Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int Heart J ; 64(4): 672-677, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37518348

ABSTRACT

Despite having a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), there are currently limited data for stratifying CVD risk among cancer survivors. The purpose of this study was to uncover the relationship of subjective gait speed with incident CVD among cancer survivors.This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from the JMDC Claims Database between 2005 and 2021 including 56,589 patients with a prior history of breast, colorectal, or stomach cancer but no history of CVD. Gait speed was evaluated using information from self-reported questionnaires collected during health checkups. The primary endpoint was composite CVD outcome, which included heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and stroke.The median (interquartile range) age was 54 (48-61) years, and 20,981 (37.1%) were male. Among them, 25,933 patients (45.8%) reported fast gait speed. During a mean follow-up period of 1002 ± 803 days, 3,221 composite CVD outcomes were recorded. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, slow gait speed was associated with a higher risk of developing CVD compared with fast gait speed (hazard ratio, 1.14, 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.22). This association was consistent across a variety of sensitivity analyses.We demonstrated that subjective slow gait speed was associated with a greater risk of CVD development among cancer survivors. This suggests the potential value of gait speed assessment for the CVD risk stratification of cancer patients as well as the clinical importance of maintaining exercise capacity among patients living with cancer.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Cardiovascular Diseases , Myocardial Infarction , Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Walking Speed , Retrospective Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Causality , Risk Factors , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology
2.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 30(8): 646-653, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36738171

ABSTRACT

AIMS: HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) has been thought to protect against cardiovascular disease (CVD), whereas a U-shaped association of both low and extremely high HDL-C with a high mortality risk has been increasingly reported in recent years. However, whether this U-shaped association is universal regardless of the individual's clinical background, including lifestyle diseases, remains unclear. We examined whether fasting plasma glucose modifies the U-shaped association between the HDL-C level and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective observational cohort study analysed data from the JMDC Claims Database between 2005 and 2021 for 3 282 389 participants without a history of CVD. The median age was 44 years (IQR, 36-51), and 1 878 164 participants (57.2%) were men. The median HDL-C level was 62 (IQR 52-74) mg/dL. The study participants were categorized according to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (<100 mg/dL, 100-125 mg/dL, and ≥126 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was composite CVD outcome, consisting of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause death. During a mean follow-up period of 1181 ± 932 days, 35 233 composite CVD events were recorded. The association between low HDL-C and CVD risk increased with the FPG level, and the relationship of high HDL-C with CV outcome was prominent only in people with diabetes mellitus. A similar relationship was observed in the individual subgroups and in each CV outcome. CONCLUSION: The U-shaped association between HDL-C and clinical outcomes was amplified with worsening glucose tolerance, suggesting a potential interaction between HDL-C levels and glycaemic status on clinical outcomes.


The aim of this study is to clarify whether fasting plasma glucose modifies the U-shaped association between HDL cholesterol and clinical outcomes. Key findings The U-shaped association between HDL cholesterol and clinical outcomes (including myocardial infarction, stroke, and death) was amplified with worsening glucose tolerance, suggesting a potential interaction between HDL cholesterol levels and glycaemic status on clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus , Hyperlipidemias , Myocardial Infarction , Male , Humans , Adult , Female , Cholesterol, HDL , Retrospective Studies , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Risk Factors
3.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 108(12): 3145-3153, 2023 Nov 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37350488

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: There have been insufficient data on the threshold of body mass index (BMI) for developing diabetes mellitus (DM) and the relationship between change in BMI and the subsequent risk of DM. OBJECTIVE: We sought to clarify the association of BMI and its change with incident DM. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using the JMDC Claims Database between 2005 and 2021. We included 3 400 303 individuals without a prior history of DM or usage of glucose-lowering medications. The median age was 44 years, and 57.5% were men. We categorized the study participants into 4 groups: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). According to the change in BMI from the initial health check-up to the health check-up 1 year after that, we divided the study participants into 3 groups: ≤-5.0%, -5.0% to +5.0%, and ≥+5.0%. RESULTS: The risk of developing DM increased steeply after BMI exceeded approximately 20 to 21 kg/m2. Compared with participants with stable BMI (-5.0% to +5.0%), the relative risk for DM among those whose BMI had increased by 5.0% or more was 1.33 (95% CI 1.31-1.36). In contrast, the relative risk for DM among those whose BMI decreased by 5.0% or more was 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.84). Moreover, people classified as normal weight, overweight, and obese reduced the risk of developing DM when they reduced their BMI, whereas the risk of developing DM for people classified as underweight increased when they reduced their BMI. CONCLUSION: Our findings offer novel insights into improving an optimal bodyweight management strategy to prevent the development of DM.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Overweight , Male , Humans , Adult , Female , Body Mass Index , Overweight/complications , Overweight/epidemiology , Thinness/epidemiology , Thinness/complications , Retrospective Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Risk Factors
4.
JACC Asia ; 3(6): 908-921, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38155795

ABSTRACT

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a novel concept of hepatic disease. Although the prevalences of heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasing worldwide, limited data have assessed the extent to which MAFLD is associated with incident HF and AF. Objectives: The authors sought to examine the association of MAFLD with incident HF and AF. Methods: Analyses were conducted using a nationwide epidemiologic database including 3,279,918 individuals (median age 45 years; 57.6% men). Metabolic dysfunction was defined as 1 or more of the following: overweight (body mass index ≥23 kg/m2), metabolic syndrome, or diabetes mellitus. FLD was defined as fatty liver index of >30. MAFLD was defined as the coexistence of metabolic dysfunction and FLD. We categorized study participants into 4 groups: non-FLD/nonmetabolic dysfunction (n = 1,709,116), metabolic dysfunction (n = 584,483), FLD (n = 89,497), and MAFLD (n = 896,822). The primary outcomes were HF and AF. Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 1,160 ± 905 days, 62,746 incident HF events and 15,408 incident AF events were recorded. Compared with the non-FLD/non-metabolic dysfunction group, HRs for HF and AF, respectively, were 1.20 (95% CI: 1.18-1.23) and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19) for metabolic dysfunction, 1.24 (95% CI: 1.19-1.30) and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.04-1.23) for FLD, and 1.73 (95% CI: 1.69-1.76) and 1.51 (95% CI: 1.46-1.57) for MAFLD. MAFLD was also associated with a higher risk of developing myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and stroke. A risk of developing cardiovascular events differed between MAFLD subtypes (Wald test P < 0.001). Conclusions: MAFLD was associated with a greater risk of developing HF and AF, suggesting the clinical importance of this novel hepatic disease concept.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL