Prognostic Relevance of Primary Tumor Sidedness in Early-stage Colorectal Cancer: An Integrated Analysis of 4 Randomized Controlled Trials (JCOG2003A).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the genuine prognostic relevance of primary tumor sidedness (PTS) in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC). BACKGROUND: The prognostic relevance of PTS in early-stage CRC remains a topic of debate. Several large epidemiological studies investigated survival only and did not consider the risk of recurrence so far. METHODS: Patients with stage II/III adenocarcinoma of the colon and upper rectum from 4 randomized controlled trials were analyzed. Survival outcomes were compared according to the tumor location: right-sided (cecum to transverse colon) or left-sided (descending colon to upper rectum). RESULTS: A total of 4113 patients were divided into a right-sided group (N=1349) and a left-sided group (N=2764). Relapse-free survival after primary surgery was not associated with PTS in all patients and each stage [hazard ratio (HR) adjusted =1.024 (95% CI: 0.886-1.183) in all patients; 1.327 (0.852-2.067) in stage II; and 0.990 (0.850-1.154) in stage III]. Also, overall survival after primary surgery was not associated with PTS in all patients and each stage [HR adjusted =0.879 (95% CI: 0.726-1.064) in all patients; 1.517 (0.738-3.115) in stage II; and 0.840 (0.689-1.024) in stage III]. In total, 795 patients (right-sided, N=257; left-sided, N=538) developed recurrence after primary surgery. PTS was significantly associated with overall survival after recurrence (HR adjusted =0.773, 95% CI: 0.627-0.954). CONCLUSIONS: PTS had no impact on the risk of recurrence for stage II/III CRC. Treatment stratification based on PTS is unnecessary for early-stage CRC.

Long-term Outcome After Surgical Resection of Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The significance of resection of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the prognosis of colorectal cancer after para-aortic lymph node metastasis resection. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study. SETTINGS: Thirty-six institutions in Japan participated in this study. Database and medical records at each institution were used for data collection. PATIENTS: Patients with resected and pathologically proven para-aortic lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer between 2010 and 2015 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival after para-aortic lymph node metastasis resection, recurrence-free survival, and recurrence patterns after R0 resection of para-aortic lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were included in the primary analysis population in this study. The 5-year overall survival rate (95% CI) was 41.0% (32.0-49.8), and the median survival (95% CI) was 4.1 (3.4-4.7) years. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were the pathological T stage (pT4 vs pT1- 3, adjusted HR: 1.91, p = 0.006), other organ metastasis (present vs absent, adjusted HR: 1.98, p = 0.005), time to metastases (synchronous vs metachronous adjusted HR: 2.02, p = 0.02), and the number of para-aortic lymph node metastasis (3 or more vs less than 3, adjusted HR: 2.13, p = 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (95% CI) was 21.1% (13.5-29.7), with a median (95% CI) of 1.2 (0.9-1.4) years. The primary tumor location (left- vs right-sided colon, adjusted HR: 4.77, p = 0.01; rectum vs right-sided colon, adjusted HR: 5.27, p = 0.006), other organ metastasis (present vs absent, adjusted HR: 1.90, p = 0.03), number of para-aortic lymph node metastases (3 or more vs less than 3, adjusted HR: 2.20, p = 0.001), and hospital volume (less than 10 vs 10 or more, adjusted HR: 2.18, p = 0.02) were identified as independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. Para-aortic lymph node recurrence was the most common at 33.3%. LIMITATIONS: Selection bias cannot be ruled out because of the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Less than 3 para-aortic lymph node metastases were a favorable prognostic factor for overall and recurrence-free survival. However, para-aortic lymph node metastases were considered to be a systemic disease, and the significance of resection was limited. See Video Abstract . RESULTADO A LARGO PLAZO POSTERIOR A LA RESECCIN QUIRRGICA DE METSTASIS EN GANGLIOS LINFTICOS PARAARTICOS DE CNCER COLORRECTAL UN ESTUDIO RETROSPECTIVO MULTICNTRICO: ANTECEDENTES:La importancia de la resección de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos paraaórticos (PALNM) en el cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es controvertida.OBJETIVO:Aclarar el pronóstico del CCR después de la resección PALNM.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico.ENTORNO CLINICO:Treinta y seis instituciones en Japón participaron en este estudio.PACIENTES:Pacientes con PALNM de CCR resecado y patológicamente probado entre 2010 y 2015.FUENTES DE DATOS:Base de datos y registros médicos de cada institución.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Supervivencia general (SG) después de la resección PALNM, supervivencia libre de recurrencia (SLR) y patrones de recurrencia después de la resección R0 de PALNM.RESULTADOS:Se incluyó un total de 133 pacientes en la población de análisis primario de este estudio. La tasa de SG a 5 años (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95 %) fue del 41,0 % (32,0, 49,8) y la mediana de supervivencia (IC del 95 %) fue de 4,1 (3,4, 4,7) años. Los factores de pronóstico independientes para la SG fueron el estadio T patológico (pT4 vs. pT1-3, índice de riesgo ajustado [aHR]: 1,91, p = 0,006), metástasis en otros órganos (presente vs. ausente, aHR: 1,98, p = 0,005), tiempo hasta las metástasis (síncronas vs. metacrónicas, aHR: 2,02, p = 0,02) y número de PALNM (≥3 vs. <3, aHR: 2,13, p = 0,001). La tasa de SLR a 5 años (IC del 95%) fue del 21,1% (13,5, 29,7), con una mediana (IC del 95%) de 1,2 (0,9, 1,4) años. La ubicación del tumor primario (colon del lado izquierdo vs. derecho, aHR: 4,77, p = 0,01; recto vs. colon del lado derecho, aHR: 5,27, p = 0,006), metástasis en otros órganos (presente vs. ausente, aHR: 1,90, p = 0,03), el número de PALNM (≥3 vs. <3, aHR: 2,20, p = 0,001) y el volumen hospitalario (<10 vs. ≥10, aHR: 2,18, p = 0,02) se identificaron como independientes factores pronósticos del SLR. La recurrencia de los ganglios linfáticos paraaórticos fue la más común con un 33,3%.LIMITACIONES:No se puede descartar un sesgo de selección debido a la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:Menos de tres PALNM fue un factor pronóstico favorable tanto para la SG como para la SLR. Sin embargo, las PALNM se consideraron una enfermedad sistémica y la importancia de la resección fue limitada. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Short- and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for inguinal lymph node metastasis in rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma.

AIM: The significance of lymphadenectomy and its indications in patients with inguinal lymph node metastasis (ILNM) of anorectal adenocarcinoma is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of inguinal lymphadenectomy for ILNM. METHOD: This study included patients who underwent surgical resection for ILNM of rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma with pathologically positive metastases between 1997 and 2011 at 20 participating centres in the Study Group for Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer organized by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: In total, 107 patients were included. The primary tumour was in the rectum in 57 patients (53.3%) and in the anal canal in 50 (46.7%). The median number of ILNMs was 2.34. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher were observed in five patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 38.8%. Multivariate analysis identified undifferentiated histological type (P < 0.001), pathological venous invasion (P = 0.01) and pathological primary tumour depth T0-2 (P = 0.01) as independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival. CONCLUSION: The 5-year overall survival after inguinal lymph node dissection was acceptable, and it warrants consideration in more patients. Further larger-scale studies are needed in order to clarify the surgical indications.

Prognostic impact of lateral sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green on oncological outcomes for clinical stage II/III lower rectal cancer without suspected lateral lymph node metastasis.

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can detect occult nodal metastasis. We have previously reported the safety and feasibility of indocyanine green (ICG)-guided SLNB for clinical stage II/III lower rectal cancer (RC). However, little is known about the influence of lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG on oncological outcomes. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of lateral pelvic SLNB on oncological outcomes compared with prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND). METHODS: Participants comprised consecutive patients with clinical stage II/III lower RC who underwent lateral pelvic SLNB or prophylactic LLND (Non-SLNB) between January 2010 and December 2020. The primary outcome measure was the 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR). Secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS). RESULTS: Among the 150 eligible patients included, 79 patients underwent lateral pelvic SLNB. Of those 79 patients, 4 patients who were SLNB-positive underwent LLND. LLND was omitted for the 75 patients who were SLNB-negative. Median follow-up was 61.0 months (range, 1.3-143.2 months). The overall recurrence rate was 30.7% (46 patients), with LR in 12.0% (18 patients). LR comprised lateral lymph node recurrence in 2.6% and central pelvic recurrence in 9.4%. No significant differences were seen between groups in terms of the frequency of LR or in CSS, OS, RFS, LRFS, or DRFS. CONCLUSION: Oncological outcomes were not different between the SLNB and Non-SLNB groups. ICG-guided SLNB appears promising as a method for determining indications for LLND.

The clinical significance of the lymph node ratio as a recurrence indicator in ampullary cancer after curative pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of the lymph node ratio (LNR), the number of metastatic lymph nodes per dissected lymph node, has not been sufficiently clarified in ampullary cancer. METHODS: Among patients diagnosed histopathologically with ampullary cancer between 1980 and 2018, the study included 106 who underwent pathological radical resection by pancreaticoduodenectomy. The relationships between the LNR and metastatic lymph node sites and prognosis were examined. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that sex and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors. In the 46 patients (43%) with metastatic lymph nodes, the LNR in the recurrence group was significantly higher than that in the non-recurrence group (0.15 ± 0.11 vs. 0.089 ± 0.071, p = 0.025). The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the LNR cut-off value, 0.07 (area under the curve = 0.70, sensitivity 81%, specificity 56%), was a significant indicator for recurrence (22% vs. 61%, p = 0.016) and prognosis (5-year survival: 48% vs. 83%, p = 0.028). Among the metastatic lymph node sites in the 46 positive cases, lymph node metastases developed from the peripancreatic head region (80%, 37/46) to the superior mesenteric artery (33%, 15/46) and para-aortic (11%, 5/46) regions. CONCLUSION: Lymph node metastasis is an independent prognostic factor, and the LNR is a significant indicator for recurrence and prognosis in patients with ampullary cancer.

Lateral node metastasis in low rectal cancer as a hallmark to predict recurrence patterns.

BACKGROUND: Lateral node metastasis confers a poor prognosis in rectal cancer. Several multidisciplinary treatments have been proposed with favorable outcomes. However, appropriate neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments or follow-up plans based on information about the probable recurrence site have not been specified. We aimed to clarify the distinctive features of recurrence patterns for lateral node-positive low rectal cancer according to the lateral and mesorectal lymph node status. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 508 patients with stage III low rectal cancer who underwent lateral node dissection. We investigated the impact of lateral and mesorectal lymph node status on site-specific recurrence rates and patient survival. RESULTS: Analyses for relapse-free survival revealed the prognostic impact of lateral node positivity in stage III low rectal cancer (p < 0.0001). Lateral node-positive patients exhibited higher risk of overall recurrence, local recurrence, and recurrence in extra-regional nodes than lateral node-negative patients (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001, respectively). However, lateral node positivity was not statistically associated with a hematogenous recurrence rate. In lateral node-positive patients, both tumor-node-metastasis (TNM)-N status and number of lateral nodes involved were revealed as significant prognostic factors (p < 0.0001, both). In addition, the number of lateral nodes involved could be a discriminatory indicator of probabilities of local recurrence and recurrence in extra-regional nodes (p = 0.02, and p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral node-positive low rectal cancer exhibits higher local recurrence and extra-regional node recurrence rates that correlate with the number of lateral nodes involved.

The preliminary analysis of lymphatic flow around the connective tissues surrounding SMA and SpA elucidates patients' oncological condition in borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), invasion of connective tissues surrounding major arteries is a crucial prognostic factor after radical resection. However, why the connective tissues invasion is associated with poor prognosis is not well understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, 25 patients receiving radical surgery for PDAC in our institute were enrolled. HyperEye Medical System (HEMS) was used to examine lymphatic flow from the connective tissues surrounding SMA and SpA and which lymph nodes ICG accumulated in was examined. RESULTS: HEMS imaging revealed ICG was transported down to the paraaortic area of the abdominal aorta along SMA. In pancreatic head cancer, 9 paraaortic lymph nodes among 14 (64.3%) were ICG positive, higher positivity than LN#15 (25.0%) or LN#18 (50.0%), indicating lymphatic flow around the SMA was leading directly to the paraaortic lymph nodes. Similarly, in pancreatic body and tail cancer, the percentage of ICG-positive LN #16a2 was very high, as was that of #8a, although that of #7 was only 42.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary result indicated that the lymphatic flow along the connective tissues surrounding major arteries could be helpful in understanding metastasis and improving prognosis in BR-A pancreatic cancer.

Clinical Impact of Metastatic Lymph Node Size on Therapeutic Effect and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Underwent Preoperative Chemotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pretreatment metastatic lymph node (LN) size has been reported to be associated with prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, its relationship with response to preoperative chemotherapy or prognosis has not been clarified. We investigated the relationship between metastatic LN size and response to preoperative treatment, and prognosis in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer who underwent surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 212 clinically node-positive patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy for ESCC were enrolled. Patients were stratified into three groups on the basis of the length of the short axis of the largest LN in pretreatment computed tomography images: < 10 mm (group A), 10-19 mm (group B), and ≥ 20 mm (group C). RESULTS: Group A had 90 patients (42%), group B had 103 patients (49%), and group C had 19 patients (9%). Group C had significantly lower percent reduction in total metastatic LN size than groups A and B (22.5% versus 35.7%, P = 0.037). Group C had significantly more metastatic LNs based on histological examination than groups A and B (10.1 versus 2.4, P < 0.001). Group C patients whose LNs responded had significantly fewer metastatic LNs than nonresponders (5.1 versus 11.9, P = 0.042). Group C had significantly poorer overall survival than groups A and B (3-year survival, 25.4% versus 67.3%, P < 0.001). However, group C patients whose LNs responded had better survival than nonresponders (3-year survival, 57.1% versus 0%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with large metastatic LNs have poor response and poor prognosis. However, if a response is obtained, long-term survival can be expected.

Prognostic Value of a Novel Index Combining the Prognostic Nutritional Index and D-Dimer Levels for Gastric Cancer after Gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and D-dimer level are two useful measures for gastric cancer prognosis. As they each comprise different factors, it is possible to employ a more useful combined indicator. This study therefore aimed to establish a PNI-D score - which combines the PNI and D-dimer level - and validate its usefulness as a prognostic marker. METHODS: We collected data from 1,218 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone radical gastrectomy (R0) between January 2004 and December 2015. Patients were divided into three PNI-D score groups based on the following criteria: score 2, low-PNI (≤46) and high D-dimer levels (>1.0 µg/mL); score 1, either low-PNI or high D-dimer levels; and score 0, no abnormality. We defined the PNI-D score as low (score 0 or 1) and high (score 2), respectively. RESULTS: The PNI-D score was significantly associated with overall, recurrence-free, and disease-specific survival (all log-rank p < 0.0001). The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with PNI-D scores of low and high were 88.1% and 64.7%, respectively; their 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 86.7% and 61.3%, respectively; and their 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 99.3% and 76.5%, respectively. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that a high-PNI-D score was an independent, statistically significant prognostic factor for poor overall (p = 0.01) survival in patients with gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The PNI-D is an independent prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer.

DUPAN-II normalisation as a biological indicator during preoperative chemoradiation therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Duke pancreatic mono-clonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-II) is a famous tumour maker for pancreatic cancer (PC) as well as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). We evaluated the clinical implications of DUPAN-II levels as a biological indicator for PC during preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). METHODS: This retrospective analysis included data from 221 consecutive patients with resectable and borderline resectable PC at diagnosis who underwent preoperative CRT between 2008 and 2017. We focused on 73 patients with elevated pre-CRT DUPAN-II levels (> 230 U/mL; more than 1.5 times the cut-off value for the normal range). Pre- and post-CRT DUPAN-II levels and the changes in DUPAN-II ratio were measured. RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified normalisation of DUPAN-II levels after CRT as a significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.06, confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-4.24, p = 0.042). Total normalisation ratio was 49% (n = 36). Overall survival (OS) in patients with normalised DUPAN-II levels was significantly longer than that in 73 patients with elevated levels (5-year survival, 55% vs. 21%, p = 0.032) and in 60 patients who underwent tumour resection (5-year survival, 59% vs. 26%, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Normalisation of DUPAN-II levels during preoperative CRT was a significant prognostic factor and could be an indicator to monitor treatment efficacy and predict patient prognosis.

Definitive S-1/mitomycin-C chemoradiotherapy for stage II/III anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase I/II dose-finding and single-arm confirmatory study (JCOG0903).

BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil plus mitomycin-C is a standard treatment for stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA). We performed this dose-finding and single-arm confirmatory trial of CRT with S-1 plus mitomycin-C to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-1 and evaluate its efficacy and safety for locally advanced SCCA. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage II/III SCCA (UICC 6th) received CRT comprising mitomycin-C (10 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29) and S-1 (60 mg/m2/day at level 0 and 80 mg/m2/day at level 1 on days 1-14 and 29-42) with concurrent radiotherapy (59.4 Gy). Dose-finding used a 3 + 3 cohort design. The primary endpoint of the confirmatory trial was 3-year event-free survival. The sample size was 65, with one-sided alpha of 5%, power of 80%, and expected and threshold values of 75% and 60%, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (dose-finding, n = 10; confirmatory, n = 59) were enrolled. The RD of S-1 was determined as 80 mg/m2/day. Three-year event-free survival in 63 eligible patients who received the RD was 65.0% (90% confidence interval 54.1-73.9). Three-year overall, progression-free, and colostomy-free survival rates were 87.3%, 85.7%, and 76.2%, respectively; the complete response rate was 81% on central review. Common grade 3/4 acute toxicities were leukopenia (63.1%), neutropenia (40.0%), diarrhea (20.0%), radiation dermatitis (15.4%), and febrile neutropenia (3.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary endpoint was not met, S-1/mitomycin-C chemoradiotherapy had an acceptable toxicity profile and favorable 3-year survival and could be a treatment option for locally advanced SCCA. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: jRCTs031180002.

Modified Collard technique is more effective than circular stapled for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a propensity score-matched study.

The anastomotic technique after esophagectomy is of great interest in the prevention of anastomotic complications that adversely affect postoperative recovery. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of modified Collard (MC) and circular stapled (CS) anastomoses after esophagectomy. A total of 504 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastric CS or MC anastomosis from January 2013 to December 2019 were enrolled. Out of 504 patients, 134 and 370 underwent CS and MC anastomoses. The frequency of anastomotic leakage and stricture was significantly lesser in the MC group than in the CS group (3.0 vs. 10.5%, P = 0.0014 and 11.1 vs. 34.3%, P < 0.001, respectively). CS anastomosis was an independent risk factor for anastomotic stricture (odds ratio, 4.89; P < 0.001). Oral intake was significantly higher in the group without anastomotic stricture than in the group with anastomotic stricture at 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.001, P = 0.013, and P < 0.001, respectively). The percentage body weight loss (%BWL) was -12.2% in the group with anastomotic stricture and -7.5% in the group without anastomotic stricture at 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.0012). Anastomotic stricture was an independent factor associated with %BWL (odds ratio, 4.86; P = 0.010). Propensity score-matched analysis, which included 88 pairs of patients, confirmed a significantly lower anastomotic stricture rate in the MC group than in the CS group (10.2 vs. 35.2%, P < 0.001). MC anastomosis is better than CS anastomosis for reducing the frequency of anastomotic stricture, which may be useful for maintaining early postoperative nutritional status.

The Conventional Technique Versus the No-touch Isolation Technique for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Colon Cancer (JCOG1006): A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This phase III trial evaluated whether the no touch was superior to the conventional in patients with cT3/T4 colon cancer. BACKGROUND: No touch involves ligating blood vessels that feed the primary tumor to limit cancer cell spreading. However, previous studies did not confirm the efficacy of the no touch. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, phase III trial was conducted at 30 Japanese centers. The eligibility criteria were histologically proven colon cancer; clinical classification of T3-4, N0-2, andM0; and patients aged 20 to 80years. Patients were randomized (1:1) to undergo open surgery with conventional or the no touch. Patients with pathological stage III disease received adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and November 2015, 853 patients were randomized to the conventional group (427 patients) or the no touch group (426 patients). The 3-year DFS were 77.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.1%-81.0%] and 76.2% (95% CI 71.9%-80.0%) in the conventional and no touch groups, respectively. The superiority of no touch was not confirmed: hazard ratio for DFS = 1.029 (95% CI 0.800- 1.324; 1-sided P = 0.59). Operative morbidity was observed in 31 of 427 conventional patients (7%) and 26 of 426 no touch patients (6%). All grade adverse events were similar between the conventional and no touch groups. No in-hospital mortality occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: The present study failed to confirm the superiority of the no touch.

Aberrant activation of Rho/ROCK signaling in impaired polarity switching of colorectal micropapillary carcinoma.

Micropapillary carcinoma (MPC) is a morphologically distinctive form of carcinoma, composed of small nests of cancer cells surrounded by lacunar spaces. Invasive MPC is associated with poor prognosis. The nests of tumor cells in MPC reportedly exhibit reverse polarity, although the molecular mechanisms underlying MPC patterns are poorly understood. Using the cancer tissue-originated spheroid (CTOS) method, we previously reported polarity switching in colorectal cancer (CRC). When cultured in suspension, the apical membrane promptly switches from the outside surface of the CTOSs to the surface of the lumen inside the CTOSs under extracellular matrix (ECM)-embedded conditions, and vice versa. Here, we investigated two CTOS lines from CRC patient tumors with MPC lesions. Xenograft tumors from the CTOSs exhibited the MPC phenotype. The MPC-CTOSs did not switch polarity in vitro. Time-course analysis of polarity switching using real-time imaging of the apical membrane revealed that local switching was continually propagated in non-MPC-CTOSs, while MPC-CTOSs were unable to complete the process. Integrin ß4 translocated to the outer membrane when embedded in ECM in both MPC and non-MPC-CTOSs. Protein levels, as well as the active form of RhoA, were higher in MPC-CTOSs. The suppression of RhoA activity by GAP overexpression enabled MPC-CTOSs to complete polarity switching both in vitro and in vivo, while overexpression of active RhoA did not affect polarity switching in non-MPC-CTOSs. Pretreatment with a ROCK inhibitor enabled MPC-CTOSs to complete polarity switching both in vitro and in vivo, although delayed treatment after becoming embedded in ECM failed to do so. Thus, the inability to switch polarity might be a cause of MPC, in which the aberrant activation of RhoA plays a critical role. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

A randomized controlled trial comparing perioperative vs. postoperative mFOLFOX6 for lower rectal cancer with suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (JCOG1310): a phase II/III randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal perioperative chemotherapy for lower rectal cancer with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis remains unclear. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative mFOLFOX6 in comparison with postoperative mFOLFOX6 for rectal cancer patients undergoing total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection. METHODS: We conducted an open label randomized phase II/III trial in 18 Japanese institutions. We enrolled patients with histologically proven lower rectal adenocarcinoma with clinical pelvic lateral lymph node metastasis who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive postoperative mFOLFOX6 (12 courses of intravenous oxaliplatin [85 mg/m2] with L-leucovorin [200 mg/m2] followed by 5-fluorouracil [400 mg/m2, bolus and 2400 mg/m2, continuous infusion, repeated every 2 weeks]) or perioperative mFOLFOX6 (six courses each preoperatively and postoperatively). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The trial is registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, number jRCTs031180230. RESULTS: Between May 2015, and May 2019, 48 patients were randomized to the postoperative arm (n = 26) and the perioperative arm (n = 22). The trial was terminated prematurely due to poor accrual. The 3-year OS in the postoperative and perioperative groups were 66.1 and 84.4%, respectively (HR 0.58, 95% CI [0.14-2.45], one-sided P = 0.23). The pathological complete response rate in the perioperative group was 9.1%. Grade 3 postoperative surgical complications were more frequently observed in the perioperative arm (50.0 vs. 12.0%). One treatment-related death due to sepsis from pelvic infection occurred in the postoperative group. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative mFOLFOX6 may be an insufficient treatment to improve survival of lower rectal cancer with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis.

Challenges needed to be overcome in multi-institutional surgical trials: accumulated experience in the JCOG Colorectal Cancer Study Group (CCSG).

JCOG-CCSG has been conducting several surgical trials and experienced several challenges. The first point is the appropriate timing of conducting the trial. Once a certain number of surgeons acquire the new technique and its utility is accepted, it suddenly becomes difficult to maintain 'equipoise' between the standard and new treatment, which may lead to poor patient accrual. Smooth preparation and commencement of the trial at an appropriate timing is necessary for its success. Second is the appropriate quality assurance of surgery. High-level quality assurance will strengthen the comparability of randomized control trials and minimize the heterogeneity among hospitals. On the other hand, it may impair the generalizability of the trial. Large observational studies help to bridge the gap of heterogeneity among hospitals. Third is the selection of an appropriate endpoint. Overall survival (OS) is the gold-standard primary endpoint; however, the number of events is much less due to more effective treatment. JCOG0212 and JCOG0404 were unable to demonstrate the non-inferiority of omission of lateral lymph node dissection and laparoscopic surgery partly due to a lack of power. Disease-free survival (DFS) is also a promising candidate for primary endpoint, but as in JCOG0603, special attention must be paid when DFS does not correlate with OS. Although careful discussion is required because the precision of the hazard ratio depends on the number of events, an alternative population-level summary of variables, including restricted mean survival time, can be considered as the primary endpoint. Future surgical trials should be planned considering these points.

Preoperative and postoperative prognostic factors of patients with stage II/III lower rectal cancer without neoadjuvant therapy in the clinical trial (JCOG0212).

BACKGROUND: The JCOG0212 trial was a randomized controlled trial comparing mesorectal excision alone to mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for stage II/III lower rectal cancer patients without clinical lateral lymph node enlargement. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological prognostic factors for relapse-free survival and overall survival of lower rectal cancer in the trial. METHODS: Prospective data were selected from 663 patients with complete data. Uni and multivariable Cox regression model was applied to evaluate the preoperative and the combined preoperative and postoperative factors, respectively. Preoperative factors included age, sex, performance status, clinical T, clinical N and operative procedures. Postoperative factors included histological grade, pathological T, number of metastatic lymph nodes and number of dissected lymph nodes. No patient received neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: Regarding preoperative factors, multivariable analysis revealed that performance status 1 (vs. 0: HR 2.079, P = 0.0041) and cT4a (vs. cT2-3: HR 2.721, P = 0.0002) were independent risk factors for relapse-free survival, and those for overall survival were male (vs. female: HR 1.660, P = 0.0228) and cT4a (vs. cT2-3: HR 2.486, P = 0.0473). The only independent preoperative risk factor common for relapse-free survival and overall survival was cT4a. Taking preoperative and postoperative factors together, the number of metastatic lymph nodes was the only independent risk factor common for relapse-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical stage II/III lower rectal cancer patients with cT4a should be a target of therapeutic development of neoadjuvant therapy. Postoperatively, intensive chemotherapy should be investigated for patients with more metastatic lymph nodes.

Management of inguinal lymph node metastases from rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma.

AIM: The surgical treatment of inguinal lymph node (ILN) metastases secondary to anorectal adenocarcinoma remains controversial. This study aimed to clarify the surgical treatment and management of ILN metastasis according to its classification. METHODS: This retrospective, multi-centre, observational study included patients with synchronous or metachronous ILN metastases who were diagnosed with rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma between January 1997 and December 2011. Treatment outcomes were analysed according to recurrence and prognosis. RESULTS: Among 1181 consecutively enrolled patients who received treatment for rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma at 20 referral hospitals, 76 (6.4%) and 65 (5.5%) had synchronous and metachronous ILN metastases, respectively. Among 141 patients with ILN metastasis, differentiated carcinoma, solitary ILN metastasis and ILN dissection were identified as independent predictive factors associated with a favourable prognosis. No significant difference was found in the frequency of recurrence after ILN dissection between patients with synchronous (80.6%) or metachronous (81.0%) ILN metastases. Patients who underwent R0 resection of the primary tumour and ILN dissection had a 5-year survival rate of 41.3% after ILN dissection (34.1% and 53.1% for patients with synchronous and metachronous ILN metastases, respectively, P = 0.55). CONCLUSION: The ILN can be appropriately classified as a regional lymph node in rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma. Moreover, aggressive ILN dissection might be effective in improving the prognosis of low rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma with ILN metastases; thus, prophylactic ILN dissection is unnecessary.

Clinical importance of carcinoembryonic antigen messenger RNA level in peritoneal lavage fluids measured by transcription-reverse transcription concerted reaction for advanced gastric cancer in laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Transcription-reverse transcription concerted reaction (TRC) is recognized as a useful method for detecting free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity and predicting peritoneal recurrence in patients with gastric cancer. Nonetheless, the clinical significance of TRC in laparoscopic surgery remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical importance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) messenger RNA (mRNA) level in peritoneal lavage fluids measured by TRC in laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: We enrolled patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy. Peritoneal lavage fluids were collected prior to gastrectomy, and the TRC method was employed to quantify CEA mRNA in peritoneal washes. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and peritoneal recurrence-free survival (PRFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) for CEA mRNA positivity. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were analyzed in this study. Overall, 22 patients (22%) exhibited CEA mRNA positivity in peritoneal lavage fluids, as measured by TRC. No significant association between CEA mRNA levels and clinicopathological characteristics was observed. Patients who were CEA mRNA-positive in peritoneal lavage fluids had significantly worse OS, RFS, and PRFS than those who were CEA mRNA-negative (p = 0.0059, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0022, respectively). In the univariate Cox model, the HR for all-cause mortality in CEA mRNA-positive versus CEA mRNA-negative patients was 3.60 (95% CI, 1.33-9.55; p = 0.0129). Multivariate analysis revealed that CEA mRNA positivity was a significant independent factor for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: TRC enables the detection of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity and CEA mRNA levels can help predict the prognosis, even in laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Comparison of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of robotic gastrectomy (RG) over laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) remain controversial. This single-center, propensity score-matched study aimed to compare the outcomes of RG with those of LG for treating gastric cancer. METHODS: We searched the prospective gastric cancer database of our institute for patients with gastric cancer who underwent RG or LG between January 2014 and December 2019, excluding patients with remnant stomach cancer and those who underwent concurrent surgery for comorbid malignancies. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias from confounding patient-related variables, and short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: We identified 1189 patients who underwent LG (n = 979) or RG (n = 210). After propensity score matching, we selected 210 pairs of patients who underwent LG (distal gastrectomy, 138; total or proximal gastrectomy, 72) or RG (distal gastrectomy, 143; total or proximal gastrectomy, 67). RG was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (RG = 201 min vs. LG = 231 min, p = 0.0051), less blood loss (RG = 13 mL vs. LG = 42 mL, p < 0.0001), lower postoperative morbidity (RG = 1.0% vs. LG = 4.8%, p = 0.0066), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.0002) than LG. Drain amylase levels on postoperative Days 1 and 3 in the RG group were significantly lower than those in the LG group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RG is a safe and feasible treatment for gastric cancer, with a shorter operative time, less blood loss, and lower postoperative morbidity than LG. The application of robotics in minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery may offer an alternative to conventional surgery. Multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trials comparing RG with conventional LG are needed to establish the feasibility and efficacy of minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery.