Revaccination after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Is Safe and Effective in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Receiving Lenalidomide Maintenance.

Guidelines recommend vaccination starting 12 months after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHCT), but there is varying practice for patients on maintenance therapy, with some centers not immunizing at all. Because of decreased vaccine rates among the general population causing loss of herd immunity, we aimed to establish the safety and efficacy of revaccinating multiple myeloma patients on lenalidomide maintenance (LM). Of the 122 patients who were vaccinated after aHCT between 2010 and 2014 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 91 (75%) were on LM. Vaccine responses were defined by increases between pre- and postvaccination titers. Reponses varied by vaccine type with 76% responding to pertussis, 70% diphtheria, 60% tetanus, 71% Haemophilus influenzae, and 58% pneumococcal. All patients retained minimal levels of polio immunity, but 27% responded with increased titers. Fewer patients received hepatitis A and B, but of those who did, 30% responded to hepatitis A and 40% to hepatitis B. No differences were seen in rates of response for those on LM at time of vaccination compared with those who were not. There were no vaccine-related adverse effects. Reimmunization with inactivated vaccines in patients on LM is therefore both safe and effective, offering this population immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases.

Immune reconstitution, vaccine responses, and rituximab use after ex-vivo CD34-selected myeloablative allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Myeloablative T cell depleted (CD34-selected) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is associated with less acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). We aimed to examine vaccine responses in relation to immune reconstitution and post HCT rituximab administration in this population. This single center retrospective study included 251 patients with hematological malignancies who received a first CD34-selected HCT between 2012 and 2015. Of 251 patients, 190 were alive 1 year after HCT. Among the entire population, 77 (30.7%) patients were vaccinated. After vaccine administration, 35/44 (80%), 30/75 (40%), 27/36 (75%), 33/65 (51%), 34/51 (51%), 22/28 (79%) and 20/34 (59%) of evaluable patients had protective antibody titers for haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib), Pneumococcus, Tetanus, Diphtheria, Pertussis, hepatitis A (HAV), and hepatitis B (HBV) respectively. Responders to the pneumococcal vaccine had a higher CD45RA T cell count than non responders, with 12/18 patients (66.7%) vs 11/32 (34.4%) p = 0.04. For pneumococcal vaccine, there was also a trend to higher total lymphocyte B cell count in responders vs non responders p = 0.06. Rituximab post HCT was given to 59/251 (23.5%) patients. No difference was found in immune reconstitution patterns for rituximab use between vaccine responders and not. Recipients of CD34-selected HCT may respond to vaccination, and T and B cell subsets could be useful to predict vaccine response.

COVID-19 Vaccines and Immunosuppressed Patients With Cancer: Critical Considerations.

BACKGROUND:  Patients with cancer are highly vulnerable to COVID-19 because of immunosuppression from diseases and treatments. Emerging data characterize the impact of COVID-19 vaccines related to cancer malignancies and treatments. OBJECTIVES:  This article provides a clinical foundation on the immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine associated with the impact of cancer and its related treatments. It reviews strategies for vaccine scheduling, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, and nursing considerations when administering the vaccine to immunosuppressed patients. METHODS:  Research studies about immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines among immunosuppressed patients with hematologic and solid tumor malignancies were summarized. FINDINGS:  Studies about the humoral immune responses of patients with cancer to COVID-19 vaccines help guide vaccination planning for this population. Critical nursing considerations for patients with cancer receiving COVID-19 vaccination are integral to the provision of optimal clinical oncology care during the pandemic.

Low-dose unfractionated heparin prophylaxis is a safe strategy for the prevention of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after myeloablative adult allogenic stem cell transplant.

Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a serious complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). However, there is no uniform consensus on the optimal strategy for SOS prevention. Ursodeoxycholic acid is the most used regimen, even though its administration is challenging in recipients unable to tolerate oral medication. Defibrotide was recently studied in a phase 3 trial, but enrollment was stopped early due to futility. Low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) is an alternative strategy. However, its efficacy is reputed but unproven increased risk of bleeding has not been fully established. We evaluated 514 adult allo-HCT recipients who received SOS prophylaxis with low-dose UFH. Bleeding complications occurred in 12 patients 2.3% of patients of which only 2 (0.4%) had significant grade 3 bleeding. Only 14 patients were diagnosed with hepatic SOS. Univariate analysis showed that day 100 SOS was higher in recipients of unmodified grafts when compared to CD34+ selected ex vivo T-cell depleted grafts (p ≤ 0.001), and patients with hepatitis B and/or C exposure pre-HCT (p = 0.028). Overall, UFH was well tolerated and associated with a low incidence of subsequent hepatic SOS. Low-dose UFH prophylaxis can be considered in select patients who cannot tolerate oral ursodiol.

Predictors of Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and CAR T-cell Therapy.

Cellular therapies including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) and autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy render patients severely immunocompromised for extended periods after therapy, and data on responses to COVID-19 vaccines are limited. We analyzed anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG Ab (spike Ab) titers and neutralizing Ab among 217 recipients of cellular treatments (allo-HCT, n = 149; auto-HCT, n = 61; CAR T-cell therapy, n = 7). At 3 months after vaccination, 188 patients (87%) had positive spike Ab levels and 139 (77%) had positive neutralization activity compared with 100% for both in 54 concurrent healthy controls. Time from cellular therapy to vaccination and immune recovery post-cellular therapy were associated with response. Vaccination against COVID-19 is an important component of post-cellular therapy care, and predictors of quantitative and qualitative response are critical in informing clinical decisions about optimal timing of vaccines and the requirement for booster doses. Significance: Identifying predictors of response to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients following cellular therapy is critical to managing this highly vulnerable patient population. To date, this is the most comprehensive study evaluating quantitative and qualitative responses to vaccination, providing parameters most predictive of response and potentially informing booster vaccination strategies.See related article by Chung et al., p. 568. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 549.