Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(12): 2395-403, 2004 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15197201

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify baseline prognostic factors and assess whether pretreatment quality of life (QoL) predicts survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophago-gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 2001, 1,080 patients were enrolled into three randomized, controlled trials assessing fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy. All patients were required to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core QoL questionnaire before random assignment. RESULTS: Of the 1080 patients randomly assigned, 979 (91%) died. Four independent poor prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis: performance status >or= 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; 99% CI, 1.25 to 1.98), liver metastases (HR, 1.41; 99%CI, 1.14 to 1.74), peritoneal metastases (HR, 1.33; 99%CI, 1.01 to 1.74) and alkaline phosphatase >or= 100 U/L (HR, 1.41; 99% CI, 1.14 to 1.76). A prognostic index was constructed dividing patients into good (no risk factor), moderate (one or two risk factors) or poor (three or four risk factors) risk groups. One-year survival for good, moderate, and poor risk groups were 48.5%, 25.7%, and 11%, respectively, and the survival differences among these groups were highly significant (P <.00001). Compared with the good risk group, the moderate risk group had nearly twice the risk of death, and the poor risk group had 3.5-fold increased risk of death. Pretreatment physical (P =.003), role functioning (P <.001), and global QoL (P <.001) predicted survival. CONCLUSION: Four poor prognostic factors were identified and a simple prognostic index was devised. Information from this analysis can be used to aid clinical decision-making, help individual patient risk stratification, and serve as benchmark for the planning for future phase III trials.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prognosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate
2.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 3(2): 102-7, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12952566

ABSTRACT

The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) rechallenge on subsequent response and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Between April 1992 and August 1998, 613 patients were enrolled into 3 consecutive prospective randomized controlled trials assessing first-line infused 5-FU in patients with advanced CRC. All patients had a planned maximum treatment period of 6 months. Those with responding or stable disease at the end of 6 months were observed off treatment. On subsequent disease progression, patients were retreated with 5-FU alone (5-FU group) or 5-FU plus mitomycin C (MMC group). Ninety-three patients have been retreated (5-FU group, n = 71; MMC group, n = 22). The median age was 60 years (range, 38-79 years), and the median time to rechallenge was 11.7 months (5-FU group, 11.7 months; MMC group, 11.4 months). Seventeen percent of patients had an objective response to rechallenge (5-FU group, 13%; MMC group, 27%). The median survival was 14.8 months (5-FU group, 15.2 months; MMC group, 10.5 months; log-rank test, P = 0.23) and the median failure-free survival was 5.4 months (5-FU group, 5.6 months; MMC group, 3.7 months; log-rank test, P = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, a prolonged treatment-free interval of > 12 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94; P = 0.027) and good performance status of 0/1 (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.22-0.68; P = 0.001) were associated with better overall survival. In conclusion, a proportion of patients who experienced a prolonged period of tumor control with first-line infused 5-FU therapy and had a planned treatment interruption, retained 5-FU sensitivity and had prolonged survival with 5-FU rechallenge.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitomycin/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 3(4): 235-42, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15025796

ABSTRACT

The combination of protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C has previously been shown to be superior to PVI 5-FU alone in terms of response rate and failure-free survival. This study explores the effect of dose intensification by circadian timing of 5-FU in this combination on response, toxicity, and survival. Patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were randomized to receive PVI 5-FU 300 mg/m2 daily or circadian-timed infusion (CTI) of 5-FU, beginning at 600 mg/m2 and subsequently reduced to 450 mg/m2, delivered as a flat-rate infusion from 10:15 PM to 9:45 AM. Both groups received mitomycin-C at a dose of 7 mg/m2 given every 6 weeks. From April 1996 to August 1998, 320 patients were randomized, including 263 with metastatic disease and 21 with circumferential margin involvement. The overall response rate for the PVI 5-FU group was 38%, compared with 30.3% for the CTI group (P = 0.176). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of failure-free survival (8.0 months vs. 9.9 months; P = 0.131) or overall survival (15.8 months vs. 16.3 months; P = 0.275) between the treatment groups. There were no differences in global quality of life. Grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred significantly more frequently with CTI 5-FU (6.5% vs. 19.8%; P < 0.001); a nonsignificant trend toward increased incidences of grade 3/4 infection and palmar plantar erythema were observed with CTI 5-FU. This study confirms the high response rate and overall survival figures for the combination of PVI 5-FU and mitomycin-C in colorectal cancer. However, dose intensification of 5-FU using a circadian-timed, flat-rate infusion did not lead to improved response or survival.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Mitomycin/administration & dosage , Circadian Rhythm , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
4.
Cancer ; 116(10): 2322-31, 2010 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20225230

