Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Am J Transplant ; 23(4): 512-519, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36732087

ABSTRACT

ABO compatibility is important for kidney transplantation, with longer waitlist times for blood group B kidney transplant candidates. However, kidneys from non-A1 (eg, A2) subtype donors, which express less A antigen, can be safely transplanted into group B recipients. ABO subtyping is routinely performed using anti-A1 lectin, but DNA-based genotyping is also possible. Here, we compare lectin and genotyping testing. Lectin and genotype subtyping was performed on 554 group A deceased donor samples at 2 transplant laboratories. The findings were supported by 2 additional data sets of 210 group A living kidney donors and 124 samples with unclear lectin testing sent to a reference laboratory. In deceased donors, genotyping found 65% more A2 donors than lectin testing, most with weak lectin reactivity, a finding supported in living donors and samples sent for reference testing. DNA sequencing and flow cytometry showed that the discordances were because of several factors, including transfusion, small variability in A antigen levels, and rare ABO∗A2.06 and ABO∗A2.16 sequences. Although lectin testing is the current standard for transplantation subtyping, genotyping is accurate and could increase A2 kidney transplant opportunities for group B candidates, a difference that should reduce group B wait times and improve transplant equity.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Genotype , Blood Group Incompatibility , Tissue Donors , Living Donors , ABO Blood-Group System/genetics , Isoantibodies
2.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 151(5): 494-503, 2019 04 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30715093

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Flow cytometry immunophenotyping is limited by poor resolution of T-cell clones. A newly described antibody was recently used to distinguish normal peripheral blood T cells from malignant T-cell clones. Here, we evaluate this antibody as a new diagnostic tool for detecting T-cell clonality in mature peripheral T-cell lymphomas. METHODS: Immunostaining for the T-cell receptor ß chain constant region 1 (TRBC1) along with routine T-cell markers was performed on 51 peripheral blood and two bone marrow samples submitted to the flow cytometry laboratory for suspected T-cell malignancy. RESULTS: TRBC immunophenotyping identified malignant T-cell clones with 97% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Findings correlated with molecular T-cell clonality testing. In cases with equivocal molecular results, TRBC1 immunophenotyping provided additional diagnostic information. CONCLUSIONS: TRBC1 flow cytometric immunophenotyping is a robust and inexpensive method for identifying T-cell clonality that could easily be incorporated into routine flow cytometric practice.


Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry/methods , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral/diagnosis , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta/analysis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Immunophenotyping , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta/analysis , Reference Values
3.
Genetics ; 177(1): 31-46, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17890361

ABSTRACT

Homolog pairing refers to the alignment and physical apposition of homologous chromosomal segments. Although commonly observed during meiosis, homolog pairing also occurs in nonmeiotic cells of several organisms, including humans and Drosophila. The mechanism underlying nonmeiotic pairing, however, remains largely unknown. Here, we explore the use of established Drosophila cell lines for the analysis of pairing in somatic cells. Using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), we assayed pairing at nine regions scattered throughout the genome of Kc167 cells, observing high levels of homolog pairing at all six euchromatic regions assayed and variably lower levels in regions in or near centromeric heterochromatin. We have also observed extensive pairing in six additional cell lines representing different tissues of origin, different ploidies, and two different species, demonstrating homolog pairing in cell culture to be impervious to cell type or culture history. Furthermore, by sorting Kc167 cells into G1, S, and G2 subpopulations, we show that even progression through these stages of the cell cycle does not significantly change pairing levels. Finally, our data indicate that disrupting Drosophila topoisomerase II (Top2) gene function with RNAi and chemical inhibitors perturbs homolog pairing, suggesting Top2 to be a gene important for pairing.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Pairing , Chromosomes, Fungal/genetics , DNA Topoisomerases, Type II/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Animals , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Cycle , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Heterochromatin , Recombination, Genetic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL