Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 79
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 44(4): 103827, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36933332

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant recipients are recognized to carry a high burden of malignancy and frequently this cancer develops in the head and neck region. Furthermore, cancer of the head and neck post-transplant carries a significantly increased mortality. In this study, we aim to conduct a national retrospective cohort study to investigate the impact of head and neck cancer in terms of frequency and mortality in a large group of solid organ transplant recipients over a 20 year time span and compare the mortality in transplant patients to non-transplant patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Patients in the Republic of Ireland who underwent solid organ transplantation between 1994 and 2014 who developed post-transplant head and neck malignancy were identified from the records of two prospective, national databases (National Cancer Registry of Ireland (NCRI) and The Irish Transplant Cancer Group database) working in conjunction with each other. Incidence of head and neck malignancy post-transplant was compared with the general population by means of standardised incidence ratios (SIR). Cumulative incidence of all cause and cancer related mortality from head and neck keratinocytic was undertaken by a competing risks analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3346 solid organ transplant recipients were identified, 2382 (71.2 %) kidney, 562 (16.8 %) liver, 214 (6.4 %) cardiac and 188 (5.6 %) lung. During the period of follow up of 428 patients developed head and neck cancer, representing (12.8 %) of the population. 97 % of these patients developed keratinocytic cancers, specifically, of head and neck. The frequency of post-transplant head and neck cancer was related to the duration of immunosuppression with 14 % of patients developing cancer at 10 years and 20 % having developed at least one cancer by 15 years. 12 (3 %) patients developed non-cutaneous head and neck malignancy. 10 (0.3 %) patients died due to head and neck keratinocytic malignancy post-transplant. Competing risk analysis demonstrated that organ transplantation conferred a strong independent effect of death, compared to non-transplant patients with head and neck keratinocytes. This applied specifically for kidney (HR 4.4, 95 % CI 2.5-7.8) and heart transplants (HR 6.5, 95 % CI 2.1-19.9), and overall, across the four transplant categories (P < 0.001). The SIR of developing keratinocyte cancer varied based on primary tumor site, gender, and type of transplant organ. CONCLUSION: Transplant patients demonstrate a particularly high rate of head and neck keratinocyte cancer with a very high rate of associated mortality. Physicians should be cognizant of the increased rate of malignancy in this population and monitor for red flag signs/symptoms.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Ireland/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Incidence , Risk Factors
2.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 43(7): e519-e524, 2023 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37193646

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is frequently associated with complex spine and chest wall deformities that may lead to severe cardiopulmonary impairment and malnutrition. The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in the nutritional status of EOS patients after treatment with magnetically controlled growing rod instrumentation (MCGR) in a single center. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of patients treated with MCGR for EOS in a single center. Exclusion criteria were <2 years' follow-up and incomplete weight-for-age Z-scores (WAZ) data. Preoperative and postoperative WAZ, radiographic parameters, including major coronal curve, kyphosis angle, space available for lung ratios, thoracic height, and unplanned returns to the operating room (UPROR), were analyzed. SD and 95% Confidence intervals (CI) are presented with means. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (37 males/31 females) were included. The mean age at surgery was 8.2 years (SD 2.8, range 1.8-14.2), and the mean follow-up time was 3.8 years (SD 1.0, range 2.1-6.8). The study population was categorized by the primary diagnosis as follows: 23 neuromuscular, 18 idiopathic, 15 congenital, and 12 syndromic patients. The major coronal curve improved between the preoperative and latest visits by 40% ( P <0.005, SD 27, CI 33-47), while the space available for lung ratios improved by 8% ( P <0.005, SD 13, CI 5-12). Thoracic height increased by 25% ( P <0.005, SD 13, CI 22-28), and kyphosis angle decreased by 25% ( P <0.005, SD 26, CI 9-39). Eighteen patients (27%) required a total of 53 UPRORs. WAZ improved significantly between the preoperative and the latest follow-up ( P =0.005). Regression analysis showed WAZ improvements were most significant in the underweight patients and the Idiopathic or Syndromic EOS patients. UPROR was not associated with deterioration in WAZ. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of EOS patients with MCGR resulted in an improvement in nutritional status, as evidenced by the significant increase in WAZ. Underweight, Idiopathic and Syndromic EOS patients, and those who required UPROR all had significant improvement in their WAZ with MCGR treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Study-Level II.


Subject(s)
Kyphosis , Scoliosis , Male , Female , Humans , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Scoliosis/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Thinness , Treatment Outcome , Kyphosis/surgery , Weight Gain , Retrospective Studies
3.
Surgeon ; 20(4): 262-267, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34229977

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Currently the Irish Hip Fracture Standards [IHFS] recommend a Time-to-Surgery [TTS] of within 48 h of admission. The aim of our research is to determine if there was a statistically significant relationship between TTS and 30-day or one-year mortality and to assess whether a 48 h window for surgery is still the most appropriate recommendation. METHODS USED: This was a single-hospital retrospective review of all of the fragility hip fractures between 1st January 2013 and 31st December 2017. Patient demographics were described using descriptive statistics. Dependent variables of interest were 30-day mortality and one-year mortality. Independent predictor variables analysed included age, ASA grade, fracture type, surgery performed, anaesthesia administered, length of stay and TTS (hours as an interval variable), TTS in less than 36 h (binary variable) and TTS in less than 48 h (binary variable). When the significant predictor variables were identified, in order to control for confounder variables, a multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify which predictors were still significantly associated with the outcome variables even after controlling for all other known confounder variables. RESULTS: In total, 806 patients were identified. TTS within 36 h was predictive of a significantly lower 30-day mortality when compared to those undergoing surgery after 36 h (p = 0.031). In contrast, TTS within 48 h did not demonstrate a significantly lower 30-day mortality when compared to those undergoing surgery after 48 h (p = 0.104). On multivariate regression analysis, TTS <36 h (p = 0.011) and age (p < 0.0001) were all independently predictive of 30-day mortality. On multivariate regression analysis, both age (p < 0.0001) and TTS < 36 h (p = 0.002) were significantly predictive of one-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Performing hip fracture surgery within 36 h confers a significant reduction in both 30-day and one-year mortality rates when compared to patients undergoing surgery outside of this time frame. A 36-h window also appears to be superior to a 48-h window because performing surgery within 48 h has no significant impact on the reduction of 30-day mortality rates. We recommend that national guidelines reflect these important findings.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures , Hip Fractures/surgery , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 42(10): 552-557, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35993600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A fundamental tenent of treating developmental dysplasia of the hip is to identify patients with dislocated hips early so as to avoid the long-term sequelae of late diagnosis. The aim of this study was to develop a readily useable triage tool for patients with suspected hip dislocation, based on the clinical history and examination findings of the referring practitioner. METHODS: All primary care referrals (n=934) over a 3-year period for suspected developmental dysplasia of the hip to a tertiary pediatric center were evaluated. Defined parameters with respect to history and clinical examination were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to establish predictors of hip dislocation, and from this a predictive model was derived which incorporated significant predictors of dislocation. An illustrative nomogram translated this predictive model into a usable numerical scoring system called the Children's Hip Prediction score, which estimates probability of hip dislocation. RESULTS: There were 97 dislocated hips in 85 patients. The final predictive model included age, sex, family history, breech, gait concerns, decreased abduction, leg length discrepancy, and medical/neurological syndrome. The area under receiver operating curve for the model is 0.761. A Children's Hip Prediction score of≥5 corresponds to a sensitivity of 76.3% and a score of≥15 has a specificity of 97.8%, corresponding to an odds ratio of 27.3 for increased risk of dislocation. CONCLUSION: We found that a novel clinical prediction score, based on readily available history and examination parameters strongly predicted risk of dislocations in hip dysplasia referral. It is hoped that this tool could be utilized to optimize resource allocation and may be of particular benefit in less well-resourced health care systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.


Subject(s)
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip , Hip Dislocation, Congenital , Hip Dislocation , Joint Dislocations , Child , Hip Dislocation/diagnosis , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnosis , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/therapy , Humans , Referral and Consultation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Triage
5.
Clin Transplant ; 35(1): e14156, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33222237

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate allograft and patient outcomes among recipients of kidney transplants after non-renal solid organ transplants. We also aim to compare our findings with recipients of a repeat kidney transplant. METHODS: We performed an analysis on kidney transplant recipients who underwent kidney transplantation after a non-renal solid organ transplant. Survival data were stratified into 2 groups: Group A (n = 37) consisted of recipients of a kidney transplant after prior non-renal solid organ transplant, and Group B (n = 330) consisted of recipients of a repeat kidney transplant. RESULTS: The 1-,5-, and 10-year graft survival (death-censored) for recipients of a kidney transplant post-non-renal solid organ transplant (Group A) were 97.3%, 91.5%, and 86.9%, compared with 97.9%, 90.2%, and 83.4% for recipients of a repeat kidney transplant (Group B) (p = .32). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 97.3%, 82.7%, and 79.1% in Group A compared to 97.9%, 90.2%, and 83.4% in Group B. Unadjusted overall patient survival was significantly lower for Group A (p = .017). CONCLUSION: Kidney transplant recipients who have undergone a previous non-renal solid organ transplant have similar allograft survival outcomes, but higher long-term mortality rates compared to repeat kidney transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Organ Transplantation , Graft Survival , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Homologous
6.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 35(10): 1802-1810, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32638007

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transplantation is a well-known risk factor for malignancy. However, outcomes of cancer in transplant recipients compared with non-transplant recipients are less well studied. We aim to study the survival in kidney transplant recipients who develop cancer and compare this with cancer outcomes in the general population. METHODS: We linked data from the National Cancer Registry Ireland with the National Kidney Transplant Database. The period of observation was from 1 January 1994 until 31 December 2014. Transplant recipients were considered at risk from the time of diagnosing cancer. We administratively censored data at 10 years post-cancer diagnosis. Survival was compared with all patients in the general population that had a recorded diagnosis of cancer. RESULTS: There were 907 renal transplant recipients and 426679 individuals in the general population diagnosed with cancer between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 2014. In those with non-melanoma skin cancer, the hazard ratio (HR) for 10-year, all-cause mortality [HR = 3.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.66-3.52] and cancer-specific mortality (HR = 3.91, 95% CI 2.57-5.96) was significantly higher among transplant recipients than the general population. Patients who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.96-4.25) and prostate cancer (HR = 4.32, 95% CI 2.39-7.82) had increased all-cause but not cancer-specific mortality. Colorectal, lung, breast and renal cell cancer did not show an increased risk of death in transplant recipients. CONCLUSION: Cancer-attributable mortality is higher in kidney transplant recipients with non-melanoma skin cancer compared with non-transplant patients. The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging should reflect the increased hazard of death in these immunosuppressed patients.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors
7.
Clin Transplant ; 34(8): e13907, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32416641

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Few studies investigate significant perioperative predictors for long-term renal allograft survival after second kidney transplant (SKT). We compared long-term survival following SKT with primary kidney transplant and determined predictors of renal allograft failure after SKT. METHODS: Outcomes of all primary or second kidney transplant recipients at a national kidney transplant center between 1993 and 2017 were reviewed. The primary outcomes measurements were renal allograft survival for both first and second kidney transplants. Secondary outcome measurements were incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), incidence of acute rejection (AR), and predictors for renal allograft survival in SKT recipients. RESULTS: In total, there were 392 SKTs and 2748 primary kidney transplants performed between 1993 and 2017. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year death-censored graft survival for deceased-donor recipients was 95.3%, 88.7%, and 78.2% for primary kidney transplant and 94.9%, 87.1%, and 74.9% for SKT (P = .0288). Survival of primary renal allograft <6 years (HR 0.6, P = .017), AR episodes (HR 1.6, P = .031), DGF (HR 2.0, P = .005), and HLA-DR MM (HR 1.7, P = .018) was independent predictors of long-term renal allograft failure after SKT. CONCLUSION: These findings may provide important information on long-term survival outcomes after SKT and for identifying patients at risk for long-term renal allograft failure after SKT.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Allografts , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
8.
Clin Transplant ; 34(2): e13783, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31958169

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (ADTKD) is a rare genetic cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We aimed to compare renal transplant outcomes in people with ESRD due to ADTKD to those with other causes of renal failure. METHODS: Patients with clinical characteristics consistent with ADTKD by the criteria outlined in the 2015 KDIGO consensus were included. We compared ADTKD transplant outcomes with those of 4633 non-ADTKD renal transplant recipients. RESULTS: We included 31 patients who met diagnostic criteria for ADTKD in this analysis, 23 of whom had an identified mutation (28 were categorized as definite-ADTKD and 3 as suspected ADTKD). Five patients received a second transplant during follow-up. In total, 36 grafts were included. We did not identify significant differences between groups in terms of graft or patient survival after transplantation. Twenty-five transplant biopsies were performed during follow-up, and none of these showed signs of recurrent ADTKD post-transplant. CONCLUSION: In patients with ESRD due to ADTKD, we demonstrate that transplant outcomes are comparable with the general transplant population. There is no evidence that ADTKD can recur after transplantation.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic , Kidney Transplantation , Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Mutation , Uromodulin/genetics
9.
Ren Fail ; 42(1): 607-612, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32605413

ABSTRACT

Background: Solid organ transplantation is associated with increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer. Studies with short follow up times have suggested a reduced occurrence of these cancers in recipients treated with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors as maintenance immunosuppression. We aimed to describe the occurrence of skin cancers in renal and liver transplant recipients switched from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus-based regimes.Methods: We performed a retrospective study of sirolimus conversion within the Irish national kidney and liver transplant programs. These data were linked with the National Cancer Registry Ireland to determine the incidence of NMSC among these recipients. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for post versus pre-conversion NMSC rates are referred in this study as an effect size with [95% confidence interval].Results: Of 4,536 kidney transplants and 574 liver transplants functioning on the 1 January 1994 or transplanted between 1 January 1994 and 01 January 1994 and 01 January 2015, 85 kidney and 88 liver transplant recipients were transitioned to sirolimus-based immunosuppression. In renal transplants, the rate of NMSC was 131 per 1000 patient years pre-switch to sirolimus, and 68 per 1000 patient years post switch, with adjusted effect size of 0.48 [0.31 - 0.74] (p = .001) following the switch. For liver transplant recipients, the rate of NMSC was 64 per 1,000 patient years pre-switch and 30 per 1,000 patient years post switch, with an adjusted effect size of 0.49 [0.22 - 1.09] (p .081). Kidney transplant recipients were followed up for a median 3.4 years. Liver transplants were followed for a median 6.6 years.Conclusions: In this study, the conversion of maintenance immunosuppression from calcineurin inhibitors to mTOR inhibitors for clinical indications did appear to reduce the incidence of NMSC in kidney and liver transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Calcineurin Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Child , Drug Substitution , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Incidence , Ireland/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Young Adult
10.
Clin Transplant ; 33(10): e13669, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31310037

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of cancer compared to the general population. To date, this risk in Ireland has not been investigated. We conducted a national registry study of cancer incidence following solid organ transplantation. METHODS: National centers for solid organ transplantation supplied their respective registry databases to cross-reference with episodes of malignancy from the National Cancer Registry Ireland (NCRI) between 1994 and 2014. Standardized incidence of cancer post-transplant was compared to the general population by means of standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and between solid organ transplant types by incidence rate ratios. RESULTS: A total of 3346 solid organ transplant recipients were included in this study. Kidney transplant recipients constituted the majority of participants (71.2%), followed by liver (16.8%), heart (6.4%), and lung (5.6%) transplants. The most common cancers within the composite of all transplant recipients included the following (SIR [95% CI]): squamous and basal cell carcinoma (20.05 [17.97, 22.31] and 7.16 [6.43, 7.96], respectively), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (6.23 [4.26, 8.59]), and renal cell carcinoma (3.36 [1.96, 5.38]). CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the incidence of cancer following solid organ transplantation in Ireland. These results have significant national policy implications for surveillance, and early diagnosis in this patient group.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Ireland/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Risk Factors
11.
Transpl Int ; 32(9): 974-984, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31209932

ABSTRACT

It is often quoted that while short-term graft survival in kidney transplantation has improved in recent years, it has not translated into a commensurate improvement in long-term graft survival. We considered whether this was true of the entire experience of the national kidney transplant program in Ireland. A retrospective analysis of the National Kidney Transplant Service (NKTS) database was undertaken to investigate patient and graft survival for all adult first deceased donor kidney transplant recipients in Ireland, 1971-2015. Three thousand two hundred and sixty recipients were included in this study. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate survival at each time period post transplant for the various eras of transplantation. Uncensored graft survival has improved over the course of the program in Ireland at various time points despite risk factors for graft failure progressively increasing over successive eras. For example the graft survival at 15 years post transplant has increased from 10% in 1971-1975 to 45% by 1996-2000. Ireland has experienced a progressive improvement in long-term graft survival following kidney transplantation. Whether these trends are attributable to biological or nonbiological factors is unclear but likely involves a combination of both.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Humans , Ireland , Kidney Transplantation/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
12.
Clin Transplant ; 32(1)2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29117638

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Primary focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (p-FSGS) is commonly complicated by recurrence (r-FSGS) post-transplantation. Our objective was to describe Irish outcomes for transplantation after end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to p-FSGS, specifically rates of, and treatments for, r-FSGS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Irish patients with biopsy-proven FSGS were identified from the Irish National Kidney Transplant database (1982-2015). Medical record review was performed to identify predictors of r-FSGS and treatments for r-FSGS. Transplant outcomes were compared to outcomes in all renal transplants performed during the same time period using registry data. Demographic and clinical predictors of r-FSGS were identified. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata (version 13, College Station, TX, USA). RESULTS: Thirty-eight transplant recipients had biopsy-proven p-FSGS, 16 received a second transplant. A total of 3846 transplants formed the comparator group. r-FSGS complicated 60.5% (23/38) of first transplants. Eighty-six percent (10/12) of patients with previous r-FSGS developed recurrent disease after further transplantation. Patients with p-FSGS receiving a first renal transplant had higher rate of graft failure than those with another cause of ESRD (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.152-3.139). Sixteen patients received immunotherapy for r-FSGS; 12 (86%) had at least partial response, but two (14%) developed significant complications. DISCUSSION: We demonstrate high rates of r-FSGS and describe modest success from with treatments for r-FSGS.


Subject(s)
Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental/surgery , Graft Rejection/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/pathology , Graft Survival , Humans , Incidence , Ireland/epidemiology , Male , Prognosis , Recurrence , Risk Factors
13.
Postgrad Med J ; 94(1107): 25-31, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28874503

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To measure the percentage rate and risk factors for amendment in the type, duration and setting of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for the treatment of cellulitis. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients receiving OPAT for cellulitis was performed. Treatment amendment (TA) was defined as hospital admission or change in antibiotic therapy in order to achieve clinical response. Multivariable logistic regression (MVLR) and classification and regression tree (CART) analysis were performed. RESULTS: There were 307 patients enrolled. TA occurred in 36 patients (11.7%). Significant risk factors for TA on MVLR were increased age, increased Numerical Pain Scale Score (NPSS) and immunocompromise. The median OPAT duration was 7 days. Increased age, heart rate and C reactive protein were associated with treatment prolongation. CART analysis selected age <64.5 years, female gender and NPSS <2.5 in the final model, generating a low-sensitivity (27.8%), high-specificity (97.1%) decision tree. CONCLUSIONS: Increased age, NPSS and immunocompromise were associated with OPAT amendment. These identified risk factors can be used to support an evidence-based approach to patient selection for OPAT in cellulitis. The CART algorithm has good specificity but lacks sensitivity and is shown to be inferior in this study to logistic regression modelling.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Cellulitis/drug therapy , Infusions, Parenteral , Age Factors , Aged , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Decision Trees , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Self Administration , Time Factors
14.
Ren Fail ; 39(1): 290-293, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27917694

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Alport syndrome is an inherited renal disease characterized by hematuria, renal failure, hearing loss and a lamellated glomerular basement membrane. Patients with Alport syndrome who undergo renal transplantation have been shown to have patient and graft survival rates similar to or better than those of patients with other renal diseases. METHODS: In this national case series, based in Beaumont Hospital Dublin, we studied the cohort of patients who underwent renal transplantation over the past 33 years, recorded prospectively in the Irish Renal Transplant Registry, and categorized them according to the presence or absence of Alport syndrome. The main outcomes assessed were patient and renal allograft survival. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients diagnosed with Alport syndrome in Beaumont Hospital received 62 transplants between 1982 and 2014. The comparison group of non-Alport patients comprised 3430 patients for 3865 transplants. Twenty-year Alport patient survival rate was 70.2%, compared to 44.8% for patients with other renal diseases (p = .01). Factors associated with patient survival included younger age at transplantation as well as differences in recipient sex, donor age, cold ischemia time, and episodes of acute rejection. Twenty-year graft survival was 46.8% for patients with Alport syndrome compared to 30.2% for those with non-Alport disease (p = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting for baseline differences between the groups, patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) due to Alport syndrome have similar patient and graft survival to those with other causes of ESKD. This indicates that early diagnosis and management can lead to favorable outcomes for this patient cohort.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Nephritis, Hereditary/complications , Adult , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Ireland , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Nephritis, Hereditary/mortality , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Homologous , Young Adult
15.
Clin Transplant ; 30(1): 17-25, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26426147

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Living donation is not only a method to increase access to kidney transplantation but can also offer superior outcomes. We report the experience of the living donor (LD) program in the Republic of Ireland and explore reasons why potential donors do not proceed to live donation. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all potential donors from January 2000 to March 2014 who presented wishing to undergo donor work-up and their subsequent outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 956 donors for 496 recipients contacted the live kidney donation program of which 883 potential donors proceeded to the initial stage of assessment. The donor dropout rate at this stage was 64.2% (614/956 potential donors did not proceed to further evaluation). Thereafter, 269 (28.1%) donors underwent further assessment by the multidisciplinary team. In total, 93 (9.7%) donors were declined following this assessment with 176 (18.4%) donors ultimately proceeding to live kidney donation. The major reason for declining a donor was a medical contraindication (n = 63, 67.7%). In term of recipients, 54.2% (n = 269/496) had a potential donor proceed for further assessment of which 65.4% (n = 176/269) ultimately proceeding to live donation. CONCLUSION: Further evaluation of the declined donor group is warranted to allow for expansion of the LD program.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Living Donors/statistics & numerical data , Patient Selection , Tissue and Organ Procurement/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Ireland , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrectomy , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
16.
Emerg Med J ; 33(9): 636-40, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27352789

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Many believe that hospital crowding manifesting in the ED with the boarding of admitted patients is a result of significant numbers of acute hospital beds being occupied by patients awaiting discharge to nursing homes, step-down facilities or home with or without additional support. This observational study was performed to establish the actual relationship between boarders in the ED and patients experiencing delayed discharge. METHODS: Data relating to the number of patients in the ED and their points in their patient pathway were entered into a logbook on a daily basis by the most senior doctor on duty. 630 days of observations of patients boarded in the ED were compared with the number of inpatients with delayed discharges, obtained from the hospital information system, to see if large numbers of inpatients with delayed discharges are associated with crowding in the ED. RESULTS: Two years of data showed an annual ED census of more than 47 000, with a daily mean ED admission rate of 29.85 patients and a daily mean ED boarding figure of 29 patients. A mean of 15.4% of the 823 hospital beds was occupied by patients with delayed discharges, and the hospital ran at, or near, full capacity (99%-105%) all the time. Results obtained highlighted a statistically significant relationship between delayed discharges in the hospital and ED crowding as a result of boarders (p value<0.001, with a regression coefficient of 0.16, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.20). The study also showed that the number of boarders was related to the number of ED admissions in the preceding 24 hours (p=0.036, with a regression coefficient of 0.14, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed hospital discharges significantly contribute to crowding in the ED. Healthcare systems should target timely discharge of inpatients experiencing delayed discharge in an urgent and efficient manner to improve timely access to acute hospital beds for patients requiring emergency admission.


Subject(s)
Bed Occupancy/statistics & numerical data , Crowding , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Ireland , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male
17.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 20(6): 426-33, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25641402

ABSTRACT

AIM: Whether socioeconomic status confers worse outcomes after kidney transplantation is unknown. Its influence on allograft and patient survival following kidney transplantation in Ireland was examined. METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort study of adult deceased-donor first kidney transplant recipients from 1990 to 2009 was performed. Those with a valid Irish postal address were assigned a socioeconomic status score based on the Pobal Hasse-Pratschke deprivation index and compared in quartiles. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to investigate any significant association of socioeconomic status with patient and allograft outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1944 eligible kidney transplant recipients were identified. The median follow-up time was 8.2 years (interquartile range 4.4-13.3 years). Socioeconomic status was not associated with uncensored or death-censored allograft survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.00, P = 0.33 and HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, P = 0.37, respectively). Patient survival was not associated with socioeconomic status quartile (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.93-1.08, P = 0.88). There was no significant difference among quartiles for uncensored or death-censored allograft survival at 5 and 10 years. CONCLUSION: There was no socioeconomic disparity in allograft or patient outcomes following kidney transplantation, which may be partly attributable to the Irish healthcare model. This may give further impetus to calls in other jurisdictions for universal healthcare and medication coverage for kidney transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation/economics , Socioeconomic Factors , Survivors , Adult , Allografts , Databases, Factual , Female , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Ireland , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Poverty , Proportional Hazards Models , Residence Characteristics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
18.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 15: 153, 2015 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26490826

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based medical education has rapidly evolved over the past two decades, despite this, there are few published reports of its use in critical care teaching. We hypothesised that simulation-based teaching of a critical care topic to final-year medical students is superior to lecture-based teaching. METHODS: Thirty-nine final-year medical students were randomly assigned to either simulation-based or lecture-based teaching in the chosen critical care topic. The study was conducted over a 6-week period. Efficacy of each teaching method was compared through use of multiple choice questionnaires (MCQ) - baseline, post-teaching and 2 week follow-up. Student satisfaction was evaluated by means of a questionnaire. Feasibility and resource requirements were documented by teachers. RESULTS: Eighteen students were randomised to simulation-based, and 21 to lecture-based teaching. There were no differences in age and gender between groups (p > 0.05). Simulation proved more resource intensive requiring specialised equipment, two instructors, and increased duration of teaching sessions (126.7 min (SD = 4.71) vs 68.3 min (SD = 2.36)). Students ranked simulation-based teaching higher with regard to enjoyment (p = 0.0044), interest (p = 0.0068), relevance to taught subject (p = 0.0313), ease of understanding (p = 0.0476) and accessibility to posing questions (p = 0.001). Both groups demonstrated improvement in post-teaching MCQ from baseline (p = 0.0002), with greater improvement seen among the simulation group (p = 0.0387), however, baseline scores were higher among the lecture group. The results of the 2-week follow-up MCQ and post-teaching MCQ were not statistically significant when each modality were compared. DISCUSSION: Simulation was perceived as more enjoyable by students. Although there was a greater improvement in post-teaching MCQ among the simulator group, baseline scores were higher among lecture group which limits interpretation of efficacy. Simulation is more resource intensive, as demonstrated by increased duration and personnel required, and this may have affected our results. CONCLUSIONS: The current pilot may be of use in informing future studies in this area.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Education, Medical/methods , Manikins , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
19.
Ren Fail ; 37(4): 562-6, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25644970

ABSTRACT

Cyclosporine is used extensively in kidney transplantation and is a substrate for cytochrome P450 enzymes. The role of cytochrome p450 polymorphisms in kidney transplant outcome has not yet been fully elucidated. We investigate the clinical impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, PPARα, and POR*28 in 255 kidney transplant recipients. We examine for any association with graft survival, time to first cancer, and delayed graft function, and also measure cyclosporine levels at days 3, 10, and months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after transplantation. The CYP3A4*22 allele is significant associated with the development of cancer post-kidney transplantation (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.57, p = 0.003). It is not significantly associated with graft survival. No other SNP's were associated with graft survival time to first cancer, or delayed graft function. There was a non-significant trend of lower cyclosporine dose requirement in CYP3A4*22 carriers. Independent replication of our findings is now warranted to confirm or reject the role of CYP3A variants in cancer development following kidney transplantation.


Subject(s)
Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/genetics , Graft Survival/genetics , Kidney Transplantation , Neoplasms/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Postoperative Complications/genetics , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
20.
Ren Fail ; 37(3): 417-23, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25585951

ABSTRACT

AIM: Long-term survival of renal allografts has improved over the last 20 years. However, less is known about current expectations for long-term allograft function as determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The aim of this study was to investigate factors which affect graft function at 5 years' post-renal transplantation. The statistically significant factors were then used to construct a predictive model for expected eGFR at five years' post-transplant. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients who received a renal transplant in the Republic of Ireland between 1990 and 2004. Data collected included era of transplantation (1990-1994, 1995-1999, 2000-2004), donor and recipient age and gender, number of human leucocyte antigen mismatches, cold ischemia time (CIT), number of prior renal transplants, immunosuppressive regimen used and acute rejection episodes. Estimated GFR was calculated at 5 years after transplantation from patient data using the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. Consecutive sampling was used to divide the study population into two equal unbiased groups of 489 patients. The first group (derivation cohort) was used to construct a predictive model for eGFR five years' post-transplantation, the second (validation cohort) to test this model. RESULTS: Nine hundred and seventy eight patients were analyzed. The median age at transplantation was 43 years (range 18-78) and 620 (63.4%) were male. One hundred and seventy five patients (17.9%) had received a prior renal transplant. Improved eGFR at five years' post-transplantation was associated with tacrolimus-based combination immunosuppression, younger donor age, male recipient, absence of cytomegalovirus disease and absence of acute rejection episodes as independently significant factors (p < 0.05). The predictive model developed using these factors showed good correlation between predicted and actual median eGFR at five years. The model explained 20% of eGFR variability. The validation model findings were consistent with the derivation model (21% variability of eGFR explained by model using same covariates on new data). CONCLUSION: The predictive model we have developed shows good correlation between predicted and actual median eGFR at five years' post-transplant. Applications of this model include comparison of current and future therapy options such as new immunosuppressive regimens.


Subject(s)
Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Kidney Transplantation , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Survival , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Ireland/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Time
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL