, Medical/psychology , Faculty, Medical/standards , Humans , Internship and Residency/methods , Internship and Residency/standards , Physical Examination/standards , Pilot Projects , Program Evaluation , Students, Medical/psychology , United Arab EmiratesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) blood glucose measurement using glucose meters is used by diabetes patients to mange their disease. POC glucose testing also is also used in tight glycemic control protocols and as a screening tool for diabetes. We report the performance and effectiveness of the Accu-Chek® Active (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) glucose meter to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using blood fasting capillary glucose (FCG). METHODS: To screen for GDM, 1,465 pregnant women underwent an oral glucose glucose tolerance test. Correlation between the FCG and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels was determined by Passing and Bablok regression analysis. Total error (TE) of the glucometer was ascertained using the Bland-Altman method with the DXC-800 analyzer (Beckman-Coulter Instruments, Brea, CA) as the reference method. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was used to analyze the performance of the FCG to predict GDM. RESULTS: FPG and FCG identified 361 (24.6%) and 338 (23%) women as having GDM, respectively. The Bland-Altman TE at 95% limits of agreement was -11.1% to 10.8%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.953 (95% confidence interval 0.943 to 0.964). CONCLUSIONS: The Roche Accu-Chek Active glucometer meets analytical and clinical quality requirements. A TE of±15% is acceptable for glucose meters used in ambulatory care, including home self-monitoring of blood glucose, and different TE targets should be set for acute critical care settings.