ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nursing students are at higher risk for depression, suicide, and other mental health concerns as compared to the general college student population. Moral distress and other ethical issues may be a significant source of psychological harm within nursing student experiences and warrants further attention. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to understand the mediating effect of depression on the relationship between moral distress and suicide risk among undergraduate nursing students. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis was derived from a larger sequential mixed methods study. The first phase was an online survey completed by a national sample of N = 679 nursing students in the United States. FINDINGS: The relationship between moral distress and suicide risk was fully mediated by depression and statistically significant at the alpha = 0.05 level. CONCLUSION: All three psychological variables (depression, moral distress, suicide risk) impact nursing students and require innovative solutions within nursing and educational programs.
Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Students, Nursing , Suicide , Humans , Students, Nursing/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , MoralsABSTRACT
Caregivers often face critical decisions, burdens, and perceived benefits related to a loved one participating in cancer clinical trial (CCTs). The purpose of this analysis was to better understand caregivers' perceptions on the benefits and burdens of participation in cancer clinical trials. Using a qualitative descriptive design, interviews with 20 caregivers of patient-participants from a larger parent study were conducted. Three major themes emerged. The benefits of research participation focused on enhancing the potential for saving a loved one's life, improving quality of life, and holding altruistic intentions. The burden of research participation emphasized a loved one's suffering as well as physical, emotional, logistical, and financial burden to caregivers. Caregiver moral distress highlighted distressing ethical encounters, such as making decisions on research participation and navigating suboptimal care. Understanding caregiver perceptions is an important step in designing future CCTs that minimize burdens and maximize patient and caregiver health and family-centered care.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Neoplasms , Humans , Caregivers/psychology , Morals , Neoplasms/therapy , Parents , Quality of Life , Clinical Trials as TopicABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to better understand how caregivers and families manage childhood Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in their everyday lives and explore family management factors most relevant to child outcomes, including the child's daily life, condition management effort, condition management ability, and view of condition impact. DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data from caregivers (Nâ¯=â¯50) of children with ADHD (ages 5-12â¯years) within a large northeastern city were collected, analyzed, and interpreted using directed content analysis and qualitative methods. This inquiry was part of a larger mixed method study which examined the impact of family management on childhood ADHD and how family management factors were related to children's level of impairment across a spectrum of child functioning. RESULTS: Thematic summaries based on qualitative descriptive methods highlighted four aspects of family management including: 1) how caregivers contextualized their child's condition in everyday family life, 2) the significant effort required by caregivers to manage their child's ADHD, 3) how caregivers perceived their ability to manage their child's condition, and 4) the impact of ADHD on their child and family's future. CONCLUSIONS: Family management is an important concept within pediatric literature and may be extended to further research and practice changes for children with ADHD and their caregivers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pediatric nurses are at the forefront of working with children and families. Understanding caregiver perspectives in regard to family management is important for strengthening collaborative partnerships with families and improving the care of children with ADHD.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Caregivers , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family , Humans , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown major disparities in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for diverse youth across America. We do not fully understand, however, how parent and family processes are related to the identification, care-seeking approaches, treatment preferences, and engagement with care systems and services for youth with ADHD. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to explore parent and family processes related to the management of ADHD in racially and ethnically diverse youth. DESIGN: This integrative review was structured with the methodology proposed by Whittemore and Knafl. RESULTS: Three major electronic databases yielded a final sample of 32 articles (24 quantitative, 6 qualitative, and 2 mixed methods). Nine themes emerged within three overarching meta-themes. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the unique perspectives of families from diverse backgrounds is essential for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, who are dedicated to understanding racial and ethnic perspectives and developing ecologically appropriate and family-based interventions for youth with ADHD.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Ethnicity , Healthcare Disparities , Parents , Racial Groups , Adolescent , Databases, Factual , Family , Female , Humans , Male , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder affecting over 9% of children in the United States. Family caregivers are often responsible for the management of their child's ADHD. Contextual influences, such as healthcare providers, systems, and resources, are factors contributing to the ease or difficulty of family management. The purpose of this article is to qualitatively describe the major contextual influences that impact family management for ethnically diverse children with ADHD. DESIGN AND METHODS: This analysis is part of a mixed methods study using a concurrent nested design (QUAL + quant) to understand the phenomenon of family management from a contextual and socioecological perspective. In this analysis, cross-sectional data from caregivers of children with ADHD (N = 50) within a large northeastern city in the United States were collected, analyzed, and interpreted in the qualitative descriptive tradition. Semistructured interviews were conducted with participants to understand the contextual influences within family management. Conventional content analysis resulted in the emergence of barrier and facilitator domains and subdomains. RESULTS: Caregivers were predominantly female (98%) and between 24 and 61 years with a mean age of 37.54 (SD = 1.18). Caregivers identified their children as Black or African American (56%), White (26%), Multi-Racial (16%), Hispanic or Latinx (8%), and Asian (2%). Contextual influences within family management emerged as barrier or facilitator domains. Barrier domains included: (1) family, (2) healthcare systems, (3) educational systems, (4) stigma, and (5) financial, insurance, and policy issues. Facilitator domains included: (1) family and community, (2) healthcare providers, and (3) educational providers. Subdomains within each domain are expanded in the article. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Specialists in pediatric nursing should consider contextual influences within family management for ethnically diverse children with ADHD. As healthcare providers, it is important to recognize system-level barriers or facilitators for caregivers and their children and find creative ways to overcome obstacles and leverage strengths within families, communities, and care systems. Another important area for pediatric specialists to consider is understanding how stigma impacts children with ADHD. Policy-level engagement and advocacy should maximize the political will of nurses, families, and educators to create change within communities.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Adult , Black or African American , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Caregivers , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
TOPIC: Previous research suggests that families are integral to the understanding of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to identify family phenomena related to children and adolescents with ADHD and highlight research findings that intersect family phenomena with the care and treatment of ADHD in youth. SOURCES: A literature review was conducted at the University of Pennsylvania in spring of 2014 using an online library system. The four major databases utilized are Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Psyc-INFO. CONCLUSIONS: A wide array of family-related concepts are identified in the literature and represent a multifaceted and dynamic range of family phenomena related to ADHD youth. Four major themes emerged in the literature, including family stress and strain, parenting practices and caregiver health, family relationships, and family processes related to ADHD management. Different cultural and ethnic groups are reflected in the studies, but the majority of participants are self-identified Caucasian. As a collective, the research findings suggest family-related phenomena are essential and relevant to the investigation of children and adolescents with ADHD and worthwhile to explore in future research endeavors, especially in diverse populations.