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Testicular cancer is curable in the majority of men, and persisting treatment toxicity is a concern. The authors report a cross-sectional study of the long-term effects of chemotherapy (C) on neurologic function and development of Raynaud phenomenon. METHODS: Seven hundred thirty-nine patients who were treated between 1982 and 1992 gave consent to enter the study. Patients were classified according to the receipt of C (n = 384) or no C (n = 355). Patients completed a general health questionnaire and a quality-of-life form (the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life C30 questionnaire with testicular module). Symptom scores of 3 or 4 were considered clinically significant. Patients were assessed in the clinic, and clinical history was used to diagnose Raynaud phenomenon (RP) and tinnitus. Examinations included peripheral nerve function testing for light touch and vibration sense. Five hundred seventy-seven patients underwent audiometry. RESULTS: On physician assessment, peripheral neuropathy and RP were more common after C (21.7% vs 9.1% [P<.001] and 20.3% vs 1.7% [P<.001], respectively). Similar results were obtained for symptom scores (12.5% vs 5.5% [P = .002] and 9.7% vs 3.7% [P<.001], respectively). On multivariate analysis, for peripheral neuropathy, the significant predictors were cisplatin dose, carboplatin dose, and age. For RP, the significant predictor was bleomycin. Significant differences in hearing thresholds were noted at 8000 hertz only and, on multivariate analysis, were related to age, cisplatin dose, and vincristine dose. Auditory symptom scores did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: With long-term follow-up, peripheral neuropathy and RP remained detectable in approximately 20% of patients and caused significant symptoms in 10% of patients. Detectable effects on high frequency remained but caused little symptomatic problem. These effects persisted and were related to the cumulative chemotherapy dose.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Raynaud Disease/chemically induced , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Hearing Loss/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Microcirculation/drug effects , Middle Aged , Time , Tinnitus/chemically induced
5.
J Clin Oncol ; 27(13): 2144-50, 2009 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19307514

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify predictive factors of adherence to medical advice, specifically the likelihood of attendance to a recommended follow-up regimen in patients with newly diagnosed testicular cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS; This was a prospective study measuring initially not only aspects of the doctor-patient interview, but also a range of demographic, psychological, social, and medical factors, and then recording attendance behavior on follow-up. All 209 new patients with testicular cancer referred between June 1992 and May 1995 were approached, and 184 men consented and completed questionnaires. The nonadherence end point (nonattender) was two failures to attend an outpatient appointment at least 1 month apart, despite a written reminder. RESULTS: Thirty-two participants (17%) were classified as nonattenders. No significant differences were found between attenders and nonattenders in the majority of psychosocial and medical variables that might have predicted nonadherence to medical advice. There was a highly significant association between nonattendance and a patient's perception of an unsatisfactory affective relationship with his clinician (P = .005; hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.6). CONCLUSION: Patients who perceived an unsatisfactory affective relationship with their clinician that included an inability to trust the clinician and a perception that they were not being treated as "a person" were subsequently more likely to disregard medical advice regarding follow-up. Attention to the ways young men may wish to communicate with their clinicians is important, bearing in mind that they may not necessarily adhere to stereotypical images of masculine self-dependence.


Subject(s)
Patient Compliance , Physician-Patient Relations , Testicular Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Affect , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Testicular Neoplasms/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL