Atezolizumab for Advanced Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare soft-tissue sarcoma with a poor prognosis and no established therapy. Recently, encouraging responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported. METHODS: We conducted an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-group, phase 2 study of the anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) agent atezolizumab in adult and pediatric patients with advanced ASPS. Atezolizumab was administered intravenously at a dose of 1200 mg (in patients ≥18 years of age) or 15 mg per kilogram of body weight with a 1200-mg cap (in patients <18 years of age) once every 21 days. Study end points included objective response, duration of response, and progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, as well as pharmacodynamic biomarkers of multistep drug action. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were evaluated. An objective response was observed in 19 of 52 patients (37%), with 1 complete response and 18 partial responses. The median time to response was 3.6 months (range, 2.1 to 19.1), the median duration of response was 24.7 months (range, 4.1 to 55.8), and the median progression-free survival was 20.8 months. Seven patients took a treatment break after 2 years of treatment, and their responses were maintained through the data-cutoff date. No treatment-related grade 4 or 5 adverse events were recorded. Responses were noted despite variable baseline expression of programmed death 1 and PD-L1. CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab was effective at inducing sustained responses in approximately one third of patients with advanced ASPS. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141684.).

Tocilizumab for the management of immune mediated adverse events secondary to PD-1 blockade.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are poised to revolutionize the management of a growing number of malignancies. Unfortunately, the management of steroid-refractory immune mediated adverse events is based on a paucity of randomized data and limited to single center experiences. Our initial experience with the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab showed clinical improvement in a wide variety of irAEs. As a result, we adopted the use of tocilizumab for the management of steroid refractory irAEs. METHODS: The character and clinical course of irAEs were abstracted from the medical record and analyzed. The dose of tocilizumab was 4 mg/kg given IV over one hour. C-reactive protein was drawn at first nivolumab infusion and at q two weeks (and with irAEs) thereafter. Clinical improvement was defined as either: documentation of resolution of symptoms or hospital discharge within seven days. RESULTS: Of the initial 87 patients that were treated with nivolumab, 34 required tocilizumab (39.1%). All patients were on corticosteroids. The majority (88.2%) were lung cancer patients. The index grade 3/4 irAE was pneumonitis in 35.3%, serum sickness/SIRS in 35.3%, cerebritis in 14.7% and one case each of hypophysitis, colitis, pancreatitis, hepatitis and immune mediated coagulopathy. Median time between first nivolumab and initiation of tocilizumab was 76 days (range 1-429). There was a statistically significant increase in C-reactive protein from a median of 23 mg/L (range 0.1-238.5) at baseline to 109.3 mg/L (21.5-350.4) at the time of index irAE, followed by a decrease to 19.2 mg/L (0.25-149) after tocilizumab ( p < 0.00001). Clinical improvement was noted in 27/34 patients (79.4%). Some patients (52.9%) required a single dose, while 38.2% required two, 8.8% required three and 1 patient required four doses. Twenty-seven doses were given in the inpatient setting (49.1%). Median time to discharge was four days (range 1-27). Seventy-four percent of patients were discharged home. For the 53 doses of tocilizumab that were delivered when infliximab was an option, there was a cost savings of $141,048.72 (WAC) during the 18 month study period. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab may be a therapeutic option for the management of steroid refractory irAEs secondary to immune checkpoint blockade. However, randomized trials are needed to better elucidate the relative efficacy and safety of these agents.

Tenascin-C in the early lung cancer tumor microenvironment promotes progression through integrin αvß1 and FAK.

Pre-cancerous lung lesions are commonly initiated by activating mutations in the RAS pathway, but do not transition to lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) without additional oncogenic signals. Here, we show that expression of the extracellular matrix protein Tenascin-C (TNC) is increased in and promotes the earliest stages of LUAD development in oncogenic KRAS-driven lung cancer mouse models and in human LUAD. TNC is initially expressed by fibroblasts and its expression extends to tumor cells as the tumor becomes invasive. Genetic deletion of TNC in the mouse models reduces early tumor burden and high-grade pathology and diminishes tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity. TNC stimulates cultured LUAD tumor cell proliferation and migration through engagement of αv-containing integrins and subsequent FAK activation. Intringuingly, lung injury causes sustained TNC accumulation in mouse lungs, suggesting injury can induce additional TNC signaling for early tumor cell transition to invasive LUAD. Biospecimens from patients with stage I/II LUAD show TNC in regions of FAK activation and an association of TNC with tumor recurrence after primary tumor resection. These results suggest that exogenous insults that elevate TNC in the lung parenchyma interact with tumor-initiating mutations to drive early LUAD progression and local recurrence.

Cardiac toxicity in patients with lung cancer receiving thoracic radiotherapy and immunotherapy.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat locally-advanced and metastatic lung cancer, which can lead to severe immunogenic-related cardiotoxicities. We assessed the risk of cardiotoxicity in ICI-treated lung cancer patients with or without cardiac radiation from thoracic radiotherapy. Methods: Retrospective data was collected on Stage III-IV lung cancer patients who received ICIs between 2015 and 2018. All cardiotoxicities associated with ICI were assessed in correlation with the timing of radiotherapy (RT) in relation to ICI, and the mean RT heart dose. The rate of cardiac events in relation to RT timing and heart dose was compared using multiple logistic regression including the Framingham risk score and steroid use prior to ICI therapy. Results: Of 194 ICI-treated patients evaluated, 55.2% (n=107/194) patients had received thoracic RT at a median dose of 60.4 Gy (range, 15-75). Cardiotoxicities such as non-ST elevated myocardial infarction and new onset supraventricular tachycardias were observed in 13 (12.2%) of those who had thoracic RT versus 9 (10.3%) who did not (p=0.87). 38 patients who received RT concurrently with ICI did not develop any cardiotoxicity whereas 14.1% (n=22/156) of those who did not receive concurrent RT developed cardiotoxicities (univariate, p=0.030; multivariate, p=0.055). There were no significant differences in the mean heart RT dose, Framingham risk score, and steroid treatment between patients that received concurrent RT with ICI versus non-concurrent RT/ICI. Conclusion: ICI-related cardiotoxicities were not significantly associated with patients who received concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in this retrospective review. Further validation of prospective studies is needed to confirm these results.

Treatment-related toxicity and improved outcome from immunotherapy in hepatocellular cancer: Evidence from an FDA pooled analysis of landmark clinical trials with validation from routine practice.

PURPOSE: The development of treatment-related adverse events (trAE) correlates favorably with clinical outcomes in multiple studies of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI); however, this relationship is undefined in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We derived a cohort of 406 patients with unresectable/advanced HCC receiving ICI therapy as part of international clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in support of marketing applications. We tested whether the development of clinically significant trAE (i.e. graded ≥2, trAE2) predicted improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rates (ORR) following ICI. We established an international consortium of 10 tertiary-care referral centres located in Europe (n = 67), United States (US, n = 248) and Asia (n = 42) to validate this association. RESULTS: In the FDA dataset of 406 patients, 325 (80%) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C HCC mostly treated with ICI monotherapy (n = 258, 64%), trAE2 were reported in 228 patients (56.1%). Development of trAE2 was associated with longer OS (16.7 versus 11.2 months) and PFS (5.5 versus 2.2 months) and persisted as an independent predictor of outcome after adjusting for viral aetiology, gender, Child-Pugh class, BCLC stage, AFP levels, ECOG-PS, ICI regimen (mono/combination therapy) and receipt of corticosteroid therapy. In a multi-institutional cohort of 357 patients with similar characteristics mostly treated with ICI monotherapy (n = 304, 85%), the development of trAE2 was associated with longer OS (23.3 versus 12.1 months) and PFS (9.6 versus 3.9 months). TrAE2 were confirmed predictors of improved OS (HR 0.43; 95% CI:0.25-0.75) and PFS (HR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31-0.75), with multivariable analyses confirming their association with outcome independent of clinicopathologic features of interest. Additional time-varying multivariable analyses also indicated that trAEs were associated with a decreased risk of progression (HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46-0.67) in the FDA dataset and death (HR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32-0.95) in the multi-institutional dataset. CONCLUSION: Development of trAE2 correlates with improved outcomes in patients with HCC receiving ICI in clinical trials and in routine practice. Prospective studies aimed at understanding the underlying immunologic foundations of such relationships are warranted to identify predictive biomarkers of toxicity and response.

Characterization of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Cardiotoxicity in Lung Cancer Patients From a Rural Setting.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related cardiotoxicity (iRC) is uncommon but can be fatal. There have been few reports of iRC from a rural cancer population and few data for iRC and inflammatory biomarkers. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in ICI-treated lung cancer patients based in a rural setting and to assess the utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the diagnosis of iRC. METHODS: Patients with lung cancer treated with ICIs at Vidant Medical Center/East Carolina University (VMC/ECU) between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. MACE included myocarditis, non-ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), and pericardial disorders. Medical history, laboratory values, pre-ICI electrocardiography (ECG), and echocardiography results were compared in patients with and without MACE. RESULTS: Among 196 ICI-treated patients, 23 patients (11%) developed MACE at a median of 46 days from the first ICI infusion (interquartile range [IQR]: 17 to 83 days). Patients who developed MACE experienced myocarditis (n = 9), NSTEMI (n = 3), SVT (n = 7), and pericardial disorders (n = 4). Ejection fraction was not significantly different at the time of MACE compared to that at baseline (p = 0.495). Compared to baseline values, NLR (10.9 ± 8.3 vs. 20.7 ± 4.2, respectively; p = 0.032) and CRP (42.1 ± 10.1 mg/l vs. 109.9 ± 15.6 mg/l, respectively; p = 0.010) were significantly elevated at the time of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: NLR and CRP were significantly elevated at the time of MACE compared to baseline values in ICI-treated patients. Larger datasets are needed to validate these findings and identify predictors of MACE that can be used in the diagnosis and management of ICI-related iRC.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Preexisting Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

PURPOSE: The risk of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy-related GI adverse events in patients with cancer and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been well described. We characterized GI adverse events in patients with underlying IBD who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with documented IBD who received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy between January 2010 and February 2019. Backward selection and multivariate logistic regression were conducted to assess risk of GI adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 102 included patients, 17 received therapy targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, and 85 received monotherapy targeting programmed cell death 1 or its ligand. Half of the patients had Crohn's disease, and half had ulcerative colitis. The median time from last active IBD episode to immunotherapy initiation was 5 years (interquartile range, 3-12 years). Forty-three patients were not receiving treatment of IBD. GI adverse events occurred in 42 patients (41%) after a median of 62 days (interquartile range, 33-123 days), a rate higher than that among similar patients without underlying IBD who were treated at centers participating in the study (11%; P < .001). GI events among patients with IBD included grade 3 or 4 diarrhea in 21 patients (21%). Four patients experienced colonic perforation, 2 of whom required surgery. No GI adverse event-related deaths were recorded. Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 therapy was associated with increased risk of GI adverse events on univariable but not multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.8 to 9.48; P = .037; and odds ratio, 4.72; 95% CI, 0.95 to 23.53; P = .058, respectively). CONCLUSION: Preexisting IBD increases the risk of severe GI adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Epigenetics: A primer for clinicians.

With recent advances in cellular biology, we now appreciate that modifications to DNA and histones can have a profound impact on transcription and function, even in the absence of changes to DNA sequence. These modifications, now commonly referred to as "epigenetic" alterations, have changed how we understand cell behavior, reprogramming and differentiation and have provided significant insight into the mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis. Epigenetic alterations, to this point, are largely identified by changes in DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation as well as methylation, acetylation, and phosphorylation of histone tails. These modifications enable significant flexibility in gene expression, rather than just turning genes "ON" or "OFF." Herein we describe the epigenetic landscape in the regulation of gene expression with a particular focus on interrogating DNA methylation in myeloid malignancy